Currently viewing the human version
Switch to AI version

Why Google Built Yet Another Language

Google got tired of the C++ standardization committee saying "no" to everything they wanted. Remember the modules proposal? That took 20 fucking years. Google has Chrome to ship and ads to serve, so they decided to build their own language instead of waiting for standards bureaucracy.

The Real Story Behind Carbon

Google engineers spent decades trying to make C++ less painful. They wanted:

The C++ committee said "backwards compatibility" to all of it. So Google said "fuck it, we'll build our own language" and here we are.

Current Development Status (Spoiler: It's Rough)

Carbon Language Development Status

As of September 2024, Carbon is experimental as hell:

  • Platform support: Ubuntu only. Good luck if you're on Windows or macOS - you'll be waiting for WSL2 or Docker
  • Compiler status: The thing crashes on anything complex. Basic "hello world" works on carbon.compiler-explorer.com but don't get excited
  • Build requirements: Prepare to hate your life. Requires specific Clang versions, Bazel (because of course it does), and about 4 hours to compile from scratch
  • Timeline: Official roadmap says 0.1 in 2026. Translation: 2028 if we're lucky, 2030 if Google doesn't get distracted

What Carbon Actually Is

Carbon C++ Interoperability

Carbon is supposed to be a migration tool, not a replacement language. The idea:

  • Call C++ from Carbon: No FFI bullshit, just direct function calls
  • Call Carbon from C++: Your existing build systems won't explode
  • Gradual conversion: Fix one file at a time instead of rewriting everything
  • Memory safety later: Phase 1 is migration, Phase 2 is making it safe

The generics system looks like Rust traits but that's mostly unimplemented. Right now you get the same template hell as C++.

Is This Just Google Politics?

Carbon Language Project

Obviously. Google got tired of the C++ committee cockblocking their improvements, so they're taking their toys and going home. Can't really blame them - the committee moves slower than continental drift.

The governance FAQ promises "community ownership" but Google pays the bills and makes the decisions. At least they're honest about it being their show.

Carbon vs. The Competition

Aspect

Carbon

C++

Rust

Status

Vaporware (2024)

Battle-tested

Actually works

Primary Use Case

Google's migration problem

Everything systems

New memory-safe projects

C++ Interop

Promises everything, delivers nothing yet

It's C++

FFI works but sucks

Memory Safety

"Coming Soon™"

Segfaults are features

Built-in, enforced

Learning Curve

Supposedly C++-like

Template hell

Borrow checker will break you

Migration Strategy

Unicorns and rainbows

Copy-paste and pray

Rewrite everything

Ecosystem Maturity

What ecosystem?

30 years of legacy pain

Growing fast

What Actually Works (Spoiler: Not Much)

The Carbon compiler exists and can compile "hello world" through carbon.compiler-explorer.com. Don't get excited - that's about where the party ends.

What You Can Actually Try

Carbon Syntax Example

The compiler handles basic Carbon syntax:

package Sample api;
import Core library "io";

fn Add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 {
    return a + b;
}

fn Main() -> i32 {
    Core.Print("Hello from Carbon!");
    return Add(2, 3);
}

This compiles and runs, giving you a feel for the syntax. The language looks familiar to C++ developers but with consistent syntax rules and modern defaults.

What Doesn't Work (Everything Important)

Carbon Language Quicksort Example

Here's where shit falls apart:

Generics System

The design docs are longer than most novels, but the compiler segfaults on anything more complex than fn Add(a: i32, b: i32). The generics implementation promises Rust-like traits but delivers C++ template hell.

C++ Interoperability

The entire fucking point of Carbon doesn't work yet. You can't call C++ code. You can't inherit from C++ classes. You can't use C++ libraries. The 2024 roadmap was supposed to fix this. It didn't.

Memory Safety

The safety strategy is "we'll figure it out later." Current Carbon is exactly as unsafe as C++ but with more steps. Compare this to Rust's memory safety which actually works.

Module System

Import syntax exists but module resolution is broken. Good luck importing anything that isn't in the standard library (which also doesn't exist).

Building Carbon (Prepare for Pain)

Setting up Carbon development:

It's like building Chrome from source but worse. Only attempt this if you hate yourself or want to contribute patches.

Should You Even Bother?

Carbon is too early to use for anything real. The design documents are the only thing worth reading - they show what Google wants to build, even if they can't build it yet.

Want to try Carbon? Use the browser compiler and play with basic syntax. Don't waste a weekend trying to build it locally unless you're contributing to the project.

Questions People Actually Ask About Carbon

Q

Should I learn Carbon now?

A

Are you fucking insane? Carbon doesn't work. The compiler crashes on anything interesting. 0.1 won't ship until 2026 if Google doesn't get distracted by the next shiny AI project. Learn Rust instead.

Q

How does Carbon compare to Rust?

A

Rust actually fucking works. Carbon is a PowerPoint presentation with delusions. If you're starting a new project, use Rust. If you have legacy C++, stick with C++ until Carbon proves it can deliver on its promises (don't hold your breath).

Q

Is the C++ interop real?

A

No. It's marketing bullshit. The design documents promise everything but the implementation can't even call a C++ function yet. Maybe by 2025 you'll be able to call basic C++ APIs without templates. Full interop? Try 2028.

Q

Why not just improve C++?

A

Because the C++ committee moves like molasses in January. Google wanted modules 20 years ago and just got them. They wanted better templates, safer memory management, faster compilation

  • the committee said "nope, backwards compatibility." So Google said "fuck this, we're building our own language."
Q

When will Carbon be ready for production?

A

The official roadmap says 0.1 in 2026, production "beyond 2028." Translation: never, or maybe 2030 if we're really lucky. Google's track record with ambitious projects is... not great.

Q

Will Google kill Carbon like everything else?

A

Probably not, but only because Chrome depends on it. Google kills side projects all the time (RIP Dart, Angular.js, Google+, Stadia...) but they need Carbon to modernize their core products. Still, I wouldn't bet my career on it.

Q

Can I contribute to Carbon?

A

Sure, if you want to waste time on compiler implementation for a language that might not exist in 5 years. The contributing guide exists. Most work is fixing basic compilation bugs.

Q

How do I try Carbon without suffering?

A

Use carbon.compiler-explorer.com for basic syntax exploration. Don't try building it locally unless you have a weekend to burn and enjoy build system pain.

Q

What about memory safety?

A

Carbon Memory Safety Strategy

"Phase 1: migrate everything, Phase 2: make it safe, Phase 3: profit." The safety features don't exist yet and won't for years. Current Carbon is as unsafe as C++ but with different syntax.

Q

Is this Google being petty about the C++ committee?

A

Obviously yes. They got tired of standards politics and decided to build their own language. The technical problems are real but this is definitely Google taking their ball and going home.

Useful Carbon Resources (The Few That Exist)

Related Tools & Recommendations

pricing
Recommended

Why Your Engineering Budget is About to Get Fucked: Rust vs Go vs C++

We Hired 12 Developers Across All Three Languages in 2024. Here's What Actually Happened to Our Budget.

Rust
/pricing/rust-vs-go-vs-cpp-development-costs-2025/enterprise-development-cost-analysis
100%
compare
Recommended

Local AI Tools: Which One Actually Works?

integrates with Ollama

Ollama
/compare/ollama/lm-studio/jan/gpt4all/llama-cpp/comprehensive-local-ai-showdown
66%
review
Recommended

Migrating from C/C++ to Zig: What Actually Happens

Should you rewrite your C++ codebase in Zig?

Zig Programming Language
/review/zig/c-cpp-migration-review
66%
howto
Recommended

How to Actually Implement Zero Trust Without Losing Your Sanity

A practical guide for engineers who need to deploy Zero Trust architecture in the real world - not marketing fluff

rust
/howto/implement-zero-trust-network-architecture/comprehensive-implementation-guide
46%
news
Recommended

Nvidia Faces China Antitrust Probe - September 15, 2025

China Suddenly Discovers 5-Year-Old Nvidia Deal Was "Illegal" - What Perfect Timing

rust
/news/2025-09-15/nvidia-china-antitrust-violation
46%
alternatives
Recommended

Tired of GitHub Actions Eating Your Budget? Here's Where Teams Are Actually Going

integrates with GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions
/alternatives/github-actions/migration-ready-alternatives
45%
tool
Recommended

GitHub Webhooks - Real-Time Repository Event Notifications

Get HTTP notifications the second shit happens in your repos. No more hammering GitHub's API every 30 seconds like some desperate stalker just to check if anyon

GitHub Webhooks
/tool/github-webhooks/overview
45%
integration
Recommended

Getting Cursor + GitHub Copilot Working Together

Run both without your laptop melting down (mostly)

Cursor
/integration/cursor-github-copilot/dual-setup-configuration
45%
news
Recommended

Google Cloud Recrute Lovable et Windsurf : La Guerre des Startups IA Coding

Les géants cloud se battent pour attirer les startups d'IA coding alors que le secteur explose

OpenAI GPT-5-Codex
/fr:news/2025-09-19/google-cloud-ia-coding
42%
troubleshoot
Recommended

Your Zig App Just Died and Memory Debugging Sucks

competes with Zig

Zig
/troubleshoot/zig-memory-management-production/memory-debugging-production-issues
41%
compare
Recommended

zig vs rust vs carbon: which one doesnt make you wanna uninstall your ide

been fighting c++ memory corruption for 3 years and these supposedly better alternatives better not waste another weekend of my life

Zig
/brainrot:compare/zig/rust/carbon/systems-programming-battle-2025
41%
tool
Recommended

Zig Build System - No More CMake Hell

Build your shit with actual Zig code instead of CMake's cryptic macro hell. Cross-compile anywhere without downloading 4GB of Visual Studio bullshit.

Zig Build System
/tool/zig-build-system/overview
41%
tool
Popular choice

jQuery - The Library That Won't Die

Explore jQuery's enduring legacy, its impact on web development, and the key changes in jQuery 4.0. Understand its relevance for new projects in 2025.

jQuery
/tool/jquery/overview
41%
tool
Popular choice

Hoppscotch - Open Source API Development Ecosystem

Fast API testing that won't crash every 20 minutes or eat half your RAM sending a GET request.

Hoppscotch
/tool/hoppscotch/overview
39%
tool
Popular choice

Stop Jira from Sucking: Performance Troubleshooting That Works

Frustrated with slow Jira Software? Learn step-by-step performance troubleshooting techniques to identify and fix common issues, optimize your instance, and boo

Jira Software
/tool/jira-software/performance-troubleshooting
38%
tool
Popular choice

Northflank - Deploy Stuff Without Kubernetes Nightmares

Discover Northflank, the deployment platform designed to simplify app hosting and development. Learn how it streamlines deployments, avoids Kubernetes complexit

Northflank
/tool/northflank/overview
36%
tool
Popular choice

LM Studio MCP Integration - Connect Your Local AI to Real Tools

Turn your offline model into an actual assistant that can do shit

LM Studio
/tool/lm-studio/mcp-integration
34%
tool
Recommended

Anthropic TypeScript SDK

Official TypeScript client for Claude. Actually works without making you want to throw your laptop out the window.

Anthropic TypeScript SDK
/tool/anthropic-typescript-sdk/overview
34%
integration
Recommended

Node.js Serverless Cold Starts Are Killing Your API Performance

This stack actually fixes it, but here's what you need to know before switching

Bun
/integration/bun-drizzle-hono-typescript/modern-api-development
34%
integration
Recommended

SvelteKit + TypeScript + Tailwind: What I Learned Building 3 Production Apps

The stack that actually doesn't make you want to throw your laptop out the window

Svelte
/integration/svelte-sveltekit-tailwind-typescript/full-stack-architecture-guide
34%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization