What is Fresh Framework?

Fresh Architecture Illustration

Fresh is a web framework built for Deno, and it works completely differently than the React frameworks you're used to. Developed by the Deno team, Fresh ditches the JavaScript-heavy approach that's been breaking web performance for years.

How Fresh Works (The Non-Bullshit Version)

Here's what makes Fresh weird in a good way:

Zero JavaScript by Default: Only the parts that actually need JavaScript get JavaScript. Your boring blog post stays as plain HTML - no 500KB React bundle to render static text. I learned this shit the hard way after spending a Friday night debugging a client's Next.js 13.4 site that took 8 seconds to show a simple paragraph because Create React App was shipping the entire React DevTools bundle to production.

Island Architecture: Fresh uses the Islands pattern where your static content is surrounded by small interactive "islands." This concept was originally proposed by Jason Miller and implemented by Astro first. Instead of React taking over your entire page like a digital parasite, Fresh only adds JavaScript where you actually need it - like a normal fucking website.

Islands Architecture Diagram

Edge Rendering: Pages render server-side on Deno Deploy's edge network, not in some distant data center. The performance difference is real - way faster cold starts, like 50x better than traditional serverless. V8 isolates start much faster than AWS Lambda containers. Don't quote me on the exact numbers, but it's noticeably faster.

The Technical Reality

File-System Routing: Works like Next.js routing but uses Fresh's routing conventions - drop a file in routes/, get a URL. No config, no route mapping bullshit. Create routes/about.tsx and /about just works.

TypeScript Without the Headache: Deno handles TypeScript natively, so no tsconfig.json, no compilation step, no watching 47 different webpack processes crash when you change one line. Just write .ts files and run them. Coming from Node.js, this feels like magic until you hit import map conflicts with existing projects and spend 3 hours getting something like Error: Cannot resolve "react" or whatever the fuck Deno was complaining about because Deno 1.38+ changed how import maps work with npm: specifiers.

Preact Under the Hood: Uses Preact instead of React - same JSX, same hooks, but 3KB instead of 45KB. Your React muscle memory works fine, just don't try to npm install React components because that'll break spectacularly.

Actually Progressive Enhancement: Pages work with JavaScript disabled. I know, shocking concept in 2025. Interactive bits enhance the experience instead of being required for basic functionality. This follows web standards best practices rather than the SPA-first approach that breaks the web.

Production Reality Check

Deno Mascot

Deno.com runs on Fresh, along with Deco.cx's ecommerce platform that handles serious traffic. At least they eat their own dog food instead of building something they wouldn't use.

Fresh 2.0 Just Hit Beta (September 2025): Fresh 2.0 graduated to beta after 63 alpha releases that kept breaking my import maps. This isn't some distant roadmap bullshit - it's basically release-candidate ready and powers deno.com in production:

  • Vite integration: Optional Vite plugin support for HMR and access to the Vite ecosystem
  • 9-12x faster boot times: Production apps start in 8ms instead of 86ms (measured on deno.com)
  • Hot module reloading in island components (finally!)
  • React aliasing solved: No more manual preact/compat mapping headaches
  • <Head> component is back for managing document head

Look, if you're starting a new project in September 2025, use Fresh 2.0 beta. The architecture is stable and the performance improvements are real.

Bottom Line: Fresh delivers what it promises - genuinely fast web apps with minimal JavaScript. But you're making a strategic trade: React's massive ecosystem for Deno's performance and simplicity.

The real question isn't whether Fresh is objectively "better" than Next.js. It's whether your project can thrive in a smaller ecosystem in exchange for dramatically better performance and developer experience. If you're building content-heavy sites where speed matters more than having 47 different date picker libraries, Fresh might be exactly what you need.

The web is moving toward less JavaScript, better performance, and simpler developer experiences. Fresh is betting on that future - and the early results look promising.

Fresh vs Other Web Frameworks (Reality Check)

Feature

Fresh

Next.js

SvelteKit

Nuxt.js

Runtime

Deno

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js

TypeScript

Native support

Requires configuration

Requires configuration

Requires configuration

Default JS Shipped

Zero

Full React bundle

Full framework

Full Vue

Build Process

None required

Webpack hell

Vite-based

Webpack/Vite

Hydration

Islands only

Full page

Full page

Full page

Edge Deployment

Native Deno Deploy

Vercel primarily

Adapter-based

Nuxt Edge

Component Ecosystem

Small (good luck with that)

Large (React)

Growing (Svelte)

Large (Vue)

Configuration

Minimal

Moderate

Some required

Some required

Bundle Size

Minimal

Optimized bundles

Small to medium

Medium

Learning Curve

Islands architecture

React knowledge

Svelte syntax

Vue knowledge

Cold Start Speed

45-60x faster per InfoWorld

Standard serverless

Standard serverless

Standard serverless

Release Year

2022

2016

2021

2016

GitHub Stars

Fresh: 13k stars vs Next.js: 125k+. Yeah, you're basically betting on the underdog here

Massive community (good luck standing out)

Decent community

Decent community

Community Support

Growing

Extensive

Good

Good

Getting Started with Fresh (The Real Experience)

Fresh Logo

Installation and Project Setup

Fresh setup breaks in predictable ways. Here's what you'll hit:

Quick Start (When It Works)

Create a new Fresh project using the Fresh 2.0 beta installer:

deno run -Ar jsr:@fresh/init@2.0.0-beta.1
cd fresh-project
deno task start

The setup works great about 60% of the time. Here's what breaks it and the exact errors you'll see:

  • Windows users get fucked immediately: PowerShell execution policy blocks script downloads with execution of scripts is disabled on this system. Run Set-ExecutionPolicy RemoteSigned first or enjoy 30 minutes of googling cryptic permission errors
  • Windows PATH limit will destroy you: Deno's cache directory paths get so long they hit Windows' 260 character limit and everything breaks silently with ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'C:\Users\...[250 chars later]...\deps.ts'
  • Your company firewall blocks script downloads because security theater
  • You have an existing Node.js project and get Error: Import map key \"react\" already defined at file://./deno.json because import map conflicts with package.json resolution
  • Recent Deno 1.37+ versions changed import resolution and half the tutorials online are broken now with Cannot resolve module \"preact/hooks\" (fun fact: took down prod for 2 hours when we auto-upgraded without checking the breaking changes)
  • You need any npm package that hasn't been tested with Deno's Node.js compatibility and get mysterious Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'fs' errors (spoiler: most npm packages haven't been tested)

Pro tip: The `-A` flag gives all permissions. In production, you'll want to be more specific with permission flags, but for local dev it saves headaches.

When everything breaks (the nuclear option): rm -rf .deno && deno cache --reload main.ts - clears Deno's cache and starts fresh. Takes 5 minutes if you're lucky, 2 hours if esm.sh is having issues.

Project Structure That Actually Makes Sense

Fresh project structure is straightforward:

project/
├── routes/          # File-system routing (like Next.js)
│   ├── index.tsx    # Homepage (/)
│   └── api/         # API routes (actually server-side)
├── islands/         # Interactive components (the magical part)
├── components/      # Static components (no JS shipped)
├── static/          # Static assets (images, CSS)
└── fresh.gen.ts     # Generated manifest (don't touch this)

Development Experience (The Truth)

TypeScript Without the Bullshit

Deno handles TypeScript natively, which is genuinely nice:

  • No tsconfig.json to fidget with
  • No watching 5 different compilation processes
  • TypeScript errors show up immediately
  • Built-in import maps (when they don't conflict with your existing setup)

This feels amazing coming from a Node.js project with 47 different build tools. Until you need to use some random npm package that doesn't work with Deno. Then you're back to dependency hell, just with different error messages.

File-System Routing (It Just Works)

Drop files in routes/, get URLs:

  • routes/index.tsx → / (homepage)
  • routes/about.tsx → /about (about page)
  • routes/blog/[slug].tsx → /blog/anything (dynamic routes)
  • routes/api/users.ts → /api/users (actual API endpoint)

No route configuration bullshit. Create the file, get the route.

Island Components (The Cool Part)

Islands are where the magic happens - interactive components in a sea of static HTML:

// islands/Counter.tsx - This gets JavaScript
import { useState } from \"preact/hooks\";

export default function Counter() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  return <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Count: {count}</button>;
}

Only this button gets JavaScript. Everything else is plain HTML.

Deployment (Where Fresh Shines)

Deno 3D Mascot

Deno Deploy (Actually Works Great)

Deno Deploy gives you a free subdomain that actually works. Unlike Heroku's random sleep cycles or Vercel's 10-second function limits, this just works.

The good: Push to GitHub, get automatic deployments, global edge distribution
The catch: You're locked into their platform (no Docker export)

Real deployment gotcha: Deno Deploy free tier is 100k requests/month. Sounds generous until your blog post hits Hacker News front page and burns through it in 3 hours (learned this the hard way when we got slammed with like 280k hits or something crazy).

Other Deployment Options

  • Docker: Works, but you lose the edge magic
  • Cloudflare Workers: Good option if you're already on CF
  • AWS Lambda: Why would you torture yourself?
  • Self-hosted: Defeats the purpose

Real talk: Fresh is designed for Deno Deploy. Other platforms work, but you're swimming upstream. Check out the new deployment guide for Cloudflare Workers if you want alternatives.

The Fresh Development Reality

Fresh represents a different philosophy: less is more. Instead of battling build tools and dependencies, you focus on writing components and routes. The development experience genuinely feels refreshing after years of webpack configurations and 500MB node_modules folders.

Is it ready for your production app? If you're building content sites, blogs, or marketing pages - absolutely. The performance benefits are real and measurable. If you need a complex dashboard with lots of client-side state management, maybe stick with React for now.

Fresh works best when you embrace its constraints rather than fight them. Think of it as a return to simpler web development - with modern tooling and genuine performance improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions (Real Answers)

Q

What makes Fresh different from Next.js or other React frameworks?

A

Fresh doesn't ship JavaScript unless you explicitly ask for it.

Next.js sends a full React bundle for every page

  • even static ones. Fresh only adds JavaScript to the specific components that need interactivity. The performance difference is measurable
  • we're talking 45-60x faster cold starts. I've seen Next.js sites take 3+ seconds to show a static landing page. Fresh shows it instantly.
Q

Does Fresh require Deno, or can it run on Node.js?

A

Fresh requires Deno.

Period. No Node.js compatibility, no "just use a shim." This is actually a feature

  • you get Type

Script support, web standards, and modern JavaScript without the npm ecosystem hell. The trade-off? You lose access to 90% of the npm packages you're used to. Hope your favorite library has been ported to JSR.

Q

What is the Islands Architecture and why does Fresh use it?

A

Think of Islands Architecture like this: your page is a static HTML island surrounded by a sea of... more static HTML. Only the parts that actually need JavaScript (forms, buttons, interactive widgets) get JavaScript. Instead of React hydrating your entire page including the footer, header, and static text, Fresh only hydrates the interactive bits. Your blog post stays HTML, your contact form gets JavaScript.

Q

How mature is Fresh for production use?

A

Fresh hit 1.0 in June 2022 and powers real production sites like deno.com itself. It's stable enough that the Deno team uses it for their own infrastructure. But: The ecosystem is tiny compared to Next.js. Good luck finding a component library that works out of the box. You'll be building everything from scratch or hoping someone ported it to JSR.

Q

What about debugging when shit breaks?

A

Fresh errors can be cryptic as hell.

Stack traces point to Deno internals you've never seen like at async instantiate (ext:core/01_core.js:543:12).

The Fresh Discord becomes your lifeline

  • thankfully the maintainers actually help at 2am instead of telling you to RTFM like most framework maintainers. Common gotcha:

Import errors will make you want to punch your monitor. Deno's module resolution is different from Node.js and you'll see shit like error: Relative import path "react" not prefixed with / or ./ or ../ which means absolutely nothing useful.

Or my favorite: `error:

Import 'https://esm.sh/react@18.2.0' failed: 500 Internal Server Error` when esm.sh is having a bad day. 3am debugging nightmare:

Spent 4 hours tracking down a "Cannot resolve module" error that turned out to be a fucking typo in the import map. The error message pointed to a completely different file. First thing to check: your import map syntax, then rm -rf node_modules and try again (old habits die hard).

Q

When should I choose Fresh over other frameworks?

A

Use Fresh if:

  • You're building content-heavy sites (blogs, marketing pages, docs)
  • Performance actually matters to your users
  • You're tired of debugging webpack configurations
  • You want to deploy to Deno Deploy specifically

Don't use Fresh if:

  • Your team is already productive with Next.js (migration headache isn't worth it)
  • You need heavy client-side interactions (SPAs, dashboards, games)
  • You rely on React ecosystem packages
  • You need enterprise support contracts
Q

What's the status of Fresh 2.0?

A

Fresh 2.0 hit beta September 2, 2025 - basically release candidates now. After a shit-ton of alpha releases, they finally landed the big features:

  • Vite integration (optional) for HMR and ecosystem access
  • 9-12x faster production boot times (8ms vs 86ms for deno.com)
  • Hot module reloading in islands
  • Automatic React aliasing (no more preact/compat headaches)

Look, if you're starting a project now, use Fresh 2.0 beta. The architecture is stable and performance improvements are massive.

Q

How does Fresh handle SEO and social media sharing?

A

SEO is actually great because everything renders server-side as HTML first. Search engines see real content immediately, not loading spinners. The good: Meta tags work, content is indexable, page loads are fast
The catch: Dynamic meta tags require server-side logic (not client-side useEffect calls)

Q

Can I migrate an existing React/Next.js application to Fresh?

A

Simple sites: If your Next.js app is mostly static with a few interactive bits, migration is doable in a weekend.

Complex SPAs: Don't even try. You'll be rewriting everything. Redux doesn't work, your component library won't work, client-side routing is different.

Bottom line: Migrating from Next.js? Budget 5 weeks minimum and you'll still be finding edge cases 6 months later. Your component library won't work, your state management is fucked, and every npm package becomes a 3-hour research project. I tried migrating a Next.js 13 app and gave up after realizing Chakra UI, React Hook Form, and SWR all needed complete rewrites. Fresh works great for new projects. Migrating existing React apps? Don't torture yourself unless you enjoy rewriting everything from scratch.

Q

What about performance monitoring and analytics?

A

High-res Deno Logo

Fresh works with standard analytics (Google Analytics, Plausible, etc.) since it's just HTML. For performance monitoring, you'll need to set up server-side instrumentation on Deno Deploy or use their built-in metrics.

Missing: The rich ecosystem of React-specific dev tools, performance profilers, and monitoring solutions. You're mostly on your own. No React DevTools, no Redux DevTools, no Sentry React integration that actually works well. Hope you like console.log debugging like it's 2015.

Essential Fresh Framework Resources (Actually Useful Stuff)

Related Tools & Recommendations

compare
Recommended

Framework Wars Survivor Guide: Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit, Remix vs Gatsby

18 months in Gatsby hell, 6 months testing everything else - here's what actually works for enterprise teams

Next.js
/compare/nextjs/nuxt/sveltekit/remix/gatsby/enterprise-team-scaling
100%
tool
Similar content

Deno Overview: Modern JavaScript & TypeScript Runtime

A secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built on V8 and Rust

Deno
/tool/deno/overview
65%
integration
Similar content

Deploy Deno Fresh, TypeScript, Supabase to Production

How to ship this stack without losing your sanity (or taking down prod)

Deno Fresh
/integration/deno-fresh-supabase-typescript/production-deployment
55%
integration
Recommended

I Spent Two Weekends Getting Supabase Auth Working with Next.js 13+

Here's what actually works (and what will break your app)

Supabase
/integration/supabase-nextjs/server-side-auth-guide
48%
review
Similar content

Bun vs Node.js vs Deno: JavaScript Runtime Production Guide

Two years of runtime fuckery later, here's the truth nobody tells you

Bun
/review/bun-nodejs-deno-comparison/production-readiness-assessment
43%
tool
Similar content

Express.js - The Web Framework Nobody Wants to Replace

It's ugly, old, and everyone still uses it

Express.js
/tool/express/overview
41%
tool
Similar content

FastAPI - High-Performance Python API Framework

The Modern Web Framework That Doesn't Make You Choose Between Speed and Developer Sanity

FastAPI
/tool/fastapi/overview
41%
compare
Recommended

Remix vs SvelteKit vs Next.js: Which One Breaks Less

I got paged at 3AM by apps built with all three of these. Here's which one made me want to quit programming.

Remix
/compare/remix/sveltekit/ssr-performance-showdown
39%
tool
Similar content

Django: Python's Web Framework for Perfectionists

Build robust, scalable web applications rapidly with Python's most comprehensive framework

Django
/tool/django/overview
39%
integration
Recommended

Stop Stripe from Destroying Your Serverless Performance

Cold starts are killing your payments, webhooks are timing out randomly, and your users think your checkout is broken. Here's how to fix the mess.

Stripe
/integration/stripe-nextjs-app-router/serverless-performance-optimization
30%
tool
Recommended

Nuxt - I Got Tired of Vue Setup Hell

Vue framework that does the tedious config shit for you, supposedly

Nuxt
/tool/nuxt/overview
27%
tool
Recommended

Astro - Static Sites That Don't Suck

competes with Astro

Astro
/tool/astro/overview
27%
tool
Recommended

Fix Astro Production Deployment Nightmares

competes with Astro

Astro
/tool/astro/production-deployment-troubleshooting
27%
compare
Recommended

Which Static Site Generator Won't Make You Hate Your Life

Just use fucking Astro. Next.js if you actually need server shit. Gatsby is dead - seriously, stop asking.

Astro
/compare/astro/nextjs/gatsby/static-generation-performance-benchmark
27%
compare
Popular choice

Augment Code vs Claude Code vs Cursor vs Windsurf

Tried all four AI coding tools. Here's what actually happened.

/compare/augment-code/claude-code/cursor/windsurf/enterprise-ai-coding-reality-check
27%
pricing
Popular choice

What It Actually Costs to Choose Rust vs Go

I've hemorrhaged money on Rust hiring at three different companies. Here's the real cost breakdown nobody talks about.

Rust
/pricing/rust-vs-go/total-cost-ownership-analysis
25%
tool
Recommended

Tailwind CSS - Write CSS Without Actually Writing CSS

compatible with Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS
/tool/tailwind-css/overview
25%
tool
Recommended

Supabase - PostgreSQL with Bells and Whistles

integrates with Supabase

Supabase
/tool/supabase/overview
25%
pricing
Recommended

Backend Pricing Reality Check: Supabase vs Firebase vs AWS Amplify

Got burned by a Firebase bill that went from like $40 to $800+ after Reddit hug of death. Firebase real-time listeners leak memory if you don't unsubscribe prop

Supabase
/pricing/supabase-firebase-amplify-cost-comparison/comprehensive-pricing-breakdown
25%
integration
Recommended

SvelteKit + TypeScript + Tailwind: What I Learned Building 3 Production Apps

The stack that actually doesn't make you want to throw your laptop out the window

Svelte
/integration/svelte-sveltekit-tailwind-typescript/full-stack-architecture-guide
24%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization