Why does `pip install vectordb-bench[all]` keep failing?

Because "all" includes conflicting dependencies. The [Pinecone client](https://docs.pinecone.io/guides/troubleshooting/dependency-conflicts) wants one version of protobuf, [Qdrant](https://qdrant.tech/documentation/guides/common-errors/) wants another, and [pgvector](https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector-python) doesn't give a shit about either. Install them one by one and test each before adding the next.

Can I run this in CI/CD?

Absolutely not reliably. A single benchmark run takes 1-6 hours and burns through cloud credits like crazy. [GitHub Actions](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-containerized-services) will timeout, and the memory requirements (16GB+) exceed most CI runners. Use dedicated benchmark infrastructure if you want this automated.

Why does the Docker container eat so much RAM?

VectorDBBench loads entire datasets into memory for benchmarking. The [SIFT dataset](http://corpus-texmex.irisa.fr/) alone is several GB, plus each database client has its own memory overhead. The container starts at 4GB and grows to 12GB+ during actual benchmarks. Budget 16GB minimum or you'll get OOM errors.

Does it work on Windows?

Technically yes, practically no. Half the database clients have issues on Windows, especially [pgvector](https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector-python/issues?q=windows) and anything requiring [native compilation](https://docs.python.org/3/extending/windows.html). Use WSL2 or Docker on Windows - save yourself the pain.

Why do my benchmark results vary so much between runs?

Network latency, cloud database throttling, and cosmic alignment. [Cloud databases](https://zilliz.com/learn/open-source-vector-database-benchmarking-your-way) especially vary by 20-40% depending on what else is running in their infrastructure. Run each benchmark 3 times minimum and take the median, not the best result.

Can I benchmark my own custom dataset?

Yes, but it's poorly documented. You need to convert your data to [HDF5 format](https://docs.h5py.org/en/stable/) with specific field names that match VectorDBBench's expectations. The [custom dataset documentation](https://github.com/zilliztech/VectorDBBench/blob/main/docs/custom-dataset.md) exists but is incomplete. Expect to read the source code.

How do you integrate this into your team's development process?

You don't - at least not directly. VectorDBBench is too resource-heavy and time-consuming for regular development. Instead, use it for quarterly architecture reviews and major database selection decisions. Create simplified test harnesses for day-to-day performance monitoring using direct database clients.

Can junior developers use this effectively?

Absolutely not. The configuration complexity, cryptic error messages, and resource requirements make this a senior engineer tool. You need to understand database internals, system administration, and benchmarking methodology to get useful results. Plan to spend time training team members or keeping it as a specialized tool.

What's your actual workflow for database evaluation?

1. **Initial screening**: Use VectorDBBench to compare 3-5 databases on standard datasets 2. **Custom validation**: Build simple test harnesses with your actual data patterns 3. **Production simulation**: Deploy top 2 candidates in staging with real traffic patterns 4. **Final benchmarking**: Use VectorDBBench again for final comparison with optimized configs

How do you handle the time and cost overhead?

Run benchmarks on dedicated infrastructure, not your development machines. Schedule them for nights/weekends. For cloud databases, set billing alerts and use test projects with spending limits. A full benchmark suite costs $200-500 in cloud credits - budget accordingly.

Does it work for team-based evaluation?

Barely. Results are hard to share (no built-in collaboration features), configurations are environment-specific, and reproducing someone else's benchmark is painful. Export results to shared documents and maintain a team wiki with working configurations for each database.

What alternatives exist for lighter-weight testing?

For quick performance checks, use [ann-benchmarks](https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks) or database-specific tools. For load testing, [Locust](https://locust.io/) with custom vector operations. For development, direct client benchmarking with [pytest-benchmark](https://pytest-benchmark.readthedocs.io/). VectorDBBench is the heavyweight option when you need comprehensive, standardized results.

Currently viewing the AI version

Switch to human version

VectorDBBench: AI-Optimized Technical Reference

Configuration Requirements

Production Installation Pattern

# CRITICAL: Don't use [all] - causes dependency conflicts
pip install vectordb-bench
pip install vectordb-bench[pinecone]
pip install vectordb-bench[qdrant]
# Test each database client individually before adding next

Resource Requirements

Memory: 16GB minimum (container starts at 4GB, grows to 12GB+ during benchmarks)
Time: 1-6 hours per benchmark run
Cost: $200-500 in cloud credits for full evaluation suite
CPU: Dedicated infrastructure required (not development machines)

Platform Compatibility

Platform	Status	Critical Issues
Ubuntu 22.04	Works (second attempt)	Protobuf version conflicts
macOS M1	High failure rate	pgvector ARM64 compilation required
Windows	Technically yes, practically no	Use WSL2 or Docker
Docker	Recommended	Requires 16GB RAM allocation

Critical Failure Modes

Dependency Hell (High Probability)

Root Cause: Conflicting protobuf versions between database clients
Impact: Complete installation failure
Solution: Sequential installation, not bulk [all] install
Detection: protobuf 3.x vs 4.x conflicts in error logs

Version Incompatibility (Ongoing Issue)

v1.0.8: Breaks Weaviate configurations from v1.0.6
v1.0.6: Memory leak kills long-running benchmarks
Impact: Choose between "stable but leaky" or "fixed but incompatible"
Mitigation: Pin specific versions, avoid automatic updates

Resource Exhaustion

Memory: OOM errors with <16GB RAM allocation
Time: CI/CD timeout failures (GitHub Actions insufficient)
Network: 20-40% result variance due to cloud database throttling
Detection: No built-in resource monitoring

Database-Specific Configuration

Milvus HNSW Critical Settings

# Default settings cause 10x performance degradation
M: 64                    # Not documented in VectorDBBench
efConstruction: 500      # Required for >1M vectors

Performance Expectations by Database

Database	Setup Difficulty	Failure Rate	Time to First Result	Operational Rating
Pinecone	Easy	5%	10 minutes	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Production Ready
Qdrant Cloud	Easy	15%	15 minutes	⭐⭐⭐ Reliable
Milvus Local	Nightmare	40%	2+ hours	⭐⭐ High Maintenance
ChromaDB	Easy	10%	5 minutes	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Development Friendly

Operational Intelligence

Error Diagnostic Patterns

ValidationError: 1 validation error = Configuration format issue, check YAML syntax
Connection failed = Authentication or network (no specific diagnostic info)
Index build failed = Memory exhaustion or parameter mismatch

Hidden Costs and Time Investments

Learning Curve: Senior engineer tool only (junior developers will struggle)
Setup Time: 2-8 hours for first successful benchmark
Ongoing Maintenance: Version conflicts require constant attention
Integration Complexity: Cannot integrate directly into CI/CD pipelines

Production Workflow Reality

Initial Screening: VectorDBBench for 3-5 database comparison
Custom Validation: Build simplified test harnesses with actual data
Production Simulation: Deploy top 2 candidates in staging
Final Benchmarking: VectorDBBench with optimized configurations

Critical Warnings

What Official Documentation Doesn't Tell You

Dataset Loading: Entire datasets loaded into memory simultaneously
Reproducibility: Results vary 20-40% between runs due to external factors
Custom Data: Requires HDF5 format conversion (poorly documented)
Configuration Export: Web UI hides advanced options, use CLI for production

Breaking Points and Thresholds

UI Failure: >1000 spans breaks debugging interface
Memory Limit: 16GB minimum for meaningful benchmarks
Network Sensitivity: Cloud databases show high variance
Concurrent Users: Single-user tool, no collaboration features

Alternative Tools for Different Use Cases

Quick Performance Checks: ann-benchmarks (lighter weight)
Load Testing: Locust with custom vector operations
Development: pytest-benchmark with direct database clients
Academic Research: FAISS benchmarks (Facebook's framework)

Decision Criteria Matrix

Use VectorDBBench When:

Need standardized comparison across multiple databases
Have dedicated benchmark infrastructure available
Evaluating for quarterly architecture decisions
Budget allows $200-500 cloud testing costs

Avoid VectorDBBench When:

Need quick development cycle feedback
Working with junior developers
Require CI/CD integration
Limited to <16GB memory environments

Resource Requirements Summary

Hardware: 16GB RAM, dedicated compute
Time: Plan 1-3 days for meaningful evaluation
Expertise: Senior engineer with database internals knowledge
Budget: $200-500 cloud costs per evaluation cycle
Infrastructure: Separate from development environment

Essential Troubleshooting Resources

GitHub Issues for dependency conflicts and database-specific problems
Database vendor performance tuning guides (critical for configuration)
System monitoring tools (htop, iotop) for resource tracking during benchmarks
Alternative benchmarking frameworks for comparison validation

Useful Links for Further Investigation

Essential Resources for Actually Using VectorDBBench

Link	Description
VectorDBBench GitHub Repository	Main codebase, issues, and release notes for the VectorDBBench project, providing the core development repository.
PyPI Package	Official Python package for VectorDBBench, including comprehensive installation instructions to get started with the tool.
Official Leaderboard	Provides the latest benchmark results and detailed methodology used in the VectorDBBench evaluations.
Installation Guide	A basic setup guide for VectorDBBench, recommended as a starting point before diving into GitHub issues for advanced configurations.
GitHub Issues	Access the repository's issue tracker for current bugs, community-contributed workarounds, and assistance with various configuration challenges.
Dependencies Troubleshooting	Dedicated section for common dependency conflicts, particularly related to protobuf, and their respective solutions within the GitHub issues.
Database-Specific Issues	Find community-driven solutions and discussions for various database setup and configuration problems encountered with VectorDBBench.
ANN Benchmarks	A lighter-weight benchmarking tool with an academic focus, offering a faster setup for approximate nearest neighbor evaluations.
FAISS Benchmarks	Facebook's dedicated benchmarks for vector similarity search, providing insights into the performance of the FAISS library.
Qdrant Benchmarks	Qdrant's own vector database benchmarking framework, designed to evaluate the performance and scalability of the Qdrant vector database.
Pinecone Performance Tests	Guides and documentation from Pinecone focusing on performance optimization and tuning for their vector database service.
Milvus Performance FAQ	An essential FAQ document for optimizing Milvus performance, crucial for achieving satisfactory and reliable benchmark results.
Pinecone Troubleshooting	Comprehensive troubleshooting guide for Pinecone, covering common issues such as API limits, memory management, and connection problems.
Qdrant Configuration Guide	An important configuration guide for Qdrant, particularly useful for optimizing and setting up on-premise deployments of the vector database.
PostgreSQL pgvector Optimization	Critical performance optimization documentation for PostgreSQL's pgvector extension, essential for accurate and efficient benchmarks.
htop	A powerful interactive process viewer and system monitor, providing real-time insights into CPU, memory, and process usage during benchmarks.
iotop	A utility for monitoring disk I/O usage, essential for identifying and diagnosing potential disk bottlenecks during performance tests.
nethogs	A network bandwidth monitor that groups bandwidth by process, useful for observing network usage during cloud database benchmarks.
Docker Stats	Provides live stream of container(s) resource usage statistics, including CPU, memory, network I/O, and block I/O for Docker environments.

VectorDBBench: AI-Optimized Technical Reference

Configuration Requirements

Production Installation Pattern

Resource Requirements

Platform Compatibility

Critical Failure Modes

Dependency Hell (High Probability)

Version Incompatibility (Ongoing Issue)

Resource Exhaustion

Database-Specific Configuration

Milvus HNSW Critical Settings

Performance Expectations by Database

Operational Intelligence

Error Diagnostic Patterns

Hidden Costs and Time Investments

Production Workflow Reality

Critical Warnings

What Official Documentation Doesn't Tell You

Breaking Points and Thresholds

Alternative Tools for Different Use Cases

Decision Criteria Matrix

Use VectorDBBench When:

Avoid VectorDBBench When:

Resource Requirements Summary

Essential Troubleshooting Resources

Useful Links for Further Investigation

Essential Resources for Actually Using VectorDBBench

Related Tools & Recommendations

Milvus vs Weaviate vs Pinecone vs Qdrant vs Chroma: What Actually Works in Production

I Deployed All Four Vector Databases in Production. Here's What Actually Works.

Milvus - Vector Database That Actually Works

Pinecone Production Reality: What I Learned After $3200 in Surprise Bills

Claude + LangChain + Pinecone RAG: What Actually Works in Production

Qdrant + LangChain Production Setup That Actually Works

Stop Fighting with Vector Databases - Here's How to Make Weaviate, LangChain, and Next.js Actually Work Together

ELK Stack for Microservices - Stop Losing Log Data

Your Elasticsearch Cluster Went Red and Production is Down

Kafka + Spark + Elasticsearch: Don't Let This Pipeline Ruin Your Life

Redis vs Memcached vs Hazelcast: Production Caching Decision Guide

Redis Alternatives for High-Performance Applications

Redis - In-Memory Data Platform for Real-Time Applications

Tabnine - AI Code Assistant That Actually Works Offline

Surviving Gatsby's Plugin Hell in 2025

React Router v7 Production Disasters I've Fixed So You Don't Have To

Plaid - The Fintech API That Actually Ships

Datadog Enterprise Pricing - What It Actually Costs When Your Shit Breaks at 3AM

Python 3.13 Production Deployment - What Actually Breaks

Python 3.13 Finally Lets You Ditch the GIL - Here's How to Install It