The Real Fluentd Specs (No Marketing Bullshit)

What You Actually Care About

Reality Check

Latest Version

v1.19.0 (July 30th release)

  • seems stable so far

License

Apache 2.0

  • use it however you want

Language

Ruby (yes, really) with some C bits for performance

Performance

Few thousand events/sec in practice, depends on your setup

Memory Usage

Starts light, grows with workload

  • keep an eye on it

Platforms

Runs on everything, works best on Linux

Plugin Situation

Tons of plugins, most work, some are abandoned

Data Sources

Handles logs from anywhere

  • files, HTTP, databases, whatever

Outputs

Ships to Elasticsearch, S3, Kafka, basically everything you'd want

Stability

Been around since 2011, pretty solid at this point

Who Uses It

Microsoft, AWS, etc.

  • big companies that know what they're doing

Scale

People run it on thousands of servers without major issues

The Questions You Actually Have (And Honest Answers)

Q

Why the hell is Fluentd written in Ruby?

A

Because it was 2011 and Ruby was hot shit back then. The good news is it actually works fine

  • the Ruby runtime handles I/O well and most performance-critical parts are written in C. The bad news is Ruby's GIL limits concurrent processing, so you'll hit throughput walls faster than with Go-based alternatives.
Q

Does Fluentd break often in production?

A

Not really. I've been running it for years and it's pretty stable. The most common fuckup is config syntax errors

  • spent 2 hours debugging a missing comma once. Buffer overflow happens when Elasticsearch goes to shit and can't keep up. Memory leaks are rare but the S3 plugin had one that took us a week to track down.
Q

Is 40MB RAM usage actually realistic?

A

For basic log forwarding, maybe. But once you add regex parsing and JSON transformations, it balloons fast. I've seen 300MB+ in production with heavy processing. That "40MB" number is complete marketing bullshit. Budget at least 100MB if you're not just doing simple forwarding.

Q

Will Fluentd handle my scale?

A

Depends what you mean by scale. We push maybe 3-4K events/sec per instance before things get unhappy. Hit 8K once during a traffic spike and lost logs for 20 minutes until buffers caught up. Multi-process helps but adds complexity. Usually easier to just run more instances.

Q

What breaks when upgrading versions?

A

Plugin compatibility is the main issue. Some plugins break between major versions or get abandoned. Always test in staging first. The recent v1.19.0 upgrade went mostly smooth but one of our regex filter plugins shit the bed and we had to rollback. Check your specific plugins.

Q

Should I use this over Logstash?

A

If you're memory-constrained or need simple log routing, yes. If you need heavy data transformation or you're already in the Elastic ecosystem, probably stick with Logstash. Fluentd is the middle ground

  • more capable than Fluent Bit but less resource-hungry than Logstash.

What Fluentd Actually Does (And Why You'd Want It)

Fluentd Architecture

I've been running Fluentd in production since 2019, and it's basically a log router that doesn't suck. It reads logs from wherever they are, transforms them if needed, and ships them to whatever storage you want. The killer feature is that it treats everything as JSON streams, which means you can process logs consistently instead of fighting regex patterns for every different log format.

How It Actually Works in Production

Containerd Logo

Here's the reality: Fluentd sits between your applications spitting out logs and your log storage system trying to make sense of them. You configure input plugins to slurp logs from files, HTTP endpoints, or message queues. Then filter plugins can modify, enrich, or route the data. Finally, output plugins dump everything to Elasticsearch, S3, or whatever you're using.

The plugin architecture is genuinely useful because you can swap destinations without touching your app configs. I've migrated from Splunk to ELK to S3 without changing a single application - just swapped the output plugin config. The CNCF graduated status means it's not going anywhere, unlike some logging tools that get abandoned.

Plugins That Don't Completely Suck

Kubernetes Logo

The plugin ecosystem is actually one of Fluentd's strengths. There are 500+ plugins for pretty much everything:

  • Elasticsearch output: Works reliably, handles backpressure properly
  • S3 output: Batches files, compresses them, doesn't lose data
  • Kafka output: Actually maintains partition ordering
  • tail input: Follows log files without missing rotations (usually)
  • Kubernetes integration: DaemonSet configs that work out of the box

Installing plugins is fluent-gem install fluent-plugin-whatever. Just make sure you restart the daemon after installing or you'll wonder why nothing works. The plugin development guide is decent if you need to write custom plugins.

Real Performance Numbers (From Actual Usage)

Prometheus Logo

In my experience, a single Fluentd process handles about few thousand events per second before you start seeing buffer backups. Memory usage starts low but can spike if you're doing heavy regex matching or JSON parsing on large payloads.

The recent v1.19.0 release finally switched from yajl-ruby to the standard JSON gem, which gives you better throughput with Ruby 3.x. They also added Zstandard compression which compresses better than gzip but uses more CPU. Worth checking the performance tuning docs for actual optimization tips.

When Fluentd Will Ruin Your Day

Fluentd Icon

Here's the thing nobody talks about - Ruby's GIL means Fluentd is basically single-threaded for most operations. Not a huge deal for I/O bound work like log processing, but it does cap your throughput. If you need to process 50K+ events/sec, you'll need multi-process workers or you should probably use Fluent Bit instead.

The configuration syntax is also annoying - it's this weird Ruby-ish DSL that looks like neither Ruby nor YAML. You'll spend time debugging config parsing errors that should be caught at startup but aren't. Here's a typical config that actually works in production:

<source>
  @type tail
  path /var/log/app/*.log
  pos_file /var/log/fluentd/app.log.pos
  format json
  tag app.logs
</source>

<filter app.logs>
  @type grep
  <exclude>
    key message
    pattern /health-check/
  </exclude>
</filter>

<match app.logs>
  @type elasticsearch
  host elasticsearch
  port 9200
  index_name app-logs
</match>

That config took me way longer to figure out than it should have - probably 3-4 hours of trial and error because the syntax errors are cryptic as hell. Error messages just say "parsing failed" without telling you which line is fucked.

Fluentd vs The Competition (Honest Comparison)

What Matters

Fluentd

Logstash

Fluent Bit

Filebeat

RAM Usage

Light (grows with load)

Heavy (RAM hog)

Tiny

Light

CPU Hit

Acceptable

Awful on busy systems

Barely noticeable

Light

Plugin Situation

Lots, most work

Plenty, well-maintained

Growing, basic

Limited but solid

Data Processing

Handles most stuff

Does everything

Basic filtering only

Just forwarding

Config Hell Factor

Ruby DSL (annoying)

JSON (verbose)

YAML (clean)

YAML (simple)

Buffer Handling

File & memory options

Disk-based, reliable

Memory only

Memory-based

Kubernetes

Works fine

Resource pig

Purpose-built

Agent pattern

Debugging

Okay logs

Decent tooling

Minimal info

Limited

When It Breaks

Config errors mostly

Memory leaks

Rare failures

Network issues