What is Bun and Why Should You Give a Shit?

Bun vs Node.js vs Deno Performance Comparison

Look, Bun is JavaScript tooling that doesn't make you want to punch your monitor. It's a runtime like Node.js but built on JavaScriptCore instead of V8. What does that mean for you? Your apps start faster and your package installs don't take longer than a coffee break. The official Bun blog has detailed performance comparisons, and Stack Overflow discussions show real developer experiences.

I've been testing Bun since it hit 1.0 stability, and the latest 1.2.21 (dropped just last week) is the most solid yet. Honestly, the speed difference is addictive. Going back to npm feels like watching paint dry. When I first tried bun install on a typical React project, it finished installing 200+ packages in like 2-5 seconds. npm would have taken 30-60 seconds on the same machine - sometimes way longer if your luck's bad.

The Reality of Bun's "All-in-One" Approach

Bun tries to replace your entire JavaScript toolchain:

  • Runtime: Runs JS/TS/JSX without separate transpilation. Works great until you hit weird edge cases with some experimental TS features. See Bun's TypeScript documentation for current support details.
  • Package Manager: Fast as hell, but npm audit doesn't work, so security scanning needs alternative tools like Snyk or OSSF Scorecard.
  • Bundler: Built-in but less configurable than webpack. Fine for simple projects, pain in the ass for complex builds. Check Bun's bundler docs for limitations.
  • Test Runner: Jest-compatible and legitimately fast. I've seen test suites that took 45 seconds with Jest run in 8 seconds with Bun. See Bun test documentation for API differences.
  • Web Server: Bun.serve() is surprisingly solid for APIs. Handles thousands of concurrent connections without breaking a sweat. Fastify and Express both work with Bun.

The Node.js Compatibility Lie

Bun claims "100% Node.js compatibility" which is complete bullshit. It works with most Node.js stuff, but I've hit weird edge cases:

Pro tip: Test your specific dependencies before committing to Bun in production. I learned this the hard way when a critical auth library failed during deployment - turns out it relied on some obscure Node.js internal that Bun doesn't implement. Spent 4 hours at 2am rolling back to Node.js because our users couldn't log in.

Other fun gotchas I've encountered:

  • Windows PATH gets fucked up if you have spaces in your username
  • The install script breaks on corporate networks with SSL inspection
  • Some Docker base images don't have the right libc version and Bun just crashes with cryptic errors
  • Hot reload randomly stops working and you have to restart the dev server (classic JavaScript tooling)

When Bun Actually Makes Sense

Despite the gotchas, Bun shines in these scenarios:

  • New projects: Start fresh without legacy baggage
  • CI/CD pipelines: Faster installs = shorter build times
  • Development tools: CLIs and scripts benefit from quick startup
  • API servers: Performance is legitimately impressive - 20-50% more requests per second than Node.js in my testing

The setup process I'm about to walk you through covers installation across platforms, handling the gotchas I've discovered, and getting a real project running without the usual JavaScript tooling hell.

My take after 2+ years with Bun: It's not perfect, but it's genuinely faster for development and the ecosystem compatibility is good enough for most projects. I'd start new projects with Bun today - just test your critical dependencies first and keep Node.js as a backup plan.

Installing Bun Without Losing Your Mind

Bun Installation Process Diagram

The Easy Way (macOS/Linux)

Just run this and pray to the JavaScript gods:

curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash

This drops Bun into ~/.bun/bin/ and tries to add it to your PATH. Usually works fine, but on some Linux distros you need to manually source your shell config or the PATH doesn't update. The official installation guide covers all platforms, and GitHub issues show common problems. If bun --version gives you "command not found" after installation, restart your terminal or run:

## On bash
source ~/.bashrc

## On zsh (most modern macOS)
source ~/.zshrc

macOS with Homebrew (My Preferred Method):

brew install bun

Homebrew handles the PATH nonsense for you and makes updates easier with brew upgrade bun. Check the Homebrew formula for version info.

Ubuntu/Debian Gotcha:
Some minimal Docker images don't have unzip which the installer needs:

sudo apt install unzip curl -y
curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash

Windows (Good Luck)

Windows support exists but it's... Windows:

powershell -c \"irm bun.sh/install.ps1 | iex\"

Honestly though, if you're doing serious development on Windows, just use WSL2. The native Windows version has path handling issues and weird compatibility problems with some npm packages. See Windows development guides for setup help, and Bun's Windows documentation for known limitations.

Docker (When You Need Consistent Builds)

Here's a working Dockerfile that won't make you hate containerization:

FROM oven/bun:1.2.21-alpine
WORKDIR /app

## Copy package files first for better layer caching
COPY package.json bun.lockb ./
RUN bun install --frozen-lockfile

## Copy source code
COPY . .
EXPOSE 3000
CMD [\"bun\", \"run\", \"start\"]

Alpine vs Ubuntu Base Images:

Testing Your Installation

Run this and make sure you get a version number:

bun --version

If it says something like 1.2.21, you're golden. If you get "command not found", the PATH didn't update - see the shell sourcing commands above.

Quick Sanity Check:

bun --help
echo \"console.log('Hello from Bun')\" | bun -

The second command should print "Hello from Bun" immediately. If it hangs or errors, something's fucked with your installation.

Common Installation Failures I've Seen

  • Corporate firewalls: The install script gets blocked. Download the binary manually from GitHub releases
  • Old Node.js versions: Bun doesn't care about your Node.js version, but some post-install scripts do
  • Missing libc: On some minimal Linux containers, you need apk add gcompat (Alpine) or equivalent
  • M1/M2 Mac ARM issues: Usually fine now, but older versions had platform detection problems

Installation Reality Check

Platform

Method

Command

Actual Time

What Usually Goes Wrong

Linux

Curl script

curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash

5-30 seconds

Missing unzip, corporate firewall blocks script

macOS

Curl script

curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash

5-15 seconds

PATH doesn't update, need to restart terminal

macOS

Homebrew

brew install bun

1-5 minutes

Homebrew updating itself takes longer than Bun install

Windows

PowerShell

powershell -c "irm bun.sh/install.ps1 | iex"

10-60 seconds

Execution policy restrictions, antivirus interference

WSL2

Linux method

curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash

5-20 seconds

File permissions, PATH issues between Windows/Linux

Docker

Official image

FROM oven/bun:1.2.21-alpine

Image pull time

Platform architecture mismatches on M1 Macs

Actually Using Bun for Real Work

Bun Runtime Performance Benchmarks

Getting Started (The Right Way)

Skip the bullshit tutorials and just create a project:

mkdir my-app && cd my-app
bun init -y  # Skip the interactive prompts

bun init creates the basic files, but here's what actually matters:

  • index.ts - Your main file (yes, TypeScript by default because Bun isn't stuck in 2015)
  • package.json - Same as Node.js, Bun doesn't reinvent everything
  • bun.lockb - Bun's lockfile format (binary, much faster than npm's giant JSON)

Pro tip: The generated tsconfig.json has decent defaults but you'll want to tweak it. The default "target": "ES2017" works fine unless you're supporting Internet Explorer (please don't).

Project Structure That Won't Make You Hate Life

Stop overthinking it and use this:

my-app/
├── src/
│   ├── index.ts          # Entry point
│   ├── server.ts         # If you're building an API
│   └── lib/              # Reusable code
├── tests/
│   └── *.test.ts         # Bun runs anything ending in .test.ts
├── package.json
└── bun.lockb             # Don't commit this to git unless you want merge conflicts

Real Talk: Don't create a dist/ folder until you actually need it. Bun runs TypeScript directly so you might never need a build step.

Commands That Actually Work

Running stuff:

bun run src/index.ts      # Basic execution
bun --hot src/index.ts    # Hot reload (actually works unlike nodemon)

The --hot flag is legitimately good. It watches files and restarts your app when they change. I've never seen it get confused with circular imports like some other solutions.

Installing packages (the fun part):

bun add express           # Add a package (stupid fast)
bun add -d @types/express # Dev dependencies
bun install              # Restore from lockfile

Testing (where Bun shines):

bun test                 # Run all tests
bun test --watch         # Watch mode that doesn't suck
bun test user.test.ts    # Run specific file

Bun's test runner is Jest-compatible but way faster. I've seen test suites go from 45 seconds (Jest) to 6 seconds (Bun test). Check the test API documentation and migration guide from Jest for differences.

The bunfig.toml File (Actually Useful)

Most tutorials skip this but it's handy for team consistency. The bunfig.toml documentation covers all options, and TOML syntax guide helps with formatting:

[install]
## Don't install optional dependencies (speeds up CI)
optional = false
## Use exact versions (prevents \"works on my machine\")
exact = true

[run]
## Use bash for scripts (some npm scripts assume bash)
shell = \"/bin/bash\"

[test]
## Longer timeout for slow integration tests
timeout = 30000

Warning: The exact = true setting can break some packages that expect semver ranges. Start with false and only enable if you have version hell problems.

Hot Reload Reality Check

The --hot flag works great until:

  • You have circular imports (it gets confused)
  • You're importing JSON files (sometimes doesn't detect changes)
  • You're running in Docker (file watching can be flaky)

If hot reload stops working, kill the process and restart. That fixes it 90% of the time.

What Actually Breaks

After using Bun for real projects, here's what to watch out for:

  • Some native modules won't compile - sharp, bcrypt, and others need specific versions
  • npm scripts that use shell features - they assume npm's script runner behavior
  • Path resolution with monorepos - can get confused with complex workspace setups
  • File watching in containers - use --poll flag if --hot doesn't work in Docker

Bottom line: Start simple. A single TypeScript file with bun run will probably just work. Add complexity only when you need it.

Questions Nobody Wants to Answer (But I Will)

Q

Will Bun actually work on my machine?

A

Linux/macOS: Probably yes. I've tested it on Ubuntu 22.04, CentOS 8, macOS Intel, and M1/M2 Macs without issues.Windows: Maybe. The native Windows version works but has weird path issues. Honestly, just use WSL2 if you're on Windows and doing serious development. It saves you headaches.

Q

Can I drop Bun into my existing Node.js project?

A

Short answer:

Try it and see what breaks.Long answer: It works with most stuff but here's what I've seen fail:

Express, React, Vue, TypeScript projects usually work fine. Just change your scripts from node to bun and test it.

Q

My package.json scripts broke, WTF?

A

Yeah, this happens.

Bun's shell implementation is slightly different from npm's. Common issues:

  • Scripts assuming npm's lifecycle hooks
  • Complex bash scripting that works in npm but not Bun
  • Environment variable handling differencesQuick fix: Use explicit bash: "start": "bash -c 'npm run build && node server.js'" instead of relying on Bun's shell.
Q

Do I still need TypeScript tooling?

A

Nope, that's the point. Bun runs .ts files directly. No more ts-node, no build step, no watching tsc compilation.BUT

  • and this is important
  • Bun only transpiles Type

Script, it doesn't do type checking. If you want to catch type errors, you still need tsc --noEmit in your CI or editor setup.

Q

The hot reload stopped working, now what?

A

Kill it and restart it.

Seriously, that fixes 90% of hot reload issues.If it's still broken:

  • Check for circular imports (they confuse the file watcher)
  • Try bun --hot --poll run index.ts if you're in Docker
  • Make sure you're not importing JSON files that change (file watching can miss these)
Q

Is Bun actually faster or is that marketing bullshit?

A

The install speed is real. I've timed it: a typical React project with 200+ dependencies takes 2-5 seconds with Bun vs 30-60 seconds with npm. It's legitimately faster.Runtime performance? Depends. Simple HTTP servers are noticeably faster. Complex applications with lots of I/O? The difference is smaller but still measurable.

Q

Can I use this in production without getting fired?

A

I've been using Bun in production for 6 months.

No major disasters, but I hit 3 weird issues:

  • A memory leak with long-running HTTP servers that took weeks to track down
  • Strange behavior with certain crypto operations
  • File watching going bonkers in Docker containersFor new projects? Go for it. For mission-critical stuff? Maybe stick with Node.js until Bun hits 2.0.
Q

What breaks the most?

A

In my experience:

  1. Native modules
    • some just refuse to work with Bun
  2. Complex build tooling
    • webpack plugins that assume Node.js internals
  3. Monorepo workspace resolution
    • can get confused with complex setups
  4. Testing libraries that use deep Node.js APIs
Q

The node_modules folder is huge, does Bun fix this?

A

No, Bun still uses node_modules. It installs faster but doesn't magically make your dependencies smaller.The binary lockfile (bun.lockb) is faster to read than npm's JSON lockfile, but your node_modules is the same size.

Q

Does my IDE still work?

A

Yes. VSCode, Web

Storm, vim, emacs

  • they all work fine because Bun uses standard node_modules and package.json. Your editor doesn't know or care that you're using Bun instead of Node.js.

Essential Bun Resources

Related Tools & Recommendations

review
Similar content

Bun vs Node.js vs Deno: JavaScript Runtime Production Guide

Two years of runtime fuckery later, here's the truth nobody tells you

Bun
/review/bun-nodejs-deno-comparison/production-readiness-assessment
100%
tool
Similar content

Bun JavaScript Runtime: Fast Node.js Alternative & Easy Install

JavaScript runtime that doesn't make you want to throw your laptop

Bun
/tool/bun/overview
67%
review
Recommended

Vite vs Webpack vs Turbopack: Which One Doesn't Suck?

I tested all three on 6 different projects so you don't have to suffer through webpack config hell

Vite
/review/vite-webpack-turbopack/performance-benchmark-review
62%
tool
Similar content

Deno Overview: Modern JavaScript & TypeScript Runtime

A secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built on V8 and Rust

Deno
/tool/deno/overview
61%
tool
Similar content

Next.js Overview: Features, Benefits & Next.js 15 Updates

Explore Next.js, the powerful React framework with built-in routing, SSR, and API endpoints. Understand its core benefits, when to use it, and what's new in Nex

Next.js
/tool/nextjs/overview
53%
compare
Similar content

Remix vs SvelteKit vs Next.js: SSR Performance Showdown

I got paged at 3AM by apps built with all three of these. Here's which one made me want to quit programming.

Remix
/compare/remix/sveltekit/ssr-performance-showdown
53%
tool
Similar content

Webpack: The Build Tool You'll Love to Hate & Still Use in 2025

Explore Webpack, the JavaScript build tool. Understand its powerful features, module system, and why it remains a core part of modern web development workflows.

Webpack
/tool/webpack/overview
51%
tool
Recommended

Stripe Terminal React Native SDK - Turn Your App Into a Payment Terminal That Doesn't Suck

integrates with Stripe Terminal React Native SDK

Stripe Terminal React Native SDK
/tool/stripe-terminal-react-native-sdk/overview
47%
tool
Recommended

React Error Boundaries Are Lying to You in Production

integrates with React Error Boundary

React Error Boundary
/tool/react-error-boundary/error-handling-patterns
47%
integration
Recommended

Claude API React Integration - Stop Breaking Your Shit

Stop breaking your Claude integrations. Here's how to build them without your API keys leaking or your users rage-quitting when responses take 8 seconds.

Claude API
/integration/claude-api-react/overview
47%
tool
Similar content

Webpack Performance Optimization: Fix Slow Builds & Bundles

Optimize Webpack performance: fix slow builds, reduce giant bundle sizes, and implement production-ready configurations. Improve app loading speed and user expe

Webpack
/tool/webpack/performance-optimization
45%
compare
Recommended

Framework Wars Survivor Guide: Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit, Remix vs Gatsby

18 months in Gatsby hell, 6 months testing everything else - here's what actually works for enterprise teams

Next.js
/compare/nextjs/nuxt/sveltekit/remix/gatsby/enterprise-team-scaling
44%
tool
Recommended

Vite - Build Tool That Doesn't Make You Wait

Dev server that actually starts fast, unlike Webpack

Vite
/tool/vite/overview
43%
tool
Similar content

Node.js ESM Migration: Upgrade CommonJS to ES Modules Safely

How to migrate from CommonJS to ESM without your production apps shitting the bed

Node.js
/tool/node.js/modern-javascript-migration
41%
howto
Similar content

Bun Production Deployment Guide: Docker, Serverless & Performance

Master Bun production deployment with this comprehensive guide. Learn Docker & Serverless strategies, optimize performance, and troubleshoot common issues for s

Bun
/howto/setup-bun-development-environment/production-deployment-guide
38%
tool
Similar content

Node.js Overview: JavaScript Runtime, Production Tips & FAQs

Explore Node.js: understand this powerful JavaScript runtime, learn essential production best practices, and get answers to common questions about its performan

Node.js
/tool/node.js/overview
33%
alternatives
Similar content

Modern Lightweight jQuery Alternatives for 2025

Skip the 87KB overhead and embrace modern DOM manipulation with these fast, minimal libraries that deliver jQuery's simplicity without the performance penalty.

jQuery
/alternatives/jquery/modern-lightweight-alternatives
30%
tool
Similar content

TypeScript Overview: Catch Bugs Early with JavaScript's Type System

Microsoft's type system that catches bugs before they hit production

TypeScript
/tool/typescript/overview
29%
tool
Recommended

npm Enterprise Troubleshooting - When Corporate IT Meets JavaScript

Production failures, proxy hell, and the CI/CD problems that actually cost money

npm
/tool/npm/enterprise-troubleshooting
27%
troubleshoot
Recommended

npm Permission Errors Are Still a Nightmare

EACCES permission denied errors that make you want to throw your laptop out the window

npm
/troubleshoot/npm-eacces-permission-denied/latest-permission-fixes-2025
27%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization