I Spent a Weekend Migrating From Jest and Lived to Tell About It

I've wasted too many hours fighting ts-jest import errors that work fine everywhere except tests. Jest's watch mode crashed my laptop twice last month when I forgot to close it. I've had it with Jest's config bullshit, so I tried Bun's test runner. Spoiler: it actually doesn't suck.

The Jest Configuration Nightmare (We've All Been There)

I've spent entire afternoons fighting Jest setups. Every new project is the same shitshow: install Jest, configure ts-jest, fight with import paths, debug why snapshots broke, then discover Jest doesn't work with the latest Node version.

Here's what my last Jest setup looked like before I rage-quit:

{
  "devDependencies": {
    "jest": "^29.0.0",
    "ts-jest": "^29.0.0",
    "@types/jest": "^29.0.0",
    "jest-environment-jsdom": "^29.0.0"
  }
}

Plus a 50-line jest.config.js that I copied from Stack Overflow and prayed worked. Every time someone cloned the project, they'd slack "tests are broken on my machine" and I'd waste an hour debugging their Node version. Pro tip: always use exact versions in package.json or npm will fuck you.

Seriously, how many times have you copy-pasted a Jest config from Stack Overflow and prayed it worked? I've done it dozens of times and I still don't know what half these options do. testPathIgnorePatterns, testMatch, testRegex - who designed this shit? Three different ways to tell Jest which files to run.

With Bun, this is the entire setup:

bun test

That's it. No config files. TypeScript works. JSX works. Coverage reports just work. I can finally write tests instead of debugging test configs.

Tests Are Actually Fast Now (Not Marketing "Fast")

Jest startup time killed my TDD flow. On my M1 MacBook, our test suite was slow as hell with Jest. With Bun it's way faster - not sure exactly how much but tests actually start instantly instead of me staring at a loading spinner. Forget the marketing bullshit about 10x faster - it's just noticeably quicker.

What I noticed after switching (your setup will definitely be different):

  • Startup time: Jest took forever to even start, Bun starts instantly
  • Our 200-ish test suite: Jest was slow as molasses, Bun runs way faster
  • Watch mode memory: Jest ate RAM like crazy, Bun doesn't crash my laptop
  • CI time: Cut our GitHub Actions time roughly in half

The biggest win is TDD finally works. Tests run fast enough that I actually run them instead of git push and hoping CI catches my fuckups.

Migration Is Easier Than Expected (With Gotchas)

Check the Bun test docs - they're actually decent, unlike most framework docs.

Migrating basic tests takes 10 minutes. Change your imports from Jest globals to bun:test and 80% of tests run immediately:

// Old Jest way (globals)
test('user creation', () => {
  expect(user.name).toBe('test');
});

// Bun way (explicit imports)
import { test, expect } from 'bun:test';

test('user creation', () => {
  expect(user.name).toBe('test');
});

Basic stuff works: describe, beforeAll, afterEach, toThrow(), toBe(). I migrated 150 simple tests without issues.

But then reality hit. Here's what broke:

  • Custom matchers I wrote for JWT validation - had to rewrite all of them using expect.extend()
  • jest.mock() auto-hoisting broke 20+ tests - Bun doesn't hoist mocks automatically
  • Snapshot tests - all snapshots had to be regenerated from scratch
  • Some async timing behaved differently - spent 2 hours debugging waitFor() timeouts
  • Module mocking syntax is completely different - goodbye __mocks__ folders
  • A few tests that relied on Jest's weird hoisting quirks just had to be rewritten

TypeScript That Actually Works

I've wasted days debugging ts-jest configs. Import paths that work in VS Code fail in tests. Source maps break. TypeScript errors get swallowed and you only find out when tests mysteriously fail.

With Bun, TypeScript just runs:

// users.test.ts - this actually works first try
import { test, expect } from 'bun:test';
import { User, createUser } from './user.ts';

test('user creation with proper typing', () => {
  const user: User = createUser({
    name: 'John',
    email: 'john@example.com',
    age: 30
  });

  expect(user.id).toBeTypeOf('string');
  expect(user.createdAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
});

No tsconfig fuckery. No source map debugging. Import paths work like everywhere else. TypeScript errors show up immediately instead of getting buried in Jest's compilation output. Path mapping from your tsconfig.json just works - no need to duplicate it anywhere.

Mocking That Makes Sense

Mocking

Jest's jest.mock() hoisting broke my brain. You call jest.mock() at the bottom of a file but it runs first? Mock implementations get hoisted but assignments don't? Who thought this was a good idea?

Bun mocking is explicit and predictable:

import { test, expect, mock } from 'bun:test';
import { sendEmail } from './email.js';

test('email sending works', async () => {
  const mockSendEmail = mock(sendEmail);
  mockSendEmail.mockResolvedValue({ messageId: '123' });

  const result = await sendWelcomeEmail('user@example.com');

  expect(mockSendEmail).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
    to: 'user@example.com',
    subject: 'Welcome!'
  });
});

No magic hoisting. No __mocks__ folders. Mock what you need, when you need it. Still crashes sometimes with complex module mocks, but at least the syntax makes sense.

Full disclosure: I tried Bun, rage-quit back to Jest when module mocking broke, then came back when I realized Jest was still worse.

And here's something nobody talks about: Jest's mock hoisting actually broke our CI twice. Once because someone moved a jest.mock() call and tests that passed locally started failing in CI. Another time Jest decided to hoist mocks in a different order after a Node update. Spent an entire afternoon figuring out why tests were importing the wrong modules.

With Bun, what you see is what you get. Mock calls run where you put them. Revolutionary concept, I know.

Coverage and Watch Mode Actually Work

Jest vs Bun Speed Bun Speed

Coverage with Jest means configuring Istanbul, debugging source maps, and waiting forever for reports. The --coverage flag is slower than molasses but at least it works. With Bun:

bun test --coverage

HTML coverage reports generate in under a second. TypeScript is included correctly. No setup required.

Watch mode doesn't crash every 20 minutes like Jest:

bun test --watch

File changes trigger re-runs quickly. Memory stays reasonable instead of eating everything like Jest. Works on our huge monorepo without dying.

After dealing with this shit for months

Assessment

What works better than Jest:

  • Setup time (just run bun test vs an hour of config hell)
  • Test speed (way faster, fast enough that TDD actually works)
  • TypeScript integration (works without any config bullshit)
  • Watch mode stability (doesn't crash and eat all my RAM)

What still sucks:

  • Custom matchers need rewriting
  • Some Testing Library edge cases break
  • Ecosystem is smaller (fewer Stack Overflow answers)
  • Browser testing doesn't exist yet

Should you switch?

If you're starting fresh: absolutely. Why torture yourself with Jest configuration when you don't have to?

If you have hundreds of Jest tests with custom matchers and complex mocking: stick with Jest for now. The migration pain isn't worth it.

If your Jest setup works but you're tired of slow tests and random configuration issues: try Bun on a side project first. See if the speed improvement is worth the switch for your team. In my experience, the productivity boost from actually being able to run tests during development is huge.

What Actually Matters: Bun vs Jest vs Vitest

What You Care About

Bun

Jest

Vitest

Setup time

Instant

Half your afternoon wasted

Kinda long

TypeScript pain

Almost none

Lots

Mostly none

Test speed

Fastest

Slowest

Fast enough

Watch mode crashes

Rare so far

Too frequent

Rare

Ecosystem size

Small

Huge

Growing

Migration effort

Depends

N/A

Usually easy

Testing Stuff That Actually Breaks in Production

The basic Jest-to-Bun migration is straightforward, but the real test is whether Bun holds up when you're testing the complex, messy stuff that actually breaks in production. I've been using Bun for about 6 months now. Switched back to Jest twice when shit broke, but kept coming back because Jest is still worse. Here's what I've learned about testing the annoying edge cases that Jest makes painful.

Database Testing Without Docker Hell

Database testing used to require Docker, connection pools, and prayer. Now it's just SQLite in memory.

I used to run PostgreSQL in Docker for tests. Half the time Docker wasn't running. The other half, tests failed because ports were in use. Fuck that noise.

