Railway - Because Vercel's Bills Are Insane
Takes about an hour to migrate | Best for: Teams sick of bandwidth surprises
Railway feels familiar if you're coming from Vercel. Same Git-push-deploy workflow, same preview deployments for PRs, but without the "gotcha" pricing that ruins your month. Check their GitHub integration docs and deployment guide for the complete setup process.
What makes it not suck:
- No bandwidth charges (finally)
- Database included (no more external Postgres bills)
- Preview deployments work like Vercel's
- Starts at $5/month instead of "free until we bankrupt you"
The one big problem:
No automatic image optimization like Vercel. You'll need to move your images to Cloudinary or deal with manual next/image
configuration. This broke our site for 2 hours until we figured it out.
Fun fact: Railway times out builds at 10 minutes. Found this out during a production deploy at midnight because their docs buried this detail in some random FAQ.
Real migration story:
"Moved our SaaS after a $200 bill for 50GB of bandwidth. Railway costs me $30/month total, including the database. Should have switched months ago." - Developer testimonial from community discussions
Render - When You Need Backend Too
Migration takes longer because you actually have to understand what the fuck you're deploying | Best for: Full-stack apps that actually need servers
Render is basically "Heroku that doesn't suck" but handles frontend deployment fine too. If your Vercel app needs a real database or background jobs, Render means you don't need 3 different platforms. Their static site hosting and web service deployment guides cover most use cases.
Why it works:
- Git deployments just like Vercel
- Preview environments for PRs
- Databases included - no more Planetscale bills
- Background jobs actually work (unlike Vercel's pretend serverless)
The real cost:
Free tier for static sites forever. Web services cost $7/month. Databases another $7/month. So $14/month total vs Vercel's $20+ before bandwidth kicks your ass.
What sucks:
Builds are way slower than Vercel, like 3x longer. Also, no Edge Functions, so you'll need to rewrite those as normal API routes. Render Postgres needs connection pooling or you'll get ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:5432
errors in production - learned this the hard way during a traffic spike.
Render vs Vercel comparison shows they're pretty honest about trade-offs, unlike most marketing bullshit.
Netlify - For When You Don't Need Server-Side Bullshit
Takes the longest to migrate | Best for: Static sites that got expensive on Vercel
Netlify invented this whole Git-to-CDN thing before Vercel made it sexy. For static sites and simple SPAs, Netlify often loads faster than Vercel and costs way less. Their build configuration and edge network documentation is actually useful.
What works great:
- Branch deployments identical to Vercel
- Forms work without API routes (actually useful)
- Functions handle simple serverless stuff
- 100GB bandwidth free vs Vercel's bandwidth trap
The honest truth:
Next.js on Netlify works but you lose SSR performance. It's fine for marketing sites and blogs, not great for apps that need real server-side rendering.
Perfect for:
Agencies running 10+ client sites where Vercel's per-site costs are brutal. One Netlify Pro plan ($19/month) can handle multiple sites that would cost $200+ on Vercel.
Migration reality:
You'll spend time reconfiguring builds and dealing with Netlify's Next.js plugin. Worth it if bandwidth costs are killing you. Your team will hate the new workflow for exactly 1 week, then forget Vercel exists.