PostgreSQL Performance: Why It's Brilliant and Infuriating at the Same Time

PostgreSQL's one-process-per-connection model is a relic from the 90s that works great until you hit 200 concurrent connections, then you need PgBouncer or everything falls apart. The query planner is brilliant 95% of the time and completely wrong the other 5% - usually during your busiest hour when a single reporting query decides to do a sequential scan on your biggest table.

Memory Configuration: Get This Wrong and You're Fucked

PostgreSQL's memory management is needlessly complex - you've got to tune at least four different memory settings or performance will be dogshit. Miss one setting and you'll spend weekends debugging why your supposedly beefy server is crawling. The PostgreSQL wiki has some guidance, but most of it is outdated bullshit that doesn't account for modern hardware.

Shared Buffers: The "25% of RAM" Lie That Ruins Performance

Everyone parrots the `shared_buffers` = 25% of RAM rule, which is absolute garbage advice that'll kill performance on any serious server. Here's what actually works:

  • For systems with 8-16GB RAM: 25% is appropriate (2-4GB)
  • For systems with 32GB+ RAM: 15-20% maximum to avoid OS cache competition
  • For high-write workloads: Even lower, around 10-15%

I learned this the hard way when I cranked shared_buffers up to 32GB thinking more cache = better performance. Performance went to absolute shit because PostgreSQL was fighting with the OS cache. Both were caching the same damn data, so I basically created a memory war zone. Took me three hours of debugging at 2:47am to figure out the issue, then dropping it to around 12GB slowly fixed the performance problems over the next 20 minutes as the caches stabilized.

-- Check current buffer hit ratio
SELECT 
    sum(heap_blks_hit) as heap_hit,
    sum(heap_blks_read) as heap_read,
    (sum(heap_blks_hit) / (sum(heap_blks_hit) + sum(heap_blks_read))) * 100 as ratio
FROM pg_statio_user_tables;

Target a buffer hit ratio above 95%. If it's lower, consider increasing shared_buffers or optimizing queries.

Work Memory: The Setting That'll Eat All Your RAM

`work_mem` is pure evil if you don't understand it. It's per operation per connection, which means a single complex query can use work_mem multiple times, and with 100 connections you can suddenly consume gigabytes without realizing it. I learned about this setting when a reporting query consumed 50GB of RAM and brought down production at 2:14am on a Friday. Guess who spent the weekend rebuilding the server.

Critical calculation: Total potential memory = connections × work_mem × operations per query

For a system with 100 connections where queries average 3 operations each:

  • At 16MB work_mem: 100 × 16MB × 3 = 4.8GB potential usage
  • At 64MB work_mem: 100 × 64MB × 3 = 19.2GB potential usage

Recommended settings by workload:

  • OLTP systems: 2-8MB (many simple queries, high concurrency)
  • Analytics/reporting: 32-128MB (complex queries, fewer concurrent users)
  • Mixed workloads: 8-16MB with connection pooling mandatory

Advanced Query Optimization Techniques

PostgreSQL's query planner makes decisions based on table statistics and config parameters, which sounds great until it fucks up your busiest query because the stats are stale. I've spent way too many nights debugging why a query that ran in 100ms yesterday is now taking 30 seconds because the planner decided to do a full table scan instead of using the perfectly good index. You'll know you're in this hell when you see "LOG: duration: 45123.456 ms" showing up in your logs every few minutes.

Index Strategy Beyond B-Trees

While B-tree indexes handle 80% of use cases, PostgreSQL offers specialized index types for specific scenarios:

GIN Indexes for JSONB and array operations, as explained in this detailed PostgreSQL tutorial:

-- For JSONB containment queries
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_metadata_gin ON products USING GIN (metadata);

-- Efficient for: WHERE metadata @> '{"category": "electronics"}'

BRIN Indexes for time-series data, perfect for PostgreSQL time-series workloads as TimescaleDB demonstrates:

-- Extremely small indexes for naturally ordered data
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_created_brin ON events USING BRIN (created_at);

BRIN indexes can be 1000x smaller than B-tree indexes while maintaining excellent performance for range queries on naturally clustered data.

Partial Indexes for filtered access patterns:

-- Only index active records
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_active_orders 
ON orders (user_id, created_at) 
WHERE status IN ('pending', 'processing');

Query Plan Analysis with EXPLAIN

Use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) to understand actual query performance:

EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT JSON) 
SELECT u.username, COUNT(o.id) as order_count
FROM users u 
LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id 
WHERE u.created_at > '2024-01-01'
GROUP BY u.id, u.username
ORDER BY order_count DESC;

Key metrics to monitor:

  • Seq Scan on large tables: Usually indicates missing indexes
  • High buffer reads: Indicates I/O pressure
  • Nested Loop with large datasets: Often needs different join strategy

Connection and Process Management

PostgreSQL's process-per-connection model requires careful connection management at scale.

PgBouncer: Not Optional If You Want to Sleep At Night

PgBouncer isn't a nice-to-have - it's fucking mandatory. PostgreSQL without connection pooling is like driving without brakes. You'll crash eventually, it's just a matter of when. The official documentation is terrible and transaction pooling breaks half the applications that try to use it, but you need it anyway. Percona's guide explains the trade-offs better than the official docs:

[databases]
production = host=localhost port=5432 dbname=mydb

[pgbouncer]
pool_mode = transaction
max_client_conn = 300
default_pool_size = 25
reserve_pool_size = 5

Pool modes:

  • Transaction pooling: Best performance, breaks session state
  • Session pooling: Maintains session state, lower performance
  • Statement pooling: Rarely used, breaks prepared statements

Autovacuum: "Automatic" My Ass

Here's what I figured out about autovacuum after debugging this shit way too many times. Autovacuum is supposed to be automatic but you'll spend hours tuning it for high-write workloads. Out of the box, it's too conservative and your tables will bloat until performance dies. I've seen 40% dead tuples on production tables because autovacuum couldn't keep up. The PostgreSQL autovacuum tuning guide from pganalyze is actually useful, unlike most documentation:

-- Check table bloat
SELECT schemaname, tablename,
       n_dead_tup,
       n_live_tup,
       round((n_dead_tup::float / (n_dead_tup + n_live_tup)) * 100, 2) as dead_percentage
FROM pg_stat_user_tables 
WHERE n_dead_tup > 1000
ORDER BY dead_percentage DESC;

For tables with high update rates, tune autovacuum per-table:

ALTER TABLE busy_table SET (
    autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.05,  -- 5% instead of 20%
    autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.02  -- 2% instead of 10%
);

Write-Ahead Log (WAL) Optimization

WAL configuration significantly impacts write performance and crash recovery time.

Checkpoint Configuration

Checkpoint tuning is where I've lost the most weekends - the database runs fine for hours, then suddenly everything blocks for 30 seconds while PostgreSQL flushes dirty pages. The first time this happened in production, I thought we were getting DDoSed because all connections just hung. Turns out the default checkpoint settings are garbage for any serious workload. This comprehensive guide to PostgreSQL checkpoint tuning explains the internals better than the official docs:

-- Spread checkpoints over time
checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9
checkpoint_timeout = 15min

-- Size WAL appropriately for write load
max_wal_size = 4GB
min_wal_size = 1GB

Setting checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9 spreads checkpoint I/O over 90% of the interval instead of creating those massive I/O spikes that make your monitoring dashboards look like someone's having a heart attack.

Monitoring WAL Generation

-- Measure WAL generation rate
SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_wal_lsn_diff(pg_current_wal_lsn(), restart_lsn)) as wal_size
FROM pg_replication_slots;

-- Check for stuck replication slots
SELECT slot_name, active, 
       pg_size_pretty(pg_wal_lsn_diff(pg_current_wal_lsn(), restart_lsn)) as retained_wal
FROM pg_replication_slots
WHERE restart_lsn IS NOT NULL;

Performance Monitoring with Built-in Tools

PostgreSQL provides extensive performance monitoring capabilities through its statistics collector. The pg_stat_statements extension is essential for production monitoring, and this monitoring checklist from Crunchy Data covers the key metrics to watch.

Essential Performance Queries

-- Find slowest queries
SELECT query,
       calls,
       total_exec_time,
       mean_exec_time,
       rows/calls as avg_rows
FROM pg_stat_statements 
ORDER BY total_exec_time DESC 
LIMIT 10;

-- Monitor lock contention
SELECT blocked_locks.pid AS blocked_pid,
       blocking_locks.pid AS blocking_pid,
       blocked_activity.query AS blocked_statement
FROM pg_catalog.pg_locks blocked_locks
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity blocked_activity ON blocked_activity.pid = blocked_locks.pid
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_locks blocking_locks ON blocking_locks.locktype = blocked_locks.locktype
WHERE NOT blocked_locks.GRANTED;

Production Configuration Example

Here's a production-ready configuration for a 32GB system running mixed OLTP/analytics workloads:

## Memory settings
shared_buffers = 6GB
work_mem = 8MB
maintenance_work_mem = 2GB
effective_cache_size = 24GB

## WAL settings
wal_buffers = 32MB
checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9
max_wal_size = 4GB

## Connection settings
max_connections = 200  # With PgBouncer

This configuration assumes connection pooling is in place and provides a solid foundation for most production workloads. Always monitor performance metrics and adjust based on your specific usage patterns. For more advanced tuning, check out PostgreSQL performance best practices from EnterpriseDB and Heroku's PostgreSQL performance guide which actually covers real-world scenarios.

PostgreSQL vs MySQL: Performance Reality Check - No Bullshit Comparison

Optimization Category

PostgreSQL Approach

MySQL (InnoDB) Approach

Key Differences

When to Choose Each

Memory Management

shared_buffers (15-25% RAM), cooperative with OS cache

innodb_buffer_pool_size (70-80% RAM), aggressive caching

PostgreSQL's memory tuning is a nightmare until you understand it, then MySQL's auto-tuning looks lazy (but breaks in MySQL 8.0.30 with memory tracking bugs)

PostgreSQL: If you like complex tuning
MySQL: If you want shit to work out of the box

Connection Handling

Process-per-connection, requires pooling at 100+ connections

Thread-per-connection, handles more direct connections

PostgreSQL's 90s architecture will bite you; MySQL actually scales connections

PostgreSQL: PgBouncer or die
MySQL: Works like you'd expect

Index Types Available

B-tree, GIN, GiST, BRIN, Hash, SP-GiST

B-tree, Hash, Full-text, Spatial (R-tree)

PostgreSQL has more specialized index types

PostgreSQL: JSONB, arrays, geospatial data
MySQL: Simpler indexing needs

Query Optimization

Cost-based planner with extensive statistics

Cost-based optimizer with histogram statistics

PostgreSQL planner more sophisticated but complex

PostgreSQL: Complex analytical queries
MySQL: Simpler OLTP patterns

Write Performance

WAL-based, checkpoint tuning critical

Redo log-based, adaptive flushing

PostgreSQL will randomly freeze for 30 seconds during checkpoints; MySQL doesn't do this shit

PostgreSQL: Tune or suffer
MySQL: Just works consistently

Parallel Processing

Parallel queries, parallel index builds

Parallel DDL operations (MySQL 8.0+)

PostgreSQL has more mature parallel query support

PostgreSQL: Large analytical queries
MySQL: DDL operations, bulk operations

Storage Engine

Single engine (heap tables) with TOAST for large values

Multiple engines (InnoDB primary), clustered indexes

MySQL clustered indexes can improve range query performance

PostgreSQL: Consistent behavior
MySQL: Primary key design critical

Monitoring Tools

pg_stat_statements, Performance Schema extensions

Performance Schema, sys schema

PostgreSQL requires extensions; MySQL has built-in comprehensive monitoring

PostgreSQL: Enable pg_stat_statements
MySQL: Rich built-in monitoring

Auto-tuning Features

Manual configuration mostly

innodb_dedicated_server auto-configuration

MySQL's auto-tuning sounds great until it allocates 80% of RAM and your monitoring goes OOM

PostgreSQL: Expertise required
MySQL: Auto-tuning that sometimes works

MySQL Performance: When Auto-Tuning Lies to You

MySQL's performance revolves around InnoDB, which works great until it doesn't. The marketing says it auto-tunes itself, but I've spent countless nights debugging why MySQL's "intelligent" buffer pool allocation consumed all available RAM and brought down monitoring systems. InnoDB's clustered indexes are brilliant for range queries and terrible for random UUID primary keys - learned this the expensive way when INSERT performance dropped 10x.

InnoDB Buffer Pool: Greedy But Effective

The InnoDB buffer pool is MySQL's way of saying "fuck the OS cache, I'll handle everything myself." Unlike PostgreSQL's cooperative approach, MySQL grabs 70-80% of your RAM and does its own thing. It works well, but when it goes wrong, it goes spectacularly wrong.

Optimal Buffer Pool Sizing

For dedicated MySQL servers, the `innodb_buffer_pool_size` should consume 70-80% of available RAM:

-- Check current buffer pool utilization
SELECT 
    FORMAT_BYTES(@@innodb_buffer_pool_size) AS configured_size,
    FORMAT(pages_data.variable_value * 100.0 / pages_total.variable_value, 2) AS utilization_pct,
    FORMAT(reads.variable_value * 100.0 / read_requests.variable_value, 2) AS disk_read_ratio_pct
FROM 
    (SELECT variable_value FROM performance_schema.global_status 
     WHERE variable_name = 'Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_data') pages_data,
    (SELECT variable_value FROM performance_schema.global_status 
     WHERE variable_name = 'Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_total') pages_total,
    (SELECT variable_value FROM performance_schema.global_status 
     WHERE variable_name = 'Innodb_buffer_pool_reads') reads,
    (SELECT variable_value FROM performance_schema.global_status 
     WHERE variable_name = 'Innodb_buffer_pool_read_requests') read_requests;

Target metrics:

  • Buffer pool utilization: >90%
  • Disk read ratio: <5%
  • Buffer pool hit ratio: >99%

Auto-Configuration with innodb_dedicated_server

MySQL 8.0 introduced `innodb_dedicated_server` which sounds amazing until you realize what "automatic" means:

-- Enable automatic configuration
SET PERSIST innodb_dedicated_server = 1;

This automatically configures:

  • Buffer Pool Size: 50-75% of RAM based on total memory
  • Redo Log Capacity: Optimized for detected workload patterns
  • Flush Method: Platform-specific optimizations

For systems with >64GB RAM, this works great... until you realize it doesn't account for other processes on the server. I've seen it allocate 90% of RAM on a server that also runs application code, causing everything to swap to death. You'll know this happened when you see "Cannot allocate memory (errno: 12)" in your MySQL error log.

Advanced Memory Management in MySQL 8.0+

MySQL 8.0+ finally added granular connection memory tracking, which should have existed 10 years ago. Before this feature, debugging MySQL memory usage was completely fucking impossible - you knew something was eating RAM but had no clue what:

-- Enable comprehensive memory tracking
SET PERSIST global_connection_memory_tracking = 1;
SET PERSIST connection_memory_limit = 2097152; -- 2MB per connection
SET PERSIST global_connection_memory_limit = 536870912; -- 512MB total

-- Monitor real-time memory usage
SELECT FORMAT_BYTES(variable_value) AS total_connection_memory
FROM performance_schema.global_status
WHERE variable_name = 'Global_connection_memory';

This feature is brilliant because MySQL's memory calculation was complete garbage before - it never properly accounted for per-connection overhead. I've had servers with 1000 connections mysteriously run out of RAM during peak traffic, and it took me 3 hours of digging through process lists and system logs to figure out that each connection was using way more memory than MySQL claimed it would.

InnoDB Redo Log Optimization

The redo log has been completely redesigned in MySQL 8.0 with highly scalable, latch-free implementation:

Dynamic Redo Log Capacity

-- Measure redo log generation rate
SELECT 
    'Redo Log Generation Analysis' AS analysis,
    FORMAT_BYTES(@redo_generated) AS redo_per_minute,
    FORMAT_BYTES(@redo_generated * 60) AS redo_per_hour
FROM (
    SELECT @start_lsn := VARIABLE_VALUE FROM performance_schema.global_status
    WHERE VARIABLE_NAME='Innodb_redo_log_current_lsn'
) start,
(SELECT SLEEP(60)) wait,
(
    SELECT @end_lsn := VARIABLE_VALUE FROM performance_schema.global_status
    WHERE VARIABLE_NAME='Innodb_redo_log_current_lsn'
) end,
(SELECT @redo_generated := ABS(@end_lsn - @start_lsn)) calc;

-- Configure based on workload analysis  
SET PERSIST innodb_redo_log_capacity = 2147483648; -- 2GB for write-heavy workloads

Sizing guidelines:

  • Light workloads: 512MB - 1GB
  • Moderate writes: 1-2GB
  • Heavy write workloads: 2-8GB
  • Bulk operations: Temporarily increase to 16GB+

Clustered Index Optimization

InnoDB's clustered index architecture stores data pages in primary key order, making primary key design critical for performance:

Primary Key Strategy

-- Optimal for high-insert workloads (sequential)
CREATE TABLE orders (
    order_id BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
    customer_id INT NOT NULL,
    order_date TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
    total_amount DECIMAL(12,2),
    
    INDEX idx_customer_date (customer_id, order_date),
    INDEX idx_date_amount (order_date, total_amount)
);

-- Problematic for high-insert workloads (random UUIDs)
CREATE TABLE user_sessions (
    session_id CHAR(36) PRIMARY KEY,  -- UUID causes page splits
    user_id INT,
    created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);

Primary key guidelines that'll save your ass:

  • Use AUTO_INCREMENT for high-insert workloads - random UUIDs cause so many page splits that INSERT performance drops 10x
  • Keep primary keys small - every secondary index includes the primary key, so a UUID primary key bloats every index
  • Avoid composite primary keys unless you really know what you're doing - they make everything more complex

Generated Invisible Primary Keys (MySQL 8.0.30+)

For tables lacking explicit primary keys:

-- Enable automatic primary key generation  
SET PERSIST sql_generate_invisible_primary_key = 1;

-- Tables without explicit PKs get automatic ones
CREATE TABLE user_sessions (
    session_token VARCHAR(255),
    user_id INT,
    created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
-- Automatically gets: my_row_id BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY (invisible)

Advanced Query Optimization

MySQL's Performance Schema provides comprehensive query analysis capabilities:

Identifying Optimization Opportunities

-- Find queries with high examination-to-return ratios
SELECT 
    SUBSTRING(digest_text, 1, 100) AS query_sample,
    count_star AS executions,
    ROUND(avg_timer_wait/1000000000, 2) AS avg_seconds,
    ROUND(sum_rows_examined/count_star, 0) AS avg_rows_examined,
    ROUND(sum_rows_sent/count_star, 0) AS avg_rows_returned,
    ROUND(sum_rows_examined/sum_rows_sent, 0) AS examination_ratio
FROM performance_schema.events_statements_summary_by_digest 
WHERE schema_name NOT IN ('performance_schema', 'information_schema', 'mysql')
    AND sum_rows_examined > sum_rows_sent * 10  -- High examination ratio
ORDER BY sum_timer_wait DESC
LIMIT 10;

Optimization targets:

  • Examination ratio >10: Likely missing indexes
  • High avg_rows_examined: Full table scans on large tables
  • Long avg_seconds: Query structure problems

Full Table Scan Detection

-- Identify tables requiring immediate indexing attention
SELECT 
    object_schema,
    object_name,
    FORMAT(rows_full_scanned, 0) AS rows_scanned,
    FORMAT_PICO_TIME(latency) AS total_latency
FROM performance_schema.table_io_waits_summary_by_table
WHERE object_schema NOT IN ('performance_schema', 'information_schema', 'mysql')
    AND rows_full_scanned > 1000
ORDER BY rows_full_scanned DESC;

Parallel Processing and Bulk Operations

MySQL 8.0+ introduces significant parallel processing capabilities:

Parallel DDL Operations

-- Configure parallel index creation
SET innodb_ddl_threads = 8;
SET innodb_parallel_read_threads = 8;  
SET innodb_ddl_buffer_size = 1073741824; -- 1GB

-- Monitor parallel DDL effectiveness
CREATE INDEX idx_flight_passenger ON bookings(flight_id, passenger_id);

-- Check parallel processing utilization
SELECT 
    event_name,
    count_star,
    sum_timer_wait/1000000000 AS total_seconds
FROM performance_schema.events_waits_summary_global_by_event_name
WHERE event_name LIKE '%parallel%'
ORDER BY sum_timer_wait DESC;

Bulk Data Import Optimization

For massive data imports, MySQL Shell's dump and load utilities provide unprecedented performance:

// MySQL Shell - parallel data loading
\js
util.loadDump(\"/opt/dump/\", {
    threads: 16,
    deferTableIndexes: \"all\",
    ignoreVersion: true,
    loadIndexes: false  // Load indexes separately after data
});

Performance optimizations for bulk operations:

-- Temporarily disable durability (use carefully)
SET PERSIST innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 0;
SET PERSIST sync_binlog = 0;

-- Optimize for bulk inserts
SET PERSIST innodb_autoinc_lock_mode = 2;
SET PERSIST innodb_buffer_pool_dump_at_shutdown = 0;

-- Restore normal settings after bulk operations
SET PERSIST innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 1;  
SET PERSIST sync_binlog = 1;

I/O and Storage Optimization

InnoDB's I/O behavior significantly affects performance, especially on modern NVMe storage:

Storage-Specific Configuration

-- NVMe SSD optimization
SET PERSIST innodb_io_capacity = 4000;
SET PERSIST innodb_io_capacity_max = 8000;
SET PERSIST innodb_flush_neighbors = 0;  -- Disable for SSD
SET PERSIST innodb_random_read_ahead = OFF;

-- Traditional SSD
SET PERSIST innodb_io_capacity = 2000;
SET PERSIST innodb_io_capacity_max = 4000;

-- HDD (legacy systems)
SET PERSIST innodb_io_capacity = 200;
SET PERSIST innodb_io_capacity_max = 400;
SET PERSIST innodb_flush_neighbors = 1;  -- Enable for HDD

Advanced I/O Monitoring

-- Monitor I/O patterns
SELECT 
    FILE_NAME,
    FORMAT_BYTES(SUM(COUNT_READ * AVG_READ_BYTES)) AS total_read,
    FORMAT_BYTES(SUM(COUNT_WRITE * AVG_WRITE_BYTES)) AS total_write,
    SUM(COUNT_READ + COUNT_WRITE) AS total_operations,
    ROUND(AVG(AVG_READ_TIME + AVG_WRITE_TIME)/1000000, 2) AS avg_latency_ms
FROM performance_schema.file_summary_by_instance
WHERE FILE_NAME LIKE '%ibd'  -- InnoDB data files
GROUP BY FILE_NAME
ORDER BY total_operations DESC
LIMIT 10;

Production Configuration Example

Here's a production-ready configuration for a 64GB dedicated MySQL server:

## Memory configuration
innodb_buffer_pool_size = 48G
innodb_buffer_pool_instances = 16

## Connection management  
max_connections = 1000
connection_memory_limit = 2M
global_connection_memory_limit = 2G

## I/O optimization (NVMe SSD)
innodb_io_capacity = 4000
innodb_io_capacity_max = 8000
innodb_flush_neighbors = 0

## Redo log configuration
innodb_redo_log_capacity = 4G

## Advanced features
innodb_dedicated_server = 1
innodb_parallel_read_threads = 8

This configuration leverages MySQL 8.0's auto-tuning capabilities while providing explicit optimization for high-performance storage and heavy concurrent workloads. Always monitor key performance metrics and adjust based on your specific application patterns.

Database Performance FAQ: 3AM Debugging Survival Guide

Q

My PostgreSQL query was fast yesterday, now it takes 30 seconds. What the fuck happened?

A

Welcome to stale statistics hell. PostgreSQL's query planner is brilliant until your data changes and it's still using week-old statistics to make decisions. Suddenly your 100ms query is doing a full table scan and you're wondering if you broke something.

Immediate fix:

-- Check when statistics were last updated
SELECT schemaname, tablename, last_vacuum, last_autovacuum, 
       last_analyze, last_autoanalyze 
FROM pg_stat_user_tables 
WHERE schemaname = 'public' AND tablename = 'your_slow_table';

-- Force statistics update
ANALYZE your_table_name;

Long-term solution: Configure autovacuum more aggressively for frequently updated tables:

ALTER TABLE busy_table SET (
    autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.02  -- 2% instead of 10%
);
Q

PostgreSQL is using 100% CPU but queries are still slow. Why?

A

You're likely doing sequential scans on large tables because indexes are missing or not being used effectively.

Diagnosis:

-- Find long-running queries
SELECT pid, now() - pg_stat_get_backend_start_time(pid) as duration, query 
FROM pg_stat_activity 
WHERE state = 'active' AND query NOT LIKE '%pg_stat_activity%'
ORDER BY duration DESC;

Look for these warning signs in EXPLAIN ANALYZE:

  • "Seq Scan" on tables with >10,000 rows
  • "Nested Loop" with large result sets
  • High "Buffers: shared read" numbers
Q

PgBouncer is supposed to make things faster but it's slow as shit. What's wrong?

A

You're using session pooling like a noob. Transaction pooling is what you want, but it breaks every application that uses temp tables or prepared statements. The PgBouncer documentation is garbage at explaining this.

Optimal PgBouncer configuration:

[databases]
production = host=localhost port=5432 dbname=mydb

[pgbouncer]
pool_mode = transaction
max_client_conn = 300
default_pool_size = 25
reserve_pool_size = 5

Important: Transaction pooling breaks applications that rely on:

  • Temporary tables
  • Prepared statements across transactions
  • Session-level SET variables

Fix the application code instead of using session pooling. Yes, it's more work. No, there's no easy way around it.

Q

PostgreSQL filled up 2TB of disk with WAL files and crashed production. How do I prevent this nightmare?

A

A stuck replication slot filled up your disk with WAL files. This is my least favorite PostgreSQL bug because it always happens on Friday at 6:47pm and takes down the entire database. If you're not monitoring replication slots, you will get burned.

Check for stuck replication slots:

SELECT slot_name, active, restart_lsn,
       pg_size_pretty(pg_wal_lsn_diff(pg_current_wal_lsn(), restart_lsn)) as retained_wal
FROM pg_replication_slots
WHERE restart_lsn IS NOT NULL;

Fix stuck slots:

-- Drop stuck replication slot (be careful!)
SELECT pg_drop_replication_slot('stuck_slot_name');

Increase WAL capacity for write-heavy workloads:

-- In postgresql.conf
max_wal_size = 8GB
checkpoint_timeout = 15min
Q

Random queries timeout with "canceling statement due to statement timeout". What's happening?

A

Either your statement_timeout is too aggressive, or you have lock contention causing queries to wait.

Check for lock contention:

SELECT blocked_locks.pid AS blocked_pid,
       blocking_locks.pid AS blocking_pid,
       blocked_activity.query AS blocked_statement
FROM pg_catalog.pg_locks blocked_locks
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity blocked_activity ON blocked_activity.pid = blocked_locks.pid
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_locks blocking_locks ON blocking_locks.locktype = blocked_locks.locktype
WHERE NOT blocked_locks.GRANTED;

Solutions:

  • If you see lock waits: Optimize the blocking queries
  • If no lock contention: Increase statement_timeout for legitimate long-running operations
  • Set per-session timeouts for specific operations that need more time
Q

MySQL was fast before I restarted it, now it's dogshit slow. What happened?

A

The InnoDB buffer pool is cold and needs to warm up. This takes forever on large datasets and your application will be slow until the frequently accessed data gets cached again. MySQL 8.0 can save and restore the buffer pool, but it's not enabled by default because reasons.

Enable buffer pool dump/restore:

SET PERSIST innodb_buffer_pool_dump_at_shutdown = 1;
SET PERSIST innodb_buffer_pool_load_at_startup = 1;

-- Check buffer pool warming status
SHOW STATUS LIKE 'Innodb_buffer_pool_load_%';

Monitor buffer pool hit ratio during warmup:

SELECT 
    ROUND((1 - (reads.variable_value / read_requests.variable_value)) * 100, 2) AS hit_ratio_pct
FROM 
    (SELECT variable_value FROM performance_schema.global_status 
     WHERE variable_name = 'Innodb_buffer_pool_reads') reads,
    (SELECT variable_value FROM performance_schema.global_status 
     WHERE variable_name = 'Innodb_buffer_pool_read_requests') read_requests;

Target >99% hit ratio. Lower ratios indicate the buffer pool is still warming up.

Q

My MySQL server runs out of memory with "Cannot allocate memory" errors. How do I fix this?

A

You've configured MySQL to use more memory than available. This often happens with too many connections or oversized per-connection buffers.

Check memory usage:

-- Total potential memory usage
SELECT 
    @@max_connections as max_conns,
    FORMAT_BYTES(@@max_connections * (
        @@read_buffer_size + @@read_rnd_buffer_size + @@sort_buffer_size + 
        @@join_buffer_size + @@binlog_cache_size
    )) as max_per_connection_memory,
    FORMAT_BYTES(@@innodb_buffer_pool_size) as buffer_pool_size;

Solutions:

  1. Reduce connection limits: SET PERSIST max_connections = 500;
  2. Enable connection memory tracking (MySQL 8.0+):
SET PERSIST global_connection_memory_tracking = 1;
SET PERSIST connection_memory_limit = 2097152; -- 2MB per connection
  1. Use connection pooling: Implement connection pooling in your application
Q

INSERT operations are very slow in MySQL. What's the most common cause?

A

Slow INSERTs are usually caused by poor primary key design, missing indexes on foreign keys, or suboptimal bulk insert configuration.

Check for random primary keys:

-- Bad: UUIDs cause page splits and fragmentation
CREATE TABLE sessions (
    session_id CHAR(36) PRIMARY KEY,  -- Random UUID
    user_id INT,
    created_at TIMESTAMP
);

-- Good: Sequential primary keys
CREATE TABLE sessions (
    id BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
    session_uuid CHAR(36),
    user_id INT,
    created_at TIMESTAMP,
    UNIQUE KEY uk_session_uuid (session_uuid)
);

For bulk operations, optimize temporarily:

-- Disable durability for bulk loads (use carefully)
SET SESSION innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 0;
SET SESSION foreign_key_checks = 0;
SET SESSION unique_checks = 0;

-- Restore after bulk operation
SET SESSION innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 1;
SET SESSION foreign_key_checks = 1;
SET SESSION unique_checks = 1;
Q

MySQL queries are fast individually but slow under load. What's happening?

A

This indicates resource contention - either I/O bottlenecks, lock contention, or thread pool exhaustion.

Check thread utilization:

-- Monitor thread pool efficiency (MySQL Enterprise)
SELECT 
    thread_group_id,
    connections_started,
    connections_closed,
    queries_executed,
    queries_queued
FROM performance_schema.tp_thread_group_stats
ORDER BY queries_queued DESC;

Check for lock contention:

-- Find blocking transactions
SELECT 
    waiting_pid,
    waiting_query,
    blocking_pid,
    blocking_query,
    wait_age
FROM sys.innodb_lock_waits;

Common solutions:

  • Enable thread pooling for high-concurrency workloads
  • Optimize slow queries that hold locks for too long
  • Consider read replicas to distribute read load
Q

MySQL replication lag is at 2 hours and climbing. How fucked am I?

A

Replication lag usually means your replica can't keep up with the primary's write load. Single-threaded replication was one of MySQL's dumbest design decisions, but parallel replication in 8.0+ helps if you enable it (spoiler alert: it's not enabled by default because MySQL hates you).

Check replication status:

-- On replica
SHOW SLAVE STATUS\G

-- Key metrics to check:
- Seconds_Behind_Master: Should be <5 seconds
- Slave_SQL_Running: Should be Yes
- Last_Error: Should be empty

Enable parallel replication (MySQL 8.0+):

-- On replica
STOP SLAVE;
SET GLOBAL slave_parallel_workers = 8;
SET GLOBAL slave_parallel_type = 'LOGICAL_CLOCK';
SET GLOBAL slave_preserve_commit_order = 1;
START SLAVE;

Monitor parallel replication effectiveness:

SELECT 
    channel_name,
    worker_id,
    thread_id,
    service_state,
    last_error_message
FROM performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker;
Q

How do I choose between PostgreSQL and MySQL for a high-performance application?

A

The choice depends on your specific workload characteristics and team expertise:

Choose PostgreSQL when:

  • Complex analytical queries with advanced SQL features (window functions, CTEs, recursive queries)
  • JSONB or array data types are central to your application
  • You need specialized index types (GIN for JSONB, BRIN for time-series, GiST for geospatial)
  • Your team has PostgreSQL expertise for complex tuning

Choose MySQL when:

  • High-concurrency OLTP with simpler query patterns
  • Dedicated database server where MySQL can control most system resources
  • Team prefers simpler configuration with good default performance
  • Web application with standard CRUD operations and established MySQL ecosystem
Q

What's the most important performance optimization for both databases?

A

Memory configuration has the highest impact for both systems, but the approaches differ:

PostgreSQL: Balance between shared_buffers and OS cache

  • shared_buffers = 15-25% of RAM (6GB on 32GB system)
  • Let OS handle most caching via effective_cache_size

MySQL: Aggressive internal caching

  • innodb_buffer_pool_size = 70-80% of RAM (24GB on 32GB system)
  • MySQL controls most data caching internally
Q

Should I use connection pooling for both databases?

A

PostgreSQL: Connection pooling is mandatory for web applications

  • Use PgBouncer with transaction pooling
  • Required at 100+ concurrent connections due to process-per-connection model

MySQL: Connection pooling is recommended but not mandatory

  • Can handle 1000+ direct connections with thread-per-connection model
  • Still beneficial for connection management and resource control
Q

How do I monitor performance for both databases?

A

PostgreSQL monitoring:

-- Enable pg_stat_statements
CREATE EXTENSION pg_stat_statements;

-- Monitor key metrics
SELECT query, calls, total_exec_time, mean_exec_time 
FROM pg_stat_statements 
ORDER BY total_exec_time DESC LIMIT 10;

MySQL monitoring:

-- Performance Schema is enabled by default
SELECT digest_text, count_star, avg_timer_wait/1000000000 as avg_seconds
FROM performance_schema.events_statements_summary_by_digest
ORDER BY sum_timer_wait DESC LIMIT 10;

Both databases benefit from external monitoring tools like Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM), pganalyze, or Datadog for comprehensive performance tracking.

Tools That Actually Work (And Some That Don't) for Database Performance

Related Tools & Recommendations

compare
Similar content

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MongoDB vs Cassandra: In-Depth Comparison

Skip the bullshit. Here's what breaks in production.

PostgreSQL
/compare/postgresql/mysql/mongodb/cassandra/comprehensive-database-comparison
100%
integration
Similar content

Laravel MySQL Performance Optimization Guide: Fix Slow Apps

Stop letting database performance kill your Laravel app - here's how to actually fix it

MySQL
/integration/mysql-laravel/overview
74%
compare
Recommended

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MariaDB vs SQLite vs CockroachDB - Pick the Database That Won't Ruin Your Life

competes with mariadb

mariadb
/compare/postgresql-mysql-mariadb-sqlite-cockroachdb/database-decision-guide
70%
compare
Similar content

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MariaDB: Developer Ecosystem Analysis

PostgreSQL, MySQL, or MariaDB: Choose Your Database Nightmare Wisely

PostgreSQL
/compare/postgresql/mysql/mariadb/developer-ecosystem-analysis
65%
howto
Similar content

MongoDB to PostgreSQL Migration: The Complete Survival Guide

Four Months of Pain, 47k Lost Sessions, and What Actually Works

MongoDB
/howto/migrate-mongodb-to-postgresql/complete-migration-guide
53%
howto
Similar content

MySQL to PostgreSQL Production Migration: Complete Guide with pgloader

Migrate MySQL to PostgreSQL without destroying your career (probably)

MySQL
/howto/migrate-mysql-to-postgresql-production/mysql-to-postgresql-production-migration
52%
tool
Similar content

SQLite: Zero Configuration SQL Database Overview & Use Cases

Zero Configuration, Actually Works

SQLite
/tool/sqlite/overview
45%
tool
Recommended

MySQL Workbench - Oracle's Official MySQL GUI (That Eats Your RAM)

Free MySQL desktop app that tries to do everything and mostly succeeds at pissing you off

MySQL Workbench
/tool/mysql-workbench/overview
43%
troubleshoot
Recommended

Docker Won't Start on Windows 11? Here's How to Fix That Garbage

Stop the whale logo from spinning forever and actually get Docker working

Docker Desktop
/troubleshoot/docker-daemon-not-running-windows-11/daemon-startup-issues
36%
compare
Similar content

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MariaDB - Performance Analysis 2025

Which Database Will Actually Survive Your Production Load?

PostgreSQL
/compare/postgresql/mysql/mariadb/performance-analysis-2025
35%
tool
Recommended

MariaDB - MySQL's Better Sibling

MySQL without Oracle's bullshit licensing

MariaDB
/tool/mariadb/overview
33%
tool
Similar content

PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Master Tuning & Monitoring

Optimize PostgreSQL performance with expert tips on memory configuration, query tuning, index design, and production monitoring. Prevent outages and speed up yo

PostgreSQL
/tool/postgresql/performance-optimization
28%
troubleshoot
Recommended

Fix MySQL Error 1045 Access Denied - Real Solutions That Actually Work

Stop fucking around with generic fixes - these authentication solutions are tested on thousands of production systems

MySQL
/troubleshoot/mysql-error-1045-access-denied/authentication-error-solutions
28%
howto
Similar content

Zero Downtime Database Migration: 2025 Tools That Actually Work

Stop Breaking Production - New Tools That Don't Suck

AWS Database Migration Service (DMS)
/howto/database-migration-zero-downtime/modern-tools-2025
27%
compare
Similar content

PostgreSQL vs MySQL vs MongoDB vs Cassandra: Database Comparison

The Real Engineering Decision: Which Database Won't Ruin Your Life

PostgreSQL
/compare/postgresql/mysql/mongodb/cassandra/database-architecture-performance-comparison
26%
howto
Recommended

Stop Docker from Killing Your Containers at Random (Exit Code 137 Is Not Your Friend)

Three weeks into a project and Docker Desktop suddenly decides your container needs 16GB of RAM to run a basic Node.js app

Docker Desktop
/howto/setup-docker-development-environment/complete-development-setup
26%
news
Recommended

Docker Desktop's Stupidly Simple Container Escape Just Owned Everyone

compatible with Technology News Aggregation

Technology News Aggregation
/news/2025-08-26/docker-cve-security
26%
compare
Similar content

MongoDB vs. PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: 2025 Performance Benchmarks

Dive into real-world 2025 performance benchmarks for MongoDB, PostgreSQL, and MySQL. Discover which database truly excels under load for reads and writes, beyon

/compare/mongodb/postgresql/mysql/performance-benchmarks-2025
24%
tool
Recommended

Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) - Google's Managed Kubernetes (That Actually Works Most of the Time)

Google runs your Kubernetes clusters so you don't wake up to etcd corruption at 3am. Costs way more than DIY but beats losing your weekend to cluster disasters.

Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
/tool/google-kubernetes-engine/overview
23%
troubleshoot
Recommended

Fix Kubernetes Service Not Accessible - Stop the 503 Hell

Your pods show "Running" but users get connection refused? Welcome to Kubernetes networking hell.

Kubernetes
/troubleshoot/kubernetes-service-not-accessible/service-connectivity-troubleshooting
23%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization