Look, Bun is JavaScript tooling that doesn't make you want to punch your monitor. It's a runtime like Node.js but built on JavaScriptCore instead of V8. What does that mean for you? Your apps start faster and your package installs don't take longer than a coffee break. The official Bun blog has detailed performance comparisons, and Stack Overflow discussions show real developer experiences.
I've been testing Bun since it hit 1.0 stability, and the latest 1.2.21 (dropped just last week) is the most solid yet. Honestly, the speed difference is addictive. Going back to npm feels like watching paint dry. When I first tried bun install
on a typical React project, it finished installing 200+ packages in like 2-5 seconds. npm would have taken 30-60 seconds on the same machine - sometimes way longer if your luck's bad.
The Reality of Bun's "All-in-One" Approach
Bun tries to replace your entire JavaScript toolchain:
- Runtime: Runs JS/TS/JSX without separate transpilation. Works great until you hit weird edge cases with some experimental TS features. See Bun's TypeScript documentation for current support details.
- Package Manager: Fast as hell, but npm audit doesn't work, so security scanning needs alternative tools like Snyk or OSSF Scorecard.
- Bundler: Built-in but less configurable than webpack. Fine for simple projects, pain in the ass for complex builds. Check Bun's bundler docs for limitations.
- Test Runner: Jest-compatible and legitimately fast. I've seen test suites that took 45 seconds with Jest run in 8 seconds with Bun. See Bun test documentation for API differences.
- Web Server: Bun.serve() is surprisingly solid for APIs. Handles thousands of concurrent connections without breaking a sweat. Fastify and Express both work with Bun.
The Node.js Compatibility Lie
Bun claims "100% Node.js compatibility" which is complete bullshit. It works with most Node.js stuff, but I've hit weird edge cases:
- Native modules can be a nightmare - some just refuse to compile
- Certain npm scripts break because they assume npm's behavior
- Path resolution sometimes gets confused with complex monorepo setups
- The crypto module has subtle differences that can bite you
Pro tip: Test your specific dependencies before committing to Bun in production. I learned this the hard way when a critical auth library failed during deployment - turns out it relied on some obscure Node.js internal that Bun doesn't implement. Spent 4 hours at 2am rolling back to Node.js because our users couldn't log in.
Other fun gotchas I've encountered:
- Windows PATH gets fucked up if you have spaces in your username
- The install script breaks on corporate networks with SSL inspection
- Some Docker base images don't have the right libc version and Bun just crashes with cryptic errors
- Hot reload randomly stops working and you have to restart the dev server (classic JavaScript tooling)
When Bun Actually Makes Sense
Despite the gotchas, Bun shines in these scenarios:
- New projects: Start fresh without legacy baggage
- CI/CD pipelines: Faster installs = shorter build times
- Development tools: CLIs and scripts benefit from quick startup
- API servers: Performance is legitimately impressive - 20-50% more requests per second than Node.js in my testing
The setup process I'm about to walk you through covers installation across platforms, handling the gotchas I've discovered, and getting a real project running without the usual JavaScript tooling hell.
My take after 2+ years with Bun: It's not perfect, but it's genuinely faster for development and the ecosystem compatibility is good enough for most projects. I'd start new projects with Bun today - just test your critical dependencies first and keep Node.js as a backup plan.