Why AVA Doesn't Suck Like Other Test Runners

AVA Process Isolation

I switched to AVA after Jest's memory usage killed our CI and tests kept mysteriously failing when run together. AVA fixes the biggest problem with JavaScript testing: test pollution.

Process Isolation Actually Works

Each test file runs in its own Node.js child process. This means:

  • No shared state between tests that causes random failures
  • Tests can't accidentally modify global objects and break other tests
  • Memory leaks in one test file don't affect others
  • You can run tests in any order without weird interactions

Jest claims to isolate tests but still runs them in the same process with worker threads. I've seen Jest tests pass individually but fail when run together because some test modified process.env or a global variable. AVA goes full nuclear and spawns separate processes. Yeah, it uses more memory, but it actually works.

Error Messages Don't Make You Want To Quit

AVA Error Output Screenshot

When AVA tests fail, you get:

  • Clean diffs showing exactly what's different
  • Code excerpts with syntax highlighting
  • No stack trace pollution from framework internals
  • Line numbers that actually point to your failing code

Compare this to Mocha's verbose wall of text or Jest's stack traces where half the output is framework bullshit. AVA uses power-assert under the hood to provide meaningful failure output.

ES Modules Just Work

AVA was built for modern JavaScript from day one. No babel configuration hell, no "type": "module" dance in package.json. Import your modules and AVA handles the rest.

import test from 'ava';
import { myFunction } from '../src/utils.js';

test('myFunction works', t => {
    t.is(myFunction(), 'expected result');
});

AVA's native ESM support means you can use dynamic imports, top-level await, and other modern features without transpilation.

The Downsides Nobody Mentions

  • Higher memory usage because of process isolation
  • Slower startup time (each process needs to boot Node.js)
  • No built-in browser testing - it's Node.js only
  • Smaller ecosystem compared to Jest's massive plugin library
  • Learning curve if you're used to globals like describe() and it()

But if you have a large test suite that's been flaky or slow, AVA's process isolation is worth the tradeoffs.

AVA vs The Competition: Real Talk

Competitor

AVA Wins When

Competitor Wins When

Reality Check

Jest

  • Your tests randomly fail when run together (Jest's shared process is bullshit)
  • You need reliable CI runs without memory leaks
  • You want actual isolation between test files
  • ES modules are giving you configuration headaches in Jest
  • You need built-in mocking without importing Sinon
  • Your team is already familiar with Jest's bloated API
  • You want code coverage without adding another tool
  • You're testing React components (Jest + Testing Library works, I guess)

Jest is popular but flaky as hell.

Last week our Jest suite had 5 tests that would randomly fail with "ReferenceError: regenerator

Runtime is not defined"

  • only when run together, never individually. Switched to AVA, problem vanished.

Mocha

  • You want tests to run in parallel without extra setup
  • You're tired of configuring assertion libraries
  • You need better error messages out of the box
  • You prefer the flexibility to choose your own assertion library
  • Your team loves the describe() and it() syntax
  • You need browser testing with Karma integration

Mocha is ancient but reliable. It's the Toyota Corolla of test runners

  • boring but it gets you there.

Node.js Built-in Test Runner

  • You need more than basic assertions
  • You want mature tooling and documentation
  • You're not on the latest Node.js version
  • You want zero dependencies
  • You're building a library and want minimal overhead
  • You're using Node.js 20+ and don't mind experimental features

Node's built-in runner is getting better fast, but it's still missing features like snapshot testing. Good for libraries, not ready for production apps.

Getting AVA Running (The 5-Minute Version)

AVA Installation Success

Installation That Actually Works

npm init ava

That's it. This npm init command does everything you need:

If you prefer doing it manually:

npm install --save-dev ava

Then add this to your package.json:

{
  "scripts": {
    "test": "ava"
  },
  "type": "module"
}

Your First Test (That Won't Fail Mysteriously)

Create test.js and write something simple:

import test from 'ava';

test('math still works', t => {
    t.is(2 + 2, 4);
});

test('async code without the pain', async t => {
    const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/status');
    const data = await response.json();
    t.truthy(data.ok);
});

Run it:

npm test

Version Info That Matters

As of September 2025, AVA is at version 6.4.1 (released July 12, 2025). Works on Node 18+, use Node 20 LTS for production.

Check your Node version with node --version.

Common Setup Issues You'll Hit

ES Modules Error: If you see SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module, make sure you have "type": "module" in your package.json. This bit me for 2 hours on my first AVA project.

TypeScript Issues: Install @ava/typescript if you want TypeScript support:

npm install --save-dev @ava/typescript

Windows Process Limits: AVA spawns lots of processes. On Windows, you might hit process limits with large test suites. I learned this the hard way when our 300-test suite crashed Windows with "EMFILE: too many open files". Set concurrency lower:

ava --concurrency=2

Who Actually Uses This Thing

Real projects using AVA (not just demo repos):

  • Sindre Sorhus's 1000+ npm packages (he created AVA, so obviously)
  • Got HTTP client - 14k GitHub stars, solid choice for API calls
  • Electron's build tools - yeah, the desktop app framework
  • XO linter - opinionated ESLint config that actually works
  • p-queue - Promise-based queue with concurrency control
  • np - Better npm publish experience

About 500k weekly downloads, which is decent but nowhere near Jest's 20M+. Smaller community means fewer Stack Overflow answers but also less noise.

Questions Real Developers Actually Ask

Q

Should I switch from Jest to AVA?

A

If Jest works fine for your project, don't fix what ain't broke.

But switch to AVA when:

  • Your tests randomly fail when run together (test pollution is killing your productivity)
  • Jest is eating all your CI memory on large test suites (our Jenkins died at 12GB)
  • You're tired of configuring ES modules in Jest
  • You want tests that actually run in isolationThe trade-off: AVA requires more setup for mocking and code coverage, but Jest's "convenience" comes with flaky tests that waste hours of debugging time. I'd rather spend 30 minutes setting up Sinon than 3 hours debugging why tests fail on CI but pass locally.
Q

Will AVA break on Node.js updates?

A

AVA follows Node.js LTS releases pretty closely. The maintainers are good about compatibility. I've never had AVA break from a Node.js update, unlike some other tools that love to use experimental APIs.

Q

How do I mock stuff without Jest's built-in mocks?

A

Install Sinon and mock like a civilized person:bashnpm install --save-dev sinon``````javascriptimport test from 'ava';import sinon from 'sinon';import { myModule } from '../src/my-module.js';test('mocking works', t => { const spy = sinon.spy(); myModule.doSomething = spy; myModule.doSomething('test'); t.true(spy.calledWith('test'));});Yeah it's an extra import, but you know exactly what's being mocked. No mysterious automatic mocking that breaks when you look at it wrong. Explicit > magical.

Q

Why is AVA slower to start than Jest?

A

AVA spawns a new Node.js process for each test file.

Process creation takes time

  • expect a 200-500ms startup penalty per test file. Jest runs everything in worker threads within the same process, which starts faster but shares memory and can cause test pollution.Trade-off: Slower startup, better isolation. On my laptop, AVA takes ~2 seconds to run 50 test files, Jest takes ~1 second but randomly fails 3 of them.
Q

Can I run AVA tests in the browser?

A

Nope.

AVA is Node.js only. If you need browser testing, use:

  • Playwright for E2E testing
  • Puppeteer for Chrome automation
  • Cypress for full browser integration tests
  • Jest + jsdom for DOM simulation (if you must)
Q

How do I get code coverage?

A

Install c8 (the modern nyc):bashnpm install --save-dev c8Update package.json:json{"scripts":{"test":"c8 ava"}}Run npm test and you get coverage reports. Not as seamless as Jest but it works.

Q

Is the AVA community dead?

A

Not dead, but smaller than Jest. 20k GitHub stars vs Jest's 44k. You'll find fewer tutorials and Stack Overflow answers, but the maintainers are responsive and the core contributors know their shit.Plus, smaller community means less noise and fewer conflicting opinions.

Related Tools & Recommendations

tool
Similar content

Mocha JS: Overview of a Feature-Rich Testing Framework

Discover Mocha, the powerful JavaScript testing framework for Node.js & browsers. Understand its architecture, core features, test execution flow, and setup pro

Mocha
/tool/mocha/overview
100%
tool
Similar content

Bun Test Runner: Migrate from Jest for Faster JavaScript Testing

Switch from Jest to Bun's native test runner for superior speed and reliability. Resolve common ts-jest errors and crashes, and streamline your JavaScript and T

Bun
/tool/bun/testing-framework
69%
tool
Similar content

Node.js Testing Strategies: Jest, Vitest & Integration Tests

Explore Node.js testing strategies, comparing Jest, Vitest, and native runners. Learn about crucial integration testing, troubleshoot CI failures, and optimize

Node.js
/tool/node.js/testing-strategies
66%
tool
Similar content

VS Code Testing & Debugging Workflows: Fix Common Issues

Master VS Code testing & debugging workflows. Fix common issues like failing tests, broken breakpoints, and explore advanced strategies for robust, reliable cod

Visual Studio Code
/tool/visual-studio-code/testing-debugging-quality-workflows
53%
review
Similar content

Bun vs Node.js vs Deno: JavaScript Runtime Production Guide

Two years of runtime fuckery later, here's the truth nobody tells you

Bun
/review/bun-nodejs-deno-comparison/production-readiness-assessment
53%
tool
Similar content

Bun JavaScript Runtime: Fast Node.js Alternative & Easy Install

JavaScript runtime that doesn't make you want to throw your laptop

Bun
/tool/bun/overview
52%
compare
Similar content

Bun vs Node.js vs Deno: JavaScript Runtime Performance Comparison

Three weeks of testing revealed which JavaScript runtime is actually faster (and when it matters)

Bun
/compare/bun/node.js/deno/performance-comparison
48%
tool
Similar content

Koa.js Overview: Async Web Framework & Practical Use Cases

What happens when the Express team gets fed up with callbacks

Koa.js
/tool/koa/overview
46%
tool
Similar content

Hardhat 3 Migration Guide: Speed Up Tests & Secure Your .env

Your Hardhat 2 tests are embarrassingly slow and your .env files are a security nightmare. Here's how to fix both problems without destroying your codebase.

Hardhat
/tool/hardhat/hardhat3-migration-guide
46%
tool
Similar content

Node.js Ecosystem 2025: AI, Serverless, Edge Computing

Node.js went from "JavaScript on the server? That's stupid" to running half the internet. Here's what actually works in production versus what looks good in dem

Node.js
/tool/node.js/ecosystem-integration-2025
46%
compare
Recommended

Playwright vs Cypress - Which One Won't Drive You Insane?

I've used both on production apps. Here's what actually matters when your tests are failing at 3am.

Playwright
/compare/playwright/cypress/testing-framework-comparison
43%
tool
Similar content

Selenium Python Bindings: Stop Test Failures & Debugging Hell

3 years of debugging Selenium bullshit - this setup finally works

Selenium WebDriver
/tool/selenium/python-implementation-guide
43%
tool
Similar content

Node.js Version Management: Master NVM, FNM & Upgrade Strategies

Master Node.js versions across projects without the 3am "it works on my machine" disasters. Handle major version migrations, compatibility nightmares, and npm p

Node.js
/tool/node.js/version-management
43%
tool
Similar content

Node.js Deployment Strategies: Master CI/CD, Serverless & Containers

Master Node.js deployment strategies, from traditional servers to modern serverless and containers. Learn to optimize CI/CD pipelines and prevent production iss

Node.js
/tool/node.js/deployment-strategies
41%
tool
Similar content

Node.js Memory Leaks & Debugging: Stop App Crashes

Learn to identify and debug Node.js memory leaks, prevent 'heap out of memory' errors, and keep your applications stable. Explore common patterns, tools, and re

Node.js
/tool/node.js/debugging-memory-leaks
41%
tool
Similar content

Express.js - The Web Framework Nobody Wants to Replace

It's ugly, old, and everyone still uses it

Express.js
/tool/express/overview
41%
tool
Similar content

Node.js Security Hardening Guide: Protect Your Apps

Master Node.js security hardening. Learn to manage npm dependencies, fix vulnerabilities, implement secure authentication, HTTPS, and input validation.

Node.js
/tool/node.js/security-hardening
41%
howto
Similar content

Polygon Dev Environment Setup: Fix Node.js, MetaMask & Gas Errors

Fix the bullshit Node.js conflicts, MetaMask fuckups, and gas estimation errors that waste your Saturday debugging sessions

Polygon SDK
/howto/polygon-dev-setup/complete-development-environment-setup
39%
howto
Similar content

Migrate Node.js to Bun 2025: Complete Guide & Best Practices

Because npm install takes forever and your CI pipeline is slower than dial-up

Bun
/howto/migrate-nodejs-to-bun/complete-migration-guide
37%
tool
Similar content

Bolt.new: VS Code in Browser for AI Full-Stack App Dev

Build full-stack apps by talking to AI - no Docker hell, no local setup

Bolt.new
/tool/bolt-new/overview
37%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization