CRA to Vite: The 4-Hour Migration That Actually Works

Stop overthinking it. Migrating from Create React App to Vite isn't rocket science, but every tutorial makes it sound scarier than it is. I've migrated dozens of CRA projects. Here's the real process that works.

Why Vite Instead of Next.js?

Everyone assumes you should migrate CRA to Next.js. That's like replacing your sedan with a semi-truck because trucks are more powerful. If your app doesn't need SSR, routing, or API routes, Vite gives you 90% of the benefits with 10% of the complexity.

Choose Vite when:

  • Your app is client-side only (SPA)
  • You want faster builds but don't need framework features
  • Your team wants minimal config changes
  • You're not ready for SSR complexity

Choose Next.js when:

  • You need SEO and server-side rendering
  • You want a full-stack framework with API routes
  • You're building a content-heavy site
  • Your team is ready for more architectural changes

For most CRA apps, Vite is the right choice. You get instant dev server startup and build times that don't make you contemplate career changes.

The Real Migration Process (4-8 Hours)

Forget the bullshit "2-hour migration" claims in tutorials. Plan for 4-8 hours, maybe a full day if your project is complex or you hit edge cases. Here's what actually happens:

Phase 1: Backup and Prepare (15 minutes)

## Create a new branch - you WILL need to rollback at some point
git checkout -b migrate-to-vite

## Backup package.json in case you need to compare later
cp package.json package.json.backup

## Optional but smart: test your current build works
npm run build
npm run test

Don't skip the backup. Spent like 3 hours debugging why process.env.NODE_ENV was undefined, only to realize I'd accidentally nuked the wrong line from package.json. When your build inevitably shits the bed at 11 PM and you need to diff configs to figure out what the hell you broke, you'll understand why this step matters.

Phase 2: Remove CRA Dependencies (10 minutes)

## Remove react-scripts and other CRA-specific packages
npm uninstall react-scripts

## Remove any CRA-specific eslint configs if you have them
npm uninstall @testing-library/jest-dom @testing-library/react @testing-library/user-event

Some guides tell you to remove testing libraries. Don't. Made this mistake once and spent like 2 hours reinstalling shit when tests started failing with cryptic errors like "ReferenceError: expect is not defined" or some weird Jest nonsense. You'll need them later, just different versions.

Phase 3: Install Vite Dependencies (5 minutes)

## Install Vite and plugins
npm install --save-dev vite @vitejs/plugin-react

## Install updated testing dependencies if you removed them
npm install --save-dev @testing-library/jest-dom @testing-library/react @testing-library/user-event vitest jsdom

Why vitest? Because Jest with Vite is a fucking nightmare. Spent like 4 hours trying to make Jest play nice with Vite's ES modules, getting delightful errors like "SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module" and "ReferenceError: global is not defined" and some other cryptic bullshit. Vitest is Jest-compatible but actually works without making you question your life choices.

Phase 4: Move and Configure Files (30 minutes)

This is where tutorials get vague and you start hitting real problems.

Move your index.html:

mv public/index.html index.html

Update index.html: Remove all the CRA-specific stuff and add the Vite entry point:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8" />
    <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
    <title>Your App</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <noscript>You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.</noscript>
    <div id="root"></div>
    <script type="module" src="/src/main.jsx"></script>
  </body>
</html>

Rename src/index.js to src/main.jsx:

mv src/index.js src/main.jsx

Why main.jsx? Because Vite expects JSX files to have the .jsx extension. This will save you from cryptic build errors.

Create vite.config.js (full config reference):

import { defineConfig } from 'vite'
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react'

export default defineConfig({
  plugins: [react()],
  server: {
    open: true,  // Auto-open browser
    port: 3000,  // Same port as CRA for convenience
  },
  build: {
    outDir: 'build', // Same output dir as CRA
  },
  test: {
    globals: true,
    environment: 'jsdom',
    setupFiles: './src/setupTests.js',
  },
})

Phase 5: Fix Environment Variables (The Hidden Nightmare)

This is where most tutorials fail you. CRA uses REACT_APP_ prefixes. Vite uses VITE_ prefixes (env variables guide). You need to update EVERY environment variable.

Find all REACT_APP variables:

## Search your entire codebase for REACT_APP usage
grep -r "REACT_APP" src/

## Check your .env files
ls .env*

Update .env files:

## OLD (.env, .env.local, .env.production, etc.)
REACT_APP_API_URL=https://api.example.com
REACT_APP_VERSION=1.2.3

## NEW
VITE_API_URL=https://api.example.com
VITE_VERSION=1.2.3

Update JavaScript code:

// OLD - CRA style
const apiUrl = process.env.REACT_APP_API_URL;

// NEW - Vite style  
const apiUrl = import.meta.env.VITE_API_URL;

Pro tip: Create a helper function to make the transition easier:

// src/utils/env.js
export const getEnvVar = (key) => {
  // Support both CRA and Vite during migration
  return import.meta.env[`VITE_${key}`] || process.env[`REACT_APP_${key}`];
};

// Usage
const apiUrl = getEnvVar('API_URL');

Phase 6: Update Package Scripts (5 minutes)

Replace CRA scripts with Vite equivalents in package.json:

{
  "scripts": {
    "dev": "vite",
    "start": "vite",
    "build": "vite build",
    "preview": "vite preview",
    "test": "vitest",
    "test:ui": "vitest --ui"
  }
}

Keep start as an alias for dev - muscle memory is real.

Phase 7: Test Everything (2-4 hours)

This is where you'll spend most of your time. Every project breaks differently.

## Start dev server
npm run dev

## Does it start? Does it load?
## Check browser console for errors

Common Problems You'll Actually Hit

Problem 1: Import Path Issues

Error: Failed to resolve import './Component' from 'src/App.jsx'

Fix: Vite is stricter about file extensions (unlike CRA which was weirdly forgiving):

// CRA allowed this
import Component from './Component';

// Vite needs explicit extensions  
import Component from './Component.jsx';
// or
import Component from './Component.js';

Solution: Use find-and-replace to add extensions systematically:

## Find files that might need extension fixes
find src -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" | xargs grep -l "import.*from ['\"].\/"

## Or just fix them as the dev server yells at you
## Usually faster than trying to be clever about it

Problem 2: Dynamic Imports Break

Error: Failed to resolve module specifier

CRA's webpack handled dynamic imports differently. With Vite:

// CRA style that breaks in Vite
const module = await import(`./components/${componentName}`);

// Vite needs explicit paths or glob imports
const modules = import.meta.glob('./components/*.jsx');
const module = await modules[`./components/${componentName}.jsx`]()

Problem 3: CSS Import Order Changes

Symptoms: Styling looks different between CRA and Vite

Fix: Vite processes CSS imports in a different order. Import your global CSS in your main.jsx:

// src/main.jsx - import CSS at the top
import './index.css';
import './App.css';
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom/client';
import App from './App';

// rest of your app code

Problem 4: SVG Imports Don't Work

Error: Module "./logo.svg" does not provide an export named 'ReactComponent'

CRA automatically converted SVGs to React components. Vite doesn't:

// CRA style - breaks
import { ReactComponent as Logo } from './logo.svg';

// Vite needs a plugin or manual handling
import logoUrl from './logo.svg';  // Gets the URL

// OR install a plugin for React component support
npm install vite-plugin-svgr

Add to vite.config.js:

import { defineConfig } from 'vite'
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react'
import svgr from 'vite-plugin-svgr'

export default defineConfig({
  plugins: [react(), svgr()],
  // ... rest of config
})

Problem 5: Environment Variables Still Don't Work

Symptoms: import.meta.env.VITE_API_URL is undefined

Debug steps (learned the hard way):

  1. Check your .env file location (should be in project root, not src/)
  2. Verify variable names start with VITE_ (forgot this 3 times)
  3. Restart the dev server (Vite caches env vars and won't pick up changes)
  4. Check if you have multiple .env files conflicting (.env vs .env.local vs .env.development)
## Debug env vars
npm run dev -- --debug

## Or add logging to see what's available
console.log('Available env vars:', import.meta.env);

The Nuclear Option: Start Fresh

If your migration is completely fucked (happens to the best of us), cut your losses. Fresh start:

## Create new Vite app
npm create vite@latest my-app-vite -- --template react

## Copy your src/ folder over  
cp -r old-cra-app/src/* my-app-vite/src/

## Copy public assets (pray they work)
cp -r old-cra-app/public/* my-app-vite/public/

## Manually copy dependencies from old package.json
## Don't copy devDependencies - you probably don't need half of them

Sometimes starting over is faster than archaeological debugging. Spent like 6 hours trying to fix CSS modules that worked fine in CRA but broke mysteriously in Vite, only to find our component naming was causing some weird import conflicts. Could've rebuilt the whole thing in maybe 4 hours? Maybe less?

Performance Reality Check

Here's what you'll actually get after migration:

Development server:

  • CRA: 15-30 seconds startup (sometimes longer if webpack is having a bad day)
  • Vite: <1 second startup (seriously, it's wild)

Hot reload:

  • CRA: 2-5 seconds to see changes (sometimes more if you're unlucky)
  • Vite: basically instant (like under 100ms usually)

Production builds:

  • CRA: 60-120 seconds (maybe more for big apps)
  • Vite: 15-45 seconds depending on project size and how much stuff you have

Bundle size:

  • Usually somewhere around 10-20% smaller with Vite, but depends on your project
  • Could be more or less - better tree shaking and modern build optimizations help

The performance difference is dramatic enough that your team will never want to go back to CRA.

When to Bail Out

Sometimes migration isn't worth it:

  • Legacy codebase with heavy CRA-specific hacks - If you ejected and customized webpack heavily, staying put might be smarter
  • Team bandwidth issues - If your team is already overwhelmed debugging production issues, stability beats speed
  • Complex monorepo setup - CRA in monorepos with custom configurations can be a nightmare to migrate
  • Business pressure - If your PM is breathing down your neck about shipping features, don't add migration risk to the timeline

CRA still works. It's just slow and won't get new features. If that's acceptable for your project timeline, there's no shame in staying put temporarily. The key is making a conscious decision rather than procrastinating indefinitely. Set a deadline: "We migrate by Q2 2026" and stick to it. Your future self will thank you when dev servers start instantly instead of giving you time to grab coffee and question your career choices.

Migration Path Comparison: Choose Your Escape Route

Factor

Vite Migration

Next.js Migration

React Router v7

Parcel Migration

Time Investment

4-8 hours

1-3 days

1-2 days

2-6 hours

Complexity

🟡 Medium

🔴 High

🟡 Medium

🟢 Low

File Structure Changes

Minimal

Major restructure

Moderate

Almost none

New Concepts to Learn

Build config

SSR, App Router, Server Components

Data loading patterns

Almost nothing

Risk of Breaking Things

🟡 Medium

🔴 High

🟡 Medium

🟢 Low

Performance Gain

⚡ Massive dev speed

⚡ Production + dev improvements

🟡 Moderate gains

✅ Good dev speed

Future-Proofing

⚡ Excellent

⚡ React's favorite

✅ Solid choice

🟡 Stable but small ecosystem

Team Learning Curve

🟢 Easy

🔴 Steep

🟡 Moderate

🟢 Minimal

Best For

SPAs, client-only apps

Full-stack, SEO-critical

Complex routing needs

Simple apps, minimal config

Next.js Migration: The Weekend That Changes Everything

If you need SEO, server-side rendering, or want to join the modern React ecosystem, migrating from CRA to Next.js is worth the effort.

But don't believe anyone who says it's "just a few config changes." This shit is a fundamental architecture shift that will break your brain for a week.

Before You Start: Is Next.js Right for You?

Next.js isn't just a build tool replacement

  • it's a full-stack framework that changes how you think about React applications. Be honest about what you're signing up for:

You NEED Next.js if:

  • SEO matters for your application (content sites, e-commerce, marketing pages)
  • You want server-side rendering for performance or social media previews
  • You're building full-stack features with API routes
  • Your app would benefit from static site generation
  • You want image optimization, automatic code splitting, and modern performance features

You DON'T need Next.js if:

  • Your app is a pure client-side dashboard or admin panel
  • SEO doesn't matter (internal tools, authenticated apps)
  • Your team isn't ready to learn SSR concepts and debugging
  • You just want faster dev builds (use Vite instead)

The Real Next.js Migration Process (1-3 Days)

Phase 1:

Create New Next.js Project (30 minutes)

Don't try to upgrade in place

  • that way lies madness. Start fresh and migrate your code over:
## Create new Next.js app with the App Router (not Pages Router)
npx create-next-app@latest my-app-nextjs --typescript --tailwind --eslint --app --src-dir --import-alias \"@/*\"

## Or without the extras if your CRA app doesn't use them
npx create-next-app@latest my-app-nextjs --app --src-dir

Why --app?

The new App Router is the future of Next.js. Pages Router is legacy mode. Don't start with deprecated patterns.

Phase 2: Understand the File Structure Shift (1 hour)

Next.js uses file-based routing.

This isn't optional

  • it's how the framework works:

CRA Structure:

src/
  components/
    Header.js
    Footer.js
  pages/
    Home.js
    About.js
    Contact.js
  App.js
  index.js

Next.js App Router Structure:

src/
  app/
    layout.js       // Root layout (replaces App.js)
    page.js         // Home page
    about/
      page.js       // About page  
    contact/
      page.js       // Contact page
    globals.css
  components/       // Same as before
    Header.js
    Footer.js

Phase 3:

Migrate Your Root App Component (2 hours)

Old CRA App.js:

import { Browser

Router, Routes, Route } from 'react-router-dom';
import Home from './pages/Home';
import About from './pages/About';
import Header from './components/Header';
import './App.css';

function App() {
  return (
    <BrowserRouter>
      <div className=\"App\">
        <Header />
        <Routes>
          <Route path=\"/\" element={<Home />} />
          <Route path=\"/about\" element={<About />} />
        </Routes>
      </div>
    </BrowserRouter>
  );
}

export default App;

New Next.js app/layout.js:

import Header from '@/components/Header';
import './globals.css';

export const metadata = {
  title: 'Your App',
  description: 'Your app description',
};

export default function RootLayout({ children }) {
  return (
    <html lang=\"en\">
      <body>
        <div className=\"App\">
          <Header />
          {children}
        </div>
      </body>
    </html>
  );
}

New Next.js app/page.js (Home page):

import Home from '@/components/Home';  // Your old Home component

export default function HomePage() {
  return <Home />;
}

Phase 4:

Convert React Router Routes to File-Based Routes (2-4 hours)

This is the tedious part. Every route becomes a folder with a page.js file:

React Router route:

<Route path=\"/products/:id\" element={<ProductDetail />} />

Next.js equivalent:

src/app/products/[id]/page.js

Dynamic route handling:

// app/products/[id]/page.js
export default function ProductPage({ params }) {
  const { id } = params;  // Get the dynamic ID
  
  return <ProductDetail id={id} />;
}

Nested routes:

// React Router nested route
<Route path=\"/dashboard\" element={<DashboardLayout />}>
  <Route path=\"analytics\" element={<Analytics />} />
  <Route path=\"settings\" element={<Settings />} />
</Route>

Next.js nested routes:

src/app/dashboard/
  layout.js          // Dashboard layout
  analytics/
    page.js           // Analytics page
  settings/
    page.js           // Settings page

Phase 5:

Handle Data Fetching Changes (The Hard Part)

This is where CRA to Next.js gets complex. React Router's useEffect + useState pattern doesn't work the same way with SSR.

Old CRA data fetching:

function Product

Detail({ id }) {
  const [product, setProduct] = useState(null);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
  
  useEffect(() => {
    fetch(`/api/products/${id}`)
      .then(res => res.json())
      .then(data => {
        setProduct(data);
        setLoading(false);
      });
  }, [id]);
  
  if (loading) return <div>Loading...</div>;
  return <div>{product.name}</div>;
}

New Next.js approach:

// app/products/[id]/page.js
async function getProduct(id) {
  const res = await fetch(`${process.env.

API_URL}/products/${id}`);
  if (!res.ok) throw new Error('Failed to fetch product');
  return res.json();
}

export default async function ProductPage({ params }) {
  const product = await getProduct(params.id);
  
  return <div>{product.name}</div>;
}

Key differences:

  • Next.js components can be async and await data
  • Data fetching happens on the server during SSR
  • Loading states are handled differently (streaming, Suspense boundaries)
  • Error handling needs error boundaries or error.js files

Phase 6:

Environment Variables and Config (30 minutes)

Next.js handles environment variables differently:

CRA style (.env):

REACT_APP_API_URL=https://api.example.com
REACT_APP_API_KEY=secret123

Next.js style (.env.local):

## Public variables (exposed to browser) 
- prefix with NEXT_PUBLIC_
NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL=https://api.example.com

## Private variables (server-only) 
- no prefix needed
API_KEY=secret123
DATABASE_URL=postgres://...

Usage changes:

// CRA
const api

Url = process.env.

REACT_APP_API_URL;

// Next.js (client-side)
const apiUrl = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL;

// Next.js (server-side, e.g., in API routes)
const apiKey = process.env.API_KEY;  // Not exposed to browser

Common Problems That Will Fuck You Up

Problem 1: \"window is not defined\" Errors

Symptoms: Your app builds fine but crashes with ReferenceError: window is not defined when you try to load it

Cause: Next.js renders components on the server first, where browser APIs don't exist.

That localStorage call that worked fine in CRA? Breaks immediately.

Fix: Use dynamic imports or useEffect for browser-only code:

import { use

Effect, useState } from 'react';

function BrowserOnlyComponent() {
  const [windowWidth, setWindowWidth] = useState(0);
  
  useEffect(() => {
    // This only runs in the browser
    setWindowWidth(window.innerWidth);
  }, []);
  
  return <div>Window width: {windowWidth}</div>;
}

Problem 2:

CSS Import Order Issues
Symptoms: Your styles look different in Next.js vs CRA

Fix: Import all global CSS in your root layout:

// app/layout.js
import './globals.css';
import './components.css';  
import './utilities.css';

For component-specific CSS, use CSS Modules:

// components/Button.module.css
.button { background: blue; }

// components/Button.js  
import styles from './Button.module.css';
export default function Button() {
  return <button className={styles.button}>Click me</button>;
}

Problem 3:

Image Imports Break
CRA allowed:

import logo from './logo.png';
<img src={logo} alt=\"Logo\" />

Next.js prefers:

import Image from 'next/image';
import logo from './logo.png';

<Image src={logo} alt=\"Logo\" width={200} height={100} />

The Next.js Image component provides automatic optimization, lazy loading, and responsive images.

Use it instead of regular <img> tags.

Problem 4: API Routes Don't Work Like Your Old Backend

If you had a separate API server, you might not need Next.js API routes.

But if you want to use them:

Create API route:

// app/api/products/route.js
export async function GET() {
  const products = await fetchProductsFromDB();
  return Response.json(products);
}

export async function POST(request) {
  const data = await request.json();
  const newProduct = await createProduct(data);
  return Response.json(newProduct);
}

Use in components:

// This runs on the server during SSR
async function getProducts() {
  const res = await fetch('http://localhost:3000/api/products');
  return res.json();
}

Problem 5:

Deployment Configuration Changes
CRA builds to a build/ folder that you can serve statically. Next.js needs a Node.js server for SSR.

Vercel deployment (easiest):

npm install -g vercel
vercel

Docker deployment:

FROM node:18-alpine
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci --only=production
COPY . .

RUN npm run build
EXPOSE 3000
CMD [\"npm\", \"start\"]

The Learning Curve Reality

Week 1: Everything feels broken.

SSR errors everywhere, routing makes no sense, data fetching is completely different. You'll seriously question whether this migration was worth the pain.

Week 2: Patterns start clicking.

You finally understand when shit runs on server vs client. File-based routing stops feeling weird.

Week 3: The benefits become obvious.

Pages load fast, code splitting just works, SEO actually functions. The performance improvements are undeniable. Though one team tried rolling back to CRA after 3 weeks because they hit weird SSR hydration errors they couldn't figure out

  • spent 2 days debugging "Expected server HTML to contain a matching
    " errors before giving up.

Month 2: You can't imagine going back to waiting 30 seconds for CRA to start.

The dev experience and production performance justify the learning curve hell.

Migration Time Budget (Be Realistic)

Small app (< 10 routes):

  • 1-2 days for experienced React developer
  • 3-5 days if learning Next.js concepts

Medium app (10-50 routes):

  • 2-4 days for experienced developer
  • 1-2 weeks if learning and dealing with complex data flows

Large app (50+ routes):

  • 1-2 weeks for experienced developer
  • 3-4 weeks if dealing with complex state management, authentication, etc.

Enterprise app with custom webpack configs:

  • 2-4 weeks, possibly longer
  • Consider staying on CRA or migrating to Vite instead

When Next.js Migration Makes Sense

Good candidates:

  • Marketing websites that need SEO
  • E-commerce sites with product pages
  • Blogs or content-heavy sites
  • Apps that would benefit from static generation
  • Teams ready to invest in learning modern React patterns

Bad candidates:

  • Internal tools/admin dashboards (no SEO benefit)
  • Apps with complex client-only state (like real-time editors)
  • Teams under tight deadlines
  • Legacy apps with heavily customized webpack configurations
  • Simple apps that just need faster dev builds (use Vite)

Next.js migration isn't just swapping build tools

  • it's adopting a completely different philosophy about how React apps should work. The benefits are real, but only if you actually need what Next.js provides.

If your CRA app is client-side only and doesn't need SEO, SSR, or full-stack features, just migrate to Vite. You'll get 80% of the performance benefits with 20% of the complexity and brain damage.

But if you're building for the web where SEO, performance, and user experience actually matter, Next.js migration is worth the weekend of suffering. Your users will thank you (even if your lighthouse scores don't immediately).

Migration Questions Everyone Actually Asks

Q

Will my CRA app break if I don't migrate?

A

Nah, but you're missing out big time. Your existing app will keep chugging along and get security patches. But you won't get React 19 features, build performance improvements, or any modern tooling benefits. It's like keeping a 2016 i

Phone

  • sure it works, but you're stuck with 2016 performance while everyone else has moved on to actually fast shit.
Q

How long does migration actually take?

A

Vite: 4-8 hours for most projects (not the "2 hours" tutorials claim) Next.js: 1-3 days minimum, up to 2 weeks for complex apps
Parcel: 2-6 hours for simple apps

Add 50-100% if your team is learning the new tools. Don't trust anyone who says "just a few config changes" - that's marketing bullshit.

Q

Should I migrate everything at once or incrementally?

A

All at once. Incremental migrations sound smart in theory but create maintenance hell in practice. You'll spend more time managing two build systems than just ripping the band-aid off over a weekend. Feature branch, migrate everything, test the shit out of it, then merge. Clean and painful beats slow and complicated every time.

Q

What breaks most often during migration?

A
  1. Environment variables - Every project hits this. REACT_APP_ becomes VITE_ or NEXT_PUBLIC_
  2. Import paths - File extensions become required, dynamic imports change syntax
  3. CSS import order - Styling looks different because build tools process CSS differently
  4. SVG imports - CRA's automatic React component conversion doesn't exist elsewhere
  5. Testing setup - Jest configs need updates, some teams switch to Vitest
Q

My CRA app is ejected. Can I still migrate?

A

To Vite: Maybe, but it's painful. You've customized webpack configs that Vite doesn't use. Plan 2-5 days.
To Next.js: Extremely difficult. Next.js has its own build system. Might be faster to rewrite.
To Parcel: Actually easier. Parcel's zero-config approach might handle your custom setup automatically.

Reality check: If you've heavily fucked with webpack configs, just stay put until you have time for a proper rewrite. Sometimes the devil you know is better than the devil you don't.

Q

Will my deployment process change?

A

Vite: No major changes. Still builds to static files you can serve anywhere.
Next.js: Big changes. You need a Node.js server for SSR. Static hosting won't work anymore.
Parcel: No changes. Same static file deployment.

Plan your deployment strategy before migrating, especially for Next.js.

Q

Do I need to rewrite all my tests?

A

Vite: Some config changes, maybe switch Jest to Vitest. Most test code stays the same.
Next.js: Testing becomes more complex with SSR. Your component tests mostly work, but you'll need new patterns for server-side testing.
Parcel: Minimal test changes.

Budget extra time for testing setup - it's always more complex than expected.

Q

Can I use TypeScript after migration?

A

All modern build tools have excellent TypeScript support. In fact, it often works better than CRA:

  • Vite: TypeScript type-checking is much faster
  • Next.js: Best-in-class TypeScript integration
  • Parcel: Zero-config TypeScript that just works

If you're not using TypeScript yet, migration is a good time to start.

Q

What about my custom webpack loaders and plugins?

A

Vite: Uses Rollup plugins instead of webpack loaders. Most functionality exists but with different APIs.
Next.js: Has its own webpack config system. Some customizations are possible.
Parcel: Zero-config philosophy means minimal customization options.

Pro tip: Question whether you actually need those custom loaders. Many were workarounds for CRA limitations that don't exist in modern tools.

Q

Will my team be able to debug the new build system?

A

Vite: Cleaner error messages than webpack, good documentation
Next.js: More complex due to SSR, but excellent error reporting
Parcel: "It just works" philosophy means less to debug

Modern build tools are generally more debuggable than CRA's hidden webpack config.

Q

What happens to my Progressive Web App (PWA) setup?

A

Vite: Use vite-plugin-pwa - similar functionality to CRA
Next.js: Built-in PWA support with next-pwa plugin
Parcel: Limited PWA support, might need custom setup

PWA migration is usually straightforward but requires rebuilding service worker configs.

Q

Can I go back if migration fails?

A

Yeah, if you're not stupid about it. Always migrate on a feature branch with your original code intact. Watched a team spend 3 weeks on a failed Next.js migration, then realize they were completely fucked and had to rollback to CRA. They could've shipped like 2 actual features instead of debugging weird SSR hydration errors that made no sense.

Don't delete your original code until the migration is battle-tested in production.

Q

Should I migrate if my team is small?

A

Team of 1-3 people: Migrate to Vite. Simplest path to better performance.
Team of 4-8 people: Vite or Next.js depending on your app's needs.
Larger teams: Next.js makes sense for consistency and advanced features.

Small teams should avoid complexity. Choose the simplest tool that solves your problems.

Q

What if I just want faster builds and don't need framework features?

A

Choose Vite. Don't migrate to Next.js just because it's popular. If you have a client-side app and just want speed, Vite gives you 90% of the benefits with 10% of the complexity. Save Next.js for when you actually need SSR or full-stack features.

Q

How do I convince my team/manager to prioritize migration?

A

Focus on developer productivity: "Our builds take 30 seconds. Modern tools take under 1 second. That's 29 seconds per build, hundreds of times per day, across our entire team. We're bleeding productivity."

Show the performance gap: Create a side-by-side demo. Vite starting instantly vs CRA taking 30 seconds. Even non-technical stakeholders get it when they see one developer coding while the other is still waiting for their server to start.

Frame it as technical debt: "We're on deprecated tooling that won't get React 19 support or security updates. This debt compounds - better to pay it now than when we're forced to migrate during a crisis."

Q

What about Create React App alternatives I should consider?

A
  • Vite: Best for most CRA migrations. Fast, flexible, modern.
  • Next.js: Full-stack framework if you need SSR, routing, API routes.
  • React Router v7: Middle ground between Vite and Next.js.
  • Parcel: Simplest migration if you want zero configuration.
  • Create T3 App: Opinionated Next.js starter with TypeScript, tRPC, Prisma.

Avoid: Webpack directly (configuration hell), Rollup directly (too low-level), older tools like Grunt/Gulp (why?).

Q

Is it worth migrating if CRA works fine for my project?

A

If your app is stable and you're not adding features: Maybe not. Migration has risk.

If you're actively developing: Yes. The productivity improvements compound over time. Faster feedback loops mean you ship features faster.

If you're onboarding new developers: Yes. Slow tooling makes onboarding painful.

The key question: Are you optimizing for short-term stability or long-term productivity? Both are valid choices depending on your situation.

Essential Migration Resources

Related Tools & Recommendations

tool
Similar content

Create React App is Dead: Why & How to Migrate Away in 2025

React team finally deprecated it in 2025 after years of minimal maintenance. Here's how to escape if you're still trapped.

Create React App
/tool/create-react-app/overview
100%
integration
Similar content

Claude API React Integration: Secure, Fast & Reliable Builds

Stop breaking your Claude integrations. Here's how to build them without your API keys leaking or your users rage-quitting when responses take 8 seconds.

Claude API
/integration/claude-api-react/overview
93%
tool
Similar content

React Error Boundaries in Production: Debugging Silent Failures

Learn why React Error Boundaries often fail silently in production builds and discover effective strategies to debug and fix them, preventing white screens for

React Error Boundary
/tool/react-error-boundary/error-handling-patterns
77%
review
Recommended

Vite vs Webpack vs Turbopack: Which One Doesn't Suck?

I tested all three on 6 different projects so you don't have to suffer through webpack config hell

Vite
/review/vite-webpack-turbopack/performance-benchmark-review
69%
tool
Similar content

JetBrains WebStorm Overview: Is This JavaScript IDE Worth It?

Explore JetBrains WebStorm, the powerful JavaScript IDE for React and web development. Discover its features, compare it to VS Code, and find out if it's worth

WebStorm
/tool/webstorm/overview
66%
tool
Similar content

Next.js Overview: Features, Benefits & Next.js 15 Updates

Explore Next.js, the powerful React framework with built-in routing, SSR, and API endpoints. Understand its core benefits, when to use it, and what's new in Nex

Next.js
/tool/nextjs/overview
56%
tool
Similar content

SvelteKit: Fast Web Apps & Why It Outperforms Alternatives

I'm tired of explaining to clients why their React checkout takes 5 seconds to load

SvelteKit
/tool/sveltekit/overview
56%
tool
Similar content

React Overview: What It Is, Why Use It, & Its Ecosystem

Facebook's solution to the "why did my dropdown menu break the entire page?" problem.

React
/tool/react/overview
56%
tool
Similar content

Astro Overview: Static Sites, React Integration & Astro 5.0

Explore Astro, the static site generator that solves JavaScript bloat. Learn about its benefits, React integration, and the game-changing content features in As

Astro
/tool/astro/overview
56%
tool
Similar content

Next.js App Router Overview: Changes, Server Components & Actions

App Router breaks everything you know about Next.js routing

Next.js App Router
/tool/nextjs-app-router/overview
56%
tool
Similar content

Remix Overview: Modern React Framework for HTML Forms & Nested Routes

Finally, a React framework that remembers HTML exists

Remix
/tool/remix/overview
54%
troubleshoot
Similar content

Fix Slow Next.js Build Times: Boost Performance & Productivity

When your 20-minute builds used to take 3 minutes and you're about to lose your mind

Next.js
/troubleshoot/nextjs-slow-build-times/build-performance-optimization
54%
howto
Similar content

React 19 Migration Guide: Fix Breaking Changes & Upgrade React 18

How to upgrade React 18 to React 19 without destroying your app

React
/howto/fix-react-19-breaking-changes/react-19-migration-guide
52%
alternatives
Similar content

Angular Alternatives 2025: Migration-Ready Frontend Frameworks

Modern Frontend Frameworks for Teams Ready to Move Beyond Angular

Angular
/alternatives/angular/migration-focused-alternatives
46%
tool
Recommended

Vite - Build Tool That Doesn't Make You Wait

Dev server that actually starts fast, unlike Webpack

Vite
/tool/vite/overview
46%
tool
Similar content

React Production Debugging: Fix App Crashes & White Screens

Five ways React apps crash in production that'll make you question your life choices.

React
/tool/react/debugging-production-issues
44%
review
Recommended

ESLint + Prettier Setup Review - The Hard Truth About JavaScript's Golden Couple

After 7 years of dominance, the cracks are showing

ESLint
/review/eslint-prettier-setup/performance-usability-review
44%
tool
Recommended

ESLint - Find and Fix Problems in Your JavaScript Code

The pluggable linting utility for JavaScript and JSX

eslint
/tool/eslint/overview
44%
tool
Similar content

React Codemod: Automated Upgrades & Migrations for React Apps

Official collection of codemods for seamless React upgrades and migrations

React Codemod
/tool/react-codemod/overview
40%
howto
Popular choice

How to Actually Get GitHub Copilot Working in JetBrains IDEs

Stop fighting with code completion and let AI do the heavy lifting in IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm, or whatever JetBrains IDE you're using

GitHub Copilot
/howto/setup-github-copilot-jetbrains-ide/complete-setup-guide
38%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization