Should I switch from Cursor to GitHub Copilot after the pricing changes?

I switched in September and honestly, I should have done it months ago. GitHub Copilot's $10/month gets you 90% of what you actually need. Yeah, you lose Cursor's codebase understanding, but you also save $10-30+ per month and don't have to worry about surprise bills.Only stick with Cursor if you're doing complex refactoring daily and the $40-80/month bills don't bother you. For most developers writing CRUD apps and fixing bugs, GitHub Copilot Pro is plenty.

What happens to existing Cursor annual subscribers after September 15?

You're safe until your renewal date, but you're basically living on borrowed time. [Cursor said](https://forum.cursor.com/t/update-to-teams-and-auto-pricing/128952) annual users keep unlimited Auto mode until renewal. So if you bought annual in June 2025, you're good until June 2026.But here's the thing - do you really want to stay locked into a tool that bait-and-switched their entire pricing model? I'd start trying GitHub Copilot now so you're not scrambling when your annual plan expires.

Is GitHub Copilot's free tier actually usable?

Hell yes. [2,000 completions plus 50 chats monthly](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/about-github-copilot/plans-for-github-copilot) is more generous than it sounds. I used it for weekend projects for months before upgrading.Compare that to Cursor's 200 completions - I burned through that in one debugging session. GitHub's free tier actually covers side projects, learning, and casual coding. It's the best free AI coding tool available, period.

What are "premium requests" and when do I need them?

Microsoft's fancy name for "the good AI models that cost more." [Premium requests](https://docs.github.com/copilot/managing-copilot/monitoring-usage-and-entitlements/about-premium-requests) kick in when you use GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, or other expensive models for complex questions.Regular autocomplete and basic chat don't count against your limit. I rarely hit the 300 monthly limit on Pro unless I'm doing architecture planning or asking it to explain complex codebases. For day-to-day coding, you probably won't even notice the limit exists.

Can I still get unlimited AI coding assistance anywhere?

Nope, the unlimited party is over. Even Cursor killed their unlimited Auto mode. The reality is that these AI models cost serious money to run, and companies finally stopped eating the costs.GitHub Copilot Pro still gives you unlimited basic autocomplete and chat, which covers 80% of what you actually use. For the expensive AI models, everyone's moved to pay-per-use. Welcome to the new reality.

Which tool is better for team collaboration?

GitHub Copilot, no contest. $19/user vs Cursor's $40/user, plus you get actual [admin controls](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/managing-copilot/reviewing-usage-data-for-github-copilot-in-your-organization) and [usage monitoring](https://docs.github.com/copilot/how-tos/administer/organizations/managing-policies-for-copilot-in-your-organization).With Cursor, you're paying double and hoping your team doesn't blow through credits. With GitHub, you know exactly what you're paying each month. Easy choice for anyone managing a development budget.

How do the pricing changes affect students and open source developers?

GitHub gives [free Copilot access](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/about-github-copilot/plans-for-github-copilot) to students and open source maintainers. Cursor gives you nothing.If you're a student or working on open source, this isn't even a choice. GitHub Copilot is free, Cursor costs money. Done.

What's the real monthly cost for heavy AI coding users?

My bills from last month: GitHub Copilot Pro + overages = $23. Cursor = $67 (one bad Auto mode session killed my budget).GitHub Pro+ at $39/month is actually the best deal for power users. You get 1,500 premium requests and don't have to worry about variable costs. With Cursor, you're basically gambling every time you use Auto mode.

Are there any alternatives to these two main options?

Sure, there's [Codeium](https://windsurf.com/) (decent free tier), [Tabnine](https://www.tabnine.com/) (if you're paranoid about security), and [Amazon Q Developer](https://aws.amazon.com/q/developer/) (if you live in AWS).But honestly? They're all playing catch-up. Cursor and GitHub Copilot are the only ones that feel like production-ready tools. Everything else feels like a tech demo.

Will these pricing models change again soon?

Oh absolutely. Cursor has changed their pricing 4 times in 2025 alone. They clearly have no fucking clue what they're doing.GitHub is probably more stable since Microsoft has infinite money, but don't be shocked if they raise prices too. That's just how SaaS works - get you hooked, then jack up prices.

How do I monitor my usage to avoid surprise bills?

GitHub shows you exactly how many premium requests you've used in your [dashboard](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/managing-copilot/reviewing-usage-data-for-github-copilot-in-your-organization). Crystal clear, no surprises.Cursor's usage tracking is garbage. You get a vague credit balance that disappears without clear explanations. I've gotten $60 bills with no idea how I spent the credits.

Should enterprises choose GitHub Copilot or Cursor?

GitHub Copilot Enterprise, and it's not even close. Actual security controls, compliance features, and predictable costs vs Cursor's "pray your developers don't bankrupt you" pricing model.Plus if you're already using GitHub Enterprise, the integration is seamless. Cursor feels like a startup that might get acquired or pivot next year.

What's the best approach for trying both tools?

Start with GitHub Copilot's free tier for a month. If you like it, upgrade to Pro for $10. If Pro feels limiting, try Pro+ for $39.Only try Cursor if GitHub feels too basic for your workflow. But set a spending alert and watch your usage like a hawk. I've seen people get $80+ bills in their first month because they didn't understand how credits work.

Currently viewing the AI version

Switch to human version

AI Coding Tools: GitHub Copilot vs Cursor - Technical Intelligence Report

Executive Summary

Critical Change: August 2025 pricing restructures fundamentally altered the cost-benefit equation for both platforms. Cursor eliminated unlimited features while GitHub introduced tiered premium models.

Operational Impact: Monthly costs increased 2-4x for heavy users. Cursor bills became unpredictable ($20-80+), while GitHub maintained cost predictability.

Pricing Structure Analysis

GitHub Copilot (August 2025)

Free Tier: 2,000 completions + 50 chats/month (production viable for side projects)
Pro: $10/month, 300 premium requests, unlimited standard features
Pro+: $39/month, 1,500 premium requests, access to latest models
Enterprise: $19/user/month with admin controls

Overage Costs: $0.04/premium request (transparent, predictable)

Critical Threshold: 300 premium requests/month = typical power user limit before overages

Cursor (August 2025)

Free Tier: 200 completions/month (unusable for production work)
Pro: $20/month + credit consumption model
Business: $40/user/month (doubled from previous $20)

Breaking Change: Unlimited Auto mode eliminated September 15, 2025

Cost Volatility: Bills range $20-80+ monthly depending on Auto mode usage

Technical Capabilities

GitHub Copilot

Strengths:

Cross-platform IDE support (VS Code, JetBrains, Vim, Neovim)
Stable performance, rare crashes
64K token context window (handles monorepos)
Reliable boilerplate generation (80% accuracy for React components)

Limitations:

Poor cross-file dependency understanding
Limited architectural refactoring capabilities
Basic codebase comprehension

Performance Metrics:

25-30% productivity increase for routine coding
Memory usage: <1GB typical
Crash frequency: Rare (<1/month)

Cursor

Strengths:

Full codebase understanding and indexing
Multi-file refactoring across 20+ files
Contextual chat with project awareness
Multiple AI model selection (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)

Critical Failures:

Memory consumption: 4GB+ typical
Crash frequency: 3+ times/month with data loss
VS Code editor lock-in (no alternatives)
Auto mode can modify unintended code

Performance Profile:

High-impact architectural changes when stable
Significant productivity gains for complex refactoring
Unpredictable resource consumption

Cost Analysis

Real-World Usage Costs (Heavy User Profile)

Tool	Monthly Base	Typical Overages	Total Cost
GitHub Copilot Pro	$10	$13	$23
GitHub Copilot Pro+	$39	$0	$39
Cursor Pro	$20	$47	$67

Team Cost Comparison:

GitHub: $19/user/month
Cursor: $40/user/month (110% premium)

Decision Thresholds

Choose GitHub Copilot if:

Budget constraints exist
Team deployment required
IDE flexibility needed
Predictable costs essential

Choose Cursor if:

Complex refactoring is daily requirement
Budget exceeds $40/month/user
VS Code workflow acceptable
Crash tolerance high

Critical Warnings

Cursor Operational Risks

Credit Burn Rate: Auto mode can consume $12-20 in single refactoring session
Data Loss: Chat history loss during crashes (no recovery)
Vendor Lock-in: Proprietary VS Code fork with no migration path
Price Instability: 4 pricing changes in 2025

GitHub Copilot Limitations

Premium Request Creep: Complex queries consume limits faster than expected
Context Boundaries: Large codebases may exceed understanding limits
Refactoring Gaps: Manual coordination required for multi-file changes

Implementation Recommendations

Migration Strategy

From Cursor to GitHub:

Start with free tier evaluation (2,000 completions sufficient for assessment)
Upgrade to Pro ($10/month) for standard workflow
Monitor premium request usage for 30 days
Upgrade to Pro+ ($39/month) if consistently exceeding limits

Risk Mitigation:

Set spending alerts for Cursor usage
Backup chat histories before complex refactoring
Maintain fallback editor for Cursor instability

Team Deployment

Requirements:

Admin controls for usage monitoring
Predictable budget allocation
Cross-IDE compatibility

Recommendation: GitHub Copilot Enterprise for teams >5 developers

Alternative Options

Secondary Tools

Codeium: Generous free tier, limited enterprise features
Tabnine: Security-focused, higher latency
Amazon Q Developer: AWS-integrated, limited general use

Verdict: All alternatives lag significantly behind market leaders

Future Considerations

Pricing Trajectory

Cursor: High volatility, additional changes expected
GitHub: More stable due to Microsoft backing
Industry trend: Movement away from unlimited models

Technology Evolution

Both platforms improving context understanding
Multi-file editing becoming standard
Enterprise security features expanding

Bottom Line Assessment

For Individual Developers: GitHub Copilot Pro provides 80% of benefits at 50% of cost

For Teams: GitHub Copilot Business offers predictable scaling and admin controls

For Complex Architecture Work: Cursor justified only if budget exceeds $40/month and crash tolerance is high

Free Tier Reality: GitHub's 2,000 completions viable for side projects; Cursor's 200 completions insufficient for meaningful use

Related Tools & Recommendations

compare

Similar content

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Codeium vs Tabnine vs Amazon Q - Which One Won't Screw You Over

After two years using these daily, here's what actually matters for choosing an AI coding tool

Cursor

/compare/cursor/github-copilot/codeium/tabnine/amazon-q-developer/windsurf/market-consolidation-upheaval

100%

compare

Similar content

AI Coding Assistants 2025 Pricing Breakdown - What You'll Actually Pay

GitHub Copilot vs Cursor vs Claude Code vs Tabnine vs Amazon Q Developer: The Real Cost Analysis

GitHub Copilot

/compare/github-copilot/cursor/claude-code/tabnine/amazon-q-developer/ai-coding-assistants-2025-pricing-breakdown

AI Coding Tools: GitHub Copilot vs Cursor - Technical Intelligence Report

Executive Summary

Pricing Structure Analysis

GitHub Copilot (August 2025)

Cursor (August 2025)

Technical Capabilities

GitHub Copilot

Cursor

Cost Analysis

Real-World Usage Costs (Heavy User Profile)

Decision Thresholds

Critical Warnings

Cursor Operational Risks

GitHub Copilot Limitations

Implementation Recommendations

Migration Strategy

Team Deployment

Alternative Options

Secondary Tools

Future Considerations

Pricing Trajectory

Technology Evolution

Bottom Line Assessment

Related Tools & Recommendations

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Codeium vs Tabnine vs Amazon Q - Which One Won't Screw You Over

AI Coding Assistants 2025 Pricing Breakdown - What You'll Actually Pay

Getting Cursor + GitHub Copilot Working Together

GitHub Copilot Value Assessment - What It Actually Costs (spoiler: way more than $19/month)

JetBrains AI Assistant Alternatives: Editors That Don't Rip You Off With Credits

Azure AI Foundry Production Reality Check

DeepSeek V3.1 Launch Hints at China's "Next Generation" AI Chips

I Got Sick of Editor Wars Without Data, So I Tested the Shit Out of Zed vs VS Code vs Cursor

Codeium Review: Does Free AI Code Completion Actually Work?

Fix Tabnine Enterprise Deployment Issues - Real Solutions That Actually Work

Windsurf MCP Integration Actually Works

Windsurf Won't Install? Here's What Actually Works

JetBrains AI Assistant - The Only AI That Gets My Weird Codebase

JetBrains AI Assistant Alternatives That Won't Bankrupt You

OpenAI Finally Admits Their Product Development is Amateur Hour

OpenAI GPT-Realtime: Production-Ready Voice AI at $32 per Million Tokens - August 29, 2025

OpenAI Alternatives That Actually Save Money (And Don't Suck)

I've Been Testing Amazon Q Developer for 3 Months - Here's What Actually Works and What's Marketing Bullshit

Anthropic TypeScript SDK

Continue - The AI Coding Tool That Actually Lets You Choose Your Model