Currently viewing the human version
Switch to AI version

Tesla's Full Self-Driving Has a Deadly Blind Spot: It Can't See Trains

Tesla's Full Self-Driving software has a potentially catastrophic flaw that the company hasn't addressed publicly: it repeatedly fails to handle railroad crossings safely. Multiple Tesla owners reported their vehicles attempting to drive through active crossings, forcing emergency manual intervention to avoid collisions with trains.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) confirmed to NBC News they've been in communication with Tesla about these incidents. The agency stated: "We are aware of the incidents and have been in communication with the manufacturer."

The Pattern of Failures Is Disturbing

NBC News identified at least 47 incidents across Reddit, X, and YouTube since 2023, including recent cases from August 2025. The malfunctions include:

  • Ignoring flashing warning lights and attempting to proceed through active crossings
  • Failing to stop for lowered crossing gates or trying to drive around them
  • Not detecting approaching trains despite clear visual and audio signals
  • Stopping on railroad tracks when traffic lights ahead are red, creating dangerous exposure
  • Turning directly onto train tracks instead of following roads

Italo Frigoli, a North Texas Tesla owner, experienced this firsthand when his 2025 Model Y with the latest FSD hardware (HW4) and software (v13.2.9) nearly drove through descending gate arms. NBC News documented the same failure when they returned to test the crossing a second time.

"It felt like it was going to run through the arms," Frigoli said. "So obviously I just slammed on the brakes."

Real Crashes Have Already Happened

Tesla Crashed Into Train Pennsylvania

In June, a Tesla in FSD mode drove itself onto train tracks in eastern Pennsylvania and was struck by a Norfolk Southern freight train. The driver and passengers evacuated before impact, avoiding serious injury when the train delivered only a glancing blow.

Western Berks Fire Commissioner Jared Renshaw, who interviewed the driver, explained: "They said when they got to the tracks, the car just turned left. The car was in self-driving mode, and it just turned left."

This incident received local news coverage but no public response from Tesla or acknowledgment of the systemic issue.

Here's Why Tesla's AI Keeps Fucking This Up

Carnegie Mellon's Phil Koopman nailed the problem: "If it's having trouble stopping at rail crossings, it's an accident waiting to happen. It's just a matter of which driver gets caught at the wrong time."

Tesla's FSD is basically a giant neural network trained on video footage. But here's the thing - if you don't show it enough examples of railroad crossings during training, it doesn't know what the fuck a railroad crossing is. Koopman thinks Tesla's engineers didn't bother collecting enough train crossing footage for their training data.

Railroad crossings aren't standardized either. Some have gates, lights, and clear stop lines. Others just have those white X signs that drivers ignore all the time. Tesla's AI can't figure out that "big metal thing on rails + flashing lights = don't drive here" because they never taught it properly.

Meanwhile, Waymo Figured This Shit Out Years Ago

Waymo basically cheats by avoiding railroad crossings whenever possible. When they can't avoid them, their cars actually listen for train sounds with audio receivers and they built a fucking model railroad crossing at their test facility to practice.

You know how many Waymo customers complain about almost getting hit by trains? Zero. Because Waymo treats railroad crossings like the death traps they are instead of pretending their AI is smart enough to figure it out on the fly.

MIT's Bryan Reimer put it well: Waymo actually invested in developing safety systems that work instead of just claiming everything's fine while people almost die.

Tesla's Marketing vs. Reality Gap

Here's the bullshit Tesla pulls: officially, FSD is a "Level 2" system that requires constant human supervision. But Musk keeps telling everyone that Tesla vehicles "can drive themselves." You can't have it both ways, Elon.

Tesla's been caught exaggerating their software capabilities before. A Miami jury awarded $243 million in a wrongful death case this summer, finding Tesla 33% responsible for an Autopilot crash. But sure, let's trust them with train crossings.

The Railroad Industry Saw This Coming in 2018

The Association of American Railroads warned regulators about this exact problem back in 2018. They pointed out that self-driving cars need to recognize locomotive lights, horns, and bells because not every crossing has fancy gates and signals.

Their warning was pretty clear: "Rail corridors must be afforded respect." Translation: don't let robots drive into fucking trains.

267 people died at railroad crossings last year according to the Federal Railroad Administration. They don't track which cars had Tesla's "self-driving" engaged, but they're aware of the Tesla incidents. That's not exactly reassuring.

Tesla's Promises vs. Reality

Musk has promised a major FSD update for late September 2025 but hasn't specifically addressed railroad crossing failures. This is particularly concerning given Tesla's robotaxi ambitions.

Tesla robotaxis are currently operating in Austin, Texas, and Musk plans to expand to cover half the U.S. population by year-end. Yet test riders have documented the same railroad crossing failures in the robotaxi service.

Joe Tegtmeyer, a Tesla booster who documented a robotaxi failure at an Austin rail crossing, described the vehicle beginning to move precisely as warning lights activated and gates descended. A Tesla employee had to intervene to prevent the vehicle from proceeding through the crossing.

Customer Trust Eroding

Even loyal Tesla customers are expressing frustration. Jared Cleaver, an Oakland Tesla owner who experienced multiple crossing failures, said: "It's kind of crazy that it hasn't been addressed."

"I think it doesn't perform nearly as well as Elon claims and Tesla claims," Cleaver added. "They seem to make a habit out of making these really big claims and then falling short. It seems like borderline false advertising."

The railroad crossing issue represents a fundamental safety flaw that undermines Tesla's autonomous driving claims. Until Tesla addresses this specific failure mode with transparent safety improvements, every FSD-enabled Tesla approaching a railroad crossing represents a potential tragedy waiting to happen.

For a company betting its future on autonomous technology, the inability to safely handle one of the most predictable and well-marked hazards on American roads raises serious questions about the readiness of Tesla's self-driving systems for unsupervised operation.

FAQ: Tesla FSD Railroad Crossing Failures

Q

How many Tesla FSD railroad crossing incidents have been documented?

A

NBC News found 47 examples since 2023 across Reddit, X, and You

Tube, including posts as recent as August 2025. Six Tesla drivers provided detailed interviews about their experiences, with four sharing video evidence.

Q

Has anyone been injured or killed in these incidents?

A

One Tesla was actually struck by a train in Pennsylvania in June 2025, but the driver and passengers had evacuated before impact and were unharmed. The train delivered only a glancing blow. Most other incidents involved drivers taking manual control to avoid collisions.

Q

What specific types of failures are happening?

A

Multiple failure modes: ignoring flashing warning lights, attempting to drive through or around lowered gates, failing to detect approaching trains, stopping on tracks when traffic lights ahead are red, and actually turning onto train tracks instead of following roads.

Q

Is Tesla aware of this problem?

A

Yes. NHTSA confirmed to NBC News they've been in communication with Tesla about these incidents. However, Tesla hasn't publicly acknowledged the issue or provided a timeline for fixes.

Q

Does this affect the latest Tesla models with newest hardware?

A

Yes. Italo Frigoli's 2025 Model Y with HW4 hardware and FSD v13.2.9 software failed to stop at a railroad crossing during NBC's testing. The problem isn't limited to older vehicles or outdated software.

Q

Why can't Tesla's cameras detect trains and crossing signals?

A

Experts believe it's a training data problem. Tesla's neural network learns from video footage, and Carnegie Mellon's Phil Koopman thinks Tesla didn't include enough railroad crossing examples in their training dataset.

Q

How does Waymo handle railroad crossings?

A

Waymo appears more cautious. Their vehicles consider rail crossings in route planning, use audio receivers to detect trains, and have a model crossing at their training facility. NBC found no customer complaints about Waymo crossing failures.

Q

Are Tesla robotaxis having the same problems?

A

Yes. A Tesla booster documented a robotaxi failure at an Austin rail crossing where the vehicle began moving as warning lights activated and gates descended. A Tesla employee had to intervene to prevent the crossing attempt.

Q

What should Tesla FSD users do at railroad crossings?

A

Always be prepared to take manual control immediately. FSD requires constant supervision, and railroad crossings represent a known failure mode. Don't rely on the system to detect trains, warning signals, or crossing gates.

Q

Is Tesla planning to fix this issue?

A

Musk announced a "major FSD update" planned for late September 2025, but hasn't specifically mentioned railroad crossing improvements. Tesla hasn't provided a public timeline for addressing this safety issue.

Q

How common are railroad crossing fatalities?

A

267 people died at railroad crossings in 2024, according to the Federal Railroad Administration. The agency doesn't track vehicle makes or autonomous software involvement in these incidents.

Q

Could this affect Tesla's robotaxi expansion plans?

A

Potentially. Tesla robotaxis are operating in Austin with plans to expand nationwide. The inability to safely handle railroad crossings could delay or limit expansion, especially since unsupervised robotaxis can't rely on human intervention.

Related Tools & Recommendations

compare
Recommended

AI Coding Assistants 2025 Pricing Breakdown - What You'll Actually Pay

GitHub Copilot vs Cursor vs Claude Code vs Tabnine vs Amazon Q Developer: The Real Cost Analysis

GitHub Copilot
/compare/github-copilot/cursor/claude-code/tabnine/amazon-q-developer/ai-coding-assistants-2025-pricing-breakdown
100%
integration
Recommended

I've Been Juggling Copilot, Cursor, and Windsurf for 8 Months

Here's What Actually Works (And What Doesn't)

GitHub Copilot
/integration/github-copilot-cursor-windsurf/workflow-integration-patterns
53%
tool
Recommended

Zapier - Connect Your Apps Without Coding (Usually)

integrates with Zapier

Zapier
/tool/zapier/overview
44%
tool
Recommended

Microsoft Copilot Studio - Chatbot Builder That Usually Doesn't Suck

competes with Microsoft Copilot Studio

Microsoft Copilot Studio
/tool/microsoft-copilot-studio/overview
43%
compare
Recommended

I Tried All 4 Major AI Coding Tools - Here's What Actually Works

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Claude Code vs Windsurf: Real Talk From Someone Who's Used Them All

Cursor
/compare/cursor/claude-code/ai-coding-assistants/ai-coding-assistants-comparison
42%
pricing
Recommended

AI API Pricing Reality Check: What These Models Actually Cost

No bullshit breakdown of Claude, OpenAI, and Gemini API costs from someone who's been burned by surprise bills

Claude
/pricing/claude-vs-openai-vs-gemini-api/api-pricing-comparison
33%
tool
Recommended

Gemini CLI - Google's AI CLI That Doesn't Completely Suck

Google's AI CLI tool. 60 requests/min, free. For now.

Gemini CLI
/tool/gemini-cli/overview
33%
tool
Recommended

Gemini - Google's Multimodal AI That Actually Works

competes with Google Gemini

Google Gemini
/tool/gemini/overview
33%
review
Recommended

Zapier Enterprise Review - Is It Worth the Insane Cost?

I've been running Zapier Enterprise for 18 months. Here's what actually works (and what will destroy your budget)

Zapier
/review/zapier/enterprise-review
32%
integration
Recommended

Claude Can Finally Do Shit Besides Talk

Stop copying outputs into other apps manually - Claude talks to Zapier now

Anthropic Claude
/integration/claude-zapier/mcp-integration-overview
32%
tool
Recommended

I Burned $400+ Testing AI Tools So You Don't Have To

Stop wasting money - here's which AI doesn't suck in 2025

Perplexity AI
/tool/perplexity-ai/comparison-guide
30%
tool
Recommended

Perplexity Pro - $20/Month to Escape Search Limit Hell

Stop rationing searches like it's the fucking apocalypse - get multiple AI models and upload PDFs without hitting artificial limits

Perplexity Pro
/tool/perplexity-pro/overview
30%
news
Recommended

Perplexity AI Got Caught Red-Handed Stealing Japanese News Content

Nikkei and Asahi want $30M after catching Perplexity bypassing their paywalls and robots.txt files like common pirates

Technology News Aggregation
/news/2025-08-26/perplexity-ai-copyright-lawsuit
30%
tool
Recommended

GitHub Desktop - Git with Training Wheels That Actually Work

Point-and-click your way through Git without memorizing 47 different commands

GitHub Desktop
/tool/github-desktop/overview
29%
integration
Recommended

Pinecone Production Reality: What I Learned After $3200 in Surprise Bills

Six months of debugging RAG systems in production so you don't have to make the same expensive mistakes I did

Vector Database Systems
/integration/vector-database-langchain-pinecone-production-architecture/pinecone-production-deployment
29%
integration
Recommended

Making LangChain, LlamaIndex, and CrewAI Work Together Without Losing Your Mind

A Real Developer's Guide to Multi-Framework Integration Hell

LangChain
/integration/langchain-llamaindex-crewai/multi-agent-integration-architecture
28%
news
Recommended

Meta Got Caught Making Fake Taylor Swift Chatbots - August 30, 2025

Because apparently someone thought flirty AI celebrities couldn't possibly go wrong

NVIDIA GPUs
/news/2025-08-30/meta-ai-chatbot-scandal
28%
news
Recommended

Meta Restructures AI Operations Into Four Teams as Zuckerberg Pursues "Personal Superintelligence"

CEO Mark Zuckerberg reorganizes Meta Superintelligence Labs with $100M+ executive hires to accelerate AI agent development

GitHub Copilot
/news/2025-08-23/meta-ai-restructuring
28%
news
Recommended

Meta Begs Google for AI Help After $36B Metaverse Flop

Zuckerberg Paying Competitors for AI He Should've Built

Samsung Galaxy Devices
/news/2025-08-31/meta-ai-partnerships
28%
tool
Recommended

Google Cloud SQL - Database Hosting That Doesn't Require a DBA

MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server hosting where Google handles the maintenance bullshit

Google Cloud SQL
/tool/google-cloud-sql/overview
26%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization