Why Bolt.new Actually Works (Unlike Most AI Coding Tools)

I've used GitHub Copilot for two years. It's great at autocomplete but terrible when you actually need to run the code. Same with v0 - beautiful components that don't connect to databases or install packages.

Bolt.new is different. It actually executes the code it writes.

The Problem with Other AI Tools

Here's what happens with Copilot:

  1. AI suggests a React component
  2. Copy-paste into your editor
  3. TypeScript errors because wrong imports
  4. Spend hours fixing dependencies
  5. Works on your machine, breaks everywhere else

v0 generates pretty React components but no backend logic, no databases, no additional packages. Basically fancy HTML.

What Bolt.new Actually Does

Bolt.new runs on WebContainers - basically Node.js compiled to WebAssembly that runs in your browser. When the AI says "let me install Express", it actually runs npm install express and it works.

No permission errors. No Docker containers. No local setup. Just works in the browser.

Last week I asked it to build a todo app with authentication. Here's what it did:

  • Installed Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind
  • Set up Supabase auth with row-level security
  • Generated API routes
  • Started dev server
  • Deployed to production

Took maybe 10 minutes. No dependencies on my machine.

Real Development Environment

Bolt.new Development Environment

The AI has access to everything you'd expect in a real dev environment:

  • npm registry (install any package)
  • Terminal with bash commands
  • File system operations
  • Network requests to external APIs
  • Database connections via Prisma, Drizzle, etc.
  • Git operations

I watched it debug a CORS issue by reading the error, installing the right middleware, and fixing it. Copilot would just suggest fixes you'd have to implement yourself.

The Cost Reality

It's expensive. Starts at $20/month but you'll burn through tokens fast. I hit my daily limit building an auth app with database connections. Budget at least $50/month if you're building real projects.

Worth it though. Beats spending 4 hours setting up Docker and fighting dependency conflicts. The GitHub repo has over 15k stars so I'm not alone in thinking this.

Which AI Coding Tool Actually Works? (Honest Comparison)

What You Actually Want

Bolt.new

v0 (Vercel)

Cursor

Replit

GitHub Copilot

Can it run the code?

✅ Full Node.js in browser

❌ Just pretty components

✅ If you set it up locally

✅ Works in cloud

❌ Code only, no execution

Will it install packages?

npm install works

❌ Static components only

✅ Uses your local setup

✅ Package management included

❌ You handle dependencies

Debugging when shit breaks?

✅ Can see errors + fix them

❌ Good luck with that

✅ Best debugging experience

✅ Decent terminal access

❌ Suggests fixes, can't run them

Deployment hassle

✅ One-click to .bolt.host

✅ Vercel integration rocks

❌ You figure it out

✅ Built-in hosting

❌ Deploy yourself

Real cost per month

💸 $50-100 (token burn)

💰 Free for basic use

💰 $20 (actually $20)

💰 $20-40 (usage-based)

💵 $10 (cheapest)

Learning curve

🔥 Chat and done

🔥 Point, click, copy

🔶 IDE setup required

🔶 Cloud IDE learning

🔥 Install extension, go

What Actually Works (And What Breaks) in Bolt.new

The WebContainers Magic That Actually Works

Bolt.new runs on WebContainers - a full Node.js runtime compiled to WebAssembly. Sounds crazy but it actually works.

VS Code React Development

What Actually Runs Without Breaking

I've tested a bunch of frameworks in Bolt.new. Here's what works reliably:

React Development Environment

Frontend frameworks that work:

  • React 18 + Next.js 14 - works perfectly, App Router and all
  • Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 - solid, no issues with Composition API
  • Svelte + SvelteKit - surprisingly fast builds
  • Astro - great for content sites

Styling that doesn't break:

  • Tailwind CSS - works flawlessly, JIT compilation and everything
  • CSS Modules - no issues with scoping
  • Styled Components - works but slows down builds
  • Sass/SCSS - compiles fine, no Python dependencies needed

Build tools that work:

  • Vite - lightning fast, HMR works perfectly
  • Webpack - slower but works for complex configs
  • Turbo - monorepo builds work great
  • esbuild - blazing fast for simple projects

Database Connections (The Tricky Part)

Database stuff works but has limitations:

What works:

  • Supabase - full auth + database + real-time subscriptions
  • PlanetScale - MySQL with branching, solid performance
  • Neon - serverless Postgres, works well for small apps
  • Firebase - Firestore + Auth works fine
  • MongoDB Atlas - via connection string, no issues

What doesn't work:

  • Local Postgres/MySQL instances (obviously)
  • Redis clusters (browser limitations)
  • Any database requiring system-level drivers

Real Performance Numbers (From My Testing)

I built the same Next.js app locally vs Bolt.new. Here's what happened:

Cold start times:

  • Local development: ~30 seconds (npm install + next dev)
  • Bolt.new: ~8 seconds (WebContainer boot + package install)

Hot reload speeds:

  • Local with Vite: ~200ms
  • Bolt.new: ~350ms (still pretty snappy)

Build times for medium React app (~50 components):

  • Local: ~45 seconds
  • Bolt.new: ~60 seconds (acceptable for prototyping)

Memory usage:

  • Local Node.js: ~800MB RAM
  • Bolt.new WebContainer: ~400MB (browser handles garbage collection better)

What Breaks and When

WebContainer limitations I've hit:

  • Can't run Docker containers (obviously)
  • No Python, Rust, or other runtimes
  • Some npm packages with native binaries fail (node-gyp dependencies)
  • File uploads larger than 25MB timeout
  • WebGL/Canvas apps consume massive memory

Token burn issues:

  • Complex apps hit daily limits fast (learned this the hard way)
  • AI refactoring entire codebases burns 100k+ tokens
  • Each conversation continuation costs tokens, even for simple fixes

Browser crashes:

  • Large Next.js apps (200+ components) sometimes freeze the tab
  • Multiple projects open = browser memory hell
  • Chrome works better than Safari or Firefox

The platform works great for JavaScript/TypeScript projects up to medium complexity. Once you need system-level stuff or non-JS runtimes, you're better off with local development.

Real Questions Developers Actually Ask

Q

Is this just another overhyped AI coding tool?

A

Honestly? Kind of, but it's the first one that actually runs the code it writes. I've wasted hours with Copilot suggestions that don't compile and v0 components that look pretty but don't work. Bolt.new actually executes the code in a real Node.js environment and debugs its own mistakes.

Q

Will I hit token limits constantly?

A

Yeah, you will. I burned through my daily limit in about 3 hours building a moderately complex app with auth. The free tier gives you 150K tokens daily which sounds like a lot but isn't. Budget $50-100/month for serious development.

Q

Does the AI actually understand what it's building or just copy-paste shit?

A

Mixed bag. For standard CRUD apps with React + Supabase, it's surprisingly competent. Handles auth flows, database schemas, API routes correctly. But ask it to integrate something niche and it hallucinates APIs that don't exist.

Q

Can I use my own packages or am I stuck with what they support?

A

You can install any package from npm.

I've used Prisma, tRPC, Zod, custom UI libraries, etc. The limitation is packages with native binaries

  • anything requiring node-gyp compilation will fail.
Q

What happens when the WebContainer shits itself?

A

It happens.

Usually you get an error like WebContainer failed to start or the tab just freezes. Refresh the page and you lose all unsaved work. GitHub sync helps but isn't automatic

  • you need to manually push changes.
Q

Is the code quality actually production-ready?

A

For simple apps, yes. For complex stuff, it needs cleanup. The AI tends to over-engineer solutions and doesn't follow consistent patterns across files. I've shipped apps built with Bolt.new but always refactor the code afterwards.

Q

Can I debug when something breaks?

A

Better than you'd expect. You get full browser dev tools, can see the terminal output, check network requests, etc. The AI can read error messages and usually fixes obvious issues like missing imports or type errors.

Q

Why does it keep suggesting Next.js for everything?

A

The AI has a hard-on for Next.js. Even when I ask for a simple static site, it wants App Router and server components. You can force it to use Vite + React or SvelteKit but requires being explicit.

Q

Does my app data stay private?

A

Your code runs in isolated WebContainers but the AI conversations go through StackBlitz's servers.

Don't paste API keys or secrets in chat

Q

Can I actually ship real products with this?

A

I've shipped 3 side projects built entirely in Bolt.new. Works fine for MVPs and prototypes. Limitations show up when you need custom deployment, advanced CI/CD, or integration with enterprise systems. Good for getting to market fast, not for complex production systems.

Related Tools & Recommendations

review
Similar content

Bolt.new vs V0 AI: Real-World Web Development Comparison

Spoiler: They both suck at different things, but one sucks less

Bolt.new
/review/bolt-new-vs-v0-ai-web-development/comprehensive-comparison-review
100%
tool
Similar content

v0 by Vercel's Agent Mode: Why It Broke Everything & Alternatives

Vercel's AI tool got ambitious and broke what actually worked

v0 by Vercel
/tool/v0/agentic-features-migration
74%
pricing
Similar content

GitHub Copilot Alternatives ROI: Calculate AI Coding Value

The Brutal Math: How to Figure Out If AI Coding Tools Actually Pay for Themselves

GitHub Copilot
/pricing/github-copilot-alternatives/roi-calculator
56%
compare
Recommended

Cursor vs Copilot vs Codeium vs Windsurf vs Amazon Q vs Claude Code: Enterprise Reality Check

I've Watched Dozens of Enterprise AI Tool Rollouts Crash and Burn. Here's What Actually Works.

Cursor
/compare/cursor/copilot/codeium/windsurf/amazon-q/claude/enterprise-adoption-analysis
54%
compare
Recommended

Augment Code vs Claude Code vs Cursor vs Windsurf

Tried all four AI coding tools. Here's what actually happened.

cursor
/compare/augment-code/claude-code/cursor/windsurf/enterprise-ai-coding-reality-check
54%
news
Recommended

Claude AI Can Now Control Your Browser and It's Both Amazing and Terrifying

Anthropic just launched a Chrome extension that lets Claude click buttons, fill forms, and shop for you - August 27, 2025

anthropic
/news/2025-08-27/anthropic-claude-chrome-browser-extension
51%
news
Recommended

Hackers Are Using Claude AI to Write Phishing Emails and We Saw It Coming

Anthropic catches cybercriminals red-handed using their own AI to build better scams - August 27, 2025

anthropic
/news/2025-08-27/anthropic-claude-hackers-weaponize-ai
51%
news
Recommended

Anthropic Pulls the Classic "Opt-Out or We Own Your Data" Move

September 28 Deadline to Stop Claude From Reading Your Shit - August 28, 2025

NVIDIA AI Chips
/news/2025-08-28/anthropic-claude-data-policy-changes
51%
tool
Recommended

Stripe Terminal React Native SDK - Turn Your App Into a Payment Terminal That Doesn't Suck

integrates with Stripe Terminal React Native SDK

Stripe Terminal React Native SDK
/tool/stripe-terminal-react-native-sdk/overview
48%
tool
Similar content

Bolt.new Performance Optimization: Fix Memory & Crashes

When Bolt.new crashes your browser tab, eats all your memory, and makes you question your life choices - here's how to fight back and actually ship something

Bolt.new
/tool/bolt-new/performance-optimization
47%
tool
Similar content

OpenAI Browser Developer Guide: Integrate AI into Web Apps

Building on the AI-Powered Web Browser Platform

OpenAI Browser
/tool/openai-browser/developer-integration-guide
41%
integration
Similar content

Claude API Node.js Express: Advanced Code Execution & Tools Guide

Build production-ready applications with Claude's code execution and file processing tools

Claude API
/integration/claude-api-nodejs-express/advanced-tools-integration
39%
compare
Similar content

VS Code vs Zed vs Cursor: Best AI Editor for Developers?

VS Code is slow as hell, Zed is missing stuff you need, and Cursor costs money but actually works

Visual Studio Code
/compare/visual-studio-code/zed/cursor/ai-editor-comparison-2025
39%
tool
Similar content

Debugging AI Coding Assistant Failures: Copilot, Cursor & More

Your AI assistant just crashed VS Code again? Welcome to the club - here's how to actually fix it

GitHub Copilot
/tool/ai-coding-assistants/debugging-production-failures
38%
compare
Recommended

I Tested 4 AI Coding Tools So You Don't Have To

Here's what actually works and what broke my workflow

Cursor
/compare/cursor/github-copilot/claude-code/windsurf/codeium/comprehensive-ai-coding-assistant-comparison
36%
tool
Recommended

TradingView - Where Traders Go to Avoid Paying $2,000/Month for Bloomberg

The charting platform that made professional-grade analysis accessible to anyone who isn't JPMorgan

TradingView
/tool/tradingview/overview
36%
tool
Similar content

Codeium: Free AI Coding That Works - Overview & Setup Guide

Started free, stayed free, now does entire features for you

Codeium (now part of Windsurf)
/tool/codeium/overview
34%
tool
Similar content

Windsurf Team Collaboration Guide: Features & Real-World Rollout

Discover Windsurf's Wave 8 team collaboration features, how AI assists developers on shared codebases, and the real-world challenges of rolling out these tools

Windsurf
/tool/windsurf/team-collaboration-guide
33%
tool
Similar content

LangChain: Python Library for Building AI Apps & RAG

Discover LangChain, the Python library for building AI applications. Understand its architecture, package structure, and get started with RAG pipelines. Include

LangChain
/tool/langchain/overview
33%
review
Recommended

I Spent a Month Building Real Apps with Lovable - Here's What Actually Happened

competes with Lovable

Lovable
/review/lovable/honest-assessment
33%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization