Someone asked me yesterday why AWS has two different Q things and I realized I couldn't explain it without sounding like an idiot

Yeah, it's stupid. Amazon decided to rebrand CodeWhisperer as Q Developer, then separately launched Q Business for document search, and gave them confusingly similar names. They do completely different things. It's like if Ford made both cars and dishwashers and called them both "Ford F-150."

My boss wants to know which one is cheaper and I have no idea how to answer

Q Developer if you just need coding help. The free tier works fine for small teams and individual developers. Q Business starts at $3/user but that version sucks, so you'll end up paying $20/user for the version that actually works. Plus consumption charges that nobody explains clearly.

Our SharePoint is a nightmare and people are threatening to quit rather than search for documents in there

Q Business might help, but it's not magic. We tried it on one team's disorganized Confluence space and it made search less terrible. But another team with well-organized SharePoint found Q Business slower than just navigating to the right folder. Really depends on how broken your current setup is.

Wait, so these two Q things don't even talk to each other?

Nope, completely separate products. Q Business looks at your documents, Q Developer looks at your code, and they have no idea the other exists. It's like Amazon built two different search engines and slapped similar names on them for maximum confusion.I think they both promise not to train AI models on your data if you pay for Pro versions, but I'm honestly not sure about the data handling policies. That stuff changes and the privacy docs are written by lawyers.

We're mostly a Microsoft shop - should we even bother with AWS Q stuff?

Probably not? Q Business can connect to SharePoint and Teams, but if you're already paying for Microsoft 365, their Copilot is $30/user and integrates better with Office apps. Q Developer doesn't know or care about your Office setup.Although Microsoft Copilot is weirdly expensive compared to these other options. I don't understand their pricing strategy.

AWS always jacks up pricing after you get hooked - what happens with these Q tools?

Yeah, that's the AWS playbook. They'll keep the current pricing for a year or two to build user base, then slowly increase prices or add new required tiers. The Q Developer free tier is probably safe for now because they're competing with GitHub Copilot, but Q Business pricing will definitely go up.Actually, there's already chatter in the AWS Slack groups about Q Developer pricing going up after September 2025, probably because they added Claude Sonnet 4 access to Pro in June. AWS never adds shiny features without jacking up prices later - it's like clockwork.I'd bet money that by 2027, the Q Business "Lite" tier will be even more limited and the Pro tier will be $25-30/user.

Our AWS bill is already insane - will adding Q stuff make it worse?

Depends how insane. If you're spending $10K+/month on AWS, Q costs are probably noise. If your monthly AWS bill is under $500, adding Q Business for a 20-person team will literally double your bill.Q Developer free tier is actually free though - I've never seen charges for it on our AWS bills. Q Business has no free option because, I assume, document indexing actually costs Amazon money to run.

What happens when the internet goes down?

You're fucked. Both tools are 100% cloud-dependent. We had a fiber cut last month that killed our internet for 4 hours. Suddenly I was back to manually searching SharePoint like some kind of caveman.GitHub Copilot at least caches some suggestions locally. These Q tools don't cache anything - no internet, no AI help.

My manager is worried about using AI tools for coding - will I get in trouble?

Probably not, but company policies are all over the place. Some places love AI tools, others are paranoid about liability. Q Developer Pro supposedly includes IP indemnity coverage, meaning AWS will cover legal costs if someone sues over AI-generated code. But I've never seen this tested in court, so who knows if it actually works.Most companies seem to be cautiously okay with AI coding assistants as long as you're not blindly copy-pasting everything without understanding it.

Why not just use ChatGPT for all this stuff?

Q Business can actually search through your company's private documents with proper permission controls. ChatGPT can't access your internal SharePoint or Confluence spaces. Q Developer knows your specific codebase context and understands AWS quirks better than generic ChatGPT.But honestly, ChatGPT-4 is better for general coding questions and architecture discussions. Q Developer is only better for very specific AWS service integration problems.

What's the big catch I'm missing here?

Q Business setup and maintenance is way more work than AWS marketing suggests. Someone needs to babysit the connectors, update permissions when people leave, and explain to users why search results aren't what they expected. It's not "set it and forget it."Q Developer pushes AWS solutions even when they're overkill. Both tools will get more expensive over time - that's how AWS operates. And both require constant internet connectivity, which sucks if you travel a lot or have unreliable connections.![Amazon Q Developer Best Practices Implementation](https://d2908q01vomqb2.cloudfront.net/7719a1c782a1ba91c031a682a0a2f8658209adbf/2024/10/11/fig9-1024x630.png)

Currently viewing the AI version

Switch to human version

Amazon Q Business vs Developer: AI-Optimized Technical Reference

Product Overview

Amazon Q Business: Document search and retrieval system for enterprise knowledge bases
Amazon Q Developer: AI coding assistant specialized for AWS development (formerly CodeWhisperer)

Critical Distinction: Two completely separate products with similar names that do not integrate with each other.

Configuration Requirements

Amazon Q Business Setup

Real Setup Time: 2-3 weeks (not AWS-claimed "simple setup")
Common Failure Points:
- SharePoint connector timeouts on large pages
- Confluence indexing missing 50% of documentation
- Permission mapping complexity across multiple data sources
Prerequisites: AWS SSO/IAM Identity Center (manual SAML configuration required)
Maintenance Overhead: Constant babysitting of connectors, permission updates

Amazon Q Developer Setup

Real Setup Time: 5 minutes with existing AWS CLI
Prerequisites: AWS Builder ID or IAM Identity Center
Installation: VS Code extension, no crashes reported
Maintenance: Install and forget

Resource Requirements