Locofy.ai Technical Reference
Core Functionality
Primary Service: AI-powered conversion of Figma/Penpot designs to frontend code
Supported Frameworks: React, React Native, Next.js, Vue, Angular, HTML/CSS, Flutter
Architecture: Plugin-based integration with design tools, token-based pricing model
Performance and Quality Metrics
Code Generation Accuracy
- Simple layouts: Generally functional, minimal manual fixes required
- Complex interactions: 30% code rewrite typically needed for custom animations
- Mobile responsiveness: Generates hardcoded pixel values that break on non-desktop
- Dark mode/RTL support: Not supported - requires manual implementation
Token Consumption
- Simple screen: 600 tokens ($240 at pay-as-you-go rates)
- Complex screen: 1,250+ tokens ($500+ at pay-as-you-go rates)
- Complexity factors: Nested Auto Layout groups, custom animations, micro-interactions
Pricing Structure
Tier Breakdown
| Plan | Cost | Token Rate | Screens/Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pay-as-you-go | $0.40/token | $240-500/screen | Variable |
| Starter | $400/year | $0.27/token | ~5 simple screens |
| Pro | $1,200/year | $0.20/token | ~24 simple screens |
| Enterprise | Custom | Bulk discounts | Unlimited |
Cost Reality Check
- MVP development: 3x speed improvement with proper design prep, 1.5x without
- Production projects: $500+ bills common for complex screens
- Hidden costs: Design preparation time, manual fixes for animations
Critical Requirements
Design Preparation (MANDATORY)
- Auto Layout: Must be used throughout design - hardcoded positions generate div soup
- Component naming: Proper layer names required (not "Rectangle 1", "Rectangle 2")
- Component structure: Logical hierarchy essential for clean code output
- Skip preparation cost: Results in unusable code with position: absolute everywhere
Technical Limitations
- Responsive breakpoints: Non-functional - hardcoded values only
- Complex animations: Expect complete rewrite for anything beyond basic transitions
- Custom interactions: Requires manual state management implementation
- Plugin stability: Frequent crashes with nested Auto Layout groups
Integration Ecosystem
Version Control
- GitHub sync: Works until design restructuring occurs
- Merge conflicts: Poor resolution - assumes design always correct
- Backup requirement: CRITICAL - manual changes get overwritten during sync
- Smart merge: Marketing term - conflict resolution is primitive
Development Workflow
- VS Code extension: Available, decent quality
- Claude/Cursor integration: MCP support for AI coding tools
- Storybook integration: Functional for design system maintenance
Competitive Position
Market Differentiation
- Mobile support: React Native/Flutter output (unique advantage)
- Code quality: Actually readable output vs competitor div soup
- Enterprise features: SAML SSO, team permissions, audit logs
- Multi-framework: Same design to multiple tech stacks
Competitor Comparison
- Builder.io: Marketing sites only, better visual editing
- Anima: Rule-based conversion, good for prototypes
- TeleportHQ: Decent code quality, limited framework support
- Figma Dev Mode: Native integration, basic functionality
Failure Scenarios
High-Risk Situations
- Complex nested components: Plugin crashes, undefined children errors
- Animation-heavy designs: 30%+ code rewrite required
- Tight deadlines: Token costs can exceed AWS bills for large projects
- Design changes during development: GitHub sync overwrites custom code
Common Misconceptions
- "10x faster development": Marketing claim - reality is 1.5-3x depending on design quality
- "Production-ready code": Requires significant manual work for complex features
- "Smart merge": Conflict resolution is basic, favors design over custom logic
Implementation Success Factors
Prerequisites
- Designer familiar with Auto Layout best practices
- Budget planning for token consumption (test on throwaway designs first)
- Backup strategy for custom code before sync operations
- Understanding that generated code is starting point, not final product
Resource Requirements
- Time investment: 50-70% of traditional development time with proper prep
- Expertise needed: Frontend development skills still required for customization
- Design skills: Auto Layout proficiency mandatory for clean output
Enterprise Considerations
- Security compliance: SAML SSO, audit logging available
- Team workflow: Multi-user support, permissions management
- Bulk pricing: Custom enterprise rates for high-volume usage
- Support quality: Dedicated enterprise support vs community forums
Operational Warnings
Critical Breaking Points
- Token budget exhaustion: $500+ bills possible for single complex screens
- Plugin stability: Requires Figma restarts for nested Auto Layout issues
- Sync conflicts: Manual code changes lost without proper backup procedures
- Framework limitations: No RTL, dark mode, or complex animation support
Success Indicators
- Clean Auto Layout structure in design
- Simple to moderate interaction complexity
- Budget allocated for 20-30% manual code refinement
- Team trained on backup procedures before sync operations
Related Tools & Recommendations
Figma's Code Generation Is Garbage (And Here's What Actually Works)
Stop Wasting Money on Broken Plugins - Use Tools That Generate Real Code
Figma Won. Sketch Is Dying. Adobe XD Is Dead.
The 2025 reality: One tool rules everything, another is gasping for air, and Adobe gave up entirely
Deploy Next.js to Vercel Production Without Losing Your Shit
Because "it works on my machine" doesn't pay the bills
Builder.io Visual Copilot - Stop Hand-Coding Figma Designs
competes with Builder.io Visual Copilot
Anima - Finally, A Design-to-Code Tool That Doesn't Completely Suck
competes with Anima
Figma's Advanced Features That Actually Matter
Variables, Auto Layout tricks, and Dev Mode for teams who ship stuff - the features that separate professionals from weekend warriors
DeepSeek V3.1 Launch Hints at China's "Next Generation" AI Chips
Chinese AI startup's model upgrade suggests breakthrough in domestic semiconductor capabilities
GitHub Copilot Value Assessment - What It Actually Costs (spoiler: way more than $19/month)
integrates with GitHub Copilot
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Codeium vs Tabnine vs Amazon Q - Which One Won't Screw You Over
After two years using these daily, here's what actually matters for choosing an AI coding tool
I Got Sick of Editor Wars Without Data, So I Tested the Shit Out of Zed vs VS Code vs Cursor
30 Days of Actually Using These Things - Here's What Actually Matters
GitHub Copilot + VS Code Integration - What Actually Works
Finally, an AI coding tool that doesn't make you want to throw your laptop
Running Claude, Cursor, and VS Code Together Without Losing Your Mind
I got tired of jumping between three different AI tools losing context every damn time
DhiWise - Convert Figma Designs to Working Code
Figma to Flutter/React code that doesn't suck
Netlify - The Platform That Actually Works
Push to GitHub, site goes live in 30 seconds. No Docker hell, no server SSH bullshit, no 47-step deployment guides that break halfway through.
Got Hit With a $3k Vercel Bill Last Month: Real Platform Costs
These platforms will fuck your budget when you least expect it
What Enterprise Platform Pricing Actually Looks Like When the Sales Gloves Come Off
Vercel, Netlify, and Cloudflare Pages: The Real Costs Behind the Marketing Bullshit
Vercel - Deploy Next.js Apps That Actually Work
integrates with Vercel
Vercel Review - I've Been Burned Three Times Now
Here's when you should actually pay Vercel's stupid prices (and when to run)
Adobe XD Migration Guide - Escaping Adobe's Abandoned Tool
Don't go down with the ship. Here's how to migrate your design work away from XD before Adobe pulls the plug completely.
Adobe XD - The Dead Design Tool That Still Works
Adobe's abandoned attempt to compete with Figma. It's in maintenance mode (fancy term for "we gave up") but still functions if you're already stuck with it.
Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization