Currently viewing the human version
Switch to AI version

What is Baidu Comate Actually Like to Use?

Baidu Comate VS Code Extension

So you've heard about Baidu Comate and wonder if it's worth the hassle. Spoiler: it's not. Here's what actually happens when you try to install this piece of shit.

It's built on their ERNIE model, which isn't complete garbage for Chinese stuff. But don't let that fool you - this isn't revolutionary, it's just another coding assistant with delusions of grandeur.

I spent three fucking hours on a Tuesday night trying to get this thing working on my machine. First, I tried the obvious approach - go to the VS Code marketplace. Nope, link's broken. Then I tried the JetBrains plugin store. Also broken, but there's like three different versions with slightly different names and I have zero idea which one actually works.

The Installation Shitshow

Want to try it? Good luck. I went through this exact process:

  1. Googled "Baidu Comate VS Code extension"
  2. Clicked the first marketplace link - 404 error
  3. Tried searching VS Code extensions directly - nothing
  4. Found some random Chinese blog post with a working link
  5. Downloaded a .vsix file from a sketchy CDN
  6. Manually installed it and hoped for the best

The JetBrains situation is even worse. There's the "official" plugin, a "Gitee version," and some third one that might be completely different. I installed all three just to see which one wouldn't immediately throw a NullPointerException on startup. Spoiler: two of them did.

When it doesn't completely suck

Once you finally get it installed, the basic autocomplete is fine. Not amazing, just fine. It'll suggest reasonable variable names and finish function calls. The problem is anything more complex than basic completion.

I tried using their "autonomous agent" feature on a real project - needed to refactor some API calls and add error handling. The damn thing kept generating code that looked right but failed with TypeError: Cannot read property 'data' of undefined because it forgot that API calls can fail. Worse, it couldn't figure out how to apply the changes to my actual files. I'd get these suggestions in the chat window, but zero way to actually integrate them into my codebase without copy-pasting everything manually like some kind of fucking caveman.

The Chinese Factor

If you're stuck in China or working with Chinese codebases, this might be your best option. It does understand Chinese comments and variable names better than Copilot or other Western tools.

But if you have access to other tools? Use them. Copilot is annoying but it actually works. Cursor costs more but won't leave you debugging your coding assistant instead of your actual code.

What "100+ languages" actually means

They claim support for over 100 programming languages. In reality, that means it has syntax highlighting for a bunch of obscure languages and maybe decent autocomplete for Python, JavaScript, and Java. Everything else is hit or miss.

I tested it on some Rust code and it suggested Python syntax. Tried it on Go and got Java patterns. The "multi-language support" is basically just the underlying model making educated guesses, not actual language-specific training.

Features That Work vs Features That Don't

AI Coding Tools Comparison 2025

Let's cut through the marketing bullshit and talk about what Comate actually does vs what they promise.

Code Completion: Actually Decent

The basic autocomplete works fine for common languages. It's not groundbreaking, but it'll suggest reasonable variable names and complete function calls. Similar to what you'd get from GitHub Copilot or Amazon Q Developer, but with better Chinese language support.

Where it struggles is understanding context beyond the current file. If you're working on a large project with complex imports, don't expect it to figure out your custom classes or modules. Cursor handles this much better with its codebase indexing.

Zulu Intelligence: Total Overhype

Baidu's big selling point is "Zulu," their autonomous agent that supposedly breaks down complex tasks. Complete horseshit. I tested this on real projects back in August and it failed every single fucking time. Simple stuff works fine, but anything involving multiple files or external APIs? Forget it.

Look, autonomous agents are the future - Continue.dev and Windsurf prove it works. But Baidu's version is clearly rushed garbage, like they saw Cursor's success and panicked.

IDE Integration: Hit or Miss

The official documentation claims seamless integration with major IDEs, but the reality is more frustrating:

  • VS Code: Extension exists but marketplace links are broken - had to manually download and install
  • JetBrains: Multiple conflicting plugins with different names, tried three different ones
  • Visual Studio: Windows-only, limited functionality
  • Xcode: Separate installer required, spent an hour figuring out the configuration

Compare this to GitHub Copilot's seamless installation - one click and you're done.

Language Support Reality Check

Baidu claims "100+ programming languages" which is pure marketing horseshit. Sure, it has syntax highlighting for random obscure languages, but actually generating useful code? Maybe 10-15 languages where it doesn't completely suck.

I tested it on Python, JavaScript, Go, and Rust. Python was decent, JavaScript tolerable, Go was fucking useless half the time, and Rust? Don't even bother. Claiming "100+ languages" is like McDonald's saying they serve "world cuisine" because they have ketchup and mustard.

Performance vs Reality

Baidu's internal metrics claim "27% of newly generated code within Baidu" uses Comate. But that's like McDonald's claiming their food is good because employees eat it - of course Baidu employees use Baidu tools.

In my actual testing over two months, I found myself constantly having to fix or completely rewrite the suggestions. Complex tasks that Cursor handles autonomously required constant babysitting with Comate. It's the difference between a tool that works for you versus a tool you work around.

What Actually Works

If you're stuck using Comate (maybe you're in China or your company mandated it), here's what actually functions:

  • Basic Python/JavaScript completion
  • Chinese comment understanding
  • Simple refactoring suggestions
  • Code explanation (though Claude does this better)

For everything else, you're better off with proven alternatives. The AI coding assistant market has matured enough that you don't need to settle for mediocre tools.

Enterprise Features: Mostly Vaporware

The "enterprise knowledge integration" sounds impressive until you try to actually configure it. The documentation is mostly in Chinese and the English translations are machine-generated garbage. I spent two days trying to figure out how to connect it to our internal documentation before giving up.

Meanwhile, Microsoft's GitHub Copilot for Business offers real enterprise features with actual support that speaks English and understands enterprise needs.

Reality Check: How These Tools Actually Perform

Feature

Baidu Comate

GitHub Copilot

Cursor IDE

Cline

Amazon Q Developer

Actually Works?

🟡 Sometimes

🟢 Usually

🟢 Yes, expensive

🟡 Burns money

🔴 Meh

Installation Hell

🔴 Broken links

🟢 One click

🟢 Download works

🟢 VS Code store

🟡 AWS bureaucracy

Complex Tasks

🔴 Fails badly

🟡 Needs babysitting

🟢 Actually works

🟢 Solid with Claude

🔴 Don't bother

Code Quality

🟡 Hit or miss

🟢 Decent

🟢 Pretty good

🟢 Depends on model

🟡 Basic stuff only

Language Support

🔴 "100+" = bullshit

🟢 Real support for 20+

🟢 Good coverage

🟢 Model dependent

🟡 AWS-focused

Cost Reality

🟡 Freemium trap

🟢 $10-19/month fixed

🔴 $20/month + usage

🔴 API costs explode

🟡 $19/month

Documentation

🔴 Chinese only

🟢 Excellent

🟢 Good

🟢 Community driven

🟡 AWS style

Real Questions Developers Actually Ask

Q

Does this thing actually work or is it another AI scam?

A

It works for basic stuff but fails badly on complex tasks. I tested it on several real projects and it consistently needed me to fix or completely rewrite complex suggestions. Good for autocomplete, absolute trash for autonomous programming.

Q

Is this better than Copilot or should I stick with what works?

A

Just stick with Copilot unless someone's forcing you to use Chinese tools. Yeah, Copilot is annoying as hell, but at least it works. Comate promises the moon and delivers a handful of dirt. After wasting two months testing this thing, Copilot wins every single time.

Q

How much does this actually cost?

A

They claim "freemium" but good luck getting useful features without paying. No transparent pricing on their website

  • always a red flag. Expect to get hit with enterprise pricing pressure once you're hooked. For comparison, GitHub Copilot is $10-19/month with clear fucking pricing.
Q

What happens when it generates broken code?

A

You debug it yourself. The tool can't apply its suggestions to your actual files half the time. I kept getting suggestions in the chat window with zero way to automatically apply them to my codebase. At least with Copilot, when it generates garbage, it's garbage that actually gets into your editor.

Q

Can I actually install this thing?

A

Good luck.

The VS Code marketplace link returns 404.

The JetBrains plugin works but there's also a Gitee version for some reason. I ended up manually downloading and installing from a third-party site.

Q

Why does Zulu keep breaking my workflow?

A

Because autonomous agents are hard and Baidu's implementation isn't ready. Tools like Cline and Cursor prove the concept works, but Baidu's version fails at complex task automation. It's the AI equivalent of "works on my machine."

Q

Is the Chinese language support actually good?

A

Yes, that's literally the only area where it beats Western tools. If you're working with Chinese codebases, variable names, or comments, it understands context better than Copilot. But that's not worth the other trade-offs unless you're geographically locked in.

Q

How many languages does it ACTUALLY support?

A

Despite claiming "100+ languages," it's realistically useful for maybe 10-15.

Python and Java

Script work okay. Everything else is hit or miss. I tested it on Go, Rust, and TypeScript

Q

Will this send my code to China?

A

Probably. Despite claims of "enterprise-grade security," this is a Chinese AI tool processing your code. If you're working on sensitive projects or under export restrictions, this should be a non-starter. On-premises deployment exists but the setup is a nightmare.

Q

Should I use this for my startup?

A

Hell no.

Your startup is already hanging by a thread

  • don't add a broken coding assistant to your list of problems. Use GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or Claude if you need something that actually works. Life's too short to debug your fucking debugging tool.
Q

What if my company mandates this?

A

My condolences. Focus on using it for basic autocomplete and Chinese language tasks where it actually helps. For complex work, keep a backup plan with tools that actually function. Document every time it fails so you have ammunition for tool migration arguments.

Q

Is the documentation any good?

A

Mostly in Chinese with terrible English translations. Compare to GitHub Copilot's excellent documentation or Cursor's clear guides. If you can't read Chinese fluently, expect frustration and confusion.

Official Resources and Documentation

Related Tools & Recommendations

compare
Recommended

I Tested 4 AI Coding Tools So You Don't Have To

Here's what actually works and what broke my workflow

Cursor
/compare/cursor/github-copilot/claude-code/windsurf/codeium/comprehensive-ai-coding-assistant-comparison
100%
alternatives
Recommended

VS Code 느려서 다른 에디터 찾는 사람들 보세요

8GB 램에서 버벅대는 VS Code 때문에 빡치는 분들을 위한 가이드

Visual Studio Code
/ko:alternatives/visual-studio-code/현실적인-vscode-대안-가이드
61%
tool
Recommended

VS Code Settings Are Probably Fucked - Here's How to Fix Them

Same codebase, 12 different formatting styles. Time to unfuck it.

Visual Studio Code
/tool/visual-studio-code/settings-configuration-hell
61%
tool
Recommended

Stop Fighting VS Code and Start Using It Right

Advanced productivity techniques for developers who actually ship code instead of configuring editors all day

Visual Studio Code
/tool/visual-studio-code/productivity-workflow-optimization
61%
compare
Recommended

AI Coding Assistants 2025 Pricing Breakdown - What You'll Actually Pay

GitHub Copilot vs Cursor vs Claude Code vs Tabnine vs Amazon Q Developer: The Real Cost Analysis

GitHub Copilot
/compare/github-copilot/cursor/claude-code/tabnine/amazon-q-developer/ai-coding-assistants-2025-pricing-breakdown
60%
alternatives
Recommended

GitHub Copilot Alternatives - Stop Getting Screwed by Microsoft

Copilot's gotten expensive as hell and slow as shit. Here's what actually works better.

GitHub Copilot
/alternatives/github-copilot/enterprise-migration
38%
alternatives
Recommended

GitHub Copilot Alternatives: For When Copilot Drives You Fucking Insane

I've tried 8 different AI assistants in 6 months. Here's what doesn't suck.

GitHub Copilot
/alternatives/github-copilot/workflow-optimization
38%
tool
Recommended

Tongyi Lingma - Free Coding AI That Doesn't Completely Suck

alternative to Tongyi Lingma (通义灵码)

Tongyi Lingma (通义灵码)
/tool/tongyi-lingma/overview
38%
compare
Recommended

通义灵码、文心快码、CodeBuddy哪个最不坑爹

Copilot在国内越来越难用,这三个开始冒头了

Tongyi Lingma
/zh:compare/tongyi-lingma/wenxin-kuaima/codebuddy/chinese-ai-coding-ecosystem
38%
tool
Recommended

通义灵码用了半年,说几个实话

alternative to Tongyi Lingma

Tongyi Lingma
/zh:tool/tongyi-lingma/overview
38%
tool
Recommended

JetBrains IDEs - IDEs That Actually Work

Expensive as hell, but worth every penny if you write code professionally

JetBrains IDEs
/tool/jetbrains-ides/overview
37%
compare
Recommended

搞了5年开发,被这三个IDE轮流坑过的血泪史

凌晨3点踩坑指南:Cursor、VS Code、JetBrains到底哪个不会在你最需要的时候掉链子

Cursor
/zh:compare/cursor/vscode/jetbrains-ides/developer-reality-check
37%
tool
Recommended

JetBrains IDEs - 又贵又吃内存但就是离不开

integrates with JetBrains IDEs

JetBrains IDEs
/zh:tool/jetbrains-ides/overview
37%
compare
Recommended

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Codeium vs Tabnine vs Amazon Q - Which One Won't Screw You Over

After two years using these daily, here's what actually matters for choosing an AI coding tool

Cursor
/compare/cursor/github-copilot/codeium/tabnine/amazon-q-developer/windsurf/market-consolidation-upheaval
34%
review
Recommended

I've Been Testing Amazon Q Developer for 3 Months - Here's What Actually Works and What's Marketing Bullshit

TL;DR: Great if you live in AWS, frustrating everywhere else

amazon-q-developer
/review/amazon-q-developer/comprehensive-review
34%
review
Recommended

Codeium Review: Does Free AI Code Completion Actually Work?

Real developer experience after 8 months: the good, the frustrating, and why I'm still using it

Codeium (now part of Windsurf)
/review/codeium/comprehensive-evaluation
34%
compare
Recommended

Enterprise AI Coding Tools: Which One Won't Get You Fired?

GitHub Copilot vs Cursor vs Claude Code vs Tabnine vs Windsurf - The Brutal Reality

GitHub Copilot Enterprise
/compare/github-copilot/cursor/claude-code/tabnine/codeium/enterprise-ai-coding-security-comparison
34%
tool
Recommended

Fix Tabnine Enterprise Deployment Issues - Real Solutions That Actually Work

alternative to Tabnine

Tabnine
/tool/tabnine/deployment-troubleshooting
34%
compare
Recommended

GitHub Copilot vs Tabnine vs Cursor - Welcher AI-Scheiß funktioniert wirklich?

Drei AI-Coding-Tools nach 6 Monaten Realitätschecks - und warum ich fast wieder zu Vim gewechselt bin

GitHub Copilot
/de:compare/github-copilot/tabnine/cursor/entwickler-realitaetscheck
34%
tool
Popular choice

jQuery - The Library That Won't Die

Explore jQuery's enduring legacy, its impact on web development, and the key changes in jQuery 4.0. Understand its relevance for new projects in 2025.

jQuery
/tool/jquery/overview
34%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization