Ever tried logging per-layer metrics from a 70B model to W&B and watched your browser tab crash? I've lost count of how many expensive training runs I couldn't debug because the tracker died. Neptune was built by people who got tired of this shit. These guys actually test their stuff with real workloads instead of toy examples.
The Real Problem with Experiment Tracking
Here's what happens with most trackers when you scale up: You're training a foundation model, logging gradients from every transformer layer because you need to catch vanishing gradients early. Your training costs stupid money - like $20K/day in compute. Three hours in, your experiment tracker starts choking on the data volume. The UI becomes unusable, charts won't load, and you're flying blind on a run that's burning money.
Here's what happened the last time I tried W&B with a 30B model: Step 23,000 into a $15K training run, gradients started exploding. W&B dashboard froze trying to load the metrics. Spent 2 hours refreshing the page while burning $200/hour on compute before giving up and switching to command line debugging like a caveman.
Want to know the worst part? The gradient explosion started at step 20,847 - I only found out later by parsing raw logs because W&B couldn't handle loading that much data.
Neptune handles 500k data points per 10 minutes on their Startup plan (5M on Lab plan) without breaking a sweat. I've tracked insane amounts of metrics - like 30K+ per step on massive models - and the charts still rendered instantly. When you're debugging why your loss spiked at step 47,000, you need tools that actually work.
What Makes Neptune Different (Technical Reality)
Most trackers try to do everything in your browser - big mistake when you're dealing with terabytes of metrics. Neptune preprocesses everything server-side, so your browser isn't trying to render millions of data points. This isn't just faster - it's the difference between actually debugging your model and staring at a frozen browser for 4 hours.
The self-hosted version scales horizontally on Kubernetes, which matters when your team is training multiple foundation models simultaneously. Companies like Bioptimus and Navier AI use it because their models are too large and too valuable to risk on trackers that crash.
Neptune vs Everything Else
W&B tries to be a complete MLOps platform - model registry, deployment, the works. Jack of all trades, master of none. Neptune does experiment tracking and does it well. No feature bloat, no surprises when your training run hits the limits of what their "unlimited" tracking can actually handle.
The pricing model makes sense too: you pay for data points, not arbitrary "compute hours" that somehow always end up costing more than expected. $150/month for the Startup plan gets you 1 billion data points. Try logging everything from a serious foundation model training run on W&B and see how fast you blow through their "affordable" pricing.
So what can Neptune actually do for your foundation model training? Let's get into the specifics that matter when you're debugging expensive runs.