Which database is actually "serverless" and not just marketing bullshit?

Only **DynamoDB** is truly serverless. You literally cannot access servers - they don't exist from your perspective. Auto-scaling happens almost instantly, not like the 15-30 seconds you get with Aurora Serverless (which feels like forever when your site's blowing up). Aurora Serverless is "server-managed" - AWS handles capacity planning, but you're still thinking in terms of compute units and connection limits. MongoDB Atlas "serverless" has a 1TB limit and connection throttling. Cassandra Astra is managed but still requires understanding distributed systems concepts. If you want true serverless (pay per request, instant scaling, zero infrastructure), DynamoDB is the only real option in this comparison.

Will DynamoDB's single-table design make my developers hate me?

Probably, at first. SQL developers need 3-6 months to think in DynamoDB patterns. But companies that successfully adopt single-table design report 10x better performance and 90% fewer production issues. The learning curve is steep: composite primary keys, GSI design, query access patterns. Your team will initially try to replicate SQL patterns and create hot partitions. But once they understand partition key distribution and data denormalization, most developers prefer the predictable performance. **Mitigation**: Start with simple use cases (user profiles, session storage) before attempting complex relational data models.

Can Aurora Serverless handle traffic spikes without destroying my budget?

Aurora Serverless v2 handles spikes better than v1, but there's a 15-30 second scaling delay. Your first wave of users during a traffic spike will experience slow response times while Aurora provisions additional ACUs. Budget impact: Aurora scales from 0.5 to 128 ACUs. Each ACU costs ~$0.90/hour. A traffic spike that requires 32 ACUs for 2 hours costs $58. The issue isn't cost - it's the scaling lag that creates poor user experience. **Better approach**: Use Aurora with read replicas for predictable traffic, DynamoDB for unpredictable spikes.

Is MongoDB Atlas pricing a trap that gets expensive as I scale?

Yes. The serverless tier is too limited for real applications (1TB storage, connection limits). Production workloads require M10+ instances where costs compound quickly: - M10 ($57/month): Development only - M30 ($300/month): Small production - M60 ($1,500/month): Real production with replica sets Add multi-region deployment, backups, and data transfer, and your $300 plan becomes $1,200+ monthly. Atlas pricing scales with your success, which sounds good until you see the bill. **Cost control**: Use MongoDB for development velocity, migrate to self-hosted or consider alternatives before hitting M60 pricing.

Should I use PostgreSQL on Lambda functions?

Not without RDS Proxy, unless you enjoy getting "FATAL: sorry, too many clients already" at 3am. PostgreSQL defaults to 100 connections. Each Lambda spins up its own connection. Do the math - under any real load, you're fucked. RDS Proxy ($0.015/hour per connection) fixes this but adds 2-5ms latency and another thing to debug. For Lambda, just use DynamoDB and save yourself the headache. **Exception**: If your Lambda runs like once an hour, direct PostgreSQL is fine. But if you're asking this question, you probably need more scale than that.

Can Cassandra actually scale to "web scale" or is that marketing?

Cassandra genuinely scales linearly - add nodes, get more capacity. Netflix handles billions of requests daily on Cassandra. The scaling isn't marketing bullshit, it's real. But "web scale" requires expertise most teams don't have. You need to understand partition keys, consistency levels, compaction strategies, JVM heap tuning, and about 50 other things that'll make you cry. Cassandra scales to infinity but debugging production issues at 3am requires a PhD in distributed systems. **Reality check**: If you can't afford a $200k Cassandra expert (and good luck finding one), you don't need Cassandra's scale. PostgreSQL with proper indexing handles millions of requests daily without the operational nightmare.

What happens when my DynamoDB bill suddenly jumps 10x?

Oh, this happens to everyone eventually. Usually it's because your app creates hot partitions or someone wrote a scan operation that's reading your entire table. Common causes I've seen: 1. **Hot partition**: All requests hitting the same partition key (like `user_id=admin` or something equally stupid) 2. **Scan operations**: Someone wrote code that scans the entire table to find one record because they didn't understand Query vs Scan 3. **Over-provisioned throughput**: Set provisioned capacity way too high "just to be safe" 4. **GSI nightmare**: Created like 6 Global Secondary Indexes without thinking about the throughput costs **Prevention**: Design partition keys for even distribution (timestamps, UUIDs, not sequential IDs), use Query not Scan, and for the love of god monitor your CloudWatch metrics. Set up billing alerts or you'll get a surprise bill that ruins your month.

How do I choose between Aurora PostgreSQL and regular RDS PostgreSQL?

**Choose Aurora if**: - You need automatic failover (< 30 seconds) - Read scaling with up to 15 read replicas - Point-in-time recovery without backup storage costs - Global database for multi-region deployment - Budget allows for 2-3x higher costs **Choose RDS PostgreSQL if**: - Predictable workloads without complex scaling needs - Cost optimization is critical - Simple backup/restore requirements - Single-region deployment Aurora's distributed storage is genuinely better for I/O intensive workloads, but you pay premium prices for features you might not need.

Should I migrate from MongoDB to PostgreSQL or stick with MongoDB?

Honestly, depends on a bunch of factors I don't know about your specific setup. But here's what I've seen: **Migrate to PostgreSQL if**: - You need complex queries and joins (MongoDB's `$lookup` is painful) - Data consistency is critical for your use case - Atlas costs are getting out of hand - Your team is constantly fighting with aggregation pipeline syntax **Stick with MongoDB if**: - Document-based queries actually match your data patterns - Schema flexibility is genuinely important (not just "nice to have") - Your team is already productive with MongoDB - Migration costs outweigh potential benefits Companies like Segment migrated from MongoDB to PostgreSQL, but that was their specific situation. Your mileage may vary.

Can I use multiple databases in the same application without creating a mess?

Yes, but be strategic about it. Successful polyglot persistence follows clear boundaries: **Good patterns**: - DynamoDB for user sessions, PostgreSQL for business logic - Cassandra for time-series data, PostgreSQL for reporting - MongoDB for content management, PostgreSQL for e-commerce transactions **Bad patterns**: - Same data duplicated across multiple databases - Complex transactions spanning multiple database types - Different databases for similar use cases (consistency nightmare) **Key principle**: Each database should own specific data domains with clear service boundaries.

What's the biggest mistake teams make when choosing databases?

**Optimizing for problems they don't fucking have.** Teams choose Cassandra because they might need to scale to Netflix levels, then spend 8 months learning distributed systems for an app serving 10,000 users. I've seen startups burn through their Series A learning Kafka and Cassandra instead of building features customers actually want. **Better approach**: Start with [PostgreSQL](https://www.postgresql.org/) for 90% of applications. When you actually hit scaling limits (not when TechCrunch writes about your "potential" scale), then migrate. [Premature optimization](https://wiki.c2.com/?PrematureOptimization) has killed more startups than bad database choices. Your bottleneck is probably your shitty N+1 queries, not your database choice.

How do I know if serverless databases are worth the complexity?

**Serverless databases make sense if**: - Your traffic is unpredictable or spiky - You want to eliminate database operations overhead - Your team focuses on application logic, not infrastructure - Cost scaling with usage is acceptable **Traditional databases are better if**: - Your workload is predictable and steady - You have database administration expertise - Cost predictability matters more than operational simplicity - You need complex queries that don't map to serverless patterns The complexity isn't in the databases themselves - it's in changing how your team thinks about data modeling and application architecture.

Currently viewing the AI version

Switch to human version

Serverless Database Comparison: Operational Intelligence

Executive Summary

Only DynamoDB is truly serverless. Aurora Serverless, MongoDB Atlas, and Cassandra Astra are managed hosting with serverless marketing. PostgreSQL and MySQL require traditional database administration despite cloud deployment.

Database Reality Check

DynamoDB: True Serverless

Architecture: Zero servers accessible, sub-second auto-scaling, unlimited connections
Performance: Scales from 10 to 40,000+ requests/second instantly
Critical Limitation: Single-table design requires complete application redesign

Cost Profile:

Typical: $150-500/month (spikes to $5k during viral traffic)
50% price reduction in late 2024 makes it competitive with managed PostgreSQL

Implementation Requirements:

3-6 months developer learning curve for single-table patterns
Complete data model redesign from relational to NoSQL
Limited transactions (25 items, 4MB maximum)

Aurora Serverless: PostgreSQL/MySQL with Managed Scaling

Architecture: 0.5-128 ACU scaling, wire-compatible with standard PostgreSQL/MySQL
Performance: 3x better throughput than standard RDS, 15-30 second scaling delay
Critical Limitation: Scaling lag creates poor user experience during traffic spikes

Cost Profile:

Typical production: $2,000-5,000/month (mysterious billing creep reported)
$0.90/hour per ACU with unpredictable scaling costs

Operational Requirements:

RDS Proxy required for Lambda functions ($0.015/hour per connection)
CloudWatch monitoring setup complexity
4-6 month migration timeline including operational changes

MongoDB Atlas: Document Database with Pricing Trap

Architecture: Cluster-based with manual scaling, M10+ required for production
Performance: Good for document queries, limited by connection throttling
Critical Limitation: Pricing escalates rapidly beyond development use

Cost Profile:

M10 ($57/month): Development only
M30+ ($300-1,200/month): Production with replica sets and backups
M60+ triggers pricing trap for real scale

Migration Considerations:

Easier than DynamoDB (table-to-collection mapping initially)
Sharding mistakes are permanent (cannot change shard key)
Aggregation pipeline learning curve for SQL developers

Cassandra Astra: Linear Scaling with Expertise Requirements

Architecture: Distributed ring with linear node scaling, no single points of failure
Performance: Handles 100k+ writes/second, linear capacity scaling
Critical Limitation: Requires distributed systems expertise

Cost Profile:

Minimum: $25/month
Production: $100-2,000/month based on operation volume

Operational Reality:

Data modeling nightmare (multiple tables per query pattern)
JVM heap tuning, compaction strategies required
Production debugging requires PhD-level expertise

PostgreSQL/MySQL: Traditional Architecture in Cloud Hosting

Architecture: Connection-limited, manual scaling, full SQL compatibility
Performance: Excellent for complex queries, poor for serverless patterns
Critical Limitation: Connection exhaustion under serverless load

Cost Profile:

Managed hosting: $200+/month baseline
Hidden costs: monitoring, backups, read replicas

Serverless Issues:

100 connection default limit causes "FATAL: sorry, too many clients"
Requires connection pooling architecture changes
Lambda functions need RDS Proxy or connection management

Decision Matrix

Choose DynamoDB When:

Traffic is unpredictable/spiky
Application can work with NoSQL patterns
Zero administration priority
Budget can handle usage-based billing

Choose Aurora Serverless When:

Complex SQL queries required
Team knows PostgreSQL/MySQL
Can tolerate 15-30 second scaling delays
Budget allows $3,000+ monthly costs

Choose MongoDB Atlas When:

Document patterns fit naturally
Schema flexibility genuinely needed
Rapid development priority
Content management/catalog systems

Choose Cassandra When:

Massive write throughput needed (100k+ ops/sec)
Global distribution required
Time-series/IoT data patterns
Team has distributed systems expertise

Choose Traditional PostgreSQL/MySQL When:

Workload is steady-state with known patterns
Complex relationships and joins central
Predictable costs required
Existing database administration expertise

Migration Reality

Migration Timelines (Actual vs. Expected):

DynamoDB migration: 12+ months (complete application rewrite)
Aurora Serverless: 4-6 months (operational complexity)
MongoDB Atlas: 6-8 months (data modeling changes)
Cassandra: 15-18 months (distributed systems learning)

Hidden Migration Costs:

Engineering time: 1+ year senior developer effort
Training: $25k+ for team certification
Consultant fees: $300-400/hour specialists
Dual-running period: 4+ months infrastructure costs
Opportunity cost: delayed feature development

Common Migration Failures:

DynamoDB: Attempting to replicate SQL patterns creates hot partitions
MongoDB: Wrong shard key selection (permanent mistake)
Cassandra: Inadequate distributed systems knowledge
Aurora: Underestimating operational complexity changes

Performance Characteristics

Read Latency (P99):

DynamoDB: 1-3ms
Aurora: 2-5ms (plus RDS Proxy overhead)
MongoDB: 5-15ms
Cassandra: 1-5ms (partition key access)
PostgreSQL: 2-5ms (direct connection)

Scaling Response Time:

DynamoDB: <1 second
Aurora: 15-30 seconds
MongoDB: Manual intervention required
Cassandra: 2-5 minutes (node addition)
PostgreSQL: Manual provisioning

Critical Warnings

DynamoDB Gotchas:

Hot partitions destroy performance
Scan operations create massive bills
25-item transaction limit
Single-table design learning curve

Aurora Serverless Gotchas:

Mysterious billing increases common
Scaling lag during traffic spikes
RDS Proxy required for Lambda
Connection pooling complexity

MongoDB Atlas Gotchas:

M10 instances unusable for production
Pricing trap above M60 tier
Shard key changes require full migration
Aggregation pipeline complexity

Cassandra Gotchas:

Tombstone accumulation degrades performance
Compaction strategy tuning required
Multiple tables per query pattern
Distributed systems debugging complexity

PostgreSQL/MySQL Gotchas:

Connection exhaustion under load
"FATAL: sorry, too many clients" errors
Memory consumption during high load
Connection pooling architecture requirements

Cost Optimization Strategies

DynamoDB:

Design partition keys for even distribution
Use Query operations, avoid Scan
Monitor CloudWatch metrics constantly
Set up billing alerts

Aurora:

Use read replicas for predictable scaling
Monitor ACU usage patterns
Consider scheduled scaling for known patterns
Optimize queries to reduce ACU consumption

MongoDB:

Stay below M60 pricing tier if possible
Use Atlas Data Lake for analytics
Optimize aggregation pipelines
Consider self-hosted for cost control

Cassandra:

Design for linear scaling needs
Optimize compaction strategies
Monitor node utilization
Use time-based partition keys for time-series data

Operational Requirements

Monitoring Complexity (Low to High):

DynamoDB: Built-in CloudWatch
Aurora: CloudWatch + custom metrics
MongoDB: Atlas monitoring + custom
Cassandra: Astra console + significant custom monitoring
PostgreSQL: Full custom monitoring stack

Security Management:

DynamoDB: IAM integration (simplest)
Aurora: VPC + RDS security groups
MongoDB: Atlas IP whitelist + authentication
Cassandra: Token-based + IP restrictions
PostgreSQL: Full security configuration required

Backup Management:

DynamoDB: Automatic point-in-time recovery
Aurora: Managed continuous backups
MongoDB: Atlas automatic backups
Cassandra: Managed snapshots
PostgreSQL: Custom backup strategy required

Use Case Optimization

High-Performance Patterns:

Key-value lookups: DynamoDB optimal
Complex analytics: PostgreSQL required
Document storage: MongoDB natural fit
Time-series data: Cassandra purpose-built
ACID transactions: PostgreSQL non-negotiable

Anti-Patterns:

DynamoDB for complex queries: Scan operations expensive
PostgreSQL for serverless: Connection management nightmare
MongoDB for financial data: Consistency concerns
Cassandra for simple applications: Operational overhead excessive

Technology Maturity Assessment

Production Readiness:

PostgreSQL: Mature, 30+ years of production use
MySQL: Mature, widespread adoption
DynamoDB: Mature for AWS environments
MongoDB: Mature with known scaling patterns
Cassandra: Mature but requires specialized expertise

Community Support Quality:

PostgreSQL: Excellent documentation, large community
MySQL: Good documentation, Oracle backing
DynamoDB: AWS documentation quality varies
MongoDB: Commercial support available, good docs
Cassandra: Apache project, expert community required

Serverless Database Comparison: Operational Intelligence

Executive Summary

Database Reality Check

DynamoDB: True Serverless

Aurora Serverless: PostgreSQL/MySQL with Managed Scaling

MongoDB Atlas: Document Database with Pricing Trap

Cassandra Astra: Linear Scaling with Expertise Requirements

PostgreSQL/MySQL: Traditional Architecture in Cloud Hosting

Decision Matrix

Choose DynamoDB When:

Choose Aurora Serverless When:

Choose MongoDB Atlas When:

Choose Cassandra When:

Choose Traditional PostgreSQL/MySQL When:

Migration Reality

Migration Timelines (Actual vs. Expected):

Hidden Migration Costs:

Common Migration Failures:

Performance Characteristics

Read Latency (P99):

Scaling Response Time:

Critical Warnings

DynamoDB Gotchas:

Aurora Serverless Gotchas:

MongoDB Atlas Gotchas:

Cassandra Gotchas:

PostgreSQL/MySQL Gotchas:

Cost Optimization Strategies

DynamoDB:

Aurora:

MongoDB:

Cassandra:

Operational Requirements

Monitoring Complexity (Low to High):

Security Management:

Backup Management:

Use Case Optimization

High-Performance Patterns:

Anti-Patterns:

Technology Maturity Assessment

Production Readiness:

Community Support Quality:

Related Tools & Recommendations

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MariaDB vs SQLite vs CockroachDB - Pick the Database That Won't Ruin Your Life

MongoDB vs PostgreSQL vs MySQL: Which One Won't Ruin Your Weekend

Why I Finally Dumped Cassandra After 5 Years of 3AM Hell

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MariaDB - Performance Analysis 2025

MariaDB - What MySQL Should Have Been

Kafka + MongoDB + Kubernetes + Prometheus Integration - When Event Streams Break

MySQL Replication - How to Keep Your Database Alive When Shit Goes Wrong

MySQL Alternatives That Don't Suck - A Migration Reality Check

How to Migrate PostgreSQL 15 to 16 Without Destroying Your Weekend

GitOps Integration Hell: Docker + Kubernetes + ArgoCD + Prometheus

SQL Server 2025 - Vector Search Finally Works (Sort Of)

MongoDB Alternatives: Choose the Right Database for Your Specific Use Case

MongoDB Alternatives: The Migration Reality Check

Apache Cassandra - The Database That Scales Forever (and Breaks Spectacularly)

How to Fix Your Slow-as-Hell Cassandra Cluster

How These Database Platforms Will Fuck Your Budget

SQLite - The Database That Just Works

SQLite Performance: When It All Goes to Shit

Docker Daemon Won't Start on Linux - Fix This Shit Now

Linux Foundation Takes Control of Solo.io's AI Agent Gateway - August 25, 2025