Currently viewing the human version
Switch to AI version

Why Connection Pool Problems Are So Fucking Confusing

Connection pooling happens at like three different layers, and any one of these bastards can ruin your day. Your app's got its own pool - HikariCP if you're stuck with Java, pgx for Go (actually decent), pg-pool for Node.js. Then maybe you've got PgBouncer sitting in the middle playing traffic cop. When any of these layers fills up, they all look exactly the same from the outside, but the fix is totally different.

PostgreSQL Architecture Diagram

Last month our e-commerce site started timing out during checkout. PostgreSQL was at 15% CPU, memory looked fine, no slow query alerts. Everything pointed to a healthy database. But users couldn't complete purchases and were bailing on their carts.

Took me 3 hours to realize our Java app's HikariCP pool was set to 10 connections while we had 200 concurrent requests hitting checkout. PostgreSQL could handle way more load, but our app was choking on its own stupid pool settings.

What Connection Pool Exhaustion Actually Looks Like

When pools fill up, the symptoms make no fucking sense:

  • Connection timeout errors while PostgreSQL CPU idles at 20%
  • Response times spike from normal 100ms to 30+ seconds for basic queries
  • PostgreSQL says "too many clients" but max_connections shows available slots
  • App pool reports "exhausted" while database metrics look perfect
  • Memory usage climbs on app servers and doesn't drop back down

This is why this problem makes me want to throw my laptop out the window. Your fancy monitoring dashboards are all green and happy while users are getting 504 errors and calling support to complain.

Common Ways Pools Fail You

Traffic spikes expose bad sizing: At my last startup, some PM decided our pool should be sized for "100 concurrent users max" based on... I honestly don't know what data. Worked fine for months until we hit the Hacker News front page at 2am PST and got absolutely demolished. Our HikariCP pool of 15 connections got steamrolled by something like 800 users, maybe way more - our monitoring was having a complete breakdown. Pool exhausted in under 30 seconds. Now I size for 3x normal peak and pray it's enough.

Slow queries eat all your connections: Had this one analytics query from hell that took exactly 37 seconds every time (I know because I watched it run about 500 times while debugging). During lunch rush we'd have 6-7 instances of this bastard running simultaneously, hogging like 80% of our measly 25-connection pool. Regular user queries - login, checkout, basic shit - couldn't get connections and would just sit there timing out. Learned to use separate pools: fast queries get their own pool, slow analytics crap gets quarantined.

Connection Pool Architecture

Connection leaks look like pool exhaustion: Code grabs connections but never gives them back, like that coworker who borrows your charger and "forgets" to return it. Pool thinks connections are busy when they're actually zombie processes doing jack shit. Our Node.js app forgot client.release() in error handlers - spent 4 hours pulling my hair out trying to figure out why we had 20 "active" connections that weren't actually doing anything. Pro tip: always use try/finally blocks or you'll be debugging this nightmare at 2am like I was.

Layer configuration mismatches: App configured for 50 connections, PgBouncer set to 20. App keeps trying to open connections that PgBouncer immediately rejects. Check that your layers are aligned - app pool should be bigger than proxy pools or you're fucked.

What Actually Happens During Outages

Pool exhaustion creates cascading failures that last way longer than the original problem. When connections finally free up, all the queued requests slam the system at once. A 5-minute connection issue turns into 20+ minutes of instability as everything tries to catch up.

Standard database monitoring is useless here - CPU and memory look fine while your app is dying. Pool metrics live in the application layer where most teams don't bother monitoring. You're debugging blind.

Timeout configurations make this worse. Database timeout 30 seconds, app timeout 60 seconds, load balancer 90 seconds. User waits 90 seconds for what should be a 200ms response. Each layer adds more delay instead of failing fast.

This is an application problem that looks like a database problem. Fix your connection management before touching PostgreSQL settings.

How to Debug This Shit

When users are timing out and your app is having a complete meltdown, here's my battle-tested approach. Don't just throw random fixes at it and hope something sticks - that's how you make things worse.

Step 1: Check if PostgreSQL is Actually Full

Run this first to see if PostgreSQL is the bottleneck:

-- See if PostgreSQL is actually full
SELECT 
    count(*) as current_connections,
    setting::int as max_connections,
    round(100.0 * count(*) / setting::int, 2) as pct_used
FROM pg_stat_activity, pg_settings 
WHERE name = 'max_connections';

-- See what's eating connections
SELECT 
    datname,
    usename,
    count(*) as connection_count,
    state
FROM pg_stat_activity 
GROUP BY datname, usename, state
ORDER BY connection_count DESC;

If PostgreSQL is chilling at like 60% connection usage but your app is screaming "pool exhausted", then PostgreSQL isn't the problem - your app is. Seen this a million times. PostgreSQL's got plenty of room but your app's connection pool is having a panic attack. Your database monitoring is all green while your application logs are full of timeout errors.

Step 2: Figure Out if You Have Leaks or Just Bad Pool Sizing

PgBouncer Authentication Model

Connection leaks and undersized pools both suck, but in different ways: The symptoms look identical but the patterns are different if you know what to watch for:

## Watch connection growth over time - this will tell you everything
watch -n 5 \"psql -c \\"SELECT count(*) as total_connections, count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'idle') as idle_connections, count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') as active_connections FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE backend_type = 'client backend';\\"\"

If You Have Connection Leaks:

  • Connection count grows steadily even when traffic is flat
  • Idle connections pile up and never get cleaned up
  • Restarting your app temporarily fixes it (classic leak behavior)
  • Problems get worse over time, not just during traffic spikes

If Your Pool is Just Too Small:

  • Connections spike with traffic then drop back down
  • Errors happen only during busy periods, not random times
  • All your app instances hit the wall simultaneously
  • Problem starts immediately, doesn't build up over hours

Step 3: Check Your App Pool (This is Where the Real Problem Usually Lives)

PgBouncer Connection Pool Architecture

Redundant Connection Pool Middleware

Alright, enough bitching about how broken everything is. Let me show you where each framework hides its pool metrics, because of course they all put them in completely different places:

Java (HikariCP) - Actually has decent monitoring: HikariCP doesn't suck and has decent configuration options:

// Turn on JMX so you can see what's happening
HikariConfig config = new HikariConfig();
config.setRegisterMbeans(true); // This saves your ass during outages

// Check if your pool is full
HikariPoolMXBean poolBean = ds.getHikariPoolMXBean();
System.out.println(\"Active: \" + poolBean.getActiveConnections());
System.out.println(\"Idle: \" + poolBean.getIdleConnections());
System.out.println(\"Waiting: \" + poolBean.getThreadsAwaitingConnection()); // If this is >0, you're screwed

Node.js (pg-pool) - Simple but works: The pg-pool docs are decent, and connection monitoring is built-in:

// Monitor pool status - these numbers will tell you everything
console.log('Total clients:', pool.totalCount);
console.log('Idle clients:', pool.idleCount);
console.log('Waiting requests:', pool.waitingCount); // If this keeps growing, you're in trouble

// Track connection lifecycle to spot leaks
pool.on('acquire', () => console.log('Connection acquired'));
pool.on('release', () => console.log('Connection released')); // These should balance out

.NET (Npgsql) - Configuration is buried in connection strings: Npgsql connection pooling requires careful configuration:

// Check your pool settings (they're probably wrong)
var builder = new NpgsqlConnectionStringBuilder(connectionString);
Console.WriteLine($\"Max Pool Size: {builder.MaxPoolSize}\"); // Default is only 100
Console.WriteLine($\"Connection Lifetime: {builder.ConnectionLifetime}\");

// Turn on logging to see what's actually happening
NpgsqlLogManager.Provider = new ConsoleLoggingProvider(NpgsqlLogLevel.Debug);

Warning Signs of Pool Problems:

  • Active connections > 90% of pool size - you're about to hit the wall
  • Threads waiting for connections > 0 - pool is already overwhelmed
  • Connection acquire time > 1 second - users will abandon requests
  • Connections held much longer than normal - likely connection leaks

Step 4: Query Analysis - Finding Connection Monopolizers

Long-running queries monopolize connection pool slots, creating artificial scarcity:

-- Find queries that have been running for suspiciously long
SELECT 
    pid,
    datname,
    usename,
    client_addr,
    now() - query_start as duration,
    state,
    query
FROM pg_stat_activity 
WHERE state != 'idle' 
AND now() - query_start > interval '10 seconds'
ORDER BY duration DESC;

-- Check for queries stuck in transaction
SELECT 
    pid,
    datname,
    usename,
    now() - xact_start as xact_duration,
    now() - query_start as query_duration,
    state,
    query
FROM pg_stat_activity 
WHERE xact_start IS NOT NULL
AND now() - xact_start > interval '60 seconds'
ORDER BY xact_duration DESC;

Connection Monopolizer Red Flags:

  • Queries running >30 seconds in applications expecting <1s response times
  • Transactions held open for minutes (indicates forgotten transaction management)
  • Multiple similar slow queries from the same application (N+1 query problem)
  • Queries with state = 'idle in transaction' that should have committed/rolled back

Step 5: Network and PgBouncer Layer Analysis

If using PgBouncer, check its connection metrics separately:

## Connect to PgBouncer admin interface
psql -p 6432 -U pgbouncer pgbouncer

## Check pool status
SHOW POOLS;
SHOW CLIENTS;
SHOW SERVERS;

## Look for warning signs
## - sv_used near default_pool_size = server pool exhausted
## - cl_waiting > 0 = clients queuing for connections
## - maxwait_us > 100000 = clients waiting >100ms for connections

PgBouncer Configuration Issues: Common PgBouncer misconfigurations I've seen include:

  • default_pool_size too small for actual concurrent query load
  • pool_mode = session preventing connection reuse (use transaction mode)
  • server_lifetime too long preventing connection cycling
  • Authentication failures preventing pool connections to PostgreSQL

Step 6: Emergency Fixes When You're On Fire

When you figure out what's broken, here's how to stop the bleeding:

For Connection Leaks:

## Kill idle connections older than 1 hour (emergency only)
SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid) 
FROM pg_stat_activity 
WHERE state = 'idle' 
AND now() - state_change > interval '1 hour'
AND pid != pg_backend_pid();

For Pool Sizing Issues:

## Temporarily increase application pool size (restart required)
export DB_POOL_SIZE=50  # Double the current size
systemctl restart your-application

## Or increase PgBouncer pool if it's the bottleneck
## Edit pgbouncer.ini: default_pool_size = 50
systemctl reload pgbouncer

For Query Monopolizers:

-- Kill specific problematic queries (use carefully)
SELECT pg_terminate_backend(12345);  -- Replace with actual PID

For Configuration Mismatches:

## Align application and PgBouncer pool sizes
## Application: max_connections = 25
## PgBouncer: default_pool_size = 25
## PostgreSQL: max_connections = 100 (4x for safety)

The goal is stop the bleeding, not perfect optimization. These emergency fixes buy you time to implement proper fixes without users screaming. PostgreSQL performance tuning and memory optimization can wait. Connection limit calculations and proper memory sizing are for after the fire is out.

Building Connection Pools That Don't Suck

Here's what 5 years of production connection pool disasters taught me. Use these tricks or enjoy your 3am wake-up calls.

PostgreSQL Connection Pool Visualization

How to Size Pools Without Guessing

Forget those bullshit academic formulas that don't work in real life. Here's how I size pools in the real world:

Start with actual traffic data: Look at real request volume during peak hours, not whatever made-up numbers your PM pulled out of their ass. On one project, the team "estimated" maybe 200 requests per second. Reality check: we were getting hammered with like 500+ RPS during normal peak, sometimes spiking way higher when shit got crazy. Thank god for proper monitoring or we would have been flying blind.

Measure your actual query times: Averages are fucking useless - use the 95th percentile. Had one system where average query time was a nice 47ms, but the 95th percentile was around 800ms because of some analytics queries that someone forgot to optimize. Those slow-ass queries monopolized connections while fast user queries timed out. Datadog's PostgreSQL monitoring saved my sanity on that one.

The math: If you're getting 500 requests per second and queries average 200ms, you need at least 100 connections just to keep up (500 * 0.2 = 100). But that's assuming perfect efficiency and no traffic spikes, which is bullshit. I start with 200 connections and call it insurance.

Traffic spikes aren't evenly distributed - you might see 5-10x normal load for short periods. Your pool needs to handle burst traffic, not just averages.

Multi-Layer Pool Architecture

Multi-layer pooling helps isolate different types of load and provides better control over database connections:

PgBouncer Architecture Diagram

Layer 1 - Application Pools (be generous):
Each application instance gets its own pool. I typically start with 50-100 connections per instance. Yeah, it sounds like a lot. But connection pools are cheap, outages are expensive. HikariCP can handle hundreds of connections efficiently, so don't be stingy.

Layer 2 - PgBouncer (be conservative):
PgBouncer sits between your apps and PostgreSQL. This is where you control the actual database connections. I usually configure 25-50 backend connections total, regardless of how many app instances you have. Transaction pooling mode works for 95% of applications.

Layer 3 - PostgreSQL (leave headroom):
Set max_connections to about 1.5x your PgBouncer pool size. So if PgBouncer uses 50 connections, set PostgreSQL to 75-80. The extra slots are for manual admin connections and monitoring.

Connection Health Management

Connection validation nightmare: Spent a week debugging intermittent "connection closed" errors. Turned out AWS load balancer was silently dropping idle connections after 10 minutes, but our pool kept them for 30 minutes. Connection validation prevents this bullshit:

// HikariCP - these settings saved my ass
config.setConnectionTestQuery("SELECT 1");
config.setValidationTimeout(3000);       // Quick validation
config.setIdleTimeout(300000);           // 5 minutes max idle
config.setMaxLifetime(1200000);          // 20 minutes max lifetime
config.setLeakDetectionThreshold(60000); // Catch connection leaks

Circuit breakers for database protection: This is where you prevent cascade failures. When your pool starts filling up, circuit breakers can serve stale cache data instead of queuing more requests:

// Node.js circuit breaker that actually works
const CircuitBreaker = require('opossum');

const dbOptions = {
  timeout: 3000,                    // Fail fast
  errorThresholdPercentage: 30,     // Trip early  
  resetTimeout: 15000               // Try again quickly
};

Monitor what matters: Track pool utilization, not just database metrics. Alert when pools hit 70% full, panic when they hit 90%. Don't wait until they're exhausted. I learned this the hard way.

Query Timeout Management

Set timeouts everywhere: This prevents runaway queries from hoarding connections for hours:

-- PostgreSQL 13+ settings I use everywhere
ALTER DATABASE production SET statement_timeout = '30s';
ALTER DATABASE production SET idle_in_transaction_session_timeout = '120s';
ALTER DATABASE production SET lock_timeout = '5s';

Kill long queries automatically: Built this after one shitty reporting query took down production by holding maybe 30 connections for 2 hours - took me forever to figure out what was hogging all the connections:

def kill_long_queries():
    # Kill queries running longer than 2 minutes
    query = """
        SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid) 
        FROM pg_stat_activity 
        WHERE state = 'active' 
        AND now() - query_start > interval '2 minutes'
        AND query NOT LIKE '%pg_stat_activity%'
        AND usename != 'postgres'
    """
    # Run this every 30 seconds

PgBouncer Connection Pool Architecture

Alert Configuration That Works

Three-tier alerting based on pool utilization:

Warning at 70% - Someone should look at this today:

alert: PoolUtilizationHigh
expr: db_pool_active / db_pool_max > 0.7
for: 5m

Critical at 85% - Wake someone up:

alert: PoolUtilizationCritical
expr: db_pool_active / db_pool_max > 0.85
for: 1m

Emergency at 95% - All hands on deck:

alert: PoolExhaustion
expr: db_pool_active / db_pool_max > 0.95
for: 30s

Traffic Scaling Strategies

Dynamic pool sizing: This is tricky to get right, but works for variable workloads. I've used this pattern successfully with containerized apps - took a few tries to tune it properly:

## Scale pool based on actual load, not CPU
def adjust_pool_size():
    current_load = get_request_rate_last_5_minutes()
    
    if current_load > 1000:  # req/sec
        return min(200, current_pool_size * 1.5)
    elif current_load < 100:
        return max(20, current_pool_size * 0.8)
    
    return current_pool_size

Separate pools for different workloads: Don't let slow analytics queries kill fast user queries. Use separate connection pools:

  • Fast queries: 50 connections, 3-second timeout
  • Analytics: 10 connections, 60-second timeout
  • Batch jobs: 5 connections, no timeout

The Real Cost of Getting This Wrong

Outage math: Database connection issues cost serious money for e-commerce sites. I've seen estimates around $300k per hour for medium-sized operations. Monitoring and proper pool architecture costs maybe $2k/month. ROI is obvious.

Time investment: Plan 2-3 weeks to implement this properly. Design for graceful degradation, not just optimal performance. Your connection pools will fill up eventually - make sure your system handles it gracefully instead of falling over.

The key insight: connection pool exhaustion is a capacity planning problem, not a database tuning problem. Fix your architecture and monitoring before trying to optimize PostgreSQL settings.

Connection Pool Exhaustion FAQ

Q

Why does my app say "connection pool exhausted" but PostgreSQL CPU is only 20%?

A

Your database is fine, your app pool is too small.

The connection pool in your application (Hikari

CP, pgx, pg-pool) is full while PostgreSQL is just sitting there. Quick test: Double your app pool size temporarily. If the "connection timeout" and "pool exhausted" errors suddenly stop, congrats

  • you found the problem. It's not the database, it's your criminally undersized pool configuration.
Q

"Too many clients already" - but I see idle connections everywhere. What gives?

A

Postgre

SQL counts ALL connections against max_connections, including idle ones just sitting there.

Those connections take up slots even when not doing anything. Usually means your app opens connections but doesn't close them. Nuclear option: `SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE state = 'idle' AND now()

  • state_change > interval '1 hour';`
Q

Should I use PgBouncer or just crank up max_connections?

A

Use PgBouncer instead of cranking up max_connections. Setting max_connections above 200-300 hurts PostgreSQL performance because of memory and context switching overhead. Each connection eats 2.5MB+ of RAM. PgBouncer handles thousands of client connections with just 25-50 database connections. Resource usage: 1000 direct connections = maybe 2.5GB+ RAM. PgBouncer with 50 backend connections = around 125MB RAM.

Q

My pool is full of "idle in transaction" connections. What's happening?

A

Your app opens transactions but forgets to commit or rollback. Set idle_in_transaction_session_timeout = '60s' in PostgreSQL to automatically kill transactions idle for more than 60 seconds. Root cause: Code calls BEGIN but forgets COMMIT/ROLLBACK in error paths. Fix your shitty transaction management to always close transactions.

Q

HikariCP says "Connection is not available, request timed out after 30000ms"

A

Classic HikariCP meltdown. Your pool ran dry and your request sat in the queue for 30 seconds before HikariCP gave up and threw this error. Either your pool is pathetically small or you're leaking connections like a broken faucet. Debug this shit: hikariConfig.setLeakDetectionThreshold(60000); will rat out connections held longer than 60 seconds. If you see leaks, fix your code to always close connections in finally blocks or use try-with-resources. I learned this after spending a whole weekend debugging connection leaks that turned out to be in our exception handlers.

Q

Can I set different pool sizes for different types of queries?

A

Yes, and you should. Create separate connection pools for different workload types:

  • Fast queries: Small pool (10-20 connections) with short timeouts
  • Reports/analytics: Separate larger pool (5-10 connections) with longer timeouts
  • Batch processing: Dedicated pool isolated from user-facing queries

This prevents slow queries from monopolizing connections needed for fast user requests.

Q

pgx (Go) throws "failed to connect to database" during traffic spikes

A

Go's pgx defaults are garbage for anything beyond a toy app. The pool is probably choking on burst traffic. Jack up MaxConns and fix the idle timeouts:

config.MaxConns = 50          // pgx v5 defaults to 4 * GOMAXPROCS
config.MaxConnIdleTime = 30 * time.Minute  // Up from 30 seconds
config.MaxConnLifetime = 60 * time.Minute  // Longer lifetime
Q

Npgsql (.NET) reports "The connection pool has been exhausted"

A

Classic .NET connection pool exhaustion. Check your connection string MaxPoolSize (default is only 100) and ensure you're disposing connections properly:

// Always use 'using' statements
using (var connection = new NpgsqlConnection(connectionString))
{
    connection.Open();
    // Your code here
} // Automatically disposed here

Common mistake: Not disposing connections in exception handlers.

Q

Should I use session pooling or transaction pooling in PgBouncer?

A

Transaction pooling for 90% of applications. It recycles connections between individual SQL statements, maximizing reuse. Session pooling only makes sense if you use:

  • Prepared statements extensively
  • Session-specific temporary tables
  • Custom session variables

Transaction pooling typically supports 5-10x more clients with the same backend connections.

Q

My application works fine locally but exhausts connections in production

A

No shit

  • your local machine has 1 user (you) clicking around slowly.

Production has 200+ people hammering the system simultaneously during peak hours. Your cute little 10-connection pool that works fine on localhost gets absolutely destroyed when real users show up. Solution: Load test with realistic concurrent users, not your gentle manual clicking. wrk -t12 -c400 -d30s will show you what happens when 400 concurrent connections try to hit your precious 10-connection pool.

Spoiler: it's not pretty.

Q

Connection pool works fine, then suddenly exhausts after hours of runtime

A

Memory leak or connection leak. Connections are opened but never returned to the pool, or they're returned in an unusable state. Enable connection leak detection in your pool:

  • HikariCP: config.setLeakDetectionThreshold(60000)
  • pgx: Monitor connection count over time: pool.Stat().TotalConns()
  • pg-pool: pool.totalCount should remain stable over time
Q

Can I monitor connection pool health without application changes?

A

Yes, most pools expose metrics through standard interfaces:

  • JMX for Java applications (HikariCP, C3P0)
  • Prometheus metrics endpoints for Go applications
  • Health check endpoints for Node.js applications
  • Performance counters for .NET applications

Set up monitoring before you need it - debugging pool exhaustion during an outage is exponentially harder.

Q

"FATAL: remaining connection slots reserved" - what's different from regular exhaustion?

A

PostgreSQL reserves superuser_reserved_connections (default 3) slots for superuser access during emergencies. This error means you've exhausted ALL non-superuser connections, which is worse than regular exhaustion. Emergency fix: Connect as superuser and kill idle connections: SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE usename != current_user AND state = 'idle';

Q

How do I size connection pools for microservices architecture?

A

Don't just copy-paste the same pool size across all your microservices like some lazy-ass cargo cult programmer. Each service has different database load patterns and needs its own pool sizing. Math that actually works:

  • Pool size = (Service Peak RPS × 95th percentile query time) × 2.5
  • User service: 120 RPS × 0.08s × 2.5 = 24 connections
  • Analytics service: 8 RPS × 1.2s × 2.5 = 24 connections (same number, totally different reasons)
  • Payment service: 50 RPS × 0.15s × 2.5 = 19 connections
Q

What's the fastest way to fix connection pool exhaustion during an active outage?

A
  1. Immediate: Kill idle connections: SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE state = 'idle' AND now() - state_change > interval '30 minutes';

  2. Short-term: Double application pool sizes and restart application instances

  3. Medium-term: Implement PgBouncer if not already present

  4. Long-term: Review connection lifecycle management and implement proper monitoring

The key is stabilizing service first, optimizing later. Users can tolerate slower response times but not complete outages.

Resources That Actually Help

Related Tools & Recommendations

integration
Recommended

GitOps Integration Hell: Docker + Kubernetes + ArgoCD + Prometheus

How to Wire Together the Modern DevOps Stack Without Losing Your Sanity

docker
/integration/docker-kubernetes-argocd-prometheus/gitops-workflow-integration
100%
integration
Recommended

Kafka + MongoDB + Kubernetes + Prometheus Integration - When Event Streams Break

When your event-driven services die and you're staring at green dashboards while everything burns, you need real observability - not the vendor promises that go

Apache Kafka
/integration/kafka-mongodb-kubernetes-prometheus-event-driven/complete-observability-architecture
68%
compare
Recommended

MongoDB vs PostgreSQL vs MySQL: Which One Won't Ruin Your Weekend

competes with mysql

mysql
/compare/mongodb/postgresql/mysql/performance-benchmarks-2025
54%
alternatives
Recommended

Docker Alternatives That Won't Break Your Budget

Docker got expensive as hell. Here's how to escape without breaking everything.

Docker
/alternatives/docker/budget-friendly-alternatives
53%
compare
Recommended

I Tested 5 Container Security Scanners in CI/CD - Here's What Actually Works

Trivy, Docker Scout, Snyk Container, Grype, and Clair - which one won't make you want to quit DevOps

docker
/compare/docker-security/cicd-integration/docker-security-cicd-integration
53%
integration
Recommended

Prometheus + Grafana + Jaeger: Stop Debugging Microservices Like It's 2015

When your API shits the bed right before the big demo, this stack tells you exactly why

Prometheus
/integration/prometheus-grafana-jaeger/microservices-observability-integration
52%
compare
Recommended

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MariaDB vs SQLite vs CockroachDB - Pick the Database That Won't Ruin Your Life

competes with mariadb

mariadb
/compare/postgresql-mysql-mariadb-sqlite-cockroachdb/database-decision-guide
52%
alternatives
Recommended

Why I Finally Dumped Cassandra After 5 Years of 3AM Hell

alternative to MongoDB

MongoDB
/alternatives/mongodb-postgresql-cassandra/cassandra-operational-nightmare
48%
troubleshoot
Recommended

Docker Daemon Won't Start on Linux - Fix This Shit Now

Your containers are useless without a running daemon. Here's how to fix the most common startup failures.

Docker Engine
/troubleshoot/docker-daemon-not-running-linux/daemon-startup-failures
42%
news
Recommended

Linux Foundation Takes Control of Solo.io's AI Agent Gateway - August 25, 2025

Open source governance shift aims to prevent vendor lock-in as AI agent infrastructure becomes critical to enterprise deployments

Technology News Aggregation
/news/2025-08-25/linux-foundation-agentgateway
42%
tool
Recommended

Grafana - The Monitoring Dashboard That Doesn't Suck

integrates with Grafana

Grafana
/tool/grafana/overview
37%
howto
Recommended

Set Up Microservices Monitoring That Actually Works

Stop flying blind - get real visibility into what's breaking your distributed services

Prometheus
/howto/setup-microservices-observability-prometheus-jaeger-grafana/complete-observability-setup
37%
integration
Recommended

RAG on Kubernetes: Why You Probably Don't Need It (But If You Do, Here's How)

Running RAG Systems on K8s Will Make You Hate Your Life, But Sometimes You Don't Have a Choice

Vector Databases
/integration/vector-database-rag-production-deployment/kubernetes-orchestration
37%
howto
Recommended

I Survived Our MongoDB to PostgreSQL Migration - Here's How You Can Too

Four Months of Pain, 47k Lost Sessions, and What Actually Works

MongoDB
/howto/migrate-mongodb-to-postgresql/complete-migration-guide
33%
tool
Recommended

MySQL Replication - How to Keep Your Database Alive When Shit Goes Wrong

competes with MySQL Replication

MySQL Replication
/tool/mysql-replication/overview
25%
alternatives
Recommended

MySQL Alternatives That Don't Suck - A Migration Reality Check

Oracle's 2025 Licensing Squeeze and MySQL's Scaling Walls Are Forcing Your Hand

MySQL
/alternatives/mysql/migration-focused-alternatives
25%
compare
Recommended

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MariaDB - Performance Analysis 2025

Which Database Will Actually Survive Your Production Load?

PostgreSQL
/compare/postgresql/mysql/mariadb/performance-analysis-2025
23%
tool
Recommended

MariaDB - What MySQL Should Have Been

competes with MariaDB

MariaDB
/tool/mariadb/overview
23%
tool
Recommended

pgAdmin - The GUI You Get With PostgreSQL

It's what you use when you don't want to remember psql commands

pgAdmin
/tool/pgadmin/overview
23%
tool
Recommended

SQL Server 2025 - Vector Search Finally Works (Sort Of)

competes with Microsoft SQL Server 2025

Microsoft SQL Server 2025
/tool/microsoft-sql-server-2025/overview
21%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization