Look, I've deployed Northflank at three different companies now, and I'm tired of reading marketing bullshit about "comprehensive solutions." Here's what actually happens when you try to deploy this thing at enterprise scale.
First off, forget everything the sales team told you about "seamless integration." BYOC is solid tech, but it's not magic. I learned this the hard way when our first deployment took down production for 3 hours because nobody mentioned that cross-account links need specific IAM policies that their docs don't document properly.
The Two Ways to Not Fuck This Up
Cross-Account Links (Actually Works): This is the way to go unless your security team has a stick up their ass about third-party access. You give Northflank an IAM role in your AWS account (or equivalent for GCP/Azure), and they manage your Kubernetes clusters without you having to share credentials.
The setup took me about 2 hours the first time because I had to figure out which IAM permissions were actually needed. Pro tip: their documentation says one thing, but you'll need eks:DescribeCluster
and ec2:DescribeVpcs
permissions that aren't listed. Save yourself the debugging and just use their CloudFormation template. For more context on BYOC patterns, check out Confluent's BYOC guide and AWS's IAM best practices.
Self-Hosted Control Plane (For the Paranoid): If you're in banking, defense, or healthcare and your compliance team loses sleep over SaaS control planes, this option exists. You basically run Northflank's management UI in your own infrastructure.
I've only done this once, and it was a pain in the ass. Takes 2-4 weeks to set up properly, and you're responsible for keeping it updated. Only go this route if you absolutely have to.
Multi-Cloud - Because Vendor Lock-in is for Suckers
One thing Northflank actually gets right is multi-cloud. They support AWS, GCP, Azure, and a bunch of smaller providers with the same interface. I've deployed the same app across AWS us-east-1, GCP europe-west1, and Azure westus2 without changing a single config file. Their AWS integration, GCP setup, and Azure deployment docs are actually pretty solid once you get past the marketing fluff.
The Cost Thing Actually Works: This was the one promise from sales that turned out to be true. We were burning through $15K/month on Heroku, moved to BYOC on our existing AWS enterprise agreement, and cut costs to $8K/month. The Clock case study isn't bullshit - you really can see per-project costs without doing spreadsheet gymnastics.
Moving Between Clouds: I've migrated workloads from AWS to GCP twice now. It's not "seamless" like the marketing says, but it's way easier than doing it manually. Takes about a day to move a medium-complexity app, including DNS cutover. Your mileage will vary if you're using cloud-specific services like RDS or BigQuery.
GPU Workloads Update (As of September 2025): They just added full GPU support for A100s, H100s, and B200s on their PaaS tier. No more waiting weeks for cloud provider GPU capacity - you can spin up AI inference workloads in minutes. GPU pricing requires pre-purchased credits (probably to prevent people from burning through $10K accidentally), but rates are competitive: H100 at $2.74/hr, A100 40GB at $1.42/hr. You get all the platform features on top - monitoring, scaling, deployment pipelines.
Real Companies Using This in Production
I talked to some folks I know who are actually running this in production:
Clock Digital Agency: These guys really are managing 350+ services for client work. The "100% uptime" claim is mostly true, but they had a 4-hour outage last year when AWS us-east-1 shit the bed. That's not Northflank's fault, but the point is that no platform prevents AWS from going down.
The environment provisioning speed is legit though. They can spin up a full staging environment in about 10 minutes, which used to take them 2-3 hours with their old Docker Swarm setup.
Cedana: YC company running production workloads for their customers. Their SOC 2 compliance story is legit - I helped them through their first audit. Northflank's audit logs and access controls saved them probably 2 months of custom development.
The template thing they mention is actually useful. You can define infrastructure as code and deploy identical environments with one click. It's like Terraform but without wanting to throw your laptop out the window. Their templates documentation covers the basics, and you can see working examples in their stack library.