Google got tired of the C++ standardization committee saying "no" to everything they wanted. Remember the modules proposal? That took 20 fucking years. Google has Chrome to ship and ads to serve, so they decided to build their own language instead of waiting for standards bureaucracy.
The Real Story Behind Carbon
Google engineers spent decades trying to make C++ less painful. They wanted:
- Templates that don't take 10 minutes to compile
- ABI breaks that actually improve performance
- Memory safety that doesn't require rewriting millions of lines of code
- Build systems that don't make you want to quit programming
The C++ committee said "backwards compatibility" to all of it. So Google said "fuck it, we'll build our own language" and here we are.
Current Development Status (Spoiler: It's Rough)
As of September 2024, Carbon is experimental as hell:
- Platform support: Ubuntu only. Good luck if you're on Windows or macOS - you'll be waiting for WSL2 or Docker
- Compiler status: The thing crashes on anything complex. Basic "hello world" works on carbon.compiler-explorer.com but don't get excited
- Build requirements: Prepare to hate your life. Requires specific Clang versions, Bazel (because of course it does), and about 4 hours to compile from scratch
- Timeline: Official roadmap says 0.1 in 2026. Translation: 2028 if we're lucky, 2030 if Google doesn't get distracted
What Carbon Actually Is
Carbon is supposed to be a migration tool, not a replacement language. The idea:
- Call C++ from Carbon: No FFI bullshit, just direct function calls
- Call Carbon from C++: Your existing build systems won't explode
- Gradual conversion: Fix one file at a time instead of rewriting everything
- Memory safety later: Phase 1 is migration, Phase 2 is making it safe
The generics system looks like Rust traits but that's mostly unimplemented. Right now you get the same template hell as C++.
Is This Just Google Politics?
Obviously. Google got tired of the C++ committee cockblocking their improvements, so they're taking their toys and going home. Can't really blame them - the committee moves slower than continental drift.
The governance FAQ promises "community ownership" but Google pays the bills and makes the decisions. At least they're honest about it being their show.