Claude Code: Smart but painful to use

Claude Code Interface

AI Code Development Workflow

Claude is probably the smartest of these tools, but using it makes me want to go back to Stack Overflow.

The web interface is fucking terrible. You copy code from your editor, paste it in a chat box, copy the answer back. Over and over. I tried their VS Code extension four times - first time it didn't install, second time it installed but didn't work, third time it worked for two days then started crashing VS Code on startup, fourth time I gave up. Just copy-paste hell forever.

The weird part is it actually understands code really well. I pasted our auth service and it immediately spotted a bug I missed. It can explain React hooks better than most of the tutorials I've read.

Good stuff

Claude 3.5 actually understands our codebase architecture. I threw our entire auth service at it - 800 lines with database schemas and Redis session handling - and it spotted a race condition in our payment processing that our tests missed. Also found a memory leak in our Redis cleanup that I'd been debugging for three weeks.

Annoying stuff

The rate limits hit when you're debugging production issues. You're in the middle of tracing a payment failure and get "message limit reached, try again in 5 hours." Great fucking timing when customers can't checkout.

Pricing nightmare

$20/month is bullshit marketing. Bill went from $47 in January to $380 in February when we were debugging that memory leak. No warning, just a credit card charge that made our CFO send some very angry Slack messages. Their usage calculator is useless - just shows "depends on usage" like that helps anyone budget.

Context loss

Mid-conversation it loses its fucking mind. You paste a stack trace from production, it analyzes it for 10 minutes, then suddenly "I don't have access to your code." I literally just showed you the entire error trace. This happened during our Black Friday deployment when we had customers hitting checkout errors. Perfect timing.

The worst part? It suggested storing credit card numbers in localStorage once. Our security team wanted to burn the internet down after that gem.

Claude could be brilliant with a real editor integration. Instead it's stuck in a chat box designed for asking about weather, not debugging production systems at 3am.

Costs and basic info

Basic stuff

Augment Code

Claude Code

Cursor

Windsurf

Monthly Cost

$150-250 (they want enterprise tax)

$20 (lol) to $400+

$20 baseline, more when used

$15-60 depending

Bill surprises

Fixed pricing thank fuck

Every goddamn month

Sometimes when team goes crazy

Started cheap then wasn't

Works with your editor

Yes

No (web only)

Their version of VS Code

VS Code fork

Enterprise stuff

Has it

Some of it

Basic compliance theater

Basically nothing

Augment Code: Costs more but works better

Augment Code Logo

Augment Agent Interface

Augment costs the most but crashes the least, which is something I guess.

Actually handles big messy codebases

Our React/TypeScript project is a disaster - 15,000 lines of TypeScript, legacy PHP auth from 2019, and some jQuery crap nobody wants to touch. Augment indexed all of it without shitting itself. Found a Redis connection pool leak that was killing our staging server every Tuesday for three months. I debugged this for weeks before Augment spotted it in our connection cleanup code.

OK, fine, the context thing actually works. It doesn't just search for text - it understands how functions connect between files. Ask about a bug and it can trace from the frontend component down to the database query causing problems.

Fixed pricing

$250/month for the Max plan (their "$200-something" is actually $250 - classic enterprise pricing bullshit). But at least you know what the bill will be. No surprise charges when your team actually uses it during crunch time.

Terminal tool actually works

The CLI doesn't crash every five minutes, which is more than I can say for any other AI tool. Can ask questions from vim without opening another fucking browser tab. Found 12 database connections we weren't closing in our API routes - would have taken days to track down manually.

Actually finds real issues

During code review it spotted SQL injection vulnerabilities in our legacy PHP auth that Snyk missed. Found string concatenation in database queries from 2019 that could have fucked us badly. Also caught a race condition in our payment processing that only happened under load.

Enterprise stuff

Their sales team called us six times before we even tried the product. Classic enterprise software experience. But they have SOC2 compliance and other certifications that make our security team less grumpy. Can run on-premise if you're paranoid about sending code to the cloud.

Still pisses me off

Gets confused by Webpack output and suggests "refactoring" generated bundle code. Auto-generated GraphQL schemas make it completely useless - keeps trying to optimize machine-generated queries. The web interface crawls on projects over 10k files.

My take

Augment costs the most but crashes the least. No surprise bills, doesn't lose context mid-conversation, and won't suggest storing passwords in plain text. If you have a complex codebase and can justify $250/month to your CFO, might be worth the headache.

For simple projects or tight budgets, absolutely not worth it. But for production systems where downtime costs more than the subscription, it's the least shitty option.

How they actually work in practice

Day-to-day stuff

Augment Code

Claude Code

Cursor

Windsurf

Big projects

Doesn't die on 15k+ files

Forgets what you were doing

Used to crash on large files, more stable now but still wonky

Actually handles large codebases

Your editor

Works with vim/emacs/whatever

Web only (fucking annoying)

Their VS Code fork

VS Code fork but crashes sometimes

Remembers context

Remembers better than I do

Forgets mid-conversation

Usually remembers unless it doesn't

Loses track randomly

Terminal use

CLI actually works

No terminal option

Basic support that sucks

Decent when it works

Stability

Rarely crashes (miracle)

Timeouts during production issues

Crashes when you need it most

Pretty stable mostly

Common questions

Q

Which one won't financially fuck us during crunch time?

A

Augment has fixed pricing so you can actually budget for it. Claude's usage-based billing is a trap

  • we went from $67 to $423 in one month with no warning. Cursor starts at $20 then hits you with overages when you actually need it. Windsurf does the classic bait-and-switch
  • cheap at first, expensive once you're hooked.None of them are "budget-friendly" if your team actually uses them. Budget for at least 3x whatever their marketing says.
Q

Do they work on big messy legacy codebases?

A

Our project is 15,000 lines of TypeScript mixed with legacy PHP from 2019 and some jQuery nobody wants to touch. Augment indexed all of it without dying. Claude works until you show it too much code, then forgets everything. Cursor used to crash every time I opened large files but got more stable recently. Windsurf handles large projects but gets confused when you have circular imports.If your codebase is a disaster like ours, Augment is the only one that doesn't shit itself.

Q

What about security and compliance bullshit?

A

Augment has all the SOC2 paperwork your security team wants. Claude has some certifications but not enough to make enterprise security happy. Cursor has basic compliance theater. Windsurf has basically nothing.If compliance is critical and your security team actually reads audit reports, Augment is your only option. Everyone else is still figuring out enterprise security requirements.

Q

Can you run them on your own servers?

A

Only Augment offers on-premise deployment as far as I know. Everything else is cloud-only. Might be important if you can't send your code to third-party services.

Q

Which one fits into your workflow best?

A

Augment works with most editors. Claude is web-only which sucks. Cursor and Windsurf are VS Code forks, so if you use VS Code already they're familiar. If you use vim or something else, your options are more limited.

Q

Are the code suggestions actually secure or will they fuck up production?

A

They all make mistakes that could destroy your production if you're not careful. I've seen Cursor suggest database migrations that would drop tables, Claude recommend storing credit card numbers in localStorage, and Augment generate API endpoints with no rate limiting.They're all excellent at finding bugs but terrible at security best practices. Don't trust any of them blindly for security-critical code unless you want your security team to hate you.

Q

How long before your team stops hating them?

A

Cursor and Windsurf took about a week since they're just VS Code with extra buttons. Augment took two weeks to understand how their context system works and why it's actually useful. Claude took a month because the chat interface fights against everything developers expect from a coding tool.Half our team refused to learn Cursor shortcuts and just used it like regular VS Code. The junior developers loved Windsurf until it started autocompleting their mistakes faster than they could type.

Q

What languages don't make them completely useless?

A

Claude is solid with Python and Java

Script, mediocre with everything else. Cursor is excellent with TypeScript but loses its mind with anything less popular. Augment works okay with most languages but nothing exceptional

  • just consistently adequate. Windsurf seems decent across the board but I haven't stressed-tested it.Haven't tried any of them with Rust, Go, or anything that's not web development. They're probably terrible at those but I can't confirm.

Related Tools & Recommendations

alternatives
Popular choice

Firebase Alternatives That Don't Suck - Real Options for 2025

Your Firebase bills are killing your budget. Here are the alternatives that actually work.

Firebase
/alternatives/firebase/best-firebase-alternatives
60%
tool
Popular choice

Node.js Production Deployment - How to Not Get Paged at 3AM

Optimize Node.js production deployment to prevent outages. Learn common pitfalls, PM2 clustering, troubleshooting FAQs, and effective monitoring for robust Node

Node.js
/tool/node.js/production-deployment
52%
news
Popular choice

Quantum Computing Gets Slightly Less Impossible, Still Years Away

University of Sydney achieves quantum computing breakthrough: single atom logic gates with GKP error correction. Learn about this impressive lab demo and its lo

GitHub Copilot
/news/2025-08-22/quantum-computing-breakthrough
50%
news
Popular choice

Quantum Computing Finally Did Useful Shit Instead of Just Burning Venture Capital

Three papers dropped that might actually matter instead of just helping physics professors get tenure

GitHub Copilot
/news/2025-08-22/quantum-computing-breakthroughs
47%
tool
Popular choice

GitHub Copilot - AI Pair Programming That Actually Works

Stop copy-pasting from ChatGPT like a caveman - this thing lives inside your editor

GitHub Copilot
/tool/github-copilot/overview
45%
news
Popular choice

Mistral AI Reportedly Closes $14B Valuation Funding Round

French AI Startup Raises €2B at $14B Valuation

/news/2025-09-03/mistral-ai-14b-funding
42%
news
Popular choice

Apple Admits Defeat, Begs Google to Fix Siri's AI Disaster

After years of promising AI breakthroughs, Apple quietly asks Google to replace Siri's brain with Gemini

Technology News Aggregation
/news/2025-08-25/apple-google-siri-gemini
40%
news
Popular choice

OpenAI Lets Employees Cash Out $10.3 Billion While the Getting is Good

Smart Employees Take the Money Before the Bubble Pops

/news/2025-09-03/openai-stock-sale-expansion
40%
alternatives
Popular choice

Stripe Alternatives: Cheaper Payment Processors That Won't Freeze Your Account

Small business alternatives to Stripe's 2.9% fees with real customer service and account stability

Stripe
/alternatives/stripe/migration-cost-alternatives
40%
news
Popular choice

US Revokes Chip Export Licenses for TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix

When Bureaucrats Decide Your $50M/Month Fab Should Go Idle

/news/2025-09-03/us-chip-export-restrictions
40%
news
Popular choice

Quantum Computing Breakthroughs: Error Correction and Parameter Tuning Unlock New Performance - August 23, 2025

Near-term quantum advantages through optimized error correction and advanced parameter tuning reveal promising pathways for practical quantum computing applicat

GitHub Copilot
/news/2025-08-23/quantum-computing-breakthroughs
40%
news
Popular choice

Google Survives Antitrust Case With Chrome Intact, Has to Share Search Secrets

Microsoft finally gets to see Google's homework after 20 years of getting their ass kicked in search

/news/2025-09-03/google-antitrust-survival
40%
news
Popular choice

Apple's Annual "Revolutionary" iPhone Show Starts Monday

September 9 keynote will reveal marginally thinner phones Apple calls "groundbreaking" - September 3, 2025

/news/2025-09-03/iphone-17-launch-countdown
40%
news
Popular choice

Kid Dies After Talking to ChatGPT, OpenAI Scrambles to Add Parental Controls

A teenager killed himself and now everyone's pretending AI safety features will fix letting algorithms counsel suicidal kids

/news/2025-09-03/chatgpt-parental-controls
40%
news
Popular choice

OpenAI Drops $1.1 Billion on A/B Testing Company, Names CEO as New CTO

OpenAI just paid $1.1 billion for A/B testing. Either they finally realized they have no clue what works, or they have too much money.

/news/2025-09-03/openai-statsig-acquisition
40%
news
Popular choice

New Mexico Bets $315 Million That Quantum Computing Will Finally Work This Time

The state built an oil fund and now they're gambling it on quantum computers

/news/2025-09-03/new-mexico-quantum-investment
40%
news
Popular choice

Anthropic Somehow Convinces VCs Claude is Worth $183 Billion

AI bubble or genius play? Anthropic raises $13B, now valued more than most countries' GDP - September 2, 2025

/news/2025-09-02/anthropic-183b-valuation
40%
tool
Popular choice

Python 3.13 - You Can Finally Disable the GIL (But Probably Shouldn't)

After 20 years of asking, we got GIL removal. Your code will run slower unless you're doing very specific parallel math.

Python 3.13
/tool/python-3.13/overview
40%
review
Popular choice

I Got Sick of Editor Wars Without Data, So I Tested the Shit Out of Zed vs VS Code vs Cursor

30 Days of Actually Using These Things - Here's What Actually Matters

Zed
/review/zed-vs-vscode-vs-cursor/performance-benchmark-review
40%
tool
Popular choice

Thunder Client - VS Code API Testing (With Recent Paywall Drama)

What started as a free Postman alternative for VS Code developers got paywalled in late 2024

Thunder Client
/tool/thunder-client/overview
40%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization