Here's what happened when we tested everything:

What Actually Matters

Next.js

Nuxt 3

SvelteKit

Remix

Gatsby

Build Times

10-15 min

8-12 min

5-8 min

12-18 min

45+ min (fucking insane)

When Shit Breaks

Actual error messages

Vue devtools help

Good stack traces

Network tab debugging

"FAILED TO COMPILE"

Hot Reload

Works fine

Works great

Vite magic

Decent

Sometimes works, usually doesn't

Content Updates

ISR rebuilds smartly

SSG/SSR hybrid works

Adapter handles it

Remix handles routing

Full rebuild for typos

Developer Hiring

Any React dev works

Need Vue experience

Svelte learning curve

React + server knowledge

Masochists only

Monthly Bills

$400-800 (Vercel)

$200-500 (various hosts)

$100-300 (adapter dependent)

$300-600 (Fly/Railway)

$2400 (Gatsby Cloud)

3AM Debug Sessions

Manageable hydration errors

SSR/client mismatches

Build adapter weirdness

Network/server issues

Existential GraphQL crises

CEO Yelling

Stopped

Rarely happens

Pretty calm

Some deployment stress

Daily screaming matches

Why Gatsby Broke Our Hiring Process

React vs Vue vs Svelte Developer Survey

How We Hired a React Guy Who Couldn't Debug Gatsby

So our CTO goes "Gatsby is perfect, it's just React with GraphQL!" Hires this React dev for $95k who spent 6 months telling us to "add more RAM" every time builds hit Node.js memory limits. Turns out knowing React and knowing how to unfuck gatsby-node.js when it's choking on 10,000+ pages are completely different skills.

This dude's solution to everything was restart the server. Builds taking an hour? Restart Docker. GraphQL queries timing out? Restart the build. Memory heap exceeded? Restart everything and pray. Windows path length errors? "Works fine on my Mac." Content team screaming because they can't publish breaking news? "Have you tried turning it off and on again?"

Dude spent 6 months suggesting we "just add more RAM" to our $4,000 MacBook Pros when the real problem was Gatsby trying to load 50GB of images into memory during builds. Even bought a 64GB desktop thinking it would help - Gatsby still crashed, just took longer.

Try running Gatsby development on Windows and you'll want to quit programming. WSL2 makes it slightly less awful but Windows developers were basically fucked. Our MacBooks from 2019 couldn't handle the memory usage - 16GB wasn't enough once you hit 5,000+ pages. M1 Macs couldn't even run half the Gatsby plugins we needed.

We burned through 3 different "senior React developers" before admitting that Gatsby requires a very specific type of masochist - someone who understands React, GraphQL, Node.js build processes, AND doesn't mind spending 40% of their time googling "gatsby sharp pipeline error win32" at 2am.

Interviewed 12 people after that. 11 ran when we mentioned Gatsby. The one who stayed lasted 3 weeks before updating his resume on Stack Overflow Jobs. Turns out "senior React dev who enjoys debugging non-deterministic build failures" isn't a real job category.

What we learned the hard way: When someone says "just React," run. It's never just React.

Testing Everything Else After Gatsby Hell

After the Gatsby nightmare, we spent 6 months testing frameworks. Not just picking the first alternative - actually building the same content site in Next.js, Nuxt 3, SvelteKit, and Remix to see what actually worked with our team.

SvelteKit was the biggest surprise. Builds were crazy fast - 5-8 minutes vs Gatsby's 45+ minute nightmares. Vite hot reload felt like magic after Gatsby's "maybe it'll work" approach. The bundle sizes were tiny, load times were insane, and everything just... worked. Problem? Try hiring Svelte developers who can actually ship production code. We interviewed 8 people, found 1 who'd touched Svelte, and he wanted senior React money for junior Svelte experience.

Nuxt 3 felt like Vue's answer to Next.js but better in some ways. Auto-imports meant less boilerplate, server API routes were cleaner than Next.js API routes, and the build process was more predictable. Issue? Our team knows React, not Vue. Training 6 developers on Vue syntax and ecosystem would've taken months we didn't have.

Remix was interesting in a "this might be the future" way. The nested routing approach made sense, server-first philosophy avoided hydration issues, and error boundaries actually contained problems instead of crashing the entire app. But our frontend team barely understood client-side React - asking them to think about server-side rendering, streaming, and progressive enhancement was like asking them to perform brain surgery.

Next.js won because it was boring. Switched to Next.js and suddenly we could hire normal React devs again. Not because Next.js is easier - it's because when shit breaks you get actual error messages. Like, with line numbers and stack traces. Revolutionary concept after 18 months of "Check your GraphQL queries" error messages that told you nothing.

Yeah, we're locked into Vercel now and the bills hit different. Still dealing with hydration errors but at least they happen predictably - client-side state doesn't match server render, fix the thing, move on with life. Not "delete everything and rebuild for 45 minutes hoping it works this time."

Edge functions are weird as hell and occasionally our API responses come back empty when deployed to fra1 but work fine from iad1. No idea why - Vercel's status page never shows issues but geographic routing is clearly fucked sometimes. Serverless cold starts still make our first-load times inconsistent but whatever - better than no deploys at all.

Vercel's pricing calculator is basically gambling. We budgeted like 400 bucks a month, hit over a grand last month because apparently our images triggered some CDN bandwidth spike. Don't ask me why - their analytics dashboard graphs make no fucking sense.

But our content team stopped wanting to murder us. New developers can actually contribute without spending 3 weeks learning Gatsby's plugin ecosystem bullshit. We spent more on Vercel bills in 6 months than the Gatsby guy's entire salary, but saved 20+ hours per week not debugging random build failures.

Developer Frustration

The Day Gatsby Broke Our Entire Workflow

Nobody tells you that Gatsby doesn't just slow down with more developers - it completely obliterates your workflow.

6 developers working fine, then suddenly builds jump from 12 minutes to 45 minutes overnight. Why? Someone added 500 blog posts to the CMS while we were sleeping. No warning, no gradual slowdown, just BAM - your deployment pipeline is fucked.

Tried everything: restart Docker, restart build server, restart our sanity. Checked if it was a plugin issue, a memory issue, a network issue. Spent 3 days profiling builds with Gatsby's debug tools (which are useless) before we realized it was just volume. More content = exponentially longer builds. Mathematical inevitability disguised as a sudden crisis.

Every push meant the entire team stopped working for 45 minutes. Couldn't test locally because 10k+ pages needed 8GB RAM minimum and our 2019 MacBooks started thermal throttling after 20 minutes. Fans spinning like jet engines, CPU at 95°C, battery draining in 2 hours.

Tried running Docker with 12GB allocated - thermal throttled even harder. Tried running on our beefier desktop machines - npm install kept failing with EPERM: operation not permitted errors that made no sense. Works on Sarah's machine, fails on mine with identical node versions. Still don't know why.

Gatsby Cloud looked like salvation until we got hit with a $2,400/month bill. For what? Incremental builds that randomly decided to rebuild everything from scratch anyway.

What We Should Have Built Instead

Just use Next.js - Same React components, 12-minute builds instead of 45. Yeah you're locked into Vercel but at least the content team can publish without praying to the build gods first.

Normal React SPA hitting an API - 90% of what we built didn't need static generation. Could've made a regular React app that fetches from our headless CMS API. Would've been done in half the time, with zero build step bullshit.

Literally anything else - WordPress, Ghost, hell even a static HTML site updated with rsync would've been less painful. At least when WordPress breaks, only the broken thing breaks.

Should've read Gatsby's own docs about performance issues and build optimization before committing to this nightmare. Pro tip: when the official docs have 47 different sections about fixing build performance, maybe the tool is the problem.

What Gatsby Actually Cost Us vs Next.js

Aspect

Gatsby Experience/Cost

Next.js Experience/Cost

Developer salaries

Hired a React dev for around 95k who couldn't figure out why Gatsby builds broke every Tuesday. Effectively higher due to inefficiency.

Now paying closer to 130k for someone who actually ships features instead of googling "gatsby-node memory leak" all day. Improved efficiency and output.

Time wasted

20+ hours per week sitting around waiting for builds to finish.

2-3 hours per week dealing with actual problems instead of Gatsby's existential crises.

Build service costs

Like 2400 bucks a month for Gatsby Cloud's "incremental builds" that decided to rebuild everything from scratch whenever Mercury was in retrograde.

Vercel bills hit 400-800 monthly but shit actually works.

Weekend debugging

Every other weekend someone had to fix broken builds. Usually involved deleting node_modules, clearing Gatsby cache, restarting Docker, checking disk space, praying to various gods, maybe sacrificing a goat. Jim kept a "Gatsby is broken again" document with 23 different things to try. None worked reliably.

Significantly reduced/eliminated. No longer a regular occurrence.

Content team therapy

Daily screaming matches about publishing taking forever.

Now they ask for new features like normal humans. Remarkable improvement in office morale.

Migration pain

Cost us probably 150-200k and 8 months to escape Gatsby hell. Could've bought a Tesla instead, but at least we sleep at night now.

N/A (This was the cost of migrating from Gatsby to a new solution like Next.js).

Developer mental health

Completely destroyed under Gatsby. Lost our senior dev to burnout

  • he's at a startup building microservices now and seems genuinely happy. DevOps guy started updating his resume after the third "why is this broken again" conversation. I stress-bought a $400 mechanical keyboard and it didn't help.

Now mostly intact, though we all flinch a little when Vercel sends billing emails. PTSD from those random thousand-dollar months.

When Gatsby Builds Break at 3AM

Production Deployment

The Saturday Morning From Hell

Saturday, 7am. CEO calling because the website's completely fucked. Our 3am build failed and nobody noticed because apparently monitoring Gatsby builds on weekends is for people who enjoy pain.

The error message? Error: Cannot query field 'title' on type 'ContentfulBlogPost'. Same GraphQL query that worked for 6 months. Spent 2 hours trying random shit from our "Gatsby is broken" playbook:

  • Cleared Gatsby cache (3 times)
  • Deleted node_modules (12 times)
  • Restarted Docker containers
  • Checked Contentful API (working fine)
  • Tried different Node versions (16.14, 16.15, 18.2)
  • Cleared npm cache
  • Even turned off Windows Defender thinking it was blocking file access
  • Googled variations of the error for 30 minutes
  • Checked if Mercury was in retrograde (it wasn't)

Nothing. Same fucking error every time.

Finally found the problem in a 2019 GitHub issue with 4 comments - someone put a regular apostrophe in a blog post title. Not Unicode, not some weird character, just a normal ' that Gatsby's GraphQL schema generator suddenly decided was poison.

Best part? The same apostrophe worked fine in development, worked fine in staging, but broke production builds for reasons that nobody on Stack Overflow could explain. CEO called every 20 minutes asking "is it fixed yet?" while I'm digging through Gatsby docs, Contentful forums, and r/reactjs trying to understand why an apostrophe can kill an entire website in 2023.

Had to manually hunt through 500+ blog posts in the CMS looking for apostrophes like some kind of medieval monk. Found three different articles with apostrophes - fixed all of them, triggered another build, waited 45 minutes. Still broke.

Turns out there was a fourth apostrophe in a meta description field that didn't even render on the page. Found it by exporting our entire CMS to JSON and running grep -n "'" content.json like a caveman. All because Gatsby can't handle basic punctuation without shitting itself.

Why We Switched to Next.js After This

You know what happens when weird content breaks Next.js? The page with the weird content returns a 500 error. The rest of the site keeps working.

You know what happens when weird content breaks Gatsby? The entire site goes down. 10,000 perfectly fine pages become inaccessible because one blog post had an apostrophe.

That's the difference: Gatsby is fragile as fuck. One bad piece of content, one GraphQL query that times out, one plugin that decides to break - your entire site dies.

Why Static Site Generators Are a Fucking Lie

After 18 months in Gatsby hell, I learned that static site generators work great until they don't - then you're completely screwed with no way to fix individual pieces.

When Gatsby works, it's beautiful. Perfect Lighthouse scores, instant loading, your CEO thinks you're a genius. But the build process is a house of cards held together with prayer and npm cache.

Random plugin breaks with ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/tmp/gatsby-transformer-sharp-1234567890.tmp'? Entire site down. CMS API timeout during build? Site down. Hit Node's memory limit at 4GB? Everything down. Deploy on a Thursday? Breaks for reasons that don't apply on Wednesday.

Favorite random failure: builds worked fine for 3 months, then started failing with spawn ENOMEM only on Ubuntu but not Mac. Same Docker image, same everything. Never figured out why. Just started building on Mac instead like savages.

Our Jenkins logs were a museum of inexplicable failures:

  • Error: Memory heap limit exceeded during page creation (with 16GB available)
  • Error: Sharp pipeline: Input buffer contains unsupported image format (JPEG was apparently "unsupported")
  • GraphQL schema inference deprecation warning for type [object Object] (thanks, very helpful)
  • Error: Cannot query field 'publishedDate' on type 'MarkdownRemark' (field existed, query was correct)
  • Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, read (reading what directory? nobody knows)
  • Error: spawn git ENOENT (git was installed, worked fine outside Gatsby)

Every error message felt like a riddle wrapped in an enigma. Half of them didn't even make sense grammatically.

Normal web apps? If one page has bad data, that page breaks. If your database is slow, some requests are slow. If an image is corrupted, that image doesn't load. The rest of your site keeps functioning like civilized software.

What Actually Works for Content Sites

After the Gatsby nightmare, we went with Next.js ISR and honestly it's fine. Not perfect, but fine. Builds take 10-15 minutes instead of 45+, content team can publish stuff without praying to the build gods, and when things break they break in predictable ways.

Could we have built the same thing with a regular React SPA hitting a headless CMS API? Yeah, probably would've been simpler. But the CEO wanted "blazing fast loading" and Next.js ISR gets you most of the benefits without the "rebuild everything when someone adds a comma" bullshit.

Don't Make Our Mistake

Look, I get why Gatsby seems appealing. The marketing is great, the demos look amazing, and static sites are "blazingly fast." But here's what nobody tells you:

Static generation doesn't scale. Period.

You can probably get to 1,000 pages fine. Maybe 5,000 if you're lucky. But the moment you hit real content volume - the moment your editorial team actually starts using the system - builds become this nightmare bottleneck that ruins everything.

We spent more time dealing with build failures than actually building features. And when something breaks, you can't just fix the broken thing. You have to rebuild the entire fucking site and hope it works this time.

What You Should Actually Use Instead

If your team knows React: Next.js is the boring, reliable choice. Yeah, you'll pay Vercel bills, but you'll also sleep at night. Your content team can publish articles without planning around 45-minute builds. Any React dev can jump in and contribute immediately.

If you're starting fresh: SvelteKit is probably the best technical choice. Fastest builds, smallest bundles, cleanest code. But good luck hiring developers. We prototyped our site in SvelteKit and it was beautiful - 5-minute builds, tiny JavaScript payloads, butter-smooth performance. Problem was finding people who could maintain it long-term.

If your team knows Vue: Nuxt 3 might be better than Next.js. Better auto-imports, cleaner server routes, more flexible deployment. Our Vue contractor built the same site in Nuxt and it was honestly cleaner than our React version. But we're a React team, so Vue didn't make sense.

If you understand servers: Remix has interesting ideas about progressive enhancement and error boundaries. Avoids a lot of Next.js hydration bullshit. But most frontend developers don't actually understand servers - they think "full-stack" means "I wrote an API route once."

If you want to keep it simple: Use a regular React SPA with a headless CMS API. It'll be faster to build, easier to debug, and way less likely to randomly break on a Saturday morning when you're trying to relax.

The Mysteries That Still Haunt Me

Even after escaping Gatsby hell, some shit still doesn't make sense:

Why did our builds work fine for 6 months, then suddenly start failing? Same codebase, same content structure, same everything. One day builds took 20 minutes, next day they crashed with memory errors. Never figured out the trigger. Still bothers me when I can't sleep.

What was that weird Sharp error on Ubuntu? For 3 months, builds randomly failed with "Input file contains unsupported image format" - but only on our Ubuntu CI servers, never locally. Same JPEG files that worked fine everywhere else. Would work for a week, fail for a day, then work again. Like the computer was playing pranks.

Why did GraphQL schema inference break randomly? Field exists, data is there, query works in GraphiQL. But production builds fail with "Cannot query field" errors until you restart everything multiple times. Makes no goddamn sense. It's 2025 and we're troubleshooting by restarting computers like it's 1995.

Also, fuck Docker while we're at it. Half our build issues came from Docker doing weird shit with file permissions and Windows path lengths. "Works on my machine" became our team motto.

Bottom line: Life's too short to debug Gatsby builds. Don't do what we did.

Check out Next.js deployment options, try SvelteKit if you're feeling adventurous, or just build a regular React app instead. You'll thank me later.

Build Success

Shit People Always Ask About This:

Q

"Which framework should I actually use for my team?"

A

Next.js if you have React developers - Just fucking use it. Yeah, you'll pay Vercel bills, but your builds won't randomly break on Saturday mornings. Any React dev can contribute immediately. When something goes wrong, you get actual error messages instead of cryptic bullshit.

SvelteKit if you're starting fresh - Fastest builds, smallest bundles, cleanest code. But good luck hiring Svelte developers. If you can train your team or hire unicorns, it's probably the best technical choice.

Nuxt if your team knows Vue - Better than Next.js in some ways - cleaner API routes, better auto-imports, more predictable builds. But you need Vue developers, not React developers.

Remix if you understand servers - Interesting approach to full-stack React. Avoids hydration issues, handles errors better. But requires actual server knowledge, not just "frontend developer who touched Node once."

Regular React SPA with a headless CMS - Honestly, this is probably what you should have built in the first place. No build step, no static generation complexity, just a normal app that fetches data from an API like every other app on the internet.

Q

"How long will it take to migrate off Gatsby?"

A

Way longer than you think. We budgeted 3 months, took 8 months. First 2 months: "How hard can it be to move React components?" Next 3 months: "Why does everything break when we change build tools?" Last 3 months: "Fuck it, rewrite everything from scratch."

The GraphQL layer, build pipeline, and plugin architecture can't be migrated - only burned to the ground and rewritten. There's no gradual migration path because Gatsby's magic is so tightly coupled you can't extract individual pieces without breaking everything.

Q

"Why are Gatsby builds so fucking slow?"

A

Because Gatsby tries to do everything at build time. Every page gets rendered, every image gets processed, every GraphQL query gets resolved. With 10,000+ pages, that's 10,000+ operations that have to complete before you can deploy a single word change.

Other frameworks? They do the work when users request pages. Much more efficient.

Q

"How much did Gatsby Cloud actually cost you?"

A

$2,400/month for incremental builds that didn't actually work. They'd randomly decide to rebuild everything from scratch, which defeated the entire purpose of paying for incremental builds.

The kicker? When we complained, support said our GraphQL schema was "unstable" but couldn't explain what that meant. We never changed the schema.

Q

"What was the stupidest Gatsby bug you had to deal with?"

A

GraphQL query worked perfectly in development. Worked in GraphiQL. Worked in staging. Failed in production with Cannot query field 'publishedDate' on type 'ContentfulBlogPost'.

Spent 2 days trying everything from our 23-item "Gatsby is broken" checklist: cleared cache, deleted node_modules, reinstalled Gatsby, checked Contentful API, verified GraphQL queries in GraphiQL, tried building on a different machine, different Node versions, even built inside a fresh Docker container.

Same fucking error every time. Felt like that scene in Groundhog Day except instead of learning French I was learning new ways to fail at static site generation.

Turns out Gatsby's GraphQL schema generation is non-deterministic. Like flipping a coin - sometimes it decides your field exists, sometimes it doesn't. Same data, same query, same everything. Pure random chance whether your build succeeds.

Found the real explanation buried in a GitHub issue from 2019 with 3 upvotes: Gatsby infers schema from your first few content items, and if those don't have all the fields, later content with those fields breaks everything. Their "fix"? Add placeholder data to ensure schema completeness. Professional software development, everyone.

Our "fix"? Restart the build until it randomly works. Took 7 tries once. Not even joking.

Q

"Can you just hire more developers to make Gatsby builds faster?"

A

No, that's not how build bottlenecks work. Gatsby builds are mostly single-threaded. You can't parallelize "render 10,000 pages" - it has to happen sequentially.

More developers just means more people waiting around for the build to finish. We had 6 developers spending 2-3 hours a day waiting for builds instead of writing code.

Q

"Any other Gatsby gotchas I should know about?"

A

Oh yeah. Never upgrade Gatsby on a Friday. I learned this the hard way when v4 came out and broke every plugin we depended on. Spent the weekend rolling back while everyone else was enjoying their lives.

Also, if you're on Windows, good fucking luck. The Sharp image processing plugin randomly crashes with win32 error 0x80070005 for no reason. Works fine, then stops working, then works again after restarting your machine. Windows file path length limits (260 characters) will break your builds in creative ways.

WSL2 helps but then you get weird file permission issues where files exist but aren't readable by Node. Docker on Windows? Performance is dog shit and npm install takes 15 minutes instead of 3.

And here's some tribal knowledge that took us 6 months to figure out: if your build starts failing with memory errors after working fine for months, check if someone added large images to the CMS. Gatsby loads ALL images into memory during build - not just the ones being processed, ALL of them.

10GB of images = 10GB of RAM usage during builds. We had 2,000 product photos eating 8GB RAM before any actual work happened. Brilliant design. Also, images in drafts count toward memory usage even though they never get rendered. Because why wouldn't they?

Q

"What about SvelteKit? Should I learn Svelte?"

A

If you're building something new and can invest in learning, probably yes. Svelte is genuinely nice to write - less boilerplate, more intuitive state management, better performance. SvelteKit builds are fast, the router makes sense, and Vite integration is smooth.

But the ecosystem is smaller. Need a date picker? React has 47 options, Svelte has maybe 3. Need a complex table component? Good luck. Most third-party services have React SDKs, some have Vue, few have Svelte.

Also, your entire team needs to learn new syntax. Coming from React, the $: reactive statements feel weird, stores work differently, and component lifecycle is different. Plan for 2-3 months of "why doesn't this work like React" complaints.

Q

"Is Nuxt actually better than Next.js?"

A

In some ways, yeah. Nuxt 3 has cleaner server API routes, better auto-imports, and the nitro build system is more predictable than Next.js's magic.

But Vue vs React is the real decision. If your team already knows React, switching to Vue for framework features is probably not worth it. If you're starting fresh or already know Vue, Nuxt might be better.

Also, hosting is more flexible - Nuxt isn't locked to one platform like Next.js is to Vercel. You can deploy to Netlify, Cloudflare, or wherever.

Q

"What's the deal with Remix? Worth learning?"

A

Remix is philosophically interesting - server-first, progressive enhancement, better error boundaries. If you actually understand web fundamentals, it makes sense. Nested routing is clever, the data loading approach avoids waterfall problems, and error handling is better than other React frameworks.

Problem is most frontend developers don't understand servers. They think "full-stack" means "I can write API routes sometimes." Remix assumes you understand HTTP, caching, streaming, and network performance. That's not most React developers.

If your team actually knows server-side development, Remix might be worth it. If they're frontend developers who've never dealt with proper server concepts, you'll spend months teaching fundamentals.

Q

"When would you actually recommend Gatsby?"

A

Personal blog under 50 pages that you update quarterly max. That's literally it.

Maybe documentation sites that never change and have like 10 pages total. But even then, why deal with the build complexity when you could just use a fucking HTML file?

Content team? Use anything else. More than 1,000 pages? Run away immediately. Need dynamic features? Honestly, WordPress would be better and I genuinely hate WordPress. At least when WordPress breaks, you can log into the admin panel and fix the broken thing instead of rebuilding the entire universe.

Read Gatsby's own troubleshooting docs - notice how much effort goes into making builds work instead of building actual features? That should tell you everything.

Related Tools & Recommendations

pricing
Recommended

Vercel vs Netlify vs Cloudflare Workers Pricing: Why Your Bill Might Surprise You

Real costs from someone who's been burned by hosting bills before

Vercel
/pricing/vercel-vs-netlify-vs-cloudflare-workers/total-cost-analysis
100%
pricing
Recommended

What Enterprise Platform Pricing Actually Looks Like When the Sales Gloves Come Off

Vercel, Netlify, and Cloudflare Pages: The Real Costs Behind the Marketing Bullshit

Vercel
/pricing/vercel-netlify-cloudflare-enterprise-comparison/enterprise-cost-analysis
90%
compare
Recommended

Remix vs SvelteKit vs Next.js: Which One Breaks Less

I got paged at 3AM by apps built with all three of these. Here's which one made me want to quit programming.

Remix
/compare/remix/sveltekit/ssr-performance-showdown
79%
integration
Recommended

Stop Your APIs From Breaking Every Time You Touch The Database

Prisma + tRPC + TypeScript: No More "It Works In Dev" Surprises

Prisma
/integration/prisma-trpc-typescript/full-stack-architecture
72%
compare
Recommended

I Tested Every Heroku Alternative So You Don't Have To

Vercel, Railway, Render, and Fly.io - Which one won't bankrupt you?

Vercel
/compare/vercel/railway/render/fly/deployment-platforms-comparison
52%
pricing
Recommended

Got Hit With a $3k Vercel Bill Last Month: Real Platform Costs

These platforms will fuck your budget when you least expect it

Vercel
/pricing/vercel-vs-netlify-vs-cloudflare-pages/complete-pricing-breakdown
51%
tool
Recommended

Astro - Static Sites That Don't Suck

competes with Astro

Astro
/tool/astro/overview
49%
tool
Recommended

Fix Astro Production Deployment Nightmares

competes with Astro

Astro
/tool/astro/production-deployment-troubleshooting
49%
compare
Recommended

Which Static Site Generator Won't Make You Hate Your Life

Just use fucking Astro. Next.js if you actually need server shit. Gatsby is dead - seriously, stop asking.

Astro
/compare/astro/nextjs/gatsby/static-generation-performance-benchmark
49%
tool
Recommended

SvelteKit - Web Apps That Actually Load Fast

I'm tired of explaining to clients why their React checkout takes 5 seconds to load

SvelteKit
/tool/sveltekit/overview
49%
integration
Recommended

I Spent Two Weekends Getting Supabase Auth Working with Next.js 13+

Here's what actually works (and what will break your app)

Supabase
/integration/supabase-nextjs/server-side-auth-guide
48%
review
Recommended

Vite vs Webpack vs Turbopack: Which One Doesn't Suck?

I tested all three on 6 different projects so you don't have to suffer through webpack config hell

Vite
/review/vite-webpack-turbopack/performance-benchmark-review
48%
tool
Recommended

TypeScript - JavaScript That Catches Your Bugs

Microsoft's type system that catches bugs before they hit production

TypeScript
/tool/typescript/overview
45%
tool
Recommended

JavaScript to TypeScript Migration - Practical Troubleshooting Guide

This guide covers the shit that actually breaks during migration

TypeScript
/tool/typescript/migration-troubleshooting-guide
45%
tool
Recommended

Actually Migrating Away From Gatsby in 2025

Real costs, timelines, and gotchas from someone who survived the process

Gatsby
/tool/gatsby/migration-strategy
41%
tool
Recommended

Fix Your Slow Gatsby Builds Before You Migrate

Turn 47-minute nightmares into bearable 6-minute builds while you plan your escape

Gatsby
/tool/gatsby/fixing-build-performance
41%
tool
Recommended

Next.js - React Without the Webpack Hell

competes with Next.js

Next.js
/tool/nextjs/overview
38%
tool
Recommended

Remix - HTML Forms That Don't Suck

Finally, a React framework that remembers HTML exists

Remix
/tool/remix/overview
33%
review
Recommended

Which JavaScript Runtime Won't Make You Hate Your Life

Two years of runtime fuckery later, here's the truth nobody tells you

Bun
/review/bun-nodejs-deno-comparison/production-readiness-assessment
31%
howto
Recommended

Install Node.js with NVM on Mac M1/M2/M3 - Because Life's Too Short for Version Hell

My M1 Mac setup broke at 2am before a deployment. Here's how I fixed it so you don't have to suffer.

Node Version Manager (NVM)
/howto/install-nodejs-nvm-mac-m1/complete-installation-guide
31%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization