Signicat Mint API: AI-Optimized Technical Reference
Configuration
OAuth 2.0 Setup
- Role Requirement: Must use "Flow Editor" role (not "Flow Viewer") to execute workflows
- Domain Verification: Required, adds 24-48 hours to setup
- Token Expiry: 3600 seconds, implement refresh mechanism
- Propagation Delay: 10-15 minutes after client creation before tokens work
Working Authentication Implementation
async function getAccessToken() {
const response = await fetch('https://api.signicat.com/auth/token', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' },
body: new URLSearchParams({
grant_type: 'client_credentials',
client_id: process.env.SIGNICAT_CLIENT_ID,
client_secret: process.env.SIGNICAT_CLIENT_SECRET
})
});
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`Auth failed: ${response.status} ${response.statusText}`);
}
const { access_token, expires_in } = await response.json();
return { token: access_token, expiresIn: expires_in };
}
Common Authentication Failures
invalid_client
: Wrong client ID/secret or trailing whitespaceunauthorized_client
: Domain verification pendingaccess_denied
: Wrong role permissions (need Flow Editor)
European eID Integration
Supported Methods
- Coverage: 35+ European identity systems
- Key Methods: BankID (Norway/Sweden), MitID (Denmark), itsme (Belgium), eIDAS nodes
- Geographic Focus: Europe-only, no global coverage
Implementation Reality
- BankID Integration: Direct integration takes weeks, complex Norwegian documentation
- Sandbox Limitations: European eID methods don't work in sandbox environment
- Testing Requirements: Must test with real accounts in production
- Maintenance Windows: Swedish BankID fails regularly (monthly maintenance), Danish MitID has weekend outages
Performance Characteristics
- Response Times: 5-30 seconds for eID verification depending on provider
- Reliability: Budget for 95% uptime (not the claimed 99.9%)
- Geographic Latency: 150-200ms from US East Coast, 250ms+ from West Coast
API Operations
Workflow Execution
# Start workflow
POST /flows/{id}/execute
Authorization: Bearer {token}
{
"input": {
"email": "user@example.com",
"product": "premium_account"
}
}
Status Monitoring (Polling Required)
- No Webhooks: Must poll status endpoint every 30 seconds
- Status Values:
Running
: ProcessingSuspended
: Waiting for user input (common, cannot be resumed programmatically)Finished
: Completed successfullyFaulted
: Failed with errorCancelled
: User abandoned
Status Polling Implementation
async function waitForCompletion(instanceId) {
let attempts = 0;
while (attempts < 60) { // 30 minutes max
const status = await checkStatus(instanceId);
if (['Finished', 'Faulted', 'Cancelled'].includes(status)) {
return status;
}
await sleep(30000);
attempts++;
}
throw new Error('Workflow timeout - probably suspended');
}
File Management
Download Implementation
const downloadUrl = `https://api.signicat.com/flows/instances/${instanceId}/files/${referenceId}/download`;
const response = await fetch(downloadUrl, {
headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${token}` }
});
const buffer = await response.buffer();
File Handling Issues
- Large Files: Files >10MB frequently timeout, implement retry with exponential backoff
- Expiration: Files expire after 30 days (not clearly documented)
- Multi-Document: ZIP files for multiple documents come as single download
- No Progress Tracking: No progress indication for large downloads
Performance and Scaling
API Rate Limits
- Undocumented Limits: Approximately 100 requests/minute
- HTTP 429: Rate limit exceeded response
- No Batch Operations: Must poll workflows individually
Latency Characteristics
- Flow Execution: <500ms to get instance ID
- Status Checks: 100-200ms
- File Downloads: 2-10 seconds for normal PDFs
- European eID: 5-30 seconds depending on provider
Scaling Limitations
- No Webhooks: Polling-only architecture limits scalability
- Concurrent Workflows: Performance degrades with 100+ concurrent workflows
- European Business Hours: Load issues during peak EU hours
Cost Analysis
Component | Cost Range | Break-Even Point |
---|---|---|
Monthly License | €5k-50k+ (volume-based) | 1000+ European verifications/month |
Setup Fees | €10k-25k | One-time |
Professional Services | €500-1500/day | Complex workflows only |
Minimum Commitment | €5k-10k/month | Enterprise contracts |
Hidden Costs
- Domain verification process delays
- European-hours support only
- No export/migration capability (vendor lock-in)
- Separate testing environment setup
Critical Warnings
Production Deployment Issues
- European Data Residency: All servers in EU, impacts US latency
- Support Timezone: European business hours only (CET)
- Vendor Lock-in: No workflow export capability
- No Failover: Single point of failure during outages
Testing Limitations
- Sandbox Restrictions: Most European eID methods return dummy data
- Separate Accounts: Sandbox and production require separate setups
- Real Account Testing: Must use production for actual eID testing
Common Failure Scenarios
- HTTP 503: European identity providers down (BankID maintenance)
- HTTP 422: Workflow validation failed (missing required inputs)
- Suspended Workflows: User abandonment during eID process
- Token Expiration: 401 errors after 1 hour without refresh
Decision Criteria
Use Signicat When:
- European Operations: Need BankID, MitID, or other European eID methods
- Complex Workflows: Multi-step identity verification beyond simple signing
- Regulatory Compliance: Financial services, healthcare, regulated industries
- Business User Control: Want non-technical users to modify workflows
- Volume Threshold: 1000+ European verifications monthly
Don't Use Signicat When:
- Simple E-signatures: DocuSign is cheaper and more straightforward
- US-Only Operations: Limited value outside Europe
- Developer Control: Want full programmatic control over workflows
- Cost Sensitivity: Small projects under 1000 verifications/month
- Real-time Requirements: Polling-only architecture inadequate
Alternative Comparison
- DocuSign: Better for simple signing, US-focused, has webhooks
- OneSpan: Better for banking/finance, complex setup
- Build In-House: 6-12 months development, €200k+ cost, ongoing maintenance
- Direct eID Integration: €50k+ per country, maintenance nightmare
Implementation Patterns
CRM Integration Pattern
async function onLeadConversion(leadId, contactInfo) {
const instance = await executeWorkflow('identity-verification-flow', {
email: contactInfo.email,
phone: contactInfo.phone,
crmLeadId: leadId
});
await db.updateLead(leadId, {
verificationInstanceId: instance.id,
status: 'verification_started'
});
}
Background Polling Pattern
async function pollWorkflowStatus() {
const pending = await db.getPendingVerifications();
for (const record of pending) {
const status = await getWorkflowStatus(record.instanceId);
if (status === 'Finished') {
const documents = await downloadWorkflowFiles(record.instanceId);
await processCompletedVerification(record.crmLeadId, documents);
}
}
}
Error Recovery
Download Retry Implementation
async function downloadWithRetry(url, maxRetries = 3) {
for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++) {
try {
const response = await fetch(url, { timeout: 60000 });
if (response.ok) return await response.buffer();
} catch (error) {
if (i === maxRetries - 1) throw error;
await sleep(Math.pow(2, i) * 1000); // Exponential backoff
}
}
}
Common Error Recovery
- Rate Limiting: Implement exponential backoff
- Token Expiry: Refresh tokens before API calls
- File Timeouts: Retry with increasing delays
- Provider Outages: Check status page, inform users
Resource Requirements
Developer Time Investment
- Basic Integration: 2-4 weeks after contract
- Complex Workflows: 1-2 months with business logic
- Testing Setup: Additional 1-2 weeks for production validation
Operational Requirements
- Monitoring: Custom status polling implementation required
- Error Handling: Robust retry logic for European provider outages
- User Communication: Status updates during suspended workflows
- Compliance: eIDAS 2 regulation changes require ongoing updates
Related Tools & Recommendations
jQuery - The Library That Won't Die
Explore jQuery's enduring legacy, its impact on web development, and the key changes in jQuery 4.0. Understand its relevance for new projects in 2025.
Hoppscotch - Open Source API Development Ecosystem
Fast API testing that won't crash every 20 minutes or eat half your RAM sending a GET request.
Stop Jira from Sucking: Performance Troubleshooting That Works
Frustrated with slow Jira Software? Learn step-by-step performance troubleshooting techniques to identify and fix common issues, optimize your instance, and boo
Power Automate: Microsoft's IFTTT for Office 365 (That Breaks Monthly)
alternative to Microsoft Power Automate
Power Automate Review: 18 Months of Production Hell
What happens when Microsoft's "low-code" platform meets real business requirements
Zapier Enterprise Review - Is It Worth the Insane Cost?
I've been running Zapier Enterprise for 18 months. Here's what actually works (and what will destroy your budget)
Zapier - Connect Your Apps Without Coding (Usually)
alternative to Zapier
Claude Can Finally Do Shit Besides Talk
Stop copying outputs into other apps manually - Claude talks to Zapier now
Northflank - Deploy Stuff Without Kubernetes Nightmares
Discover Northflank, the deployment platform designed to simplify app hosting and development. Learn how it streamlines deployments, avoids Kubernetes complexit
Signicat Mint API - Integration Hell Survival Guide
Stop clicking through their UI like a peasant - automate your identity workflows with the Mint API
LM Studio MCP Integration - Connect Your Local AI to Real Tools
Turn your offline model into an actual assistant that can do shit
Marc Benioff Just Fired 4,000 People and Bragged About It - September 6, 2025
"I Need Less Heads": Salesforce CEO Admits AI Replaced Half Their Customer Service Team
Marc Benioff Finally Said What Every CEO Is Thinking About AI
"I need less heads" - 4,000 customer service jobs gone, replaced by AI agents
Zscaler Gets Owned Through Their Salesforce Instance - 2025-09-02
Security company that sells protection got breached through their fucking CRM
Microsoft 365 Developer Program - Free Sandbox Days Are Over
Want to test Office 365 integrations? Hope you've got $540/year lying around for Visual Studio.
Microsoft 365 Developer Tools Pricing - Complete Cost Analysis 2025
The definitive guide to Microsoft 365 development costs that prevents budget disasters before they happen
Amazon SageMaker - AWS's ML Platform That Actually Works
AWS's managed ML service that handles the infrastructure so you can focus on not screwing up your models. Warning: This will cost you actual money.
CUDA Development Toolkit 13.0 - Still Breaking Builds Since 2007
NVIDIA's parallel programming platform that makes GPU computing possible but not painless
OAuth 2.0 - Authorization Framework Under Siege
The authentication protocol powering billions of logins—and the sophisticated attacks targeting it in 2025
OAuth 2.0 Security Hardening Guide
Defend against device flow attacks and enterprise OAuth compromises based on 2024-2025 threat intelligence
Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization