Currently viewing the human version
Switch to AI version

What NeuVector Actually Does (And Where It Breaks)

Container security is fucked.

Your containers are spinning up and down randomly, talking to each other in ways that would make your network engineer weep, and most security tools either block everything (breaking prod) or let everything through (defeating the point).

Traditional firewalls don't know what the hell a pod is. Vulnerability scanners find CVEs from 2003 in base images that haven't been patched since Obama was president. Most organizations tweet about being "concerned about container security" while still running legacy approaches that treat containers like fucking VMs.

The Reality of Container Security

I've debugged enough production incidents to know that container security theater is worse than no security. At least with no security, you know you're vulnerable. With bad security, you get a false sense of safety right up until someone pwns your Bitcoin exchange.

How NeuVector Actually Works

NeuVector deploys as containers in your cluster and basically spies on everything. Here's what actually happens:

It Learns Your Apps:

Instead of making you write YAML firewall policies (thank fucking god), it watches your containers for a few days and figures out what they normally do. Then it builds firewall rules automatically. This is pure magic when it works, but it completely shits the bed if you deploy new stuff during the learning phase

  • learned this during a midnight deployment that took down our payment processing for 45 minutes.

Runtime Protection: It catches processes doing suspicious things in your containers

  • like some asshole spawning /bin/bash where there shouldn't be one.

Works pretty well, though you'll get false positives if you're doing anything clever with init containers.

Network Segmentation: Creates a Layer 7 firewall between your containers.

This is where it gets interesting

  • it actually understands HTTP and g

RPC traffic, not just ports. But it breaks if your load balancer does anything non-standard with headers (and AWS ALB loves doing non-standard shit).

Vulnerability Scanning: Scans your images for CVEs.

The scanning engine is decent, but the UI will drown you in medium-severity findings from dependencies you can't update because they'd break half your stack.

The Architecture (And What Breaks First)

NeuVector Components

NeuVector has 4 pieces that matter in production:

Controllers:

The brains. Usually the first thing to break when you upgrade Kubernetes. Run 3 in production or you'll hate yourself when one dies during a critical incident.

Enforcers: DaemonSet that runs on every node.

These actually block traffic. They crash if you're using containerd without the right flags (spent 3 hours debugging this).

Manager: The web UI.

Built with Angular and Scala because someone wanted to be fancy. Looks like it was designed in 2015 but works once you get past the visual pain.

Scanners: Resource-hungry image scanners that will steal CPU from your actual workloads if you don't set proper limits.

Deployment Gotchas (You Will Hit These)

Container Runtime Hell:

If you're using containerd, you need --set containerd.enabled=true or the enforcers won't start. The error message is "Unknown container runtime"

  • completely fucking useless. Took me an hour scrolling through Git

Hub issues to figure this out, and another 2 hours when I realized K3s 1.28.2 changes the socket path again.

K3s is Special: Use --set k3s.enabled=true if you're on K3s.

Because K3s puts socket files in weird places for no good reason.

Memory Limits: Default memory limits are way too low.

You'll get OOMKilled (exit code 137) in production. Start with 512Mi for enforcers and 1Gi for controllers.

cgroup v2: If you're on Ubuntu 22.04+, make sure cgroup v2 is enabled.

The pods crash loop with cryptic errors on v 1.

When NOT to Use NeuVector

Skip NeuVector if:

  • You deploy constantly (learning phase never finishes)
  • You have weird networking (custom CNI plugins confuse it)
  • You can't tolerate network latency (adds 1-2ms per request)
  • Your cluster is under-resourced (needs 4GB+ RAM total)

The GitHub issues section is where you'll spend your time debugging why your specific setup doesn't work. Community discussions are more helpful than docs for edge cases.

Reality check complete. Now let's talk about actually getting this deployed...

NeuVector vs. Other Container Security Tools (Honest Take)

Feature

NeuVector

Aqua Security

Prisma Cloud

Sysdig Secure

Open Source

100%

Hell no

Hell no

Hell no

Learning Mode

Auto-learns (when it works)

Write YAML forever

Write YAML forever

ML + still write YAML

Runtime Protection

Pretty good

Bulletproof

Bulletproof

Decent

Vulnerability Scanning

Basic but functional

Best available

Way too much info

Good context

Network Policies

Auto-generated

Manual nightmare

Policy hell

Manual

UI/UX

Looks like shit, works fine

Polished

Corporate bloat

Actually usable

Performance Impact

1-3ms (not the claimed <1ms)

Depends

~5ms

Minimal

Documentation

Needs work

Actually good

Corporate word soup

Great

Pricing

~$1,500/node/year

$$$

$$$$ (lawyer required)

$$$

Container Runtime Support

Breaks on edge cases

Rock solid

Stable

Stable

Features

Basic but sufficient

Everything

Everything + bloat

Observability focus

Learning Curve

Medium (if you're lucky)

Steep

Extremely steep

Medium

Real-World Deployment (And What Actually Happens)

Getting NeuVector Running (The Hard Way)

Deploying NeuVector looks simple in the docs, but here's what actually happens when you try it in production. The GitHub examples get you started, but they're missing the edge cases that break everything at 2am.

The Installation Command That Actually Works

Forget the basic helm install from the docs. Here's what you'll end up using after 3 hours of troubleshooting:

helm upgrade --install neuvector neuvector/core \
  --namespace neuvector --create-namespace \
  --set tag=5.4.4 \
  --set registry=docker.io \
  --set containerd.enabled=true \
  --set k3s.enabled=true \
  --set controller.replicas=3 \
  --set manager.env.ssl=off \
  --set cve.scanner.internal.certificate.secret=\"\" \
  --set controller.resources.limits.memory=1Gi \
  --set enforcer.resources.limits.memory=512Mi

Why these flags matter:

  • containerd.enabled=true: Without this, enforcers crash with "Unknown container runtime"
  • k3s.enabled=true: K3s has special socket paths that aren't documented well
  • controller.replicas=3: The default of 1 will bite you when you upgrade Kubernetes
  • ssl=off: SSL cert issues will lock you out of the UI for hours
  • Memory limits: Default limits are way too low for production workloads

Multi-Cloud Reality Check

NeuVector runs on AWS EKS, Azure AKS, and Google GKE, but each cloud provider has special ways to break your deployment:

AWS EKS Issues:
  • Bottlerocket needs custom containerd socket paths (not documented anywhere obvious)
  • Fargate is a no-go (needs DaemonSet access to nodes)
  • ALB does weird header manipulation that confuses network learning
Azure AKS Pain Points:
  • Windows node pools need separate enforcer configs (because of course they fucking do)
  • Azure CNI fights with network policies (cilium works better)
  • AKS 1.28+ upgrades randomly break enforcer communications with error "failed to connect to controller:11443"
Google GKE Problems:
  • Autopilot doesn't allow privileged access (makes sense but breaks everything)
  • GKE network policies conflict with NeuVector's
  • Container-Optimized OS needs additional security contexts

Production Scaling Issues

Memory and CPU Reality

The "lightweight" marketing is about as accurate as weather forecasts. Here's actual resource usage in a decent-sized cluster:

  • Controllers: 1-2GB RAM each, 200-500m CPU under load
  • Enforcers: 300-800MB RAM per node, 100-300m CPU depending on traffic
  • Manager: 512MB-1GB RAM, minimal CPU
  • Scanners: 2-4GB RAM when scanning, minimal when idle

The math: For a 20-node cluster, you're looking at 8-12GB RAM just for NeuVector. Budget accordingly.

Network Performance Hit

The claimed "<1ms latency" is best case. In real production:

  • HTTP traffic: 1-3ms additional latency
  • gRPC with heavy payloads: 5-15ms impact
  • TLS termination inside containers: 10-50ms depending on complexity

Workaround: Run performance tests before and after. You'll probably need to bump your connection pool sizes from 20 to 50 and increase request timeouts by 10-20ms. Found this out when our mobile app started timing out randomly after enabling enforcement.

Enterprise Integration Hell

SIEM Integration That Actually Works

Syslog integration works, but the format is annoying:

## You'll need this rsyslog config to parse NeuVector events
$template NeuVectorFormat,\"%msg:2:$%
\"
if $programname contains \"NeuVector\" then {
    *.* /var/log/neuvector.log;NeuVectorFormat
    stop
}

Splunk users: The built-in NeuVector Splunk app is more confusing than fucking YAML indentation rules. Write your own queries or you'll spend more time debugging the integration than actual security events.

LDAP Integration Gotchas

LDAP authentication works but has weird requirements:

  • Needs anonymous bind enabled (security teams hate this)
  • Group membership detection is flaky with nested groups
  • SAML is better but needs a SUSE support contract for setup help

Compliance Reality Check

NeuVector covers CIS Kubernetes benchmarks and basic compliance, but:

What works:

  • CIS benchmark scanning catches real misconfigurations
  • Policy violation reporting works for basic cases
  • Audit logs are comprehensive (maybe too much)

What's missing:

  • SOC 2 Type II needs manual report interpretation
  • PCI DSS coverage is basic - need additional controls
  • GDPR compliance is mostly documentation templates

Real Deployment Timeline

Week 1: Install NeuVector, discover containerd issues, fix configurations
Week 2: Learning mode - watch it discover your applications
Week 3: Fine-tune policies, deal with false positives
Week 4: Enable enforcement, fight with legitimate traffic being blocked
Week 5: Realize you need more memory, resize everything
Week 6: Finally stable, but you're questioning your life choices

Pro tip: Plan 2-3 months for production deployment, not the "30-60 minutes" marketing bullshit. I learned this the hard way when our NeuVector deployment took down half our microservices for 4 hours because the learning phase decided our ETL batch jobs were malicious during a Friday evening deployment. Spent the entire weekend explaining to leadership why our "security enhancement" caused a 4-hour outage.

Marketing timelines are lies.

SUSE support is helpful once you get past Level 1, but expect to spend time in GitHub issues for edge cases.

Now that you know what you're getting into deployment-wise, let me answer the questions you're probably already thinking about...

Questions People Actually Ask (And Honest Answers)

Q

Why does my NeuVector installation keep failing with "Unknown container runtime"?

A

You forgot --set containerd.enabled=true in your helm command. The error message "Unknown container runtime" is completely fucking useless

  • tells you nothing about what's actually wrong. If you're on K3s, you also need --set k3s.enabled=true because K3s does everything differently for no good reason.Spent an hour debugging this exact same issue, then another hour when I realized K3s 1.29.1 changed socket paths again.
Q

My enforcers keep crashing with exit code 137. What's wrong?

A

OOMKilled. The default memory limits are way too low for production. Set enforcer memory limits to at least 512Mi, controllers to 1Gi. Don't trust the "lightweight" marketing

  • NeuVector uses real memory.bash--set controller.resources.limits.memory=1Gi \--set enforcer.resources.limits.memory=512Mi
Q

How long does the learning phase actually take?

A

The docs say 24-48 hours, but it's more like 1-2 weeks if you want policies that don't block legitimate shit. It depends on your traffic patterns. If you deploy new stuff during learning, it gets confused and you start over

  • found this out when a hotfix deployment reset 3 days of learning.Don't touch your deployments for at least a week after enabling learning mode, and definitely don't let your CI/CD run during this time.
Q

Does the "2% performance impact" claim hold up?

A

Hell no.

That's fantasy marketing numbers. In real environments:

  • 1-3ms latency for HTTP services
  • 5-15ms for gRPC with large payloads
  • 10-50ms if you're doing TLS termination in containersAlways run your own performance tests.
Q

Can I run this on EKS Fargate?

A

Nope. NeuVector needs DaemonSets with privileged node access. Fargate is too locked down.

Q

Why is the UI so ugly and slow?

A

Built by security engineers who think UX is a typo. Looks like 2015, runs like dial-up. The API is fine though

  • use that instead.
Q

Does NeuVector actually stop attacks or just alert on them?

A

It can do both. In "Protect" mode it blocks traffic that violates policies. In "Monitor" mode it just logs violations. Start with Monitor or you'll break legitimate traffic and spend your weekend debugging.

Q

How much does this thing actually cost?

A

About $1,500-2,000 per node per year for SUSE support depending on how hard you negotiate. Software is free (open source), but you absolutely want support unless you enjoy debugging fucking Scala stack traces at 2am when enforcers randomly stop talking to controllers.Compare to Aqua at ~$3,000+ per node or Prisma Cloud at ~$4,000+ per node.

Q

My security team wants SOC 2 compliance reports. Does NeuVector do that?

A

Kinda. It generates basic compliance reports, but you'll manually interpret most findings for SOC 2 Type II. CIS benchmark scans are solid though.

Q

Why does NeuVector block my legitimate traffic?

A

Because it learned the wrong fucking patterns during the learning phase, or you enabled enforcement too early.

Common causes:

  • Load balancers doing health checks from different IPs (ALB switches IPs randomly)
  • Batch jobs that run outside normal patterns (3am ETL jobs confuse the shit out of it)
  • Services that scale up and change traffic patterns (autoscaling breaks learned policies)Set up proper network policies before enabling enforcement, and whitelist your monitoring endpoints first.
Q

Can I run multiple NeuVector clusters?

A

Yes, but they don't share policies. Each cluster needs its own learning phase and policy management. There's no central management for multi-cluster deployments

  • you'll need to script policy synchronization yourself.
Q

What happens when I upgrade Kubernetes?

A

Controllers break if you only run one (always run 3 in production). Enforcers usually survive upgrades but might need restarts. Plan for downtime and test in dev first

  • learned this when a K8s 1.29 upgrade broke all our network policies at 6am on a Monday.The 5.4.x release notes mention K8s 1.29 compatibility, but expect edge cases with new versions. Version 5.4.4 fixed the container runtime detection issues with newer containerd.

Useful NeuVector Resources (That Actually Help)

Related Tools & Recommendations

integration
Recommended

GitOps Integration Hell: Docker + Kubernetes + ArgoCD + Prometheus

How to Wire Together the Modern DevOps Stack Without Losing Your Sanity

kubernetes
/integration/docker-kubernetes-argocd-prometheus/gitops-workflow-integration
100%
integration
Recommended

Kafka + MongoDB + Kubernetes + Prometheus Integration - When Event Streams Break

When your event-driven services die and you're staring at green dashboards while everything burns, you need real observability - not the vendor promises that go

Apache Kafka
/integration/kafka-mongodb-kubernetes-prometheus-event-driven/complete-observability-architecture
64%
compare
Recommended

Twistlock vs Aqua Security vs Snyk Container - Which One Won't Bankrupt You?

We tested all three platforms in production so you don't have to suffer through the sales demos

Twistlock
/compare/twistlock/aqua-security/snyk-container/comprehensive-comparison
48%
integration
Recommended

RAG on Kubernetes: Why You Probably Don't Need It (But If You Do, Here's How)

Running RAG Systems on K8s Will Make You Hate Your Life, But Sometimes You Don't Have a Choice

Vector Databases
/integration/vector-database-rag-production-deployment/kubernetes-orchestration
45%
integration
Recommended

Prometheus + Grafana + Jaeger: Stop Debugging Microservices Like It's 2015

When your API shits the bed right before the big demo, this stack tells you exactly why

Prometheus
/integration/prometheus-grafana-jaeger/microservices-observability-integration
44%
alternatives
Recommended

Docker Alternatives That Won't Break Your Budget

Docker got expensive as hell. Here's how to escape without breaking everything.

Docker
/alternatives/docker/budget-friendly-alternatives
43%
compare
Recommended

I Tested 5 Container Security Scanners in CI/CD - Here's What Actually Works

Trivy, Docker Scout, Snyk Container, Grype, and Clair - which one won't make you want to quit DevOps

docker
/compare/docker-security/cicd-integration/docker-security-cicd-integration
43%
pricing
Recommended

Container Security Pricing Reality Check 2025: What You'll Actually Pay

Stop getting screwed by "contact sales" pricing - here's what everyone's really spending

Twistlock
/pricing/twistlock-aqua-snyk-sysdig/competitive-pricing-analysis
42%
integration
Recommended

Snyk + Trivy + Prisma Cloud: Stop Your Security Tools From Fighting Each Other

Make three security scanners play nice instead of fighting each other for Docker socket access

Snyk
/integration/snyk-trivy-twistlock-cicd/comprehensive-security-pipeline-integration
42%
tool
Recommended

Aqua Security - Container Security That Actually Works

Been scanning containers since Docker was scary, now covers all your cloud stuff without breaking CI/CD

Aqua Security Platform
/tool/aqua-security/overview
31%
tool
Recommended

Aqua Security Production Troubleshooting - When Things Break at 3AM

Real fixes for the shit that goes wrong when Aqua Security decides to ruin your weekend

Aqua Security Platform
/tool/aqua-security/production-troubleshooting
31%
tool
Recommended

Prisma Cloud - Cloud Security That Actually Catches Real Threats

Prisma Cloud - Palo Alto Networks' comprehensive cloud security platform

Prisma Cloud
/tool/prisma-cloud/overview
31%
tool
Recommended

Prisma Cloud Compute Edition - Self-Hosted Container Security

Survival guide for deploying and maintaining Prisma Cloud Compute Edition when cloud connectivity isn't an option

Prisma Cloud Compute Edition
/tool/prisma-cloud-compute-edition/self-hosted-deployment
31%
tool
Recommended

Prisma Cloud Enterprise Deployment - What Actually Works vs The Sales Pitch

competes with Prisma Cloud

Prisma Cloud
/tool/prisma-cloud/enterprise-deployment-architecture
31%
tool
Recommended

Rancher Desktop - Docker Desktop's Free Replacement That Actually Works

integrates with Rancher Desktop

Rancher Desktop
/tool/rancher-desktop/overview
30%
review
Recommended

I Ditched Docker Desktop for Rancher Desktop - Here's What Actually Happened

3 Months Later: The Good, Bad, and Bullshit

Rancher Desktop
/review/rancher-desktop/overview
30%
tool
Recommended

Rancher - Manage Multiple Kubernetes Clusters Without Losing Your Sanity

One dashboard for all your clusters, whether they're on AWS, your basement server, or that sketchy cloud provider your CTO picked

Rancher
/tool/rancher/overview
30%
tool
Recommended

Sysdig - Security Tools That Actually Watch What's Running

Security tools that watch what your containers are actually doing, not just what they're supposed to do

Sysdig Secure
/tool/sysdig-secure/overview
28%
tool
Recommended

RHACS Cost Analysis & Pricing Guide: Budget Without Breaking Security

Red Hat quoted us $50K. We spent $127K. Here's why their estimates are fantasy.

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
/tool/red-hat-advanced-cluster-security/cost-analysis-pricing-guide
28%
tool
Recommended

RHACS - Scans Your Containers So They Don't Get You Fired

Red Hat's solution to the "why the hell did we get hacked" problem

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
/tool/red-hat-advanced-cluster-security/overview
28%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization