Why is my CDK deployment taking forever when they said "days not months"?

Because the marketing timeline is bullshit. That "one day" thing is just basic infrastructure. Real production deployment takes at least 6 weeks, probably more.You'll spend weeks on security audits, integration testing, bridge operations, monitoring setup, and debugging weird configuration issues that aren't documented anywhere. Budget 2-3x whatever timeline they quote you. Our "2 week" deployment took 11 weeks because the bridge contracts needed 3 separate audits and we kept hitting undocumented API rate limits.

What's this actually going to cost me?

Like 3x whatever they tell you, then add another 50% for the shit they didn't mention. Conduit starts around 15k monthly but you'll hit 35-65k once you need failover and monitoring. CDK-erigon with Gateway.fm runs $25-70k/month depending on how much traffic you get.Hidden costs that'll destroy your budget: ZK proving infrastructure ($8k-15k/month), security audits ($75-250k if you need custom stuff), compliance work (6+ months of legal fees), AWS bills that spike to $35k during sync operations, and don't forget the $6k/month for decent log storage because everything breaks and you need to debug it. Also budget $12k/month for Grafana Cloud Enterprise because the free tier can't handle CDK telemetry volumes.

My sequencer keeps crashing - what's wrong?

Usually memory issues or bad config. Sequencers are picky about resources and crash when they run out. We had to provision 64GB+ RAM instances after the sequencer kept OOM-killing during high traffic. Error message "sequencer stopped unexpectedly" usually means OOM or disk space issues.Check your gas limits, block size configuration, and prover coordination settings. Bad configurations cause silent failures that only surface under load. Always load test with realistic transaction patterns before going live. If you see "connection refused" to the prover, check your firewall rules - learned this after 6 hours of debugging.

Why are my bridge operations failing silently?

Bridge failures happen constantly and the error messages are useless. Transactions show success on one side but never make it to the other. The bridge components don't coordinate failure states well. You'll see "transaction successful" on L2 but the L1 transaction shows "reverted" with no reason.Common causes: prover backlog, incorrect gas estimation, network partitions between components. Build retry logic and user notification systems because the default error handling is garbage. Monitor bridge contract events directly instead of trusting the UI. If withdrawals get stuck, check the L1 gas oracle - it often lags 30+ seconds behind real gas prices.

Do I really need my own L2 or should I just use Polygon PoS?

Probably just use Polygon PoS. Unless you need custom gas tokens or compliance stuff existing chains can't handle, building your own L2 is overkill.I've seen startups waste 8 months building custom chains when they could've shipped their product on existing infrastructure and actually gotten users. The only valid reasons: regulatory compliance that requires specific features, custom economics that don't work on existing chains, or you're building the next major DeFi protocol.

How much can I actually save compared to Ethereum mainnet?

Good cost savings but not magic. Simple transfers cost pennies instead of Ethereum's dollars, so yeah the savings are real. Complex DeFi operations that cost $100+ on Ethereum run $0.20-2.00 on CDK chains.But you're trading cost for ecosystem size. Ethereum has every oracle, indexer, and tool you need. CDK ecosystems are tiny - you'll spend time building integrations that exist everywhere else. Sometimes the development cost exceeds the gas savings.

What mode should I actually use?

Start with Sovereign mode unless you're handling serious money. It's cheaper, faster, and good enough for most stuff. The Agglayer connectivity works fine and you avoid the complexity of ZK proving.Validium mode if you need ZK security but can tolerate off-chain data availability. zkRollup mode only if you're handling high-value assets and need maximum security - it's expensive and slow but provides Ethereum-level guarantees.Most production deployments start Sovereign and upgrade later if needed. Don't over-engineer security for MVP launches.

Why is my TPS so much lower than advertised?

Because marketing numbers are synthetic benchmarks. Those TPS numbers assume perfect conditions that don't exist in reality. Real applications with complex smart contracts hit 300-800 TPS max.DeFi operations are especially slow because they involve multiple contract calls, state reads, and gas-intensive computations. The prover also creates bottlenecks - complex transactions take longer to prove, reducing overall throughput. Load test with your actual use case, not token transfers.

What breaks during high traffic periods?

**Everything.** The sequencer starts dropping transactions, the prover falls behind creating massive backlogs, and bridge operations timeout. Memory usage spikes, nodes crash, and you'll be firefighting instead of sleeping. Our sequencer hit 97% memory usage and the kernel started killing random processes - fun times at 4am.We learned this during our first major traffic spike - had to emergency scale everything while users complained about failed transactions. Build monitoring for every component and plan for 10x your expected traffic, not 2x. We went from 500 TPS to 2000 TPS in 10 minutes and everything broke. Autoscaling doesn't help when your prover architecture is fundamentally single-threaded.

Can I actually migrate between different modes later?

**No, not really.** Despite what the documentation claims, migrating between Sovereign/Validium/zkRollup modes requires careful planning and often a full redeployment. The data structures and proving requirements are different enough that migration is complex.Pick your mode carefully at the beginning based on your final requirements, not just launch needs. "We'll upgrade later" usually means "we'll rebuild later" in practice.

What happens when something goes wrong at 3am?

**You're fucked unless you paid for enterprise support.** The Discord communities are helpful but not 24/7. If your sequencer crashes during a traffic spike, you're troubleshooting alone with incomplete documentation.Conduit and Gateway.fm provide real support if you pay them, but their standard SLAs don't cover every possible failure mode. Plan for extended downtime during your first few months until you understand all the failure modes.If you've read this far and you're still determined to deploy CDK, you'll need these resources. Some are actually useful, most are basic, and a few might save you from pulling your hair out.

Currently viewing the AI version

Switch to human version

Polygon CDK Deployment: AI-Optimized Technical Reference

Decision Framework

When CDK Is Actually Needed

Valid Use Cases: Custom gas tokens, specific economic models, regulatory compliance requirements that existing L2s cannot provide
Invalid Use Cases: Standard DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces (use Polygon PoS or Arbitrum instead)
Reality Check: Most projects waste 6-8 months building custom chains when existing infrastructure would suffice
Cost-Benefit Threshold: Only justified for enterprise compliance or revolutionary DeFi protocols requiring custom economics

CDK vs Alternatives Performance Comparison

Stack	Real TPS	Complex TX TPS	Finality	Deploy Time	Monthly Cost	Custom Gas Token	Withdrawal Time
CDK-opgeth	600-1200	200-600	30-60 min	2-4 weeks	$18k-35k	✅	Instant
CDK-erigon	400-800	150-450	30 min	4-8 weeks	$35k-65k	✅	Instant
OP Stack	800-1800	300-800	7 days	1-3 weeks	$8k-25k	❌	7 days
Arbitrum Orbit	600-1200	200-600	7 days	2-6 weeks	$15k-40k	❌	7 days
Polygon zkEVM	900-1800	400-1000	10-15 min	8-12 weeks	$25k-50k	❌	10-15 min

Technical Specifications

CDK-opgeth Stack

Architecture: OP Stack with Geth v1.13.8
Maintainer: Conduit (managed deployment available)
Performance: 800-1200 TPS simple transfers, degrades to 200-600 TPS for DeFi operations
Marketing vs Reality: "One day deployment" = infrastructure only, actual integration takes 2-4 weeks
Limitation: Performance tanks with external oracle interactions

CDK-erigon Stack

Architecture: Erigon v2.52.0 execution client
Maintainer: Gateway.fm
Key Feature: Custom gas tokens (users pay fees in native token vs ETH)
Deployment Time: 4-8 weeks minimum
ZK Proving Cost: $10k-15k monthly for decent performance
Storage Advantage: Significantly less storage than Geth
Critical Bug: Erigon v2.53.x breaks native token validation

Agglayer Cross-Chain

Purpose: Direct CDK chain connections without routing through Ethereum
Advantage: Near-instant transfers vs 7-day optimistic rollup withdrawals
Proving Model: Paranoid (guilty until proven innocent) - faster than optimistic
Limitation: Small ecosystem (~12 live chains vs hundreds of Ethereum L2s)
Smart Contract Issues: Complex contracts can fail unpredictably

Resource Requirements

Real Production Costs

Base Monthly: $27k-55k (spikes during traffic)
Security Audits: $75k-150k (higher for custom features)
Timeline Multiplier: Take quoted timeline × 2.5
Hidden Costs:
- ZK proving infrastructure: $8k-15k/month
- AWS bills during sync: $35k/month spikes
- Log storage: $6k/month for Grafana Cloud Enterprise
- Compliance work: 6+ months legal fees

Hardware Requirements (Real vs Documented)

RAM: 64GB+ required (docs say 32GB, causes OOM crashes)
Storage: 2.5TB+ after 6 months (starts at 1TB recommendation)
Network: High-bandwidth required (cheap VPS throttling causes 200ms latencies)
CDK-erigon Specific: CPU-intensive, needs compute-optimized instances
Memory Leak: Erigon v2.52.3 consumes +8GB every 48 hours

Critical Failure Modes

Sequencer Failures

Primary Risk: Single point of failure - chain stops when sequencer crashes
Common Causes: OOM errors during traffic spikes, disk space exhaustion
Mitigation: Run 3 sequencers with automated failover
Error Indicators: "sequencer health check failed", "sequencer stopped unexpectedly"
Debug Reality: Manual failover at 3am leads to extended downtime

Bridge Operation Failures

Silent Failures: Transactions show success on one side, fail on other
Common Causes: Prover backlog, gas estimation errors, network partitions
L1 Gas Oracle Lag: 30+ seconds behind real prices causes transaction failures
Error Messages: Generic "execution reverted" instead of useful debugging info
Required Monitoring: Direct bridge contract events (don't trust UI)

Memory and Performance Issues

Sync Memory Usage: 32GB+ RAM consumption during initial sync
High Traffic Impact: 97% memory usage triggers kernel process killing
TPS Degradation: Marketing numbers assume perfect conditions
DeFi Performance: Complex operations reduce TPS by 60-70%
Prover Bottleneck: Single-threaded architecture creates backlogs

Security and Key Management

Critical Key Types

Sequencer Keys: Chain operation control
Aggregator Keys: Proof generation
Admin Keys: Configuration management
Bridge Keys: Cross-chain asset control
Recovery Risk: Bridge admin key has zero recovery mechanism

Key Management Requirements

HSM Storage: Essential for production (AWS Parameter Store insufficient)
Multi-sig Setup: Required but adds operational complexity across timezones
Audit Scope: Core contracts audited, custom configurations require separate audits
Compliance: Varies by jurisdiction, requires custom logging for regulatory requirements

Implementation Reality

Local Development Setup

opgeth Setup: Plan 2-4 hours despite "30 minute" claim
Docker Issues: Port conflicts, resource constraints on development machines
erigon Requirements: Minimum 8GB RAM (will freeze laptops), prefer 16GB+
AggSandbox Limitations: Doesn't catch timing issues or gas estimation problems

Production Deployment Process

Infrastructure Setup: 2-4 weeks (opgeth) or 4-8 weeks (erigon)
Security Audits: 75k-250k cost, 4-8 weeks duration
Integration Testing: Bridge operations, gas estimation, failover procedures
Monitoring Setup: Custom solutions required (default tooling insufficient)
Load Testing: Essential with realistic transaction patterns

Version Upgrade Risks

Coordination Complexity: Multiple services must upgrade simultaneously
Configuration Drift: One mismatch breaks inter-service communication
Rollback Requirements: Full production environment clones needed for testing
Breaking Changes: v0.8.2 to v0.8.3 broke native token decimal handling

Operational Challenges

Enterprise Integration

Payment Processor Compatibility: Requires specific transaction formats
Compliance System Integration: Custom event logs needed
Database Synchronization: ETL pipelines required (longer than initial deployment)
Business Intelligence: Event logs not structured for BI tools

Web3 Tool Compatibility

JSON-RPC: Mostly compatible but edge cases in production
Rate Limiting: 100 concurrent users overwhelm RPC endpoints
Connection Pooling: Required but not documented
Bridge Error Handling: lxly.js provides generic error messages

Economics and Tokenomics

Gas Token Design: Complex economic system requiring months of modeling
Fee Structure: No magic formula - requires iteration based on actual usage
Cold Start Problem: New chains lack users and liquidity
Liquidity Mining: Burns treasury quickly without sustainable user retention

Troubleshooting Guide

Common Error Scenarios

"Sequencer Connection Refused"

Cause: Firewall configuration issues
Debug Time: Expect 6+ hours if unfamiliar with networking
Solution: Check firewall rules before investigating other causes

"Bridge Operation Failed"

Silent Failures: Transaction success on L2, revert on L1
Gas Oracle Issues: Stale data causes "insufficient gas price" errors
Timing Problems: AggSandbox works, production fails due to real-world latencies

"Native Token Validation Failed"

Causes: Incorrect decimals, wrong contract addresses
Prevention: Extensive testing with exact production configuration
Recovery: Often requires contract redeployment

Memory and Resource Issues

OOM Crashes: "SIGKILL process: node-exporter" indicates RAM exhaustion
Storage Growth: Plan for 3x documented storage requirements
Network Throttling: Cheap VPS providers cause bridge timeouts

Performance Optimization

TPS Reality: 30-50% of marketing numbers under real conditions
DeFi Impact: Complex transactions reduce throughput significantly
Prover Coordination: Bottleneck for zkRollup mode operations
Load Testing: Use actual transaction patterns, not synthetic benchmarks

Resource Ecosystem

Essential Tools and Documentation

Agglayer CDK Overview: Primary architecture documentation
GitHub Issue Trackers: Real gotchas and workarounds (search before asking)
Discord CDK Channels: Active developer support (no 24/7 guarantee)
Conduit/Gateway.fm: Managed services (expensive but knowledgeable)

Support Infrastructure

Enterprise Support: Essential for 24/7 operations
Standard SLAs: Don't cover all failure modes
Community Support: Helpful but not real-time
Documentation Quality: Basic, requires source code reading for details

Decision Matrix

Choose CDK When:

Regulatory compliance requires specific features existing L2s cannot provide
Custom gas token economics are essential to business model
Enterprise requires full chain control and customization
Budget exceeds $500k+ for first year including development and operations

Avoid CDK When:

Building standard DeFi/NFT applications
Timeline pressure (existing L2s faster to market)
Limited budget (<$300k first year)
Small team without blockchain infrastructure expertise
Ecosystem tooling and integrations are priority

Success Probability Factors

High Success: Dedicated ops team, enterprise budget, clear compliance requirements
Medium Success: Experienced team, custom economics needs, sufficient funding
Low Success: Small team, standard use case, tight timeline, limited budget

Useful Links for Further Investigation

Actually Useful CDK Resources (Skip the Rest)

Link	Description
Agglayer CDK Overview	Decent starting point for CDK architecture. Actually readable, which is rare for blockchain docs. Skip the "5 minute deployment" section - it's bullshit.
CDK-opgeth Local Guide	Decent tutorial for local deployment. Docker setup mostly works but you'll probably hit networking issues. The Docker Compose file assumes port 8545 is free - good luck with that on a dev machine.
CDK-erigon Local Deployment	More complex than the opgeth guide but thorough. Custom token examples are useful. Needs way more RAM than they tell you. The native token setup will fail silently if you get the decimals wrong.
AggSandbox Testing Environment	Good for testing cross-chain functionality before mainnet. Can be flaky but better than debugging in production.
CDK Architecture Documentation	Basic component overview. Useful for understanding the moving parts but light on implementation details. You'll need to read the source code for real understanding. The "simple three component" architecture is misleading - there are like 12 moving parts.
GitHub CDK Repositories	Where you go when the documentation doesn't explain why your deployment is failing. Issue trackers have the real gotchas and workarounds. Search the issues before asking questions - most problems have been hit before.
CDK-erigon Native Token Guide	Actually useful if you need custom gas tokens. The implementation examples work but expect integration complexity with existing wallets and tools. MetaMask gets confused if you change token contracts after initial setup.
Conduit CDK-opgeth Services	Managed infrastructure for CDK-opgeth. Expensive but they know their shit. Good if you have budget and don't want to handle ops.
Gateway.fm CDK-erigon Services	Enterprise CDK-erigon provider. Solid team but expensive as hell. Get quotes early - not cheap.
Polygon Discord - CDK Channels	Where you go for help when things break. The core developers are active but responses aren't guaranteed. Better than stackoverflow for CDK-specific issues.
L2Beat CDK Project Analysis	Independent security assessments and TVL tracking for CDK projects. Use this to benchmark your security model against other deployments.
Polygon Security Reports	Historical vulnerability disclosures. Read these to understand what's broken before and plan your security audits accordingly.
Lxly.js Bridging Library	JavaScript SDK for cross-chain operations. Works but error handling could be better. You'll probably end up writing wrapper functions.
Standard Ethereum Tools	Hardhat, Remix, MetaMask all work fine with CDK chains. No special setup required, just add your custom network config.
Polygon Labs Support	Official support portal. Response times vary. Enterprise customers get priority, others wait.
Stack Overflow CDK Questions	Limited activity but sometimes has solutions for specific technical issues. Don't expect quick responses.

Polygon CDK Deployment: AI-Optimized Technical Reference

Decision Framework

When CDK Is Actually Needed

CDK vs Alternatives Performance Comparison

Technical Specifications

CDK-opgeth Stack

CDK-erigon Stack

Agglayer Cross-Chain

Resource Requirements

Real Production Costs

Hardware Requirements (Real vs Documented)

Critical Failure Modes

Sequencer Failures

Bridge Operation Failures

Memory and Performance Issues

Security and Key Management

Critical Key Types

Key Management Requirements

Implementation Reality

Local Development Setup

Production Deployment Process

Version Upgrade Risks

Operational Challenges

Enterprise Integration

Web3 Tool Compatibility

Economics and Tokenomics

Troubleshooting Guide

Common Error Scenarios

"Sequencer Connection Refused"

"Bridge Operation Failed"

"Native Token Validation Failed"

Memory and Resource Issues

Performance Optimization

Resource Ecosystem

Essential Tools and Documentation

Support Infrastructure

Decision Matrix

Choose CDK When:

Avoid CDK When:

Success Probability Factors

Useful Links for Further Investigation

Actually Useful CDK Resources (Skip the Rest)

Related Tools & Recommendations

Arbitrum Orbit - Launch Your Own L2/L3 Chain (Without the Headaches)

Arbitrum Orbit SDK Integration Guide

OP Stack Deployment Guide - So You Want to Run a Rollup

OP Stack - The Rollup Framework That Doesn't Suck

MetaMask Web3 Integration - Stop Fighting Mobile Connections

Web3.js is Dead, Now Pick Your Poison: Ethers vs Wagmi vs Viem

Stop Waiting 15 Minutes for Your Tests to Finish - Hardhat 3 Migration Guide

Hardhat Advanced Debugging & Testing - Debug Smart Contracts Like a Pro

Escaping Hardhat Hell: Migration Guide That Won't Waste Your Time

MetaMask vs Coinbase Wallet vs Trust Wallet vs Ledger Live - Which Won't Screw You Over?

MetaMask - Your Gateway to Web3 Hell

jQuery - The Library That Won't Die

Hoppscotch - Open Source API Development Ecosystem

Stop Jira from Sucking: Performance Troubleshooting That Works

Web3.js is Dead - Now What? Production Apps Still Running Legacy Code

Solana Web3.js - JavaScript SDK That Won't Make You Quit Programming

Fix Ethers.js Production Nightmares - Debug Guide for Real Apps

Truffle - The Framework Consensys Killed

🔧 Debug Symbol: When your dead framework still needs to work

Hardhat vs Foundry vs Dead Frameworks - Stop Wasting Time on Dead Tools