Codejet - AI-Optimized Technical Reference

Configuration

Settings That Actually Work in Production

• Export Limits: Maximum 3-5 components per batch (tool crashes beyond this threshold)
• Component Complexity: Simple grid layouts only - overlapping elements cause positioning failures
• Framework Compatibility: React 18 + Node 18 + TypeScript (with extensive cleanup required)
• Recommended Pre-Export Setup: Use Jet UI components when possible - they export with fewer errors

Common Failure Modes and Solutions

• Plugin Crashes: Occurs every 15-20 exports - requires Figma restart
• Export Failures: Silent failures with eternal loading - simplify design complexity
• Mobile Breakpoint Failures: Generated media queries work in Chrome preview but fail on actual mobile devices
• TypeScript Errors: All interfaces default to any type - requires complete retyping for production use

Resource Requirements

Real Time and Expertise Costs

• Cleanup Time: 30-50% of normal coding time required post-generation
• Simple Button Component: 15 minutes saved, 30 minutes cleanup = net time loss
• Landing Page Hero: 2 hours saved, 1 hour cleanup = net time gain
• Complex Form: 4 hours "saved", 6+ hours fixing = significant net loss
• Debugging Time: 3-4 hours typical for "simple" components due to poor variable naming and structure

Decision Criteria for Alternatives

• Use Codejet When: Landing pages, marketing sites, throwaway prototypes, basic component scaffolding
• Avoid When: Pixel-perfect requirements, complex interactions, accessibility compliance, production applications
• Break-Even Point: Components with 5+ interactive elements require more cleanup time than manual coding

Expertise Requirements

• Minimum Skill Level: Senior developer required for cleanup - junior developers will struggle with generated anti-patterns
• Required Knowledge: React patterns, TypeScript strict mode, CSS debugging, mobile responsive design
• Team Overhead: All generated code requires experienced review before production deployment

Critical Warnings

What Official Documentation Doesn't Tell You

• Business Continuity Risk: Company pivoting to mysite.ai - estimated 12-18 months before service discontinuation
• One-Way Process: Cannot re-export after modifications - all design updates require manual implementation
• Support Quality: Bug reports sit unresolved for weeks, generic responses about focusing on new product
• Pricing Instability: Inconsistent pricing across sources ($12-$39/month range) indicates business model uncertainty

Breaking Points and Failure Modes

• Mobile Compatibility: Responsive breakpoints fail on Safari mobile despite working in Chrome desktop preview
• TypeScript Strict Mode: 20+ errors per simple component when strict mode enabled
• ESLint Compliance: 23+ violations per button component with standard React ESLint configuration
• Bundle Size Impact: No optimization, lazy loading, or code splitting - manual implementation required
• Security Vulnerabilities: No form validation, weak prop types, unsafe input handling

Performance Thresholds with Real-World Impact

• Plugin Stability: Crashes after 15-20 exports, requires Figma restart
• Component Complexity Limit: 5+ interactive elements = cleanup time exceeds manual coding time
• CSS Specificity Wars: Generated z-index: 999 throughout codebase causes maintenance nightmares
• Variable Naming: component1, container2 naming convention makes debugging 3-4x slower

Technical Specifications

Code Quality Output Analysis

Aspect	Generated Quality	Production Readiness	Cleanup Required
Component Structure	Decent (uses Flexbox)	60% ready	2-3 hours
TypeScript Interfaces	Poor (all any types)	10% ready	Complete rewrite
CSS Responsive Design	Broken on mobile	30% ready	4-6 hours
React Patterns	Anti-patterns throughout	20% ready	3-5 hours
Accessibility	Non-existent	0% ready	Build from scratch
Event Handlers	Console.log placeholders	0% ready	Complete implementation

Integration Compatibility Matrix

Build Tool	Compatibility	Issues	Workaround Required
Create React App	Works	ESLint violations	Configure custom rules
Next.js	Works	Bundle warnings	Manual optimization
Vite	Works	Import errors	Fix path resolution
TypeScript Strict	Fails	All interface types	Complete retyping
Storybook	Manual	No documentation	Write all stories

Error Patterns and Root Causes

• TypeError: Cannot read property 'children' of undefined: Plugin fails on empty Figma frames
• Mobile Layout Collapse: Generated media queries use incorrect viewport units
• Z-Index Conflicts: Every element gets z-index: 999 causing stacking context issues
• Event Handler Failures: Generated onClick handlers are placeholder functions
• Form Validation Missing: No input sanitization or validation logic generated

Competitive Analysis

Tool Comparison Matrix

Tool	Monthly Cost	Code Quality	Stability Risk	Time Savings
Codejet	$15-39	Requires cleanup	High (pivoting)	Break-even only
Builder.io	$25-299	Production-ready	Low	Significant
Anima	Free-$39	Limited scope	Low	Prototyping only
Manual Coding	Developer time	Complete control	None	N/A

Decision Framework

IF project_type == "landing_page" AND deadline < 1_week:
    CONSIDER Codejet
ELIF accessibility_required OR pixel_perfect_required:
    AVOID Codejet
ELIF team_experience < "senior_level":
    AVOID Codejet (cleanup complexity)
ELIF business_continuity_critical:
    AVOID Codejet (company pivoting)
ELSE:
    USE manual_coding OR Builder.io

Implementation Workflow

Pre-Export Risk Mitigation

1. Design Simplification: Remove overlapping elements, complex animations
2. Version Control: Create feature branch, never export to main
3. Expectation Setting: Budget 2x normal development time for cleanup
4. Fallback Planning: Keep manual coding option ready for complex components

Post-Export Cleanup Checklist

1. Immediate Actions (0-30 minutes):

   • Commit raw generated code before modifications
   • Verify compilation and basic functionality
   • Run TypeScript in strict mode to identify errors

2. Essential Fixes (30-120 minutes):

   • Rename all variables from component1 to meaningful names
   • Replace any types with proper TypeScript interfaces
   • Fix mobile responsive breakpoints and test on real devices
   • Implement proper event handlers replacing console.log placeholders

3. Production Readiness (120-240 minutes):

   • Add accessibility attributes and keyboard navigation
   • Implement proper error handling and form validation
   • Add hover states and focus indicators
   • Write unit tests and documentation

Quality Gates

• TypeScript Strict Mode: Must pass without errors
• Mobile Testing: Must function on iOS Safari and Android Chrome
• ESLint Compliance: Must pass with team's standard React rules
• Accessibility Audit: Must meet WCAG 2.1 AA standards
• Performance Budget: Must not exceed 50kb bundle size increase

Risk Assessment

Business Continuity Risks

• Service Discontinuation: High probability within 12-18 months based on company pivot
• Support Degradation: Already experiencing delayed responses and generic replies
• Feature Development: No major updates since early 2024, maintenance mode only
• Migration Cost: Generated code cannot be re-exported, requiring manual maintenance forever

Technical Debt Accumulation

• Code Quality Degradation: Anti-patterns compound over time without proper refactoring
• Maintenance Burden: Poor variable naming and structure increases debugging time exponentially
• Security Vulnerabilities: Weak typing and validation create attack vectors
• Team Knowledge Gaps: Cleanup complexity requires senior developer involvement

Recommended Risk Mitigation

1. Usage Limitation: Restrict to non-critical marketing pages and prototypes only
2. Documentation Requirements: Mandate comprehensive cleanup documentation for all generated components
3. Exit Strategy: Plan manual coding capability for when service discontinues
4. Quality Standards: Implement mandatory code review for all generated components before production deployment

Conclusion

Viability Score: 3/10 for Production Use

Codejet provides marginal time savings for simple marketing components but introduces significant technical debt and business continuity risks. The tool's value proposition is undermined by extensive cleanup requirements, poor code quality, and the company's pivot away from the product.

Recommendation: Use only for throwaway prototypes and simple landing pages where "good enough" genuinely suffices. For any production application or component that requires maintenance, manual coding or Builder.io provide better long-term value despite higher upfront investment.