With Bun's SQLite, database tests are fast enough to run real database operations:

import { test, expect, beforeEach } from 'bun:test';
import { Database } from 'bun:sqlite';

beforeEach(() => {
  db = new Database(':memory:');
  db.run('CREATE TABLE users (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, email TEXT UNIQUE)');
});

test('duplicate email constraint actually works', () => {
  const insert = db.prepare('INSERT INTO users (email) VALUES (?)');

  insert.run('user@example.com');

  // This should blow up with constraint error
  expect(() => insert.run('user@example.com')).toThrow(/UNIQUE constraint/);
});

No Docker. No connection pooling issues. Tests run in 20ms instead of 2 seconds. Constraints actually get tested instead of mocked away. The SQLite database is created fresh for each test file, so you get proper isolation without the complexity of transaction rollbacks or database cleanup.

TypeScript That Doesn't Make You Cry

TypeScript

Remember configuring ts-jest? The 50-line config file that stopped working when Node updated? The import/export issues that only happened in tests?

Bun just runs TypeScript:

import { test, expect } from 'bun:test';
import { calculateTax } from './tax-utils.ts';

test('tax calculation edge cases', () => {
  // Test the thing that broke in production
  expect(calculateTax(0)).toBe(0);
  expect(calculateTax(-100)).toBe(0); // Negative amounts = no tax
  expect(() => calculateTax(NaN)).toThrow('Invalid amount');
});

Import paths work. Type checking works. No configuration. No source map debugging when tests fail.

Async Tests That Don't Race

Async Testing

Jest async tests are a minefield. Random timeouts. Race conditions. Promises that resolve in the wrong order and fail your CI.

Bun handles async better:

import { test, expect } from 'bun:test';

test('parallel API calls do not randomly fail', async () => {
  const promises = [1, 2, 3].map(id =>
    fetch(`https://api.example.com/users/${id}`)
  );

  const responses = await Promise.allSettled(promises);

  // Check they all completed (even if some failed)
  expect(responses).toHaveLength(3);

  // Count successful responses
  const successful = responses.filter(r => r.status === 'fulfilled');
  expect(successful.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});

Promise.allSettled actually works. Timeout handling is predictable. Less random CI failures.

The Reality Check After 6 Months

What actually got better:

  • Setup time went from an hour of config hell to just running bun test
  • Test runs are way faster - fast enough that TDD actually works instead of being a pain in the ass
  • TypeScript works without any of the usual config bullshit
  • Watch mode doesn't crash and eat all my RAM like Jest did

What still sucks:

  • Testing Library has weird edge cases with Bun (spent 2 hours debugging one last week)
  • No browser testing (have to use Playwright separately, which is annoying)
  • Smaller ecosystem means fewer Stack Overflow answers when things break
  • Some mocking scenarios are more complex than Jest (especially module mocks)

Actually, let me rant about the browser testing thing for a second. It's 2025 and we still can't test React components properly in Bun without jumping through hoops. Yes, I know jsdom works "mostly" but it's not the same as real browser testing. The Bun team keeps saying it's coming but it's been "coming" for months. If your tests randomly fail in CI, it's usually a race condition in your async code or some weird jsdom timing issue.

Would I switch again? Yes, for new projects. The speed and simplicity wins outweigh the ecosystem limitations. Being able to actually use TDD because tests run fast enough is a game-changer.

Would I migrate existing Jest setups? Depends. If your Jest setup works fine and you're not constantly debugging configuration issues, stick with it. But if you're spending more time fighting Jest than writing tests, Bun is worth the migration pain. The weekend I spent migrating paid for itself in the first week of actually being able to run tests without grabbing coffee.

Shit That Will Actually Break When You Switch

Q

Will my Jest tests just work in Bun?

A

Basic tests? Yeah. Anything complex? Prepare for a weekend of debugging.

I migrated 200 tests and here's what broke:

  • Custom matchers I wrote for JWT validation - had to rewrite all of them
  • jest.mock() hoisting - 30+ tests failed because mocks weren't auto-hoisted
  • Snapshot tests - all snapshots had to be regenerated
  • Testing Library - waitFor() timing behaved differently, broke 10 tests

Took me a full weekend to migrate. Basic CRUD tests? 5 minutes. Tests with complex mocking? Pain in the ass.

Q

How much faster is Bun actually?

A

Forget the marketing bullshit about 10x faster - it's just noticeably quicker. Fast enough that TDD actually works.

What I noticed on my M1 MacBook:

  • 200 test suite: Jest was slow as hell, Bun runs way faster
  • Cold start: Jest takes forever to start, Bun starts instantly
  • Watch mode memory: Jest eats RAM like crazy, Bun stays reasonable

The killer feature is startup time. Jest takes forever to start, Bun starts instantly. Makes TDD actually usable instead of "run tests, grab coffee, hope they pass."

Q

Does TypeScript actually work without setup?

A

Yes, and it's magical. No jest.config.js. No ts-jest. No tsconfig modifications. Import .ts files and they just work.

import { test, expect } from 'bun:test';
import { calculateTax } from './utils.ts';

test('tax calculation', () => {
  expect(calculateTax(100)).toBe(7.25); // Works immediately
});

Import paths work like everywhere else. TypeScript errors show up immediately instead of getting buried in Jest's compilation output. This alone saved me hours of configuration debugging.

Q

How's the mocking compared to Jest's nightmare?

A

Much simpler. Jest's jest.mock() hoisting broke my brain - you call it at the bottom but it runs first? What the fuck? Bun mocking is way more predictable.

Bun mocking is explicit:

import { test, expect, mock } from 'bun:test';

test('email sending', () => {
  const mockSend = mock();
  mockSend.mockReturnValue(true);

  expect(sendEmail(mockSend, 'test@example.com')).toBe(true);
  expect(mockSend).toHaveBeenCalledWith('test@example.com');
});

No magic hoisting. No __mocks__ folders. Mock what you need, when you need it. Still crashes with complex module mocks sometimes, but at least the API makes sense.

Q

Does coverage work without configuration hell?

A

Yes. Run bun test --coverage and get HTML reports instantly. No Istanbul setup. No source maps debugging. TypeScript is included correctly.

Q

Can I use Testing Library?

A

Mostly, but with gotchas. Basic queries work fine. waitFor() timing is different

  • some of my async tests broke because the default timeout behavior isn't identical to Jest. cleanup() timing is also weird. The screen object works fine but some advanced features like custom queries need testing. Overall it works but expect to spend some time debugging edge cases that worked fine in Jest.
Q

What about browser testing?

A

Doesn't exist. Use Playwright separately. This is Bun's biggest weakness vs Jest/Vitest.

Q

Does watch mode crash like Jest?

A

No. Jest's watch mode ate RAM and crashed randomly. Bun's watch mode stays reasonable and doesn't randomly die. File changes trigger re-runs quickly.

Q

Should I migrate my existing Jest project?

A

Migrate if your Jest setup is constantly breaking, tests are painfully slow, or TypeScript configuration is a nightmare.

Don't migrate if Jest works fine for your team, you use lots of Jest plugins, or you have 500+ tests with complex mocking.

For new projects: Use Bun or Vitest. Don't start with Jest in 2025. I learned this the hard way after setting up Jest on three different projects this year.

Related Tools & Recommendations

compare
Similar content

Deno 2 vs Node.js vs Bun: Real-World Performance Benchmarks 2025

The Reality: Speed vs. Stability in 2024-2025

Deno
/compare/deno/node-js/bun/performance-benchmarks-2025
100%
compare
Similar content

Bun vs Node.js vs Deno: JavaScript Runtime Performance Comparison

Three weeks of testing revealed which JavaScript runtime is actually faster (and when it matters)

Bun
/compare/bun/node.js/deno/performance-comparison
97%
compare
Similar content

Deno, Node.js, Bun: Deep Dive into Performance Benchmarks

Explore detailed performance benchmarks for Deno, Node.js, and Bun. Understand why Bun is fast, what breaks during migration, and if switching from Node.js is w

Deno
/compare/deno/node-js/bun/benchmark-methodologies
89%
howto
Similar content

Bun: Fast JavaScript Runtime & Toolkit - Setup & Overview Guide

Learn to set up and use Bun, the ultra-fast JavaScript runtime, bundler, and package manager. This guide covers installation, environment setup, and integrating

Bun
/howto/setup-bun-development-environment/overview
64%
tool
Similar content

Bun JavaScript Runtime: Fast Node.js Alternative & Easy Install

JavaScript runtime that doesn't make you want to throw your laptop

Bun
/tool/bun/overview
61%
tool
Similar content

AVA: Node.js Test Runner - Fast, Parallel, & Easy Setup

Fast parallel tests without the usual bullshit

AVA
/tool/ava/overview
61%
tool
Recommended

pnpm - Fixes npm's Biggest Annoyances

alternative to pnpm

pnpm
/tool/pnpm/overview
57%
integration
Recommended

Hono + Drizzle + tRPC: Actually Fast TypeScript Stack That Doesn't Suck

integrates with Hono

Hono
/integration/hono-drizzle-trpc/modern-architecture-integration
52%
compare
Recommended

Which Node.js framework is actually faster (and does it matter)?

Hono is stupidly fast, but that doesn't mean you should use it

Hono
/compare/hono/express/fastify/koa/overview
51%
howto
Similar content

Migrate Node.js to Bun 2025: Complete Guide & Best Practices

Because npm install takes forever and your CI pipeline is slower than dial-up

Bun
/howto/migrate-nodejs-to-bun/complete-migration-guide
51%
compare
Similar content

Bun vs Deno vs Node.js: JavaScript Runtime Comparison Guide

A Developer's Guide to Not Hating Your JavaScript Toolchain

Bun
/compare/bun/node.js/deno/ecosystem-tooling-comparison
50%
review
Similar content

Bun vs Node.js vs Deno: JavaScript Runtime Production Guide

Two years of runtime fuckery later, here's the truth nobody tells you

Bun
/review/bun-nodejs-deno-comparison/production-readiness-assessment
47%
compare
Recommended

Vite vs Webpack vs Turbopack vs esbuild vs Rollup - Which Build Tool Won't Make You Hate Life

I've wasted too much time configuring build tools so you don't have to

Vite
/compare/vite/webpack/turbopack/esbuild/rollup/performance-comparison
47%
tool
Similar content

Bun Database Integration: Built-in Drivers & Connection Pooling

Built-in database drivers. No more npm package hell when Node updates.

Bun
/tool/bun/database-integration
42%
tool
Similar content

Bun Production Optimization: Deploy Fast, Monitor & Fix Issues

Master Bun production deployments. Optimize performance, diagnose and fix common issues like memory leaks and Docker crashes, and implement effective monitoring

Bun
/tool/bun/production-optimization
41%
howto
Similar content

Bun Production Deployment Guide: Docker, Serverless & Performance

Master Bun production deployment with this comprehensive guide. Learn Docker & Serverless strategies, optimize performance, and troubleshoot common issues for s

Bun
/howto/setup-bun-development-environment/production-deployment-guide
41%
troubleshoot
Similar content

Bun Memory Leaks in Production: Debugging & Fixes Guide

🏃‍♂️ Bun JavaScript Runtime Memory Troubleshooting Guide

Bun
/troubleshoot/bun-production-memory-leaks/production-memory-leaks
41%
troubleshoot
Similar content

Bun npm Peer Dependency Issues: Fix ESLint & More

When Bun breaks your ESLint setup and you want to throw your laptop out the window

Bun
/troubleshoot/bun-npm-compatibility/peer-dependency-resolution
41%
integration
Similar content

Bun React TypeScript Drizzle: Real-World Setup & Deployment

Real-world integration experience - what actually works and what doesn't

Bun
/integration/bun-react-typescript-drizzle/performance-stack-overview
39%
tool
Recommended

Deno Deploy - Finally, a Serverless Platform That Doesn't Suck

TypeScript runs at the edge in under 50ms. No build steps. No webpack hell.

Deno Deploy
/tool/deno-deploy/overview
34%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization