Currently viewing the human version
Switch to AI version

Which API Should You Actually Use? (Spoiler: NoSQL)

Azure Cosmos DB Architecture Overview

Microsoft gives you five APIs, but they're not all created equal.

I've deployed every single one in production and lived through the pain. Here's what nobody tells you:

The APIs Ranked by How Much They'll Ruin Your Week

NoSQL API (Core SQL):

Just fucking use this one. It's Microsoft's favorite child and gets new features first. If you know SQL, the learning curve isn't terrible. Gets stored procedures, triggers, and somehow burns through RUs more efficiently than the others. When that weird connection pooling bug hit last month (I think it was 18.2.1?), NoSQL API got patched in like 2 days while MongoDB API users waited weeks.

MongoDB API: Good for migrations when you can't afford to rewrite everything.

Existing Mongo

DB drivers work, which is nice. But here's the fun part

  • it's not actually MongoDB. GridFS doesn't work, some aggregation pipeline operations behave differently, and good luck debugging why your compound indexes aren't being used properly. I spent three days figuring out why our session store was consuming 10x more RUs than expected.

Table API: The boring one that actually works reliably.

Key-value operations only, but they're fast and cheap. Perfect for user sessions, feature flags, or anything that doesn't need complex queries. I've never had a production incident with Table API because there's not much to break.

Cassandra API: Time-series data and nothing else.

CQL works until you try using secondary indexes

  • then you discover half the features are missing or behave weirdly. One team I worked with spent two weeks debugging why their WHERE clauses weren't working, turns out Cosmos DB's Cassandra doesn't support filtering on non-primary key columns the same way.

Gremlin API: Graph databases for when you hate yourself and everyone around you.

Query syntax looks like someone threw Cypher and SQL into a blender. Performance? Good fucking luck

  • I've seen a simple "find friends of friends" query somehow eat 2,000 RUs while an identical traversal cost 50 RUs. Still have no idea why. Only use this if you absolutely need graph operations and enjoy explaining to your manager why the database budget tripled.

The Reality Behind "Multi-API Magic"

Cosmos DB stores everything in their proprietary ARS format and translates to whatever API you're using. Clever engineering, but here's what bites you:

  • **No

SQL gets the best performance**

  • other APIs have translation overhead
  • Some features are NoSQL-only
  • stored procedures, triggers, patch operations
  • MongoDB compatibility isn't 100%
  • aggregation pipelines can consume 2x the RUs
  • Mixing APIs is asking for trouble
  • don't even think about it

When Each API Makes Sense (Real Talk)

Use NoSQL API:

  • You're starting fresh
  • You want new features first (vector search, full-text search)
  • You need stored procedures or server-side logic
  • You want the most efficient RU consumption

Use MongoDB API:

  • You're migrating existing MongoDB code
  • Your team refuses to learn new syntax
  • You have complex aggregation pipelines that work
  • You're stuck with existing MongoDB tooling

Use Table API:

  • Simple key-value lookups only
  • You're migrating from Azure Table Storage
  • You want predictable, cheap operations
  • Complex queries aren't needed

Use Cassandra API:

  • Time-series or IoT data at massive scale
  • You're already using Cassandra and it works
  • You need wide-column data modeling
  • You understand CQL limitations in Cosmos DB

Use Gremlin API:

  • You absolutely need graph traversals
  • Building recommendation engines
  • Fraud detection with relationship analysis
  • You enjoy debugging nightmare query performance

The Brutal Truth About RU Consumption

Every API uses Request Units, but the costs vary wildly:

  • Point reads: 1 RU per 1KB (only thing that's consistent)
  • Writes: 5-8 RUs per 1KB depending on API overhead
  • Queries:

No

SQL is cheapest, MongoDB costs 20-30% more, Gremlin will bankrupt you

  • Cross-partition queries: All APIs get destroyed equally

I watched one team's Mongo

DB aggregation pipeline absolutely destroy their budget

  • 800 RUs for a query that would cost maybe 20 RUs in NoSQL.

Turns out they had these pointless $unwind operations that Cosmos DB just couldn't figure out how to optimize. Took them three weeks to unfuck it, but their monthly bill dropped from like $4,000 to $1,200.

Real Decision Framework

Use NoSQL API unless you have a damn good reason not to. It gets new features first, best tooling, and burns the fewest RUs.

Only use other APIs if:

  1. You're migrating existing code and can't afford a full rewrite
  2. Your team will quit if they have to learn new syntax
  3. You need specific features (graph traversals, Cassandra wide columns)

Don't get clever with multiple APIs. Pick one, stick with it, and resist the urge to use them all just because Microsoft lets you.

Honest API Comparison

What Actually Matters

NoSQL (Core SQL)

MongoDB

Cassandra

Gremlin (Graph)

Table

When to Use

New projects, complex queries

MongoDB migrations

Time-series/IoT data

Recommendation engines

Simple lookups

Data Model

JSON documents

BSON documents

Wide columns

Vertices and edges

Key-value pairs

Query Language

SQL-like (familiar)

MongoDB queries

CQL (limited)

Gremlin (brain melting)

OData (basic)

Complex Queries

Yes, actually good

Yes, but costs more RUs

Limited, don't expect miracles

Yes, if you enjoy suffering

No, don't even try

RU Efficiency

Best you'll get

20-30% higher than NoSQL

Moderate

Depends on graph complexity

Efficient for simple ops

Real Production Pain

Partition key design hell

MongoDB compatibility gotchas

Secondary index limitations

Query optimization nightmare

None, it's boring

Learning Curve

2-3 weeks for basics

Easy if you know MongoDB

1-2 months for CQL

3-6 months to not hate it

1 day

When It Breaks

Shitty partition keys

Weird MongoDB quirks

Index fuckups

Graph traversal explosions

Almost never

Documentation Quality

Best available

Pretty good

Adequate

Confusing as hell

Simple enough

Community Support

Large and active

MongoDB community helps

Smaller but helpful

Niche but passionate

Limited

Hidden Gotchas

RU consumption surprises

Not 100% MongoDB compatible

No complex JOINs

Query performance unpredictable

None really

Setting Up Cosmos DB: What Actually Goes Wrong

You've picked your API (hopefully NoSQL) and now you need to set it up. Here's the setup guide with all the ways you'll fuck this up and how to fix it.

The decisions you make in the next 30 minutes determine whether you spend $500/month or $5,000/month on the same workload. No pressure.

Creating Your Account (First Way You'll Mess Up)

The Azure Portal Trap
Don't click through the portal defaults like an idiot. Teams blow their entire budgets because they trust Microsoft's "helpful" default settings. Use the quickstart but ignore literally every default value they suggest.

Critical decisions that'll destroy your budget:

  • API Selection: Pick wrong, rebuild everything later
  • Location: Choose based on where users are, not where you work
  • Capacity Mode: Provisioned vs Serverless - wrong choice means overpaying or throttling
  • Backup Policy: Continuous backup costs extra but saves your job

Provisioned vs Serverless Reality:

  • Provisioned: Pay even when nobody uses your app, cheaper with consistent traffic
  • Serverless: Costs 2x per operation, no minimum charge - fine for dev, death for production

A team I worked with picked Serverless for production because "it scales automatically." Their first traffic spike cost $3,000 in a single day. Serverless charges per RU consumed, not provisioned capacity.

Partition Keys: Where Dreams Go to Die

Cosmos DB Entity Relationships

This is where most people destroy their Cosmos DB setup. Get the partition key wrong and you're rebuilding everything from scratch.

Partition key rules that'll save your job:

  • Pick something with thousands of unique values (not 5)
  • Make sure queries don't scan every partition
  • You can NEVER change it after creating the container
  • Avoid hot spots like timestamps or status fields

Real examples of how teams destroyed their apps:

E-commerce Epic Fail:

// What they did (complete disaster):
"partitionKey": "/orderStatus"
// Result: 90% of orders in "pending" partition, constant 429 errors

// What actually works:
"partitionKey": "/customerId"
// Result: Even distribution, fast queries

IoT Catastrophe:

// The obvious stupid choice:
"partitionKey": "/timestamp"
// Result: All current data destroys one partition

// Less obvious but equally stupid:
"partitionKey": "/deviceType"
// Result: Tesla Model 3 devices overwhelm everything

// What works:
"partitionKey": "/deviceId"
// Result: Even distribution

Multi-tenant Disaster:

// Lazy choice that killed performance:
"partitionKey": "/tenantPlan"
// Result: All enterprise customers in one partition

// The fix:
"partitionKey": "/tenantId"
// Result: Perfect isolation

I watched one team spend 6 weeks rebuilding their entire fucking data model because some genius decided to partition on orderStatus. Guess what? 95% of orders are "pending" so that one partition was getting absolutely hammered. Queries took 30+ seconds and users were ready to throw their laptops out the window.

Consistency Levels: Choose Your Own Adventure

Azure Cosmos DB Consistency Levels

Cosmos DB has five consistency levels. Pick wrong and you'll either blow your budget or ship data bugs.

Session Consistency (Default): Just use this

  • Users see their own writes immediately
  • Might not see other users' writes right away
  • Works for 90% of applications
  • Costs 1x RUs (baseline)
  • Gotcha: Multi-device users see inconsistencies

Strong Consistency: When money's involved

  • Everyone sees identical data always
  • Banking, payments, inventory where wrong data = lawsuit
  • Costs 2x RUs (ouch)
  • Single write region only (kills global performance)

Eventual Consistency: When you don't care

  • Data becomes consistent eventually, maybe in seconds
  • Perfect for analytics, logging, "close enough" scenarios
  • Cheapest at 1x RUs
  • Users see stale data for random amounts of time

Bounded Staleness: The compromise nobody wants

  • Data might be X seconds old or Y versions behind
  • Collaborative editing, leaderboards
  • Costs 2x RUs without strong guarantees
  • Most teams should just use Session instead

Consistent Prefix: The weird one

  • See writes in order but might miss recent ones
  • Social feeds, activity streams
  • Costs 1x RUs
  • Rarely needed in practice

95% of teams should use Session consistency. Don't overthink it unless you're handling money or have bizarre requirements.

The Index Trap That'll Kill Your Performance

Cosmos DB indexes everything by default. Every property in your JSON gets indexed, which sounds great until you realize you're paying to index 50MB blob fields you never search.

How to not destroy your RU budget:

{
  "indexingMode": "consistent",
  "automatic": true,
  "includedPaths": [
    {
      "path": "/userId/?" // Only index what you query
    },
    {
      "path": "/createdDate/?" // Timestamp for sorting
    }
  ],
  "excludedPaths": [
    {
      "path": "/largeDescription/*", // Don't index big text
      "path": "/binaryData/*", // Never index blobs
      {
      "path": "/*" // Exclude everything else
    }
  ]
}

Indexing strategies:

  • Default: Index everything (expensive writes, fast queries)
  • Smart: Only index queried fields (cheap writes, fast targeted queries)
  • Dumb: No indexes (cheap writes, everything else is slow)

A team I worked with indexed their document store including 5MB PDF contents. Every write consumed 100+ RUs because Cosmos DB was indexing binary data. Took them three months and $20k before they figured out why their bill was insane.

RU Capacity: How to Not Go Broke

Microsoft's capacity calculator will lie to you. It gives optimistic estimates that never match production reality. Whatever number it spits out, multiply by 2x for a realistic starting point.

Request Units are how Cosmos DB charges you. Estimate wrong and you'll either get throttled or pay 10x more than expected.

RU math that matters:

  • Read 1KB: 1 RU
  • Write 1KB: 5-8 RUs
  • Delete: 5-8 RUs
  • Query scanning 100 docs: 50-200 RUs (wildly depends on complexity)

Provisioned capacity reality:

  • Too low: 429 throttling errors during traffic spikes
  • Too high: Pay for capacity you never use
  • Autoscale: Scales 10%-100% of max, costs 1.5x at minimum

Start with manual provisioning at 25% of what you think you need. Monitor for a week. Increase based on actual usage, not Microsoft's fairy tale projections.

Global Distribution: Great Feature, Expensive Reality

Global distribution sounds awesome until you see the bill. Here's what matters for multi-region deployments:

Start simple:

  1. One write region where most users are
  2. Add read regions for global users
  3. Don't enable multi-region writes unless you absolutely need it

Multi-region cost breakdown:

  • Single region: $1,000/month
  • Multi-region reads: $1,500/month (+50%)
  • Multi-region writes: $3,000/month (+200%)

Code that works:

var options = new CosmosClientOptions()
{
    ApplicationName = "MyApp",
    ApplicationRegion = Regions.WestUS2, // Primary region
    ConnectionMode = ConnectionMode.Direct // Always Direct
};

The Emulator: Your New Best Friend

Use the Cosmos DB emulator for development or spend $200/month testing things.

## Docker setup that works
docker run -p 8081:8081 -m 3g --name cosmos-emulator \
  microsoft/azure-cosmosdb-emulator

Emulator gotchas:

  • Self-signed SSL certificates (ignore in dev)
  • Performance doesn't match production
  • New features lag behind
  • Breaks randomly on Windows updates

Monitoring That Matters

Your RU consumption graph becomes your obsession. Normalized RU utilization shows which partition keys eat your budget. One partition consistently above 80% = bottleneck.

Set up alerts or get bill surprises:

{
  "alertName": "RU Consumption > 80%",
  "threshold": 80,
  "action": "Wake someone up"
}

Essential metrics:

  • RU consumption: > 80% = add capacity now
  • 429 errors: Throttling = users getting timeouts
  • P99 latency: > 100ms = something's broken
  • Monthly cost: Track weekly, not monthly

Production checklist:

  • Partition key tested with realistic data
  • RU consumption measured under load
  • 429 error handling with retry patterns
  • Backup policy configured
  • Cost alerts set up
  • Team knows how to debug at 3 AM

That's it. Everything else is optimization for later. Get these basics right and you won't hate Cosmos DB.

FAQ: The Questions You Actually Ask (When Things Break)

Q

Why is my Cosmos DB bill $8,000 this month when I expected $500?

A

Welcome to the fucking club. Here's probably what happened:

  1. You enabled multi-region writes without reading the fine print (+200% cost)
  2. Your queries scan entire collections instead of using partition keys
  3. You're indexing binary data (images, PDFs) that you never search
  4. Autoscale is stuck at maximum because of shitty partition key design
  5. Cross-partition queries during traffic spikes

Fix it now:

  • Check Azure Cost Management to see what's eating your budget
  • Look at RU consumption metrics - normalized RU > 80% = problem
  • Turn off multi-region writes unless you actually need them
  • Review indexing policy and exclude large fields

Real production costs:

  • Small app (10K users): $300-1,200/month (not the $200-800 Microsoft claims)
  • Medium app (100K users): $1,500-5,000/month
  • Large app (1M+ users): $5,000-25,000/month
Q

Can I use multiple APIs on the same data? I heard it's possible.

A

No. Don't even think about it.

Technically possible doesn't mean good idea. Each API expects different data shapes and has different performance. You'll get:

  • Data corruption from schema mismatches
  • Performance issues from API translation overhead
  • Debugging nightmares when something breaks
  • Angry team members who have to maintain your mess

One API per container. Period.

Q

My queries are taking 30+ seconds. What the hell is wrong?

A

90% of the time it's one of these:

  1. Terrible partition key design - you're scanning every partition for every query
  2. Missing indexes - you excluded too much from indexing policy
  3. Cross-partition queries - WHERE clause doesn't include partition key
  4. Hot partitions - all data in one partition getting throttled

Debug steps that work:

-- Check partition distribution (NoSQL API)
SELECT c.partitionKey, COUNT(1) as count
FROM c
GROUP BY c.partitionKey
ORDER BY count DESC

If one partition has like 10x more docs than others, you're pretty much screwed. Time to rebuild with a better partition key or find a new job.

Quick fixes:

  • Add partition key to WHERE clause
  • Check if you're doing SELECT * and returning huge documents
  • Look at query metrics - RU consumption > 100 for simple queries = problem
  • Increase RUs temporarily to see if it's just throttling
Q

I'm getting 429 errors constantly. How do I fix this?

A

429 = "Too Many Requests" = you're being throttled

Immediate fixes:

  1. Increase provisioned RUs (costs money but stops the bleeding)
  2. Enable autoscale if you haven't
  3. Implement retry logic in your app (SDKs do this automatically)
  4. Check for hot partitions in Azure Monitor

Long-term fixes:

  • Redesign partition key if one partition is getting hammered
  • Optimize queries to consume fewer RUs
  • Spread traffic across multiple partition keys
  • Use bulk operations for multiple document operations

Reality check: If you're getting 429s during normal operation, your partition key probably sucks ass.

Q

Should I use Provisioned or Serverless? I'm confused as hell.

A

Provisioned Throughput:

  • Pay for RUs whether you use them or not
  • Cheaper if you have consistent traffic
  • Required for multi-region deployments
  • Can handle traffic spikes if you provision enough

Serverless:

  • Pay only for RUs you consume
  • 2x more expensive per RU than Provisioned
  • Single region only
  • Gets expensive fast under sustained load

Use Serverless for dev/test environments. Use Provisioned for production unless your app gets less than 1000 requests/day.

Q

How much do operations actually cost in RUs?

A
What You're Doing Document Size RU Cost Reality Check
Read by ID 1KB 1 RU Only thing that's consistent
Write new doc 1KB 5-6 RUs Higher with lots of indexes
Update existing 1KB 6-8 RUs Depends on what changed
Simple query 10 results 5-15 RUs Add partition key or pay more
Cross-partition scan 100 results 100-500 RUs Expensive as hell
Complex aggregation 1000 docs 200-1000 RUs Can bankrupt you during spikes

How to not waste RUs:

  • Always include partition key in WHERE clauses
  • Use bulk operations for multiple writes
  • Don't index fields you never query
  • Use point reads (by ID) whenever possible
Q

My app randomly throws errors. What's happening?

A

Common Cosmos DB errors:

429 - Too Many Requests: You're being throttled

  • Fix: Increase RUs or fix partition key design

404 - Not Found: Document or container doesn't exist

  • Fix: Check database/container names and document IDs

400 - Bad Request: Malformed query or document

  • Fix: Check JSON structure and query syntax

503 - Service Unavailable: Cosmos DB is having issues

  • Fix: Implement retry logic and wait it out

RequestRateTooLarge: Same as 429, different name

  • Fix: Same as 429 - more RUs or better partition keys
Q

I need to migrate from MongoDB/SQL. How screwed am I?

A

From MongoDB: Not terrible

  • Use Azure Database Migration Service for the data
  • Most MongoDB code works with minimal changes
  • Gotcha: Some MongoDB features aren't 100% compatible

From SQL Server: Pretty painful

  • You'll need to denormalize your relational data
  • Export to JSON and import, or use Azure Data Factory
  • Reality check: Plan for weeks of refactoring, not days

Migration checklist:

  • Test new partition key with realistic data volume
  • Measure RU consumption with actual query patterns
  • Plan for downtime during cutover (migration tools lie about zero downtime)
  • Have rollback plans ready
Q

What consistency level should I actually use?

A

Session Consistency: Use this for 95% of applications

  • Users see their own writes immediately
  • Don't see other users' writes immediately (usually fine)
  • Best performance/consistency balance

Strong Consistency: Only for financial transactions

  • Everyone sees the same data always
  • Costs 2x RUs and limits you to single-region writes
  • Required for payments, banking, inventory

Everything else: You probably don't need them

  • Eventual: For analytics and logging where "close enough" works
  • Bounded Staleness: Rarely needed in practice
  • Consistent Prefix: Even more rarely needed
Q

Can I integrate with other Azure services?

A

Yes, and it's actually pretty good:

Azure Functions: Change feed triggers work great for real-time processing

Azure Search: Cosmos DB indexer gives you full-text search

Power BI: Direct Query works but can be slow with large datasets

Synapse Analytics: Synapse Link for analytics without killing production performance

Stream Analytics: Direct output to Cosmos DB for real-time data ingestion

Example that works:

[CosmosDBTrigger(
    databaseName: "MyDB",
    collectionName: "Users",
    ConnectionStringSetting = "CosmosDBConnection")]
public static void ProcessUserChanges(IReadOnlyList<Document> docs)
{
    // Runs whenever documents change
    // Great for cache invalidation, notifications, etc.
}

Resources: The Good, The Bad, and The Useless

Related Tools & Recommendations

tool
Similar content

Amazon DocumentDB - MongoDB's Evil Twin

Looks like MongoDB, smells like MongoDB, definitely not fucking MongoDB

Amazon DocumentDB
/tool/amazon-documentdb/overview
100%
tool
Similar content

Azure - Microsoft's Cloud Platform (The Good, Bad, and Expensive)

Explore Microsoft Azure's cloud platform, its key services, and real-world usage. Get a candid look at Azure's pros, cons, and costs, plus comparisons to AWS an

Microsoft Azure
/tool/microsoft-azure/overview
91%
compare
Recommended

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MongoDB vs Cassandra - Which Database Will Ruin Your Weekend Less?

Skip the bullshit. Here's what breaks in production.

PostgreSQL
/compare/postgresql/mysql/mongodb/cassandra/comprehensive-database-comparison
81%
tool
Similar content

Azure AI Foundry Production Reality Check

Microsoft finally unfucked their scattered AI mess, but get ready to finance another Tesla payment

Microsoft Azure AI
/tool/microsoft-azure-ai/production-deployment
70%
tool
Recommended

Amazon DynamoDB - AWS NoSQL Database That Actually Scales

Fast key-value lookups without the server headaches, but query patterns matter more than you think

Amazon DynamoDB
/tool/amazon-dynamodb/overview
59%
tool
Recommended

MongoDB 스키마 설계 - 삽질 안 하는 법

competes with MongoDB

MongoDB
/ko:tool/mongodb/schema-design-patterns
56%
alternatives
Recommended

MongoDB Alternatives: Choose the Right Database for Your Specific Use Case

Stop paying MongoDB tax. Choose a database that actually works for your use case.

MongoDB
/alternatives/mongodb/use-case-driven-alternatives
56%
tool
Recommended

Google Cloud Firestore - NoSQL That Won't Ruin Your Weekend

Google's document database that won't make you hate yourself (usually).

Google Cloud Firestore
/tool/google-cloud-firestore/overview
53%
review
Recommended

Kafka Will Fuck Your Budget - Here's the Real Cost

Don't let "free and open source" fool you. Kafka costs more than your mortgage.

Apache Kafka
/review/apache-kafka/cost-benefit-review
53%
tool
Recommended

Apache Kafka - The Distributed Log That LinkedIn Built (And You Probably Don't Need)

integrates with Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka
/tool/apache-kafka/overview
53%
compare
Similar content

MongoDB vs DynamoDB vs Cosmos DB - The Database Choice That'll Make or Break Your Project

Real talk from someone who's deployed all three in production and lived through the 3AM outages

MongoDB
/compare/mongodb/dynamodb/cosmos-db/enterprise-database-selection-guide
50%
tool
Recommended

How to Fix Your Slow-as-Hell Cassandra Cluster

Stop Pretending Your 50 Ops/Sec Cluster is "Scalable"

Apache Cassandra
/tool/apache-cassandra/performance-optimization-guide
48%
tool
Recommended

Cassandra Vector Search - Build RAG Apps Without the Vector Database Bullshit

alternative to Apache Cassandra

Apache Cassandra
/tool/apache-cassandra/vector-search-ai-guide
48%
tool
Recommended

Hardening Cassandra Security - Because Default Configs Get You Fired

alternative to Apache Cassandra

Apache Cassandra
/tool/apache-cassandra/enterprise-security-hardening
48%
integration
Recommended

Temporal + Kubernetes + Redis: The Only Microservices Stack That Doesn't Hate You

Stop debugging distributed transactions at 3am like some kind of digital masochist

Temporal
/integration/temporal-kubernetes-redis-microservices/microservices-communication-architecture
46%
tool
Recommended

Redis Insight - The Only Redis GUI That Won't Make You Rage Quit

Finally, a Redis GUI that doesn't actively hate you

Redis Insight
/tool/redis-insight/overview
46%
alternatives
Recommended

Redis Alternatives for High-Performance Applications

The landscape of in-memory databases has evolved dramatically beyond Redis

Redis
/alternatives/redis/performance-focused-alternatives
46%
integration
Recommended

Kafka + Spark + Elasticsearch: Don't Let This Pipeline Ruin Your Life

The Data Pipeline That'll Consume Your Soul (But Actually Works)

Apache Kafka
/integration/kafka-spark-elasticsearch/real-time-data-pipeline
44%
troubleshoot
Recommended

Your Elasticsearch Cluster Went Red and Production is Down

Here's How to Fix It Without Losing Your Mind (Or Your Job)

Elasticsearch
/troubleshoot/elasticsearch-cluster-health-issues/cluster-health-troubleshooting
44%
integration
Recommended

EFK Stack Integration - Stop Your Logs From Disappearing Into the Void

Elasticsearch + Fluentd + Kibana: Because searching through 50 different log files at 3am while the site is down fucking sucks

Elasticsearch
/integration/elasticsearch-fluentd-kibana/enterprise-logging-architecture
44%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization