The TypeScript Tax: Why These Developers Cost So Damn Much

I've hired both and the salary difference will make you cry. TypeScript devs cost about 30% more than JavaScript developers, and every year they get pickier about compensation. Recent salary surveys show TypeScript developers averaging $122k annually, while JavaScript developer rates range significantly lower.

Why Your Budget Will Cry

Here's the reality from hiring in 2025:

Senior TypeScript devs want $150k-175k while JavaScript seniors are usually happy with $110k-130k. CloudDevs data confirms TypeScript developer salaries averaging $122k annually, with top tech firms paying $120k-$180k annually. That's like $40-45k more per dev, per year. Had one candidate straight-up laugh when I offered $140k - said he had three other offers starting at $165k. My 5-person team's salary costs jumped from $650k to maybe $820k, something like that, just making the switch.

Contractors are even worse. TypeScript contractors charge $120-180/hour while JavaScript contractors are $80-120/hour. Arc's developer rate data shows JavaScript hourly rates typically $61-80 globally, while TypeScript specialists command premiums averaging $91k+ base with significant regional variations. TeamCubate reports JavaScript developers at $25-150/hour varying by experience vs significantly higher TypeScript rates. I learned this shit the hard way when our contractor bill hit $28k for work that should've cost maybe $18k.

The Supply Problem is Real

TypeScript vs JavaScript Developer Costs

There just aren't enough TypeScript developers. Everyone wants them, but half the JavaScript devs claiming TypeScript skills can't handle generics without having a complete meltdown.

I posted a TypeScript job last month and got maybe 40 applicants. Same exact role for JavaScript? Something like 120+ applicants. The TypeScript candidates were pickier as hell - demanding higher salaries, better benefits, full remote, and one guy wanted a $5k signing bonus just to consider our offer.

The worst part? Many "TypeScript" developers are just JavaScript devs who read the docs once. I've interviewed dozens who fall apart when you ask about conditional types or mapped types. Had one "senior TypeScript developer" who couldn't explain the difference between interface and type. Another one claimed 5 years of TypeScript experience but had never heard of discriminated unions. Finding someone who actually knows TypeScript well enough to architect with it? Good fucking luck.

Hidden Costs That Will Fuck You

Recruiting takes forever. Finding a decent TypeScript dev takes roughly 3+ months versus maybe 6 weeks for JavaScript. My last TypeScript hire took 4 months and we ended up paying $15k to a recruiter just to find someone who wouldn't quit after two weeks.

Training costs money. Converting JavaScript teams costs real money - budget around $10k per developer between training, lost productivity, and senior dev time babysitting. We spent 3 months with half our team basically useless while they fought with the compiler. Had to buy every developer a Frontend Masters subscription ($390/year each) plus send two seniors to a TypeScript workshop in Austin ($3k each including travel). Still took them weeks to understand why T extends keyof U isn't the same as T extends U[keyof U].

Junior devs quit. I've had three junior developers bail during TypeScript transitions. The learning curve breaks some people, especially when the compiler starts bitching about every line they write.

Geographic Reality Check

Offshore isn't much cheaper. Ukrainian TypeScript developers still cost around 70-80% more than their JavaScript counterparts. Regional rate analysis shows JavaScript developers at $46-65/hour globally, while TypeScript developers command higher rates across all regions. The TypeScript premium exists everywhere.

Remote work fucked everything up. Now that everyone can hire remotely, TypeScript developers have global opportunities. Lost two developers in 2024 to remote Bay Area companies offering $180k+ for the same work they were doing here for $135k. Your local TypeScript dev can just as easily work for a Silicon Valley company paying 40% more and never leave their bedroom.

When It's Worth the Pain

Look, TypeScript developers are expensive for a reason. If your project is:

  • Over 50k lines of code
  • Has more than 5 developers
  • Will be maintained for 2+ years
  • Already having production bugs from type errors

Then pay the premium. The TypeScript tax pays for itself when you're not fixing "Cannot read property 'user' of undefined" at 3 AM on a Saturday because some frontend dev assumed the API response would always have a user object (it didn't during server maintenance).

But if you're building an MVP or have a small team? Just use JavaScript and save the money for when you actually need TypeScript's benefits. Don't pay enterprise prices for startup problems.

And here's the thing - those salary premiums I just told you about? That's just the tip of the iceberg. The real wallet-crushing costs come from build times that'll make you question your career choices, migration nightmares that drag on for months, and infrastructure upgrades that'll triple your AWS bills...

The Real Costs: What I've Actually Spent on TypeScript vs JavaScript

What Actually Matters

JavaScript Reality

TypeScript Pain

The Damage

Senior Dev Salary

$105k-135k/year

$140k-180k/year

+$35-45k per dev

Junior Dev Salary

$62k-78k/year

$83k-108k/year

+$20-30k per dev

Contractors

$80-120/hour

$120-180/hour

+50% hourly rate

Time to Hire

4-6 weeks

8-12 weeks

Double the pain

Learning Hell

Start coding day 1

3 weeks of compiler rage

Productivity nosedives

Build Times

30 seconds

3-8 minutes

Coffee break every build

Migration Nightmare

Free

6 months of hell

$100k+ in lost time

Training Costs

Read some docs

$10k per dev + mentoring

Real money

Debugging

Runtime surprises

Compile-time safety

Actually saves time

Refactoring

Pray and test

Compiler has your back

Much safer

The Build Time Nightmare and Migration Hell

TypeScript's dirty secret isn't just the salary premium

  • it's the soul-crushing build times and migration disasters that nobody mentions in those cheerful blog posts.

The [TypeScript Performance Wiki](https://github.com/microsoft/Type

Script/wiki/Performance) admits these issues exist, but good luck finding that buried in the docs. Performance optimization studies show significant compilation bottlenecks, while Microsoft's native port plans promise 10x faster builds

  • eventually.

Compilation is Slow as Hell

TypeScript Performance Issues

TypeScript compilation is slow as shit.

I'm talking 4-8 minute builds that used to take 30 seconds with JavaScript. The TypeScript GitHub issues are full of developers having nervous breakdowns over performance. [Performance benchmarking research](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389689114_Performance_Benchmarking_Type

Script_vs_JavaScript_in_Modern_Web_Development) confirms significant compilation overhead, while optimization guides try to mitigate the pain. Large-scale project analysis shows why TypeScript chokes on big codebases.

Real numbers from our team:

  • JavaScript build: 45 seconds (webpack 5.74.0)
  • TypeScript build: 4-8 minutes, sometimes longer if TypeScript 4.9 decides to hate you
  • Daily builds per dev: maybe 20-25
  • Time spent waiting: 2+ hours per dev per day
  • Cost: probably $15k/month paying people to stare at terminals

Our build server costs tripled because TypeScript needs around 8GB+ RAM just to not crash during compilation.

Had one guy's laptop completely freeze when he tried to run tsc --build on our monorepo

  • killed his whole machine for like 10 minutes. The worst part? Sometimes it just fails randomly with "FATAL ERROR: CALL_AND_RETRY_LAST Allocation failed
  • JavaScript heap out of memory" and you have to restart the whole damn thing.

Migration is a Nightmare Factory

JavaScript to TypeScript Migration

Every "simple" TypeScript migration turns into a 6+ month nightmare.

Here's what actually happens:

**Month 1-2:

Optimism Phase**

  • Install Type

Script 5.1, configure tsconfig.json (took 3 days to get this right)

  • Everything breaks immediately with like 800 type errors
  • Spend about 2 weeks just getting the project to compile with any everywhere
  • Discover half your npm packages don't have @types definitions

Month 3-4: Reality Sets In

  • Hot reload stops working (webpack-dev-server conflicts with ts-loader)
  • Every save requires a full restart (10+ seconds each time)
  • Junior devs start submitting resumes after fighting with React.

FC types for a week

  • @ts-ignore comments everywhere because the compiler is being a pedantic asshole
  • Spent $800 on @types packages for legacy dependencies that barely work

Month 5-6: Acceptance

  • Half the team threatens to quit
  • You're 3 months behind on actual features
  • Management starts asking why builds take forever
  • Finally get basic types working

Slack's TypeScript migration took about 6 months to annotate most of their desktop app, and that was with a team of experts. Stripe migrated millions of lines over several years. Airbnb's migration tools were created to handle large-scale conversions, while enterprise modernization case studies show the complexity involved. Migration guide research confirms the pain is real.

If these engineering powerhouses struggle with migration, you will too.

The Learning Curve from Hell

TypeScript isn't just "JavaScript with types." It's a completely different language with its own special ways to make you suffer. The TypeScript Handbook tries to make it seem simple, but r/typescript is full of developers crying about the complexity. Productivity comparison studies show initial learning drops, while performance analysis confirms the cognitive overhead. Development experience research shows the complexity impact on teams.

Week 1: "This isn't so bad, just add some types"
Week 2: Fighting with generic constraints and conditional types
Week 3: Googling "typescript error TS2322" for like the 40th time (still no fucking clue what it means)
Week 4: Seriously considering switching careers after spending 3 hours debugging `TS2589:

Type instantiation is excessively deep and possibly infinite`

The error messages are about as useful as a screen door on a submarine:

Type '{ x: number; }' is not assignable to type 'IntrinsicAttributes & { y: string; }'.

Property 'y' is missing in type '{ x: number; }' but required in type '{ y: string; }'.

Translation:

You fucked up a prop name, but we're going to make you decode this academic bullshit to figure it out. I see this garbage error at least 5 times a day and it never gets less annoying. Oh, and TS2345: Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type 'never' is my personal favorite

  • means you probably have a type guard somewhere that's too strict, but good luck finding it in a 200-file codebase.

Infrastructure Costs That'll Surprise You

Build servers eat CPU like candy. Our AWS bills went up around 60% just from Type

Script compilation.

We had to upgrade from t3.large to c5.2xlarge instances just to handle the damn compilation load.

Docker images become fat as hell. Our production Docker images went from roughly 150MB to 400MB+ because TypeScript needs Node.js, the compiler, and all the @types packages during build.

Development machines suffer. Junior devs with 8GB laptops can't run TypeScript + VSCode + Chrome without everything crawling to a halt. Had one intern's MacBook Air literally overheat and shut down during a TypeScript build

  • the fan was screaming for 10 minutes straight. Budget around $1000+ per dev for hardware upgrades or you'll be buying new laptops every year.

When It's Actually Worth It

TypeScript makes sense if:

  • You have production bugs costing $50k+ annually
  • Your team can survive 6 months of reduced productivity
  • You can afford build server upgrades
  • Your junior developers won't quit during migration
  • Your codebase is over 100k lines

But if you're shipping MVP features, have tight deadlines, or a junior-heavy team? Stick with Java

Script and ESLint. Don't pay enterprise complexity taxes for startup problems.

The builds are slow, the migration sucks, and your team will hate you. But once you get through the hell, those compile-time error catches are worth not getting paged at 3 AM.

So you've seen the nightmare scenarios and horror stories. But developers still have burning questions about making this decision...

Real Questions from Developers Who've Been Through TypeScript Hell

Q

How much more do TypeScript developers actually cost?

A

About 30-40% more, and they negotiate way harder. Senior TypeScript devs want $150k+ while JavaScript devs are usually happy with $110k-130k. The TypeScript candidates I've interviewed negotiate way harder and have more options.Contractors are worse. TypeScript contractors charge around $120-180/hour vs $80-120/hour for JavaScript. Last month our TypeScript contractor bill hit $28k for work that probably would've cost $20k with a JavaScript dev.Recruiting takes forever. Posted a TypeScript role

  • got maybe 40 applicants. Same role for JavaScript
  • got something like 160-180 applicants. Took me 4 months to find our last TypeScript hire vs about 6 weeks for JavaScript roles.
Q

What does migrating to TypeScript actually cost?

A

It's expensive as hell and takes way longer than anyone tells you. I've been through a few migrations:80k line React app: about 8 months, half the team productivity, probably $200k in lost features250k line Node.js app: 14 months, two developers quit, I think it cost us around $500k total20k line Vue app: 3 months, relatively painless, maybe $50k costBudget probably 6-12 months at 50% productivity for anything serious. Big companies like Netflix took ages for their TypeScript migrations. If they struggle, you definitely will.

Q

Will TypeScript slow down my team forever?

A

First 3-4 weeks: Your team will hate you. Productivity drops like 70%. Junior devs will start updating their resumes.Month 2-3: Still slower, but the compiler stops being a complete asshole. Productivity maybe around 80%.Month 6+: Actually faster than before. Refactoring doesn't require 3 days of testing. AutoComplete actually works.The break-even point is probably 8-12 months if your team doesn't quit first.

Q

How much do slow TypeScript builds actually cost?

A

Our builds went from like 45 seconds to maybe 6 minutes.

That's probably 25 builds per dev per day just waiting around.Real costs from our team:

  • Roughly 2.5 hours daily per dev just waiting for builds
  • Probably $15k/month in salary paying people to stare at terminals
  • Build server costs went up about 200%
  • Two developers bought faster laptops with their own moneyUse --incremental flag and project references or you'll go insane.

TypeScript 5.0 was supposed to fix the performance issues but our builds are still ass-slow. The new TypeScript compiler can't come soon enough.

Q

Should startups use TypeScript?

A

Hell no.

If you're racing to product-market fit, Type

Script is overkill. The learning curve, build times, and migration costs will kill your velocity.Use TypeScript if:

  • You have 6+ month timeline

  • Team over 5 developers

  • Production bugs costing $50k+ annually

  • Can afford 6 months of reduced productivityStick with JavaScript + ESLint if:

  • Building MVP or proof of concept

  • Team under 4 people

  • Need to ship features yesterday

  • Junior-heavy team

Q

Can I train JavaScript devs to use TypeScript?

A

Yes, but it's expensive and some will quit.Training costs: Like $10k per developer when you factor in courses, lost productivity, and mentoring time. Three of our JavaScript devs successfully made the transition. Two others quit because they couldn't stand the compiler constantly bitching at them.Pro tip: Don't try to convert your entire team at once. One person loses their shit learning generics, and suddenly the whole team is updating their LinkedIn profiles.Better approach: Hire one senior TypeScript dev to mentor the team. They can handle the complex types while others learn gradually.

Q

Is offshore TypeScript development cheaper?

A

The rates are lower but the premium still exists. Ukrainian TypeScript developers cost around $50-80/hour vs $30-50/hour for JavaScript devs in the same region.The real problem: Finding good TypeScript developers offshore is just as hard as domestic. Most "TypeScript" developers internationally are JavaScript devs who read the docs once.

Q

What infrastructure costs am I not thinking about?

A

Build servers eat CPU. Our AWS bills went up around 60% just from TypeScript compilation. Had to upgrade from t3.large to c5.2xlarge instances.Docker images get fat. Went from roughly 150MB to 400MB+ images because TypeScript needs the compiler and @types packages.Dev machines suffer. Junior devs with 8GB laptops can't run TypeScript + IDE + browser. Budget around $1000+ per dev for hardware upgrades.

Q

When does TypeScript actually pay for itself?

A

Probably 12-18 months if you survive the migration.

The math works when:

  • Production bugs cost more than developer salaries
  • You're maintaining code for 2+ years
  • Team size over 5 developers
  • Codebase over 100k linesWe hit break-even at around 14 months. Haven't seen a runtime type error in production since month 8. Those incidents used to cost us around $25k each in emergency fixes and lost customers.
Q

Should I migrate all at once or gradually?

A

Gradual or you'll die.

All-at-once migrations are suicide.Start with:

  • "strict": false in tsconfig.json (seriously, don't try strict mode first)

  • "noImplicitAny": false or you'll go insane

  • Convert utility functions first (they're the easiest)

  • Leave React components for last (props interfaces are a nightmare)

  • Budget around 1-2 files per day conversion rate if you're luckyNever do:

  • Convert everything in one weekend

  • Start with the most complex files

  • Force strict mode immediately

  • Ignore junior developer complaints[Microsoft's migration guide](https://github.com/Microsoft/Type

Script/wiki/Migrating-from-JavaScript) is actually useful, unlike most documentation.

Look, all these questions you're asking? They boil down to one brutal reality check: when does spending all this money and going through months of hell actually make financial sense? Because I've run the numbers on multiple projects, and here's exactly when TypeScript pays for itself...

Is TypeScript Worth the Pain? Here's When the Math Works

Your Situation

Stick with JavaScript

Maybe Consider TypeScript

TypeScript Makes Sense

Team Size

1-3 devs

4-6 devs

7+ devs

Codebase Size

Under 30k lines

30k-100k lines

100k+ lines

Timeline

Ship next quarter

1-2 year project

2+ year maintenance

Production Bugs

Annoying but cheap

Costing real money

$50k+ annual impact

Team Experience

Junior heavy

Mixed experience

Senior heavy

Migration Budget

Broke

Can afford 6 months pain

Deep pockets

Build Speed

Must be fast

Can tolerate some slowdown

Don't care about builds

Shipping Pressure

MVP mode

Balanced

Stability over speed

Resources That Actually Help with TypeScript Cost Decisions

Related Tools & Recommendations

tool
Similar content

Webpack: The Build Tool You'll Love to Hate & Still Use in 2025

Explore Webpack, the JavaScript build tool. Understand its powerful features, module system, and why it remains a core part of modern web development workflows.

Webpack
/tool/webpack/overview
100%
compare
Similar content

Python vs JavaScript vs Go vs Rust - Production Reality Check

What Actually Happens When You Ship Code With These Languages

/compare/python-javascript-go-rust/production-reality-check
88%
integration
Similar content

Prisma tRPC TypeScript: Full-Stack Architecture Guide to Robust APIs

Prisma + tRPC + TypeScript: No More "It Works In Dev" Surprises

Prisma
/integration/prisma-trpc-typescript/full-stack-architecture
83%
tool
Similar content

TypeScript Overview: Catch Bugs Early with JavaScript's Type System

Microsoft's type system that catches bugs before they hit production

TypeScript
/tool/typescript/overview
79%
review
Recommended

Vite vs Webpack vs Turbopack: Which One Doesn't Suck?

I tested all three on 6 different projects so you don't have to suffer through webpack config hell

Vite
/review/vite-webpack-turbopack/performance-benchmark-review
74%
integration
Similar content

Supabase Next.js 13+ Server-Side Auth Guide: What Works & Fixes

Here's what actually works (and what will break your app)

Supabase
/integration/supabase-nextjs/server-side-auth-guide
66%
tool
Similar content

ESLint - Find and Fix Problems in Your JavaScript Code

The pluggable linting utility for JavaScript and JSX

/tool/eslint/overview
64%
tool
Similar content

JavaScript: The Ubiquitous Language - Overview & Ecosystem

JavaScript runs everywhere - browsers, servers, mobile apps, even your fucking toaster if you're brave enough

JavaScript
/tool/javascript/overview
61%
tool
Recommended

Stripe Terminal React Native SDK - Turn Your App Into a Payment Terminal That Doesn't Suck

integrates with Stripe Terminal React Native SDK

Stripe Terminal React Native SDK
/tool/stripe-terminal-react-native-sdk/overview
55%
tool
Recommended

React Error Boundaries Are Lying to You in Production

integrates with React Error Boundary

React Error Boundary
/tool/react-error-boundary/error-handling-patterns
55%
integration
Recommended

Claude API React Integration - Stop Breaking Your Shit

Stop breaking your Claude integrations. Here's how to build them without your API keys leaking or your users rage-quitting when responses take 8 seconds.

Claude API
/integration/claude-api-react/overview
55%
tool
Recommended

Angular - Google's Opinionated TypeScript Framework

For when you want someone else to make the architectural decisions

Angular
/tool/angular/overview
55%
alternatives
Recommended

Angular Alternatives in 2025 - Migration-Ready Frameworks

Modern Frontend Frameworks for Teams Ready to Move Beyond Angular

Angular
/alternatives/angular/migration-focused-alternatives
55%
alternatives
Recommended

Best Angular Alternatives in 2025: Choose the Right Framework

Skip the Angular Pain and Build Something Better

Angular
/alternatives/angular/best-alternatives-2025
55%
alternatives
Recommended

Webpack is Slow as Hell - Here Are the Tools That Actually Work

Tired of waiting 30+ seconds for hot reload? These build tools cut Webpack's bloated compile times down to milliseconds

Webpack
/alternatives/webpack/modern-performance-alternatives
53%
compare
Recommended

Framework Wars Survivor Guide: Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit, Remix vs Gatsby

18 months in Gatsby hell, 6 months testing everything else - here's what actually works for enterprise teams

Next.js
/compare/nextjs/nuxt/sveltekit/remix/gatsby/enterprise-team-scaling
51%
news
Recommended

Google Avoids Breakup, Stock Surges

Judge blocks DOJ breakup plan. Google keeps Chrome and Android.

rust
/news/2025-09-04/google-antitrust-chrome-victory
50%
tool
Recommended

Helm - Because Managing 47 YAML Files Will Drive You Insane

Package manager for Kubernetes that saves you from copy-pasting deployment configs like a savage. Helm charts beat maintaining separate YAML files for every dam

Helm
/tool/helm/overview
41%
tool
Recommended

Fix Helm When It Inevitably Breaks - Debug Guide

The commands, tools, and nuclear options for when your Helm deployment is fucked and you need to debug template errors at 3am.

Helm
/tool/helm/troubleshooting-guide
41%
compare
Similar content

Nx vs Turborepo: Deep Dive into Monorepo Build Performance

After 8 months in monorepo hell, here's what actually works

Nx
/compare/nx/turborepo/build-performance-comparison
38%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization