Currently viewing the human version
Switch to AI version

What These Platforms Actually Do When You Use Them for Real

Tutorials lie. Every platform works great in demos with clean test data and zero edge cases. Here's what happens when you throw real users, messy data, and production traffic at them.

Supabase Logo

Supabase: PostgreSQL with Training Wheels

Supabase is PostgreSQL with auto-generated APIs and real-time subscriptions. If you know SQL, you'll feel at home. If you don't, get ready to learn or watch your app crawl.

Getting started is actually nice: The JavaScript client generates TypeScript types from your database schema. Your IDE autocompletes field names instead of you guessing what exists. This alone beats Firebase's "cross your fingers and hope" approach to data types.

Row Level Security will break your brain: Row Level Security policies control who sees what at the database level. Writing (auth.uid() = user_id) looks simple until you need complex permissions with table joins. I spent 6 hours debugging why users couldn't see their own posts - turned out my RLS policy had a typo in the table reference. The error messages don't help: "permission denied" could mean anything.

SQL is both blessing and curse: Complex queries work because it's actual PostgreSQL. Want to join five tables and aggregate by date? No problem. Need full-text search? Built in. The catch: you need to know SQL performance tuning or your queries will run like garbage. I've seen developers write queries that scan entire tables because they forgot to add indexes. Supabase doesn't hold your hand here - you get rope to either pull yourself up or hang yourself with.

Firebase: Great for Mobile, Weird for Everything Else

Firebase Logo

Firebase is Google's attempt to make backend development painless for mobile apps. It succeeds brilliantly until you try to do anything that doesn't fit their narrow vision.

Authentication just works: Firebase Auth handles OAuth, email/password, phone auth, and all the edge cases you forgot about. No implementing password reset flows, no dealing with JWT token refresh. It's genuinely good, which makes the rest more frustrating.

Query limitations will drive you insane: Firestore forces you to think in documents, not relationships. Want to filter users by age AND location? Create a composite index first. Need to show posts with their author's name? Either duplicate author data in every post document or make separate queries and combine them in your app. Coming from SQL, this feels like programming with your hands tied.

Billing surprises are real: Firebase charges per read/write operation. That real-time listener updating every second? Each update counts. I've seen bills jump from $20 to $400 because someone left a listener running on a busy collection. The worst part: no spend caps. Your app can literally bankrupt itself while you sleep.

The NoSQL mind-shift: If you're used to normalized databases, Firestore requires you to duplicate data everywhere. User changes their profile pic? Now you need to update it in posts, comments, and user documents. Miss one update, and your data is inconsistent. There's no CASCADE UPDATE to save you.

AWS Amplify: Enterprise Power with Enterprise Complexity

AWS Amplify connects you to Amazon's entire service catalog. If you love complexity and have AWS experts on your team, it's incredibly powerful. If you're new to AWS, prepare to hate your life for a few months.

Configuration nightmare: Run amplify init and watch it generate 47 CloudFormation files for what should be a simple API. The CLI creates IAM roles with names like amplify-todoapp-dev-20210301-authRole-1ABCD2EFGH. Good luck figuring out what anything does when something breaks. I spent two days debugging why my Lambda couldn't read from DynamoDB - turned out the auto-generated IAM policy had a typo in the resource ARN.

Scaling is genuinely impressive: When properly configured, Lambda functions handle traffic spikes flawlessly, DynamoDB serves millions of requests per second, and CloudFront caches your content globally. The integration between services is seamless - once you understand how the 47 moving parts work together.

Debugging is AWS hell: Error messages reference internal AWS states, not your application. "Deployment failed" could mean anything: CloudFormation rollback, service quota exceeded, IAM permission denied, or Lambda timeout. You'll become an expert at reading CloudWatch logs whether you want to or not. The debugging process assumes you know AWS's 200+ services and how they interact.

Appwrite: Self-Hosted Backend Services

Appwrite Logo

Appwrite gives you Firebase-like features without the vendor lock-in. You own your data and infrastructure, which means you also own every 3am outage and security patch.

Local development is smooth: Run docker-compose up and you get a complete backend stack - database, auth, storage, functions, everything. The Docker setup actually works, which is more than I can say for most self-hosted solutions. Development feels fast and reliable because everything runs locally.

SDKs are surprisingly consistent: Unlike Firebase where iOS, Android, and web SDKs all work differently, Appwrite's SDKs use identical patterns across platforms. Create a user, upload a file, query documents - same code structure everywhere. This is genuinely nice when you're context-switching between frontend and mobile.

You're the ops team now: Self-hosting means you handle SSL certificate renewals, database backups, security updates, load balancing, monitoring, log rotation, and disaster recovery. When Redis runs out of memory at 2am, you're the one getting paged. When the disk fills up with logs, that's your problem. The flip side: when something breaks, you can SSH in and fix it instead of filing a support ticket and hoping.

Multi-Developer Reality Check

Here's what actually happens when you're not working alone anymore and suddenly need to coordinate with other humans who have their own ideas about how databases should work.

Schema changes expose team chaos: Supabase handles schema changes like a real database - with migrations you can review in pull requests. Firebase's "just change the structure whenever" approach works until Sarah from frontend renames userId to user_id and breaks the mobile app. Nobody knows what fields exist because there's no schema to check. Good luck finding all the places that reference the old field name.

Environment hell is real: AWS Amplify gives you proper staging environments that actually match production - if you can decode the CloudFormation. Firebase's environments are "production" and "production-with-fewer-users." Appwrite lets you spin up unlimited environments, but you're manually configuring SSL certs and load balancers for each one. At 11pm. Because the deployment pipeline broke again.

Testing reveals the lies: Supabase's PostgreSQL lets you test complex queries locally with real data. Firebase's emulator suite pretends to work like production but real-time listeners randomly disconnect in ways that never happen locally. AWS testing means learning which of their 47 testing services actually matter - spoiler: most don't.

When your team grows past "two people who sit next to each other," these platform differences become the reason deploys take three hours and everyone's stressed. The tools that felt clever with one developer become coordination nightmares with five.

Developer Experience Comparison Matrix

What You'll Experience

Supabase

Firebase

AWS Amplify

Appwrite

First day productivity

Fast if you know SQL, painful otherwise

Incredibly fast for mobile, weird for web

Prepare for 2 weeks of setup hell

Works in 30 minutes but you're configuring servers

When shit breaks

Can see actual SQL queries and fix them

Black box debugging, good luck

CloudWatch logs that make no sense

SSH into the server and figure it out

TypeScript experience

Types generated from your schema

  • actually works

Decent but you're crossing your fingers on nested data

Types exist but buried in AWS complexity

Strong types that actually help

Local development

Docker stack that works

Emulator that lies about how production behaves

Complex setup that breaks constantly

Full local control, runs like production

Team onboarding

Fast if they know databases

Mobile devs love it, backend devs confused

Slow unless they already know AWS

Medium learning curve but consistent

Production debugging

Standard PostgreSQL tools work

Firebase console shows pretty graphs, not actual problems

Welcome to CloudWatch hell

Full server access when things break

Adding team members

SQL migrations in version control

Hope everyone follows the naming conventions

Infrastructure as code (when it works)

Manual server setup for each environment

Production Scaling and Operations Reality

Production Monitoring Dashboard

What Changes When You Have Real Users

Development environments with clean test data don't reveal platform limitations. Production workloads with concurrent users, large file uploads, complex queries, and traffic spikes expose different challenges for each platform.

AWS Amplify Logo

Supabase: PostgreSQL Performance Patterns

Predictable scaling: Supabase performance follows standard PostgreSQL patterns. Slow queries show up in logs with execution plans, connection pool limits cause predictable bottlenecks, and standard database optimization techniques apply.

Connection management: The connection pool has finite limits that become apparent under load. PgBouncer helps manage connections efficiently, and standard PostgreSQL monitoring tools work for capacity planning.

Query debugging: EXPLAIN ANALYZE works normally for performance analysis. The Supabase dashboard identifies slow queries, and direct PostgreSQL connections allow standard database administration tools like pgAdmin.

Compliance features: SOC 2 certification and GDPR compliance features handle common enterprise requirements. Multi-region deployments incur additional costs but provide clear pricing structures.

Firebase: Automatic Scaling with Limited Visibility

Hands-off scaling: Firebase handles traffic increases automatically with global replication and caching. Applications remain responsive during traffic spikes without manual intervention. Usage-based billing means costs scale with success.

Limited optimization control: Firestore query optimization happens behind the scenes. Performance issues require restructuring data models rather than tuning database queries. The platform abstracts away database internals.

Troubleshooting constraints: The Firebase console provides high-level metrics but limited detailed diagnostics. Performance debugging relies on Firebase-specific patterns and community knowledge rather than standard database troubleshooting techniques.

Enterprise integration: Firebase enterprise features handle many compliance requirements, but integrating with existing enterprise systems often requires custom middleware. The cloud-native approach may not align with all enterprise data residency requirements.

AWS Amplify: Full AWS Service Integration

For teams already using AWS services, Amplify provides seamless integration with CloudFront CDN, RDS databases, and Lambda functions. The comprehensive service catalog requires understanding AWS architecture patterns.

Configuration complexity: CloudFormation templates manage infrastructure automatically but debugging failed deployments requires AWS expertise. Error messages often reference internal AWS states rather than application-level issues.

Production advantages: Auto-scaling works reliably across services, inter-AWS data transfers cost less than external transfers, and CloudWatch provides comprehensive monitoring. The platform handles enterprise requirements like compliance and availability zones effectively.

Expertise requirements: IAM policies control access between services and require careful configuration. Teams need AWS knowledge for effective troubleshooting and optimization.

Appwrite: Self-Hosting Operations

Appwrite provides complete control over infrastructure and data placement through self-hosting options. Full access to logs and configuration enables customization but requires operational expertise.

Operational requirements: The Docker setup runs quickly in development environments. Production deployments require configuring load balancing, database backups, security updates, SSL certificates, and monitoring systems.

Direct control benefits: Self-hosting provides complete data residency control and customization flexibility. System logs and configurations are directly accessible for troubleshooting and optimization without vendor support dependencies.

Managed alternative: Appwrite Cloud offers hosted services for teams preferring managed infrastructure over self-hosting operational overhead, though with higher costs than self-managed deployments.

Security Model Deep Dive

Security Architecture Diagram

Each platform handles security completely differently, and the approach you choose will determine how much you hate your life when implementing authorization.

Supabase Row Level Security: PostgreSQL's native RLS provides granular, database-level access control. Policies are written in SQL and enforced at the database layer, ensuring security even if application logic is compromised. However, complex RLS policies can impact query performance and require PostgreSQL expertise.

Firebase Security Rules: Security Rules operate at the service level, providing fine-grained access control for Firestore, Storage, and Realtime Database. The declarative syntax is approachable but can become complex for intricate authorization logic. Rules are evaluated on every operation, adding latency to data access.

AWS IAM Integration: Amplify leverages AWS Identity and Access Management for comprehensive security controls. This provides enterprise-grade access management but requires understanding AWS's complex permission model. Fine-grained API access control through AWS API Gateway enables sophisticated authorization patterns.

Appwrite Permission System: Appwrite's permission system provides role-based access control with document-level permissions. The system is more straightforward than AWS IAM but less powerful than Supabase RLS for complex authorization logic.

Long-term Platform Viability

Technology Evolution Timeline

Platform longevity matters when you're building something you hope will last more than a few months.

Open source vs. proprietary lock-in: Supabase and Appwrite's open-source nature provides escape hatches if the companies change direction. Firebase and AWS Amplify require complete application rewrites for platform migration, creating significant technical debt over time.

Company backing and financial stability: Firebase benefits from Google's resources but faces potential deprecation risk given Google's history of discontinuing products. AWS Amplify enjoys Amazon's enterprise focus and long-term commitment. Supabase and Appwrite rely on venture funding and community adoption for continued development.

Technological evolution adaptation: Platforms built on standard technologies (PostgreSQL for Supabase, SQL Server compatibility for AWS) adapt more easily to changing requirements than those with proprietary architectures (Firestore's document model, Appwrite's custom APIs).

The platform choice ultimately determines not just current development velocity but the application's ability to evolve with changing business requirements and technological landscapes.

Technical Reality: What These Platforms Actually Give You

Database Reality

Supabase

Firebase

AWS Amplify

Appwrite

What you're actually using

Real PostgreSQL with all the power

NoSQL documents that force weird data patterns

DynamoDB key-value store pretending to be a database

Whatever database you want (and can configure)

Query complexity

Write SQL like a human

Write queries like a contortionist

Design around single-table patterns or suffer

SQL works normally

Data consistency

ACID transactions work

Eventually consistent means "good luck with race conditions"

Eventually consistent but with better tooling

Depends on your database choice

Joins and relationships

Normal SQL joins

Duplicate data everywhere or make multiple queries

Single-table design or multiple API calls

Normal SQL joins

Offline support

You build it yourself

Actually works automatically

You implement it manually

You build it yourself

When you need to migrate

Standard PostgreSQL dump

Complex export, pray nothing breaks

DynamoDB-specific tools, good luck

Standard database backup

Backup recovery

Point-in-time recovery (costs extra)

Automatic but you can't control timing

DynamoDB handles it

You set it up and maintain it

Frequently Asked Questions: Platform Selection Decision Points

Q

Which platform should I choose for my specific use case?

A

For rapid mobile app prototyping:

Firebase if you want to ship fast and don't mind paying later. The offline sync actually works and real-time features are bulletproof. Just set up billing alerts because it'll surprise you.For data-heavy applications: Supabase if your team knows SQL.

PostgreSQL handles complex queries and reporting without the NoSQL gymnastics. But you need actual database skills

  • this isn't a point-and-click solution.For enterprise integration: AWS Amplify if you're already drinking the AWS Kool-Aid and have someone who understands IAM policies.

Don't choose this as your first AWS service unless you enjoy pain.For maximum control (and maximum headaches): Appwrite if you want to own everything and have someone who can debug Docker containers at 3am. Great for avoiding vendor lock-in, terrible for work-life balance.

Q

How do the platforms handle sudden traffic spikes?

A

Firebase:

Scales automatically and bills you accordingly. I've seen apps go from $20/month to $400/month overnight when they hit Reddit's front page. Firebase doesn't care if you can afford it

  • it'll scale your app AND your credit card debt.Supabase: Scales compute but has spend caps that actually work.

When you hit your limit, it stops the bleeding by pausing service. Your app goes down, but you don't go bankrupt. Choose your poison: downtime or surprise bills.

AWS Amplify: Scales beautifully if you configured auto-scaling correctly.

Fails spectacularly if you didn't. The data transfer costs during traffic spikes can be brutal

  • I've seen $500 bills from a single viral day.Appwrite: Self-hosted means you're the one getting paged when your server runs out of memory. The cloud version scales but costs more than the others. At least when it breaks, you can SSH in and fix it instead of filing a support ticket.
Q

What's the real learning curve for each platform?

A

Junior developers (0-2 years experience):

  • Firebase:

Quick for basic features, mobile-first approach is intuitive

  • Supabase: Moderate if SQL knowledge exists, longer otherwise
  • AWS Amplify:

Steep learning curve, requires understanding distributed systems

  • Appwrite: Moderate plus Docker/infrastructure knowledgeMid-level developers (2-5 years experience):

  • Firebase:

Quick for core features, Firestore query patterns take longer

  • Supabase: Moderate including Row Level Security mastery
  • AWS Amplify:

Varies significantly depending on AWS familiarity

  • Appwrite: Quick for development, longer for production deploymentSenior developers (5+ years experience):

  • Firebase:

Quick for implementation, ongoing cost optimization challenges

  • Supabase: Quick including advanced PostgreSQL features
  • AWS Amplify:

Moderate for full ecosystem utilization

  • Appwrite: Quick development, additional time for infrastructure design
Q

Which platform has the best debugging experience?

A

Supabase: Superior debugging with direct SQL access, standard PostgreSQL logging, and transparent error messages. Can use familiar database tools like pgAdmin.Firebase: Limited debugging capabilities. Real-time issues are particularly difficult to trace. Firebase console provides basic metrics but lacks detailed error analysis.AWS Amplify: Complex debugging requiring CloudWatch expertise and understanding of distributed AWS services. Powerful but requires significant operational knowledge.Appwrite: Full system access enables comprehensive debugging. Self-hosted nature provides complete visibility into all system components and logs.

Q

How do migration paths work between platforms?

A

Migrating FROM Firebase:

  • To Supabase:

Complex data restructuring from documents to relational tables

  • To AWS Amplify: Moderate complexity, mainly API endpoint changes
  • To Appwrite:

Difficult due to different API patternsMigrating FROM Supabase:

  • To Firebase:

Data model conversion from relational to documents

  • To AWS Amplify: Moderate with PostgreSQL to DynamoDB conversion
  • To Appwrite:

Easier due to SQL compatibilityMigrating FROM AWS Amplify:

  • To Firebase:

Complex due to DynamoDB to Firestore conversion

  • To Supabase: Moderate complexity, DynamoDB to PostgreSQL
  • To Appwrite:

Difficult due to AWS service dependenciesMigrating FROM Appwrite:

  • To any platform: Relatively easier due to standard SQL and API patterns
Q

What are the hidden costs and gotchas that'll wreck your budget?

A

Supabase gotchas that hurt:

  • Point-in-time recovery costs extra
  • found this out when I needed to restore corrupted data and got hit with a $150 recovery fee
  • The jump from $25 to $599 team plan has no middle ground.

Your choice: outgrow the starter plan or pay enterprise prices

  • CPU-intensive operations burn through compute units fast.

Image processing killed my budget in 2 days

  • Their "unlimited" APIs have soft limits that throttle real appsFirebase billing nightmares:

  • Real-time listeners with memory leaks cost me $400 in one month.

A single forgotten unsubscribe() call in React destroyed my budget

  • Document reads multiply fast

  • each item in an array counts separately. Showing a list of 100 posts? That's 100 reads every time someone refreshes

  • No spend caps. Your app can literally spend your rent money while you're sleeping

  • SMS auth costs vary wildly by country. Test users in expensive regions killed my free creditsAWS Amplify cost traps:

  • Data transfer between regions adds up fast.

Moving 1TB of data between us-east-1 and eu-west-1 cost $90 I didn't budget for

  • CloudWatch logs with debug enabled in production cost $200/month before I noticed
  • NAT Gateway fees: $45/month per availability zone just to exist.

Nobody mentions this in tutorials

  • Learning curve extends projects. What should take 2 weeks takes 2 months. Time is moneyAppwrite operational reality:

  • SSL certificate renewals broke our app at 3am on a Sunday. LetsEncrypt expired and took the site down

  • Database backups grew to 500GB over 6 months. S3 storage costs crept up to $50/month

  • Self-hosting needs dedicated monitoring or you find out about outages from angry users

  • Hiring someone who can manage Docker in production costs more than paying Firebase's bills

Q

Which platform offers the best long-term viability?

A

Firebase:

Google has deep pockets but also kills products regularly. Remember Google Reader? Google+? Firebase could get the axe if it doesn't make enough money. The proprietary APIs mean migration would be hell.Supabase: Open-source means if the company disappears, you can fork it and keep running.

PostgreSQL isn't going anywhere

  • it's been around for 25+ years and will outlive us all.AWS Amplify: Amazon won't kill this
  • too much enterprise money involved.

But you're locked into AWS's ecosystem. If you want to move to Google Cloud in 5 years, good luck rewriting everything.Appwrite: Small company means higher risk of failure, but open-source means you can self-host forever. If they go under tomorrow, your app keeps running. That's not true for the others.

Q

How do the platforms compare for team collaboration?

A

Database schema collaboration:

  • Supabase:

Excellent with SQL migrations and version control integration

  • Firebase: Challenging due to schema-less nature and limited collaboration tools
  • AWS Amplify:

Good with CloudFormation infrastructure as code

  • Appwrite: Moderate with configuration file managementDevelopment environment consistency:

  • Supabase:

Good local development with Docker stack

  • Firebase: Limited with emulator suite that doesn't match production exactly
  • AWS Amplify:

Complex local setup but comprehensive when configured

  • Appwrite: Excellent with identical local and production environmentsCode review and deployment:

  • Supabase:

Standard Git workflows with database migration reviews

  • Firebase: Limited infrastructure review capabilities
  • AWS Amplify:

Comprehensive CI/CD with infrastructure change reviews

  • Appwrite: Custom deployment pipeline setup required
Q

What's the reality of "vendor lock-in" for each platform?

A

Most locked-in:

Firebase

  • You'll rewrite everything. Their APIs are completely proprietary and the NoSQL data structure won't transfer anywhere else cleanly.Moderately locked-in: AWS Amplify
  • You're married to AWS services, but at least IAM and DynamoDB patterns exist elsewhere.

Migration is painful but possible.Minimally locked-in: Supabase

  • It's Postgre

SQL underneath, so your data exports cleanly.

Some auth and real-time features are proprietary, but the core is standard.Least locked-in: Appwrite

  • Open source and self-hostable means you can literally take the code and run.

Your data is in standard databases using standard APIs.Real talk: If you're successful enough that vendor lock-in matters, you're successful enough to afford migration costs. Most apps die before vendor lock-in becomes a real problem.

Resources That Actually Help When You're Stuck

Related Tools & Recommendations

integration
Recommended

Supabase + Next.js + Stripe: How to Actually Make This Work

The least broken way to handle auth and payments (until it isn't)

Supabase
/integration/supabase-nextjs-stripe-authentication/customer-auth-payment-flow
100%
integration
Recommended

Stop Stripe from Destroying Your Serverless Performance

Cold starts are killing your payments, webhooks are timing out randomly, and your users think your checkout is broken. Here's how to fix the mess.

Stripe
/integration/stripe-nextjs-app-router/serverless-performance-optimization
67%
compare
Recommended

Flutter vs React Native vs Kotlin Multiplatform: Which One Won't Destroy Your Sanity?

The Real Question: Which Framework Actually Ships Apps Without Breaking?

Flutter
/compare/flutter-react-native-kotlin-multiplatform/cross-platform-framework-comparison
59%
compare
Recommended

Supabase vs Firebase vs Appwrite vs PocketBase - Which Backend Won't Fuck You Over

I've Debugged All Four at 3am - Here's What You Need to Know

Supabase
/compare/supabase/firebase/appwrite/pocketbase/backend-service-comparison
55%
integration
Recommended

Stripe Terminal React Native Production Integration Guide

Don't Let Beta Software Ruin Your Weekend: A Reality Check for Card Reader Integration

Stripe Terminal
/integration/stripe-terminal-react-native/production-deployment-guide
48%
integration
Recommended

Claude API + Next.js App Router: What Actually Works in Production

I've been fighting with Claude API and Next.js App Router for 8 months. Here's what actually works, what breaks spectacularly, and how to avoid the gotchas that

Claude API
/integration/claude-api-nextjs-app-router/app-router-integration
47%
howto
Recommended

Converting Angular to React: What Actually Happens When You Migrate

Based on 3 failed attempts and 1 that worked

Angular
/howto/convert-angular-app-react/complete-migration-guide
47%
news
Recommended

Major npm Supply Chain Attack Hits 18 Popular Packages

Vercel responds to cryptocurrency theft attack targeting developers

OpenAI GPT
/news/2025-09-08/vercel-npm-supply-chain-attack
42%
pricing
Recommended

Edge Computing's Dirty Little Billing Secrets

The gotchas, surprise charges, and "wait, what the fuck?" moments that'll wreck your budget

vercel
/pricing/cloudflare-aws-vercel/hidden-costs-billing-gotchas
42%
news
Recommended

Vercel AI SDK 5.0 Drops With Breaking Changes - 2025-09-07

Deprecated APIs finally get the axe, Zod 4 support arrives

Microsoft Copilot
/news/2025-09-07/vercel-ai-sdk-5-breaking-changes
42%
alternatives
Recommended

Firebase Alternatives That Don't Suck - Real Options for 2025

Your Firebase bills are killing your budget. Here are the alternatives that actually work.

Firebase
/alternatives/firebase/best-firebase-alternatives
40%
alternatives
Recommended

Firebase Alternatives That Don't Suck (September 2025)

Stop burning money and getting locked into Google's ecosystem - here's what actually works after I've migrated a bunch of production apps over the past couple y

Firebase
/alternatives/firebase/decision-framework
40%
review
Recommended

Supabase vs Firebase Enterprise: The CTO's Decision Framework

Making the $500K+ Backend Choice That Won't Tank Your Roadmap

Supabase
/review/supabase-vs-firebase-enterprise/enterprise-decision-framework
40%
tool
Recommended

Fix Flutter Performance Issues That Actually Matter in Production

Stop guessing why your app is slow. Debug frame drops, memory leaks, and rebuild hell with tools that work.

Flutter
/tool/flutter/performance-optimization
37%
compare
Recommended

Tauri vs Electron vs Flutter Desktop - Which One Doesn't Suck?

integrates with Tauri

Tauri
/compare/tauri/electron/flutter-desktop/desktop-framework-comparison
37%
tool
Recommended

Supabase - PostgreSQL with Bells and Whistles

competes with Supabase

Supabase
/tool/supabase/overview
37%
tool
Recommended

Supabase Auth: PostgreSQL-Based Authentication

competes with Supabase Auth

Supabase Auth
/tool/supabase-auth/authentication-guide
37%
review
Recommended

Which JavaScript Runtime Won't Make You Hate Your Life

Two years of runtime fuckery later, here's the truth nobody tells you

Bun
/review/bun-nodejs-deno-comparison/production-readiness-assessment
36%
compare
Recommended

Bun vs Deno vs Node.js: Which Runtime Won't Ruin Your Weekend

built on Bun

Bun
/compare/bun/deno/nodejs/performance-battle
36%
tool
Recommended

PocketBase - SQLite Backend That Actually Works

Single-File Backend for Prototypes and Small Apps

PocketBase
/tool/pocketbase/overview
33%

Recommendations combine user behavior, content similarity, research intelligence, and SEO optimization