The January 2025 CPU Quota Crisis: What Changed and Why It Matters

On January 14, 2025, Fly.io fully enabled CPU quota enforcement changes that have fundamentally altered how applications perform on their platform. What used to be 30-second deploys now take 8+ minutes for Django, Rails, and Node.js applications, catching developers completely off-guard with zero email notification about the breaking change.

Understanding the New CPU Throttling System

The core change is brutal in its simplicity: shared vCPUs are now limited to 1/16th of a CPU core (6.25% baseline), while performance vCPUs get 100% of a dedicated core. This means a shared-cpu-1x machine that previously had access to burst CPU power can now only sustain 62.5 milliseconds of CPU time per second.

Fly.io CPU Throttling Graph - What Throttling Looks Like

The throttling system works on 80ms cycles, where each cycle grants you 5ms of CPU time on a shared-cpu-1x. Any time you don't use gets banked as "burst balance" - but with a low accrual rate that makes startup-heavy applications suffer dramatically.

The Real-World Impact

Deploy Time Explosions: Applications that previously deployed in 30 seconds now take 8-20 minutes to boot because startup processes get throttled immediately. Django apps loading models, Rails apps precompiling assets, and Node.js apps warming up V8 all hit this wall hard.

Production Outages: Multiple users reported immediate production outages when the enforcement went live. Rolling deployments failed because new instances couldn't pass health checks within reasonable timeframes.

Scaling Confusion: A shared-cpu-8x machine still gets the same 6.25% baseline as shared-cpu-1x, making the scaling meaningless for CPU-bound workloads. Users found themselves forced to upgrade to performance instances just to deploy successfully.

Why Fly.io Made This Change

The Predictable Processor Performance initiative aimed to address "noisy neighbor" problems where some applications consumed excessive CPU, affecting others on the same hardware. The change aligns with industry standards - AWS Lambda has similar throttling, Google Cloud Run limits concurrent requests, and most cloud providers limit shared resources.

However, Fly.io completely botched this rollout. Despite their bullshit claims that "a tiny fraction of organizations" would be affected, the change broke apps everywhere. My production Rails app shit the bed middle of the day with zero warning - I found out when users started complaining about 10-second page loads, not from any email from Fly.io.

Fly.io Global Regions - Where Your App Gets Throttled

Zero fucking email notifications about a change this massive violates every change management practice that real platform providers follow.

The Burst Balance System

Fly.io provides a "burst balance" mechanism to soften the throttling impact. Unused CPU time accumulates and can be spent in bursts, but the math is unforgiving:

  • Idle Accumulation: A completely idle shared-cpu-1x accrues only 3.75 minutes of burst balance per hour, similar to AWS EC2 burst credits but with much lower accrual rates
  • Startup Penalty: New machines start with just 5 seconds of burst balance, insufficient for most application startup sequences and unlike Google Cloud Run's generous startup allowances
  • Reset on Restart: Restarting a machine after startup mysteriously works better - took me 3 hours of debugging to figure this shit out, but restart the machine and suddenly it's fast again

Performance vs. Shared CPU Economics

So now you're stuck choosing between broken or expensive:

  • shared-cpu-1x: $2/month but doesn't work
  • performance-1x: $7/month but actually functions

shared-cpu-1x costs $2/month but doesn't work, performance-1x costs $7/month but actually functions. Do the math - about 4x more expensive for basic functionality that worked fine before their throttling disaster. AWS and Google do similar throttling, but they don't spring it on you without warning like Fly.io did.

Critical Performance Questions: CPU Quotas and Optimization

Q

Why did my deploy time jump from 30 seconds to 8+ minutes?

A

The January 2025 CPU quota enforcement throttles shared v

CPUs to 1/16th of a core (6.25% baseline).

Your application's startup process

  • Django loading models, Rails precompiling assets, Node.js warming V8
  • now gets throttled during the most CPU-intensive phase. New machines start with only 5 seconds of burst balance, nowhere near enough for typical startup sequences. My Rails app went from like 45 seconds to deploy to over 10 minutes overnight.
Q

Should I upgrade all my shared CPUs to performance CPUs?

A

**For anything you actually care about:

Yes, because shared CPUs are now basically useless**. The math sucks but it's reality

  • shared-cpu-1x at $0.0027/hour takes 8+ minutes to deploy a simple Django app, while performance-1x at $0.01/hour actually fucking works. $7/month beats explaining to your users why your staging environment is down for 10 minutes during a "quick" deploy.

For hobby projects that you check once a month, shared CPUs might work with blue-green deployments (if you don't use volumes).

Q

Will scaling to shared-cpu-8x help with performance?

A

No, surprisingly not. The baseline CPU quota remains 6.25% regardless of the number of shared vCPUs. Users reported identical throttling on shared-cpu-8x as shared-cpu-1x. The additional vCPUs only help if your application can effectively use parallel processing while staying within the collective quota limits.

Q

Why does restarting my machine after deployment fix the slowness?

A

This is a documented workaround that proves their throttling system is buggy as hell.

I spent 3 hours debugging why our Rails 7.1.2 app was throwing `ActionController::Unknown

Format` errors and responding in 2+ seconds after deployment, then some random person on Discord mentioned restarting fixes it. Sure enough

  • restart the machine and suddenly it's fast again. The burst balance clearly doesn't reset properly during deployment, but Fly.io won't admit their system is broken so they call it a "feature."
Q

How can I monitor CPU throttling on my applications?

A

Check the Fly.io Metrics dashboard for these key indicators:

  • fly_instance_cpu_throttle - Shows throttling time in centiseconds
  • fly_instance_cpu_balance - Your current burst balance
  • fly_instance_cpu_baseline - Your baseline quota (should be 0.0625 for shared CPUs)

You can also access these via the Prometheus API or managed Grafana instance.

Q

Can I optimize my application to work better with CPU quotas?

A

Startup optimization strategies:

  • Lazy load heavy dependencies instead of loading everything at boot
  • Pre-build assets in your Docker image rather than at runtime
  • Use blue-green deployments to avoid health check timeouts (requires giving up volumes)
  • Consider splitting CPU-heavy initialization into background jobs

Runtime optimization:

  • Profile your application to identify CPU hotspots during normal operation
  • Implement efficient caching to reduce CPU-intensive operations
  • Use asynchronous processing for heavy workloads
Q

What about memory optimization - does that help with CPU throttling?

A

Memory won't fix CPU throttling, but optimizing both together improves overall performance and cost efficiency. High memory usage can trigger swapping, which increases CPU usage and makes throttling worse. Monitor fly_instance_memory_swap_free and ensure your application stays within allocated RAM limits.

Q

Is there any way to get more burst balance for startup?

A

Currently, Fly.io provides 5 seconds of initial burst balance, and they've indicated this might be adjusted based on feedback. The accrual rate is tied to your CPU quota

  • idle time below your baseline accumulates as burst balance, but at the low 6.25% baseline, accumulation is painfully slow.
Q

Should I migrate away from Fly.io because of these changes?

A

If you're running anything important, fuck yes. I moved two production apps to Railway after this disaster

  • no CPU throttling bullshit and the pricing is actually honest. Fly.io's global edge stuff is nice, but not when your app can't deploy reliably and you're paying 4x more just to have basic functionality.
Q

Will Fly.io add intermediate CPU tiers between shared and performance?

A

Fly.io has indicated they're "quite likely" to add other vCPU options in the future, potentially offering something between the current 6.25% and 100% allocations. However, no timeline has been provided, and developers need solutions today, not promises for future improvements.

Practical Performance Optimization Strategies for Fly.io

The CPU quota disaster broke every optimization strategy that actually worked before January 2025. I spent 6 hours trying every Docker trick in the book and still got 6-minute deploy times for a basic Node.js app. Here's what actually works now that Fly.io throttled shared CPUs into oblivion.

Docker Tricks That Actually Help Now

I learned this the hard way - put all your heavy shit in the Dockerfile, don't run it at startup where Fly.io will throttle you to death. Pre-compile everything during the build phase.

Docker Multi-stage Build Optimization

## Good: Pre-build assets during image creation
RUN npm run build:production
RUN bundle exec rails assets:precompile

## Bad: These run every time the container starts
CMD [\"sh\", \"-c\", \"npm run build && rails s\"]

Lazy loading saved my ass - don't load everything at startup. Our Django app was loading dozens of models at boot and it would timeout. Now I lazy-load models only when needed and startup is actually reasonable.

Background Processing: Move CPU-intensive startup tasks to background jobs that can run after the health checks pass. I use Sidekiq for Ruby apps, Celery for Python, and Bull for Node.js to offload the heavy shit from startup.

Memory Tricks That Actually Help

Garbage Collection Tuning: Language-specific garbage collection can trigger CPU spikes that push you over quota limits. Configure GC settings for your runtime:

  • Node.js: Use `--max-old-space-size` to control V8 heap limits and reduce GC pressure
    I spent a weekend tuning Ruby GC settings and MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=2 made the biggest difference - learned that the hard way after Rails kept timing out on startup. For Python, disabling GC during Django startup actually helps with the throttling.

Memory Profiling: High memory usage triggers swapping, which increases CPU consumption and makes throttling worse. Monitor these Fly.io metrics:

Use tools like Valgrind for C/C++, memory_profiler for Python, or Node.js built-in heap profiling to identify memory bottlenecks that contribute to CPU throttling.

How to Size Your Instances Without Going Broke

The new economics make instance sizing critical. Here's what I figured out after burning through my budget testing this shit:

  • Hobby projects: shared-cpu-1x with autostop enabled, accept slow deploys
  • Development/staging: shared-cpu-2x or shared-cpu-4x for slightly better startup, but consider blue-green deploys
  • Production: performance-1x minimum for reliable deployment and operation
  • High-traffic production: performance-2x or higher based on actual load testing

Regional Distribution: Spread instances across regions to reduce individual instance load. Fly.io's WireGuard mesh networking makes this operationally simple, and regional distribution can improve both performance and reliability.

Autoscaling Configuration: Set up autoscaling based on CPU metrics rather than just concurrent connections. Monitor fly_instance_cpu metrics and scale before hitting throttling limits.

Deployment Strategy Optimization

Blue-Green Deployments: If you don't use volumes, blue-green deployment strategy works great until you realize you lose persistent storage - which rules out most real applications. I tried this for our Rails app and it worked beautifully until we needed file uploads and realized we'd have to rebuild our entire storage architecture. Also breaks session storage if you're not using Redis or some external store.

[build]
  strategy = \"bluegreen\"

[http_service]
  processes = [\"web\"]
  internal_port = 8080
  force_https = true

  # Give instances more time to warm up
  [http_service.http_options]
    grace_period = \"30s\"

Rolling Deployment Tuning: If you must use rolling deployments (volumes, stateful applications), adjust these settings:

  • Increase health check timeouts to accommodate slower startups
  • Reduce the number of concurrent replacements during deployment
  • Consider using fly deploy --strategy immediate for faster rollbacks

Monitoring and Alerting Setup

The metrics that actually matter (learned this the expensive way):

  • fly_instance_cpu_throttle - Throttling time indicates performance issues
  • fly_instance_cpu_balance - Low balance predicts future throttling
  • fly_app_http_response_time_seconds - End-user impact measurement
  • fly_edge_http_response_time_seconds - Global performance perspective

Set up alerts for:

  • CPU throttling over 10% of total time
  • Burst balance below 60 seconds
  • Response times above your SLA thresholds
  • Deploy times exceeding expected duration.

Framework-specific bullshit I had to figure out (after 2 hours of prod downtime):

Django Applications:

  • Use --lazy-apps flag with Gunicorn to delay model loading
  • Pre-build static files in Docker image, not at startup
  • Consider django-extensions for profiling startup bottlenecks
  • Tune DATABASES['default']['CONN_MAX_AGE'] to reduce connection overhead

Rails Applications:

  • Enable config.eager_load = true in production to front-load initialization
  • Use bootsnap gem for faster boot times
  • Pre-compile assets in Docker build, not at startup
  • Consider derailed_benchmarks gem for memory profiling

Node.js Applications:

  • Use --expose-gc flag and manually trigger garbage collection during idle periods
  • Implement clustering with PM2 or Node.js cluster module to distribute load
  • Pre-build and cache expensive computations in the Docker image
  • Monitor V8 heap usage with --heap-prof during development.

Cost Optimization Strategies

Hybrid Instance Strategy: Use performance instances for critical services and shared instances for less demanding workloads like background workers or admin interfaces.

Autostop Configuration: For development and staging environments, autostop functionality can significantly reduce costs, despite the cold start penalty.

Resource Right-sizing: Regularly review your instance utilization. Over-provisioned performance instances are expensive, but under-provisioned shared instances are unreliable. Use the metrics data to find the sweet spot.

The new CPU quota reality has made performance optimization from a nice-to-have into a mission-critical requirement. Applications that worked fine with previous Fly.io defaults now require careful tuning and potentially higher-tier instances to maintain acceptable performance and deployment reliability.

CPU Performance Tiers: Cost vs. Performance Analysis

CPU Type

Baseline

Monthly Cost (24/7)

Deploy Time

Real-World Performance

Best Use Case

shared-cpu-1x

6.25% (1/16 core)

$2.00

anywhere from 8 to 20 minutes (or longer if Mercury is in retrograde)

Severe throttling during startup, barely usable for production

Hobby projects, demos, services that can tolerate very long deploy times

shared-cpu-2x

6.25% (still 1/16 core)

$2.00

maybe 8-15 minutes, hard to tell the difference

No meaningful improvement over 1x due to quota limits

Not recommended

  • same throttling, no cost savings

shared-cpu-4x

6.25% (still 1/16 core)

$2.00

like 6-12 minutes if you're lucky

Marginal improvement if app can parallelize within quota

CPU-parallel workloads that can work within severe limits

shared-cpu-8x

6.25% (still 1/16 core)

$2.00

still painful, maybe 5-10 minutes

Slight improvement but still throttled heavily

Background workers, batch processing with patience

performance-1x

100% (full core)

$7.30

30-60 seconds

Normal, reliable performance for most workloads

Production web applications, APIs, most real workloads

performance-2x

200% (2 full cores)

$14.60

15-30 seconds

Fast deployment and operation, good for CPU-heavy apps

High-traffic applications, CPU-intensive processing

performance-4x

400% (4 full cores)

$29.20

10-20 seconds

Excellent performance for demanding applications

Large production apps, heavy compute workloads

performance-8x

800% (8 full cores)

$58.40

5-15 seconds

Maximum performance tier, handles extreme workloads

Enterprise applications, ML inference, heavy databases

Related Tools & Recommendations

tool
Similar content

Fly.io - Deploy Your Apps Everywhere Without the AWS Headache

Explore Fly.io: deploy Docker apps globally across 35+ regions, avoiding single-server issues. Understand how it works, its pricing structure, and answers to co

Fly.io
/tool/fly.io/overview
100%
compare
Similar content

Heroku Alternatives: Vercel, Railway, Render, Fly.io Compared

Vercel, Railway, Render, and Fly.io - Which one won't bankrupt you?

Vercel
/compare/vercel/railway/render/fly/deployment-platforms-comparison
74%
tool
Similar content

Jira Software Enterprise Deployment Guide: Large Scale Implementation

Deploy Jira for enterprises with 500+ users and complex workflows. Here's the architectural decisions that'll save your ass and the infrastructure that actually

Jira Software
/tool/jira-software/enterprise-deployment
65%
tool
Similar content

Render vs. Heroku: Deploy, Pricing, & Common Issues Explained

Deploy from GitHub, get SSL automatically, and actually sleep through the night. It's like Heroku but without the wallet-draining addon ecosystem.

Render
/tool/render/overview
62%
tool
Similar content

Kubernetes Operators: Custom Controllers for App Automation

Explore Kubernetes Operators, custom controllers that understand your application's needs. Learn what they are, why they're essential, and how to build your fir

Kubernetes Operator
/tool/kubernetes-operator/overview
62%
tool
Similar content

TypeScript Compiler Performance: Fix Slow Builds & Optimize Speed

Practical performance fixes that actually work in production, not marketing bullshit

TypeScript Compiler
/tool/typescript/performance-optimization-guide
62%
alternatives
Similar content

Fly.io Alternatives: Best Cloud Deployment Platforms Compared

Explore top Fly.io alternatives for cloud deployment. Compare platforms like Railway and DigitalOcean to find the perfect fit for your specific use case and bud

Fly.io
/alternatives/fly-io/comprehensive-alternatives
57%
tool
Similar content

Jsonnet Overview: Stop Copy-Pasting YAML Like an Animal

Because managing 50 microservice configs by hand will make you lose your mind

Jsonnet
/tool/jsonnet/overview
55%
tool
Similar content

OpenCost: Kubernetes Cost Monitoring, Optimization & Setup Guide

When your AWS bill doubles overnight and nobody knows why

OpenCost
/tool/opencost/overview
55%
tool
Similar content

NVIDIA Container Toolkit: Production Deployment, Docker & Kubernetes GPU

Docker Compose, multi-container GPU sharing, and real production patterns that actually work

NVIDIA Container Toolkit
/tool/nvidia-container-toolkit/production-deployment
55%
tool
Similar content

Open Policy Agent (OPA): Centralize Authorization & Policy Management

Stop hardcoding "if user.role == admin" across 47 microservices - ask OPA instead

/tool/open-policy-agent/overview
53%
tool
Similar content

Debug Kubernetes Issues: The 3AM Production Survival Guide

When your pods are crashing, services aren't accessible, and your pager won't stop buzzing - here's how to actually fix it

Kubernetes
/tool/kubernetes/debugging-kubernetes-issues
50%
howto
Similar content

Migrate Node.js to Bun 2025: Complete Guide & Best Practices

Because npm install takes forever and your CI pipeline is slower than dial-up

Bun
/howto/migrate-nodejs-to-bun/complete-migration-guide
48%
pricing
Similar content

JavaScript Runtime Cost Analysis: Node.js, Deno, Bun Hosting

Three months of "optimization" that cost me more than a fucking MacBook Pro

Deno
/pricing/javascript-runtime-comparison-2025/total-cost-analysis
48%
tool
Similar content

Google Cloud Developer Tools: SDKs, CLIs & Automation Guide

Google's collection of SDKs, CLIs, and automation tools that actually work together (most of the time).

Google Cloud Developer Tools
/tool/google-cloud-developer-tools/overview
48%
tool
Similar content

Grafana: Monitoring Dashboards, Observability & Ecosystem Overview

Explore Grafana's journey from monitoring dashboards to a full observability ecosystem. Learn about its features, LGTM stack, and how it empowers 20 million use

Grafana
/tool/grafana/overview
48%
tool
Similar content

Python 3.12 New Projects: Setup, Best Practices & Performance

Master Python 3.12 greenfield development. Set up new projects with best practices, optimize performance, and choose the right frameworks for fresh Python 3.12

Python 3.12
/tool/python-3.12/greenfield-development-guide
48%
tool
Popular choice

jQuery - The Library That Won't Die

Explore jQuery's enduring legacy, its impact on web development, and the key changes in jQuery 4.0. Understand its relevance for new projects in 2025.

jQuery
/tool/jquery/overview
45%
tool
Similar content

pyenv-virtualenv: Stop Python Environment Hell - Overview & Guide

Discover pyenv-virtualenv to manage Python environments effortlessly. Prevent project breaks, solve local vs. production issues, and streamline your Python deve

pyenv-virtualenv
/tool/pyenv-virtualenv/overview
43%
tool
Similar content

Rancher Desktop: The Free Docker Desktop Alternative That Works

Discover why Rancher Desktop is a powerful, free alternative to Docker Desktop. Learn its features, installation process, and solutions for common issues on mac

Rancher Desktop
/tool/rancher-desktop/overview
43%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization