What makes Sysdig different from other cloud security platforms?

Most security tools scan your config files and scream about every CVE that exists anywhere in your container images. Sysdig actually watches what processes are running to see which vulnerabilities are loaded and exploitable. Built on Falco (CNCF graduated project) instead of proprietary bullshit, so you can actually read the detection logic instead of trusting vendor promises.

What's the actual cost?

Pricing is per-host, which gets expensive fast. A medium Kubernetes cluster will cost you $10-15k/month easily. Last I checked it was around $30-40/host for basic tiers but prices change faster than Kubernetes releases. Enterprise pricing is "call us" territory, which means expensive as hell but they won't tell you until you're three demos deep and your boss is asking for a purchase order. Small businesses will get sticker shock - budget $5k+/month minimum for a decent-sized setup.

What is runtime insights and why should I give a shit?

Runtime insights means watching what your processes are actually doing - syscalls, network connections, file access, and API calls - instead of just scanning static config files. So if your container image has 100 vulnerabilities but only 10 packages are actually loaded and running, Sysdig focuses on those 10 while ignoring the other 90 as noise. Learned this the hard way after spending 3 days patching a "critical" CVE that was in a package that wasn't even fucking loaded.ImageData: ![Runtime Security Dashboard](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/681a1c8e5b6ebfc0f8529533/688490dec0101f3e616300d9_sysdig-cloud-security-platform.webp)

How does this compare to Datadog or New Relic for monitoring?

Unlike traditional APM tools that just track app performance, [Sysdig Monitor](https://www.sysdig.com/products/monitor) goes deep into infrastructure and security. It's managed Prometheus with full PromQL compatibility, Kubernetes-native monitoring, and cost optimization built in. The big difference is you get security and monitoring in one platform instead of paying for Datadog monitoring AND some separate security tool that never talks to each other and makes you maintain two sets of dashboards.

What are the actual gotchas with deployment?

eBPF needs kernel 4.14+ minimum, but really you want 5.4+ or you'll hit weird edge cases. Agent install fails silently on older kernels with "Error: failed to load eBPF program" and zero helpful context. The agent needs privileged access that your security team will question - expect them to ask "why does it need CAP_SYS_PTRACE?" about 50 times. Expect networking weirdness if you're running service mesh like Istio - random 503s that disappear when you restart the agent. Windows support exists but it's garbage - agent crashes every few hours on Windows Server 2019. Memory usage spikes hard during pod churn - saw it hit 800MB during a rolling update that should have been routine.

What open source projects does Sysdig maintain?

Sysdig created and maintains several critical CNCF projects: [Falco](https://falco.org/) (graduated project for runtime security), contributed to [Prometheus](https://www.sysdig.com/opensource/prometheus) ecosystem, and recently donated [Stratoshark](https://www.sysdig.com/opensource/stratoshark) to the Wireshark Foundation. The company also maintains the original sysdig CLI tool for system troubleshooting.

Does the 2-second detection actually work?

The 2-second detection is real for simple shit like someone running `nc -l` or crypto miners spinning up. Complex attack chains take longer to correlate and you'll spend hours tuning false positives. The speed comes from watching kernel events in real-time instead of parsing logs after shit hits the fan. But don't expect miracles - caught a container running a reverse shell in under 10 seconds, but missed a privilege escalation that used legitimate kubectl commands until someone manually investigated 3 days later. You'll spend way more time tuning rules than their demos suggest.

Does this work across multiple clouds or just AWS?

Yeah, it supports AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure through both agent-based and agentless approaches. The platform auto-discovers cloud resources, monitors cloud APIs, and correlates activity across cloud boundaries. Also handles hybrid setups with on-prem Kubernetes and legacy infrastructure, though expect the usual cross-cloud networking headaches when setting up monitoring across VPCs and regions.

What compliance frameworks does it support?

Pre-built reporting for SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, CIS Benchmarks, and NIST frameworks. Continuously monitors compliance and generates automated reports. [Enterprise customers report](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/cloud-native-application-protection-platforms/vendor/sysdig/product/sysdig-secure) decent time savings during audits, though expect to spend time explaining to auditors why your security tool needs root access and CAP_SYS_PTRACE capabilities. The historical data retention helps, but make sure you understand their data retention policies before audit season.

How painful are the integrations?

The Slack integration spams your #security channel until you spend 3 hours tuning severity filters - learned this after getting death threats from the on-call team. SIEM integration to Splunk works but expect JSON parsing errors for the first week until you figure out their timestamp format is weird. Sentinel integration randomly stops sending events and the only fix is regenerating API keys. The AWS cross-account role setup fails with cryptic "AssumeRole operation: Access Denied" errors until you get the trust policy exactly right - their docs miss half the required permissions. GitHub Actions webhook setup looks simple but fails silently if your repo has branch protection rules enabled.

Does the AI actually help or is it marketing bullshit?

[Sysdig Sage](https://www.sysdig.com/generative-ai) actually correlates threats and maps attack paths through your infrastructure, unlike most "AI-powered" tools that just grep logs and call it machine learning. It shows you how an attacker could pivot from compromised container X to access service Y to reach your database. The natural language explanations help junior engineers understand what's happening without having to become experts in reading syscall traces and kernel logs. Still not perfect - had it confidently explain an attack path that turned out to be a false positive from a health check script, but it's way better than the usual AI security bullshit.

Currently viewing the AI version

Switch to human version

Sysdig: Runtime Security and Monitoring Platform

Platform Overview

What it is: Container and Kubernetes security platform that monitors actual runtime behavior via eBPF kernel instrumentation, not just static configuration scanning.

Creator: Loris Degioanni (Wireshark creator), founded 2013

Core Technology: eBPF-based system call monitoring with Falco (CNCF graduated project) as the runtime security engine

Critical Configuration Requirements

System Prerequisites

Linux Kernel: 4.14+ minimum, 5.4+ recommended
- Failure Mode: eBPF programs fail to load on older kernels with "Error: failed to load eBPF program"
- Impact: Complete monitoring failure with no helpful error messages
Container Privileges: CAP_SYS_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_PTRACE, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE required
- Security Team Friction: Expect 3-week approval process for privileged access
Windows Support: Exists but unreliable - agent crashes every few hours on Windows Server 2019

Resource Requirements

Normal Operation: 50MB RAM, <1% CPU
During Pod Churn: 200-800MB RAM spikes, significant CPU usage
Network Overhead: Significant when sending high event volumes to SaaS platform
Storage: Event data retention depends on pricing tier

Product Architecture

Two Main Products

Sysdig Secure: Runtime security and vulnerability management
Sysdig Monitor: Managed Prometheus and Kubernetes observability

Deployment Options

Agent-based: DaemonSet on Kubernetes, systemd service on VMs
Agentless: Cloud API integration for configuration scanning
Hybrid: Combination for comprehensive coverage

Critical Warnings and Failure Modes

Known Breaking Points

Service Mesh Conflicts: Random 503 errors with Istio 1.18+ due to eBPF probe interference
Legacy Systems: RHEL 7.6 (kernel 3.10) and Ubuntu 16.04 completely unsupported
Memory Exhaustion: Agent memory usage spikes to 800MB+ during rolling updates
Silent Failures: Agent install fails without clear error messages on incompatible systems

Integration Pain Points

AWS Cross-Account Roles: "AssumeRole operation: Access Denied" until external ID configured correctly
GCP Service Accounts: JSON keys expire silently, breaking scanning without alerts
Azure API Permissions: Requires 15+ specific permissions not documented clearly
SIEM Integration: JSON parsing errors for first week due to non-standard timestamp formats

Performance Reality Check

Detection Capabilities

Simple Threats: <2 seconds for obvious malicious activity (crypto miners, reverse shells)
Complex Attack Chains: Minutes to hours for correlation and analysis
False Positive Rate: High initially - expect weeks of rule tuning
Zero-Day Detection: Behavioral anomaly detection for unknown threats

Scaling Limitations

Prometheus Management: Works better than self-managed at scale, but query limits apply
Event Processing: Performance degrades with complex Falco rules
Multi-Cloud: Cross-VPC networking complications for hybrid deployments

Cost Analysis

Pricing Structure

Model: Per-host pricing
Medium Kubernetes Cluster: $10-15k/month easily
Basic Tiers: $30-40/host/month (subject to change)
Enterprise: "Call us" pricing (expensive)
Minimum Budget: $5k+/month for decent-sized deployment

Hidden Costs

Implementation Time: Weeks of rule tuning and integration setup
Security Team Training: Learning eBPF concepts and Falco rule syntax
Ongoing Maintenance: Continuous rule refinement to reduce false positives

Decision Criteria

When Sysdig Makes Sense

Runtime Visibility Required: Need to see actual process behavior, not just configs
Kubernetes-Heavy Environment: Platform built specifically for container orchestration
Security Budget Available: Cost justified by threat detection capabilities
Open Source Preference: Built on Falco (CNCF graduated) with transparent detection logic

When to Look Elsewhere

Windows-Centric Environment: Windows support unreliable and crash-prone
Legacy Infrastructure: Older kernels not supported
Budget Constraints: Too expensive for small-medium deployments
Simple Compliance Needs: Overkill for basic configuration scanning

Implementation Strategy

Phase 1: Prerequisites

Verify kernel versions across infrastructure
Secure security team approval for privileged access
Plan network architecture for agent communication
Budget for initial tuning period (4-6 weeks)

Phase 2: Pilot Deployment

Start with non-production Kubernetes cluster
Deploy agent via Helm chart with basic configuration
Expect RBAC errors on restrictive clusters
Begin Falco rule customization for environment

Phase 3: Production Rollout

Gradual agent deployment across production systems
Intensive false positive tuning
SIEM integration and alert routing configuration
Team training on incident response workflows

Competitive Differentiation

vs Traditional CNAPP

Speed: <2 seconds vs minutes-hours detection
Context: Runtime vulnerability prioritization vs static CVSS scoring
Foundation: Open source Falco vs proprietary engines

vs Traditional APM

Scope: Infrastructure + security vs application-only monitoring
Integration: Unified platform vs separate tools
Kubernetes: Purpose-built vs add-on capabilities

Open Source Foundation

Key Projects

Falco: CNCF graduated runtime security engine (600+ contributors)
Sysdig CLI: Original system inspection tool (2k+ GitHub stars)
eBPF Libraries: Low-level kernel interaction libraries
Stratoshark: Advanced troubleshooting tool donated to Wireshark Foundation

Commercial vs Open Source

Free Option: Run Falco independently for basic runtime security
Commercial Adds: Management UI, compliance reporting, correlation features
Migration Path: Start with open source, upgrade when scale demands it

Critical Success Factors

Technical Requirements

Modern Linux kernel infrastructure (4.14+)
Kubernetes RBAC permissions for privileged operations
Network architecture supporting agent-to-platform communication
Security team buy-in for required capabilities

Operational Requirements

Dedicated security engineering time for initial tuning
Incident response process integration
SIEM integration planning and testing
Ongoing rule maintenance and refinement

Business Requirements

Sufficient budget for per-host pricing model
Commitment to 6+ month implementation timeline
Security team training and skill development
Executive support for privileged access requirements

Resource Links

Documentation and Support

Sysdig Documentation: Complete technical documentation
Falco Documentation: Open source runtime security guide
GitHub Repository: Source code and community

Evaluation Resources

Gartner Reviews: Read 1-star reviews first for real deployment issues
Customer Stories: Enterprise deployment examples
Demo Request: Hands-on evaluation opportunity

Useful Links for Further Investigation

Essential Sysdig Resources

Link	Description
Sysdig Homepage	Complete platform overview, product information, and company news
Sysdig Secure Product Page	Detailed information about the CNAPP security platform capabilities
Sysdig Monitor Product Page	Kubernetes monitoring and managed Prometheus service details
Pricing Information	Current pricing models for both Secure and Monitor products
Sysdig Documentation	Actually readable technical documentation that doesn't suck - installation guides and API references that you can follow without wanting to punch your monitor
Falco Official Site	CNCF-graduated runtime security project created by Sysdig
Falco GitHub Repository	Source code, issues, and community contributions for Falco
Sysdig Open Source Projects	Overview of all open source contributions and community initiatives
Stratoshark	Advanced troubleshooting and forensics tool for cloud environments
Sysdig Blog	Their threat research is actually worth reading instead of the usual vendor marketing garbage - real cloud security insights and product updates
Learn Cloud Native	Educational content covering container and Kubernetes security fundamentals
Sysdig Threat Research	Latest security research, threat analysis, and vulnerability reports
Open Source Community	Join discussions with Falco, Wireshark, and cloud security community members
Sysdig Integrations	Complete list of 200+ supported tools and platforms
AWS Marketplace	Deploy Sysdig directly from AWS with marketplace billing
Azure Marketplace	Azure-native deployment and billing options
Google Cloud Marketplace	GCP marketplace listing for Sysdig platform
Gartner CNAPP Market Guide 2025	Sysdig named as representative vendor in Gartner's CNAPP market guide
Customer Reviews on Gartner Peer Insights	Read the 1-star reviews first - they tell you what really breaks and what the sales team won't mention
Sysdig Customer Stories	Real customer stories and deployment examples from enterprise users
Sysdig Support Portal	Technical support, documentation, and customer success resources
Contact Sysdig	Sales inquiries, partnerships, and general information
System Status Page	Real-time platform status and incident notifications
Request a Demo	Schedule a personalized demonstration with Sysdig experts

Sysdig: Runtime Security and Monitoring Platform

Platform Overview

Critical Configuration Requirements

System Prerequisites

Resource Requirements

Product Architecture

Two Main Products

Deployment Options

Critical Warnings and Failure Modes

Known Breaking Points

Integration Pain Points

Performance Reality Check

Detection Capabilities

Scaling Limitations

Cost Analysis

Pricing Structure

Hidden Costs

Decision Criteria

When Sysdig Makes Sense

When to Look Elsewhere

Implementation Strategy

Phase 1: Prerequisites

Phase 2: Pilot Deployment

Phase 3: Production Rollout

Competitive Differentiation

vs Traditional CNAPP

vs Traditional APM

Open Source Foundation

Key Projects

Commercial vs Open Source

Critical Success Factors

Technical Requirements

Operational Requirements

Business Requirements

Resource Links

Documentation and Support

Evaluation Resources

Useful Links for Further Investigation

Essential Sysdig Resources

Related Tools & Recommendations

GitOps Integration Hell: Docker + Kubernetes + ArgoCD + Prometheus

Falco - Linux Security Monitoring That Actually Works

Falco + Prometheus + Grafana: The Only Security Stack That Doesn't Suck

Kafka + MongoDB + Kubernetes + Prometheus Integration - When Event Streams Break

Twistlock vs Aqua Security vs Snyk Container - Which One Won't Bankrupt You?

RAG on Kubernetes: Why You Probably Don't Need It (But If You Do, Here's How)

OpenAI Gets Sued After GPT-5 Convinced Kid to Kill Himself

AWS Organizations - Stop Losing Your Mind Managing Dozens of AWS Accounts

AWS Amplify - Amazon's Attempt to Make Fullstack Development Not Suck

Azure AI Foundry Production Reality Check

Azure OpenAI Service - OpenAI Models Wrapped in Microsoft Bureaucracy

Azure Container Instances Production Troubleshooting - Fix the Shit That Always Breaks

Google Cloud SQL - Database Hosting That Doesn't Require a DBA

Google Cloud Developer Tools - Deploy Your Shit Without Losing Your Mind

Google Cloud Reports Billions in AI Revenue, $106 Billion Backlog

Docker Alternatives That Won't Break Your Budget

I Tested 5 Container Security Scanners in CI/CD - Here's What Actually Works

Aqua Security - Container Security That Actually Works

Aqua Security Production Troubleshooting - When Things Break at 3AM

Figma Gets Lukewarm Wall Street Reception Despite AI Potential - August 25, 2